Putin singing Moscow Rolling Blackouts██۞██ sung by CIA, Mi6, Russian Federation choir spammers "_" from Portugal Spam Auditorium --Rock of Ages, cleft for me

And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen Old China.

Special guest singer Kibo Parry M, science failure turned tap dancer and singer
Kibo ParryM singing Rock of Ages██۞██Moscow rolling blackouts
Vladimir Putin, stealing Outer Manchuria....

> Rock of Ages, Vladimir Putin
> Stealing Ukraine once again
> On Friday, December 9, 2022 at 1:57:33 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > On 12/7/2022 9:43 PM, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed Oct 26 16:38:22 2022 Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >> "wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > >> flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > >>> Roger Penrose, why is Andrew Wiles a kook moron of math with his slant cut of cone a ellipse, yet a cone has 1 axis of symmetry, so that is a Oval, never ellipse. Is Andrew just a kook moron chasing after fame and fortune, not the truth of geometry??
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> From: qbwr...@gmail.com
> > >>
> > >> Here is a plane and cone
> > >> x + 1 = z
> > >> and
> > >> 2*x^2 + 2*y^2 = z^2
> > >>
> > >> Square the first equation giving us
> > >> x^2 + 2*x + 1 = z^2
> > >>
> > >> In the second equation replace z^2 with x^2 + 2*x + 1 giving us
> > >> 2*x^2 + 2*y^2 = x^2 + 2*x + 1
> > >>
> > >> Subtract x^2 + 2*x - 1 from both sides giving us
> > >> x^2 - 2*x + 1 + 2*y^2 = 2
> > >>
> > >> Replace x^2 - 2*x + 1 with (x-1)^2 giving us
> > >> (x-1)^2 + 2*y^2 = 2
> > >>
> > >> That is EXACTLY the equation of an ellipse
> > >> And there are two planes of symmetry.
> > >>
> > >> No matter how you tilt or rotate an ellipse it
> > >> REMAINS an ellipse and has TWO PLANES of symmetry,
> > >> just like the intersection of a plane and cylinder
> > >> remains an ellipse no matter what the slope of the
> > >> plane is.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> PAY ATTENTION,
>>>>The formula from this proof produces an
> > >> ellipse with the formula (x-1)^2 + 2*y^2 = 2. Since the terms (x-1)
> > >> and 2y are both squared, that produces TWO PLANES OF SYMMETRY. Around
> > >> y=0 and x=1 (NOT x=0!)
> > >
> > > *
> > > Michael: Producing a good and valoid proof
>>> is like farting into a wind tunnel. I would not expect much in return.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> > You keep forgetting that I'm not here for the math, I'm here to watch
> > the kooks be kooks, and interacting with them at times. In particular,
> I like the Perry Como rendition over the Bing Crosby of Rock of Ages but maybe China has an even better singer.
> In Chinese-------
>
3> Rock of Ages, Outer Manchuria
> Let me free this Chinese land
> Let the Amur river and the fields
> From the Ussuri side which flow
> Save from wrath and make me pure.
> Be of rice the double cure

Rock of Ages ██۞██ Vladimir Putin
> Stealing Ukraine once again
> Let the rich soils of Ukraine
> Remain as Ukraine
> Vladimir Putin thief he is
Stop him by rolling blackouts in Moscow

Rock of Ages ██۞██ rolling blackouts
Rolling blackouts in Volgograd
Rolling blackouts in Pyongyang
Rolling blackouts in Tehran
People happy with glee
As they watch the petty dictators flee

Rock of Ages, Outer Manchuria
> Cleanse me from its guilt and power
> Free for me,
> Let me work the land to be

Hanoi Cuocco,whodat, Pennino Choir singing from Rolling Black Out St.Petersburg

Chorus: Chairman Xi, Taiwan is only 1/28 the size of Outer Manchuria, yet you let the Russian Nazi Putin steal your 1 million square kilometers of land. Send in 1,000 divisions and get your land back while Russia has an insane dictator.
Xi invades Russia to take back Outer Manchuria with 1,000 divisions to Putin's 1 platoon.
> > > Not waiting for Putin to gift wrap Outer Manchuria and hand the stolen land back to China
> > >
> > > And where the baby Xi Jinping was nestled cuddled and tightly caressed and fed by Chairman Mao concubines in the stillness of the waters of the Amur River in the Rice Reeds and Paddies, where panda bears were playfully playing in yonder oak and beech and rock elm trees. The musical of Rock of Ages was played and sung by Chairman Mao's concubines as the rich nutritious protein syrup of fresh rice cultivated by the Ussuri and Amur Rivers flowed their bountiful water over the lush fields of rice and cinnamon and sugar cane. The baby Xi was given dessert of fresh mulberry and peaches and cream from the 3 Farmers visiting.
> > >
> > > Everytime Russia bombs Ukraine, China fells another GLONASS satellite.. This makes it easier for China to regain its stolen lands of OUTER MANCHURIA which is 28 times larger than Taiwan. Taiwan can wait, it is not going anywhere, but while Russia has an insane dictator, China may as well recover its beautiful lands of Outer Manchuria.
> > >
> > > Xi masses troops on Russian border to take back Outer Manchuria. If you do not know the history, Russia stole Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok from China.
> > >
> > > While Putin is too busy with his personal war, Xi thinks time is ripe to get back what belongs to China in the first place. OUTER MANCHURIA and especially Vladivostok.
> > >
> > > Xi gives the Chinese people a Christmas gift--- Outer Manchuria-- the beloved Old China
> > > I am not positive we can take out GLONASS and BeiDou from ground based radio and microwaves and laser waves, even jamming.
> > >
> > > But I am certain that we can put a satellite in orbit that is a wrecking ramming satellite that does take out GLONASS and BeiDou. I am certain of this because several countries have robotic satellites that maintenance their fleet of satellites. And to this end, we need such a wrecking ball satellite immediately up there.
> > >

Kibo on Moscow & Tehran███۞███ rolling electricity blackouts

Kibo in his CIA disguise as MM.
Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 3:51:19 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> Really? Still? Do you have a fresher corpse yet?

Kibo on Moscow & Tehran███۞███ rolling electricity blackouts

On Monday, December 12, 2022 at 2:09:21 PM UTC-6, Trolidan7 wrote:
>Re: Formula for Dictator Disposed = Street Protests + Economic Sanctions - Electric Power // Formula similar to Polyhedron V-E+F = 2.

>
> They are all dictators who do not believe that
> their own people have the right to live.
>
> You are a fool if you think otherwise.
>

Yes, Trolidan7, how did the Russians short circuit their high powered electricity?? How did the Iranians??

0
//\/o-o-o bola power line weapon for short circuit, made of metal wire
\/\
.... /
---------------------

/------o \o
| /\O/
\o \\
//

Instead of a bola, simply a drone, the common ordinary drone bought in stores, and then fasten a type of wire that the drone can carry. Fly the drone over the high voltage line and let the wire drop onto the line causing short circuit.

Another device would be like a harpoon gun that shoots a wire that drapes over the high voltage line.

Better yet a powerful bow and arrow carrying a wire.

Kibo Parry M drawing of Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, John Stillwell, Thomas Hales as crancks & loonies. Why Kibo?? Because they cannot admit slant cut of cone is oval, never ellipse, or their Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, or is it their inability to ever do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- see below???

On Wednesday, December 28, 2022 at 9:53:19 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Remember, proclaiming absurd "physics" as fact is one of the reasons we
> laugh at your buddy Plutonium. We'll laugh at you for the same reason.
> Angel writes:
> Dec 27, 2022, 8:36:22 PM
> to sci.math
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠛⢉⢉⠉⠉⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠠⡰⣕⣗⣷⣧⣀⣅⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⣠⣳⣟⣿⣿⣷⣿⡿⣜⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠁⠄⣳⢷⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣝⠖⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠄⢢⡹⣿⢷⣯⢿⢷⡫⣗⠍⢰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⡏⢀⢄⠤⣁⠋⠿⣗⣟⡯⡏⢎⠁⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⠄⢔⢕⣯⣿⣿⡲⡤⡄⡤⠄⡀⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⠇⠠⡳⣯⣿⣿⣾⢵⣫⢎⢎⠆⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⠄⢨⣫⣿⣿⡿⣿⣻⢎⡗⡕⡅⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⠄⢜⢾⣾⣿⣿⣟⣗⢯⡪⡳⡀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⠄⢸⢽⣿⣷⣿⣻⡮⡧⡳⡱⡁⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⡄⢨⣻⣽⣿⣟⣿⣞⣗⡽⡸⡐⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⡇⢀⢗⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣞⡵⡣⣊⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⡀⡣⣗⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⡯⡺⣼⠎⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣧⠐⡵⣻⣟⣯⣿⣷⣟⣝⢞⡿⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⢘⡺⣽⢿⣻⣿⣗⡷⣹⢩⢃⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠄⠪⣯⣟⣿⢯⣿⣻⣜⢎⢆⠜⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠄⢣⣻⣽⣿⣿⣟⣾⡮⡺⡸⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿
> ⣿⣿⡿⠛⠉⠁⠄⢕⡳⣽⡾⣿⢽⣯⡿⣮⢚⣅⠹⣿⣿⣿
> ⡿⠋⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⠒⠝⣞⢿⡿⣿⣽⢿⡽⣧⣳⡅⠌⠻⣿
> ⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⡐⠱⡱⣻⡻⣝⣮⣟⣿⣻⣟⣻⡺⣊
> Archimedes Plutonium kirjutas Kolmapäev, 28. detsember 2022 kl 00:25:35 UTC+2:
> > Andrew Wiles ceased being a mathematician ever since he started to run and hide from his mistakes of geometry-- a slant cut in cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. Run Andrew, Hide Andrew, the coward of mathematics
>

Why, James Kibo Parry (Moron--) ??? Because Sheldon Glashow is far too stupid to ask which is the Atom's true electron -- the Muon or 0.5MeV particle????

Harry Cliff, Cole, Cooper,David John Sainsbury,Cambridge University ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.




1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Kibo> I want to fuck her corpse>Harvard's Dr.Hau, Lisa Randall,Kate Heinzelman,Dr.Panchanathan
Can Kibo Parry M be stopped?? > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > Kibo Parry M on Harvard's Dr. Hau, Dr.Lisa Randall,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart-- AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney???

The 30 year long paid for nonstop stalker Kibo Parry Moron-ey (along with the psychology-sickfucks instructing him)
3-Can Kibo Parry M be stopped?? > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau, Dr.Lisa Randall, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart-- AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney???

Back in September, AP was giving his condolences to the Queen--, and in steps Kibo & Zelos & Chris smear and Forgery AP.
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse

Kibo Parry M. in his CIA disguise
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:39:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"Putin's minion"
> fails at math and science:
>*still* lusting after the Queen's corpse?
>
> Are you upset that I haven't been paying enough attention to you? You
> have been hoping for more punishment for attacking me? Or as Chris
> states, it's time for your spanking?
>
> Are you frustrated that even after you try to make sci.math into a gay
> pickup bar (complete with your dick pic) you still can't find a
> replacement bedwarmer?
>

> > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> >
>
> Why just yesterday's Kibo spam indicates he will go ahead
> Michael Moroney threatens and writes:
> Dec 21, 2022, 3:38:37 PM
> to
> ☠️ of Math and 🏴‍☠️ of Physics
> > fails at math and science:
> > Physicists
>
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 11:33:16 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Pope Arky the Last"
> > > Village Idiot"
> > > Oh no! Don't go to town wearing only a tight shirt! At minimum, you'll
> > > be arrested for not wearing pants!
> >
> >
> > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell..thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Re: World std open hate channel for 30 years of nonstop hate spew stalking, how much is the CIA responsible for this and how much the Dr. Panchanathan's NSF???
> >
> > Sometime in the 1990s world std in Boston was granted Federal money to set up what is known as a plug in of hate spew, under the name Michael Moroney, with Kibo Parry the main instigator of hate. Where all across the globe, people can dial in under "Michael Moroney" and spew hatred upon AP, without their name, directly showing. A massive amount of the hate spew posted each and every day from the Account of "Michael Moroney" is hate-spewing psychologists. How much of the hate-spew issued by the account "Michael Moroney" comes from the CIA is unknown to me. Recently the account of Moroney was limited to 1 post of hate spew per day against AP, but now it has ratcheted up to its prior-- almost unlimited hate spew to fill every AP thread as was the case from 1995 to 2022. The only solution to a hate spew account of Moroney is total unplug.
> >
> > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > Controversy
> > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > --- end quote ---
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > by
> > Michael Moroney Jan 23, 2018, 10:24:48 AM
> >
> >
> > Re: bwr fml & Kibo Parry M on Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, failures of Natural Logarithm with their disconnect of Natural Log defined as integral area of Y=1/t in interval 1 to x
> > by Michael Moroney Sep 21, 2021, 12:08:40 AM
> >
> > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
> > 1:30 AM
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block, Ernest Abers, Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and 0.5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > by Michael Moroney Mar 3, 2019, 6:38:18 PM
> >
> > Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> > May 10, 2021 by Michael Moroney
> >
> >
> > Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 28 posts 292 views updated 12:31 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: L. Reif, Marty Walsh, Charlie Baker, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins-- Moroney-- Boston's antiscience stalker fool//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 19 posts 120 views updated 12:28 PM
> >
> > Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 156 views updated 12:26 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 29 posts 422 views updated 12:25 PM

Re: 2-Dan Christensen on spanking Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher for their failure to admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never the Ellipse. Dan the crazy insane Canadian is into fetishes with his illogic of 2 OR 1=3 with AND as subtraction.Is it Canadian winter
by
Horatio Cornholer 28Dec2022 4:20 PM

> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 34 posts 244 views updated 12:23 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > By Michael Moroney 20 posts 165 views updated 12:22 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> > By Michael Moroney 50 posts 405 views updated 12:21 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> >
> > Re: Zelos asks why Harvard's Dr. Hau wants to fail in physics, by not turning off the light to see if light wave is a closed loop pencil ellipse that AP predicts. Is Dr.Hau stubborn and too ignorant to finish her experiment??
> > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2021, 2:06:24 PM
> >
> > Re: Drs. Sigurdur Helgason, Anette Hosoi, David Jerison of MIT are you as dumb as Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 14 posts 94 views Jan 15, 2018, 12:07:24 AM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views, 1/23/18
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views updated 2:19 AM
> >
> > Re: Racist-math at Reed College-- ellipse is never a conic, David Perkinson, Lyudmila Korobenko, John Lind, Dylan McNamee, Kyle Ormsby, Angelica Osorno
> > By Michael Moroney 55 posts 419 views updated 2:18 AM
> >
> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > By Michael Moroney 24 posts 176 views updated 2:17 AM
> >
> >
> > Re: Erik sickfuck Eastside says>oil & vinegar// UCLA Physics with their imbecile electron--Gene D. Block,Ernest Abers,Elihu Abrahams, too stupid to understand Real Proton = 840 MeV with electron= muon and .5MeV was Dirac magnetic monopole
> > By Michael Moroney 39 posts 288 views updated 2:16 AM
> >
> >
> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 32 posts 430 views updated 2:15 AM
> >
> > Re: If Marissa Mayer were still at Google-- probably take her 15 minutes to engineer a better newsgroup
> > By Michael Moroney 28 posts 188 views updated 2:14 AM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Alfred Goshaw, Henry Greenside of Duke Univ, are you as dumb as McElroy & __@__.__ //never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV
> > by Michael Moroney Dec 28, 2017
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
> > by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
> >
> > Re: 6Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > By Michael Moroney 29 posts 307 views updated 2:13 AM
> >
> >
> >
> > Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > 3/4/18
> > By Michael Moroney
> >
> >
> > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > by Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
> >
> >
> > Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
> > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> > by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
> > by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
> >
> > Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
> > by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
> >
> > Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> > by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
> >
> > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> > by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
> >
> > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
> >
> > Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
> > by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
> >
> > Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
> > By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
> >
> > Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
> > I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
> > By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: Steven Weinberg flunked physics lifelong-generation test
> > By Michael Moroney 37 posts 427 views updated 2:04 PM
> >
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > 1/23/18
> > By Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: unpaid AP doing the world's finest logic, while Cambridge, Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Princeton teach dunce Logic
> > 10/28/17
> > By Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> > 8 posts by 2 authors
> > 12/4/17
> > By Michael Moroney
> >
> > Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > 20 posts by 3 authors
> > By Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: 8Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> > 20 posts by 2 authors
> > 4/9/18
> > By Michael Moroney
> >
> >
> > Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
> > By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
> >
> >
> > Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
> > 2:07 AM
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> > Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
> > The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
> > 1:52 AM
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> >
> > Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> > Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
> > 1:37 AM
> > by Michael Moroney
> >
> >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> > > > 1481 views
> > > > by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> > > >
> >
> > > > Re: time to bounce the CHURNING sam wormley out of sci.physics
> > > > By Michael Moroney 6 posts 31 views updated 4:36 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says of Conde Nast's Nicholas Thompson, he cannot do percentages like Kibo Parry Moroney, so what is kibo Parry Moroney even doing here in sci.math or sci.physics??
> > > > by Budd Hakken
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney calls his own mother a "pandemic shit mule" but says that President of South Korea will save Moon Bears
> > > > by Roger Davis
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney asks Trump to give South Korea to North Korea, for who wants to protect barbarians that torture Moon Bears in cages
> > > > by Roger Davis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney talking to President Moon Jae-In about torturing Moon Bears in South Korea
> > > > by Irwin Houser
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says boycott South Korea's Hyundai UNTIL they stop torturing MOON BEARS
> > > > Kibo, is the flat screen composed of 12% tortured Moon Bear bile by Samsung? Kibo, is 12% of the
> > > > 2:15 AM
> > > > by Buck Futter
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Drs.L. Reif, Victor Kac, Irwin Pless of MIT, teach percentages correctly-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > AP's diary in 2020 lockdown and social-distancing // sociology series, book 2 Kindle Edition by
> > > > 2:07 AM
> > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in Wired for his 938 is 12% short of 945, Yoo, Nick, why not publish Lisa Randall with her 938MeV proton, 0.5MeV electron which a hydrogen atom ceases to exist
> > > > Investigating Solid State Engineering versus Mechanical Simple Machine Engineering and AI-robots//
> > > > 2:02 AM
> > > > by Bret Alva
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > How 6 legged insects evolved//How bird wings evolved// Wing experiment// evolution series, book 2
> > > > 1:55 AM
> > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 7Barry Shein's Moroney's world std stalker's hideout-- why Daniel Freedman, Michel Goemans, Vadim Gorin, Harvey Greenspan, flunked calculus & angular momentum never realizing Real proton has to be 840MeV
> > > > The AP- Linnaeus Classification of Biology-- Using Physics instead of wishy-washy characteristics//
> > > > 1:52 AM
> > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney says Lisa Randall, John Baez, abject failures of Math, and supposedly physics with their ignorance of angular momentum because no hydrogen atom can form from proton=938MeV & electron = 0.5MeV
> > > > Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution // biophysics series, book 1 Kindle Edition by
> > > > 1:47 AM
> > > > by Betsy Kibo Moroney Perry DeVos Anal Manure Buttfuck
> > > >
> > > > Re: Barry Shein, instead of being cornholed by Kibo Parry Moroney, why not try mounting the Kibo and spraying some semen into his bottom and hopefully can cure his stalking, and make sci.physics a better place// tired of this 27 year stalking
> > > > By Richard Cranium 2 posts 4 views updated
> > > >
> > > > Re: I am sure Murray can do a percentage correctly, never Archie Re: Murray Gell-Mann flunked the Physics lifelong-generation Test
> > > > Fusion Barrier Principle // Energy series, book 1 Kindle Edition by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) I
> > > > 1:37 AM
> > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > > Re: MIT's Dr.Martin Bazant, Harvard's Dr.Dennis Gaitsgory-- time you take your full responsibilities as science educator and deal with science failures Michael Moroney
> > > > World's First Proof of Kepler Packing Problem KPP // Math proof series, book 3 Kindle Edition by
> > > > 1:30 AM
> > > > by Michael Moroney
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> > > By Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > Controversy
> > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > --- end quote ---
> >
> > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> >
> > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > France Anne Cordova
> > Subra Suresh
> > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > Rita R. Colwell
> > Neal Francis Lane
> > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> >
> > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> >
> > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell..thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
> >
> > AP no longer tolerates 30 year nonstop stalker shitheads like Kibo Parry M.
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> > Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
> Fred Jeffries replacing Andrew Wiles Oxford Uni math failure?? For at least Jeffries can ask the question which is slant cut of cone -- oval or ellipse, while all that Andrew Wiles can do in math is Run Wiles Hide Wiles
>
> > On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 5:59:58 PM UTC-6, FredJeffries wrote:
> > > On Saturday, December 17, 2022 at 1:49:50 PM UTC-8, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 7:00:38 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > > *
> > > > > Several of you have questioned: Is the ellipse a conic section? The answer depends.
> > > > > If you are Archimedes Plutonium, the answer is no. If you are one of the other 398,726 mahematicians living today, the answer is yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > earle
> > > > > *
> > > > The failed meathead Earle Jones, looks like you have 398,726 subtract 1, as it appears Fred Jeffries below in this thread is starting to question the second axis of symmetry in the slant cut of cone.
> > > > On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 5:41:05 PM UTC-6, FredJeffries wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, December 15, 2022 at 6:23:18 PM UTC-8, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Disney did a nice animation on it:
> > > > > >
> > > > > http ----------
> > > > > But it also fails to show how to find the second axis of symmetry
>
> So where is Andrew Wiles failure of math propose where the missing 2nd axis is hiding?? Is it running and hiding along with the math failure Andrew Wiles??
>
> 1--Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
> >
> > Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> > Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
> >
> > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sap-heads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> > Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> > John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > 3rd published book
> >
> > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > •
> > •
> >
> > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> >
> > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> >
> > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> >
> > Product details
> > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> >
> > #12-2, 11th published book
> >
> > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> >
> > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > Preface:
> > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> >
> > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> >
> > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> >
> > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> >
> >
> > Product details
> > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Math shitheads of Gottingen Uni, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu, Metin Tolin, Wolfgang Mueckenheim (WM)

WM reminds Gottingen students that if they brought a huge cone to class, one the size of a person and started to make a slant cut near the apex that exits near the base, that the apex portion is like a nipple but the base portion is a huge portion of a Oval, never the ellipse.

This is why WM went insane with his Dark Numbers nonsense, because the professors of math at Gottingen are themselves insane with their slant cut of cone, their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and no wonder no math professor at Gottingen can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for they belong as the village idiots in a circus of Gottingen

olcott
, …
Chris M. Thomasson
23
unread,
ChatGBT is my best reviewer yet
On 1/27/2023 9:37 AM, Mostowski Collapse wrote: > There are many parrots in this world: >
2:18 PM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
FromTheRafters
8 unread,
The testimony of unit fractions
WM explained on 1/27/2023 : > FromTheRafters schrieb am Freitag, 27. Januar 2023 um 13:31:45 UTC+1
1:50 PM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
olcott
746
unread,
Question on Hilbert's Hotel.
On 12/19/2022 4:04 AM, WM wrote: > If the complete set ℕ of natural numbers exists, then it can be
1:43 PM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
William
500
unread,
Who recognizes these true pioneers of dark numbers?
On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 3:17:43 PM UTC-4, WM wrote: > Find a Peano element that has less [
1:38 PM


Pete Olcott,David Sainsbury,Richard Damon,Alexander, Allison, Ansorge,Ahnert,Alai, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > >
> > > > Why spamming Pete Olcott? Because they cannot tell apart a ellipse from oval? Or like you Pete, too stupid to see something wrong in Boole Logic with your mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or too stupid to ask which is Atom's true electron.
> > > > > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.

Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim

Eternal-September.org
Wolfgang M. Weyand
Berliner Strasse
Bad Homburg

Goethe Universitat Physics dept

Brigitta Wolff president

Jurgen Habermass
Horst Stocker
Gerd Binnig
Horst Ludwig Stormer  
Peter Grunberg

math
Alex Kuronya
Martin Moller
Jakob Stix
Annette Werner
Andreas Bernig
Esther Cabezas-Rivas
Hans Crauel
Thomas Gerstner
Bastian von Harrach
Thomas Mettler
Tobias Weth
Amin Coja-Oghlan
Raman Sanyal
Thorsten Theobald
Yury Person            

Gottingen Univ math

Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu

Gottingen Univ physics
Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius

> > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > 
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > y z
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > | /
> > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci..math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup.. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium

Math shitheads Gottingen Uni,Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu, Metin Tolin, Wolfgang Mueckenheim (WM),Thomas Schick,...

unread,
Question on Hilbert's Hotel.
On 1/27/2023 4:43 PM, WM wrote: > olcott schrieb am Freitag, 27. Januar 2023 um 20:43:37 UTC+1:
4:55 PM

olcott's profile photo
olcott
, …
Mostowski Collapse
35
unread,
ChatGBT is my best reviewer yet
The subtle difference between 1st and 2nd incompleteness theorem. In the 1st incompleteness theorem:
4:43 PM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
WM
502
unread,
Who recognizes these true pioneers of dark numbers?
Jim Burns schrieb am Freitag, 27. Januar 2023 um 23:23:43 UTC+1: > On 1/27/2023 2:25 PM, WM wrote:
4:30 PM

Michael Moroney's profile photo
>
> WM reminds Gottingen students that if they brought a huge cone to class, one the size of a person and started to make a slant cut near the apex that exits near the base, that the apex portion is like a nipple but the base portion is a huge portion of a Oval, never the ellipse.
>
> This is why WM went insane with his Dark Numbers nonsense, because the professors of math at Gottingen are themselves insane with their slant cut of cone, their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and no wonder no math professor at Gottingen can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for they belong as the village idiots in a circus of Gottingen
>
> olcott
> , …
> Chris M. Thomasson
> 23
> unread,
> ChatGBT is my best reviewer yet
> On 1/27/2023 9:37 AM, Mostowski Collapse wrote: > There are many parrots in this world: >
> 2:18 PM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> FromTheRafters
> 8
> unread,
> The testimony of unit fractions
> WM explained on 1/27/2023 : > FromTheRafters schrieb am Freitag, 27. Januar 2023 um 13:31:45 UTC+1
> 1:50 PM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> olcott
> 746
> unread,
> Question on Hilbert's Hotel.
> On 12/19/2022 4:04 AM, WM wrote: > If the complete set ℕ of natural numbers exists, then it can be
> 1:43 PM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> William
> 500
> unread,
> Who recognizes these true pioneers of dark numbers?
> On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 3:17:43 PM UTC-4, WM wrote: > Find a Peano element that has less [
> 1:38 PM
> 
>
>
> Pete Olcott,David Sainsbury,Richard Damon,Alexander, Allison, Ansorge,Ahnert,Alai, far too stupid in physics to ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why spamming Pete Olcott? Because they cannot tell apart a ellipse from oval? Or like you Pete, too stupid to see something wrong in Boole Logic with your mindless 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or too stupid to ask which is Atom's true electron.
> > > > > > > 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > > > > 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > > > > 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > > > > 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
> Universitat Augsburg, Germany, rector Sabine Doering-Manteuffel
> Math dept Ronald H.W.Hoppe, B. Schmidt, Sarah Friedrich, Stefan Grosskinsky, Friedrich Pukelsheim, Mirjam Dur, Ralf Werner.
>
> Hochschule Augsburg, Wolfgang Mueckenheim
> Eternal-September.org
> Wolfgang M. Weyand
> Berliner Strasse
> Bad Homburg
>
> Goethe Universitat Physics dept
>
> Brigitta Wolff president
>
> Jurgen Habermass
> Horst Stocker
> Gerd Binnig
> Horst Ludwig Stormer
> Peter Grunberg
>
> math
> Alex Kuronya
> Martin Moller
> Jakob Stix
> Annette Werner
> Andreas Bernig
> Esther Cabezas-Rivas
> Hans Crauel
> Thomas Gerstner
> Bastian von Harrach
> Thomas Mettler
> Tobias Weth
> Amin Coja-Oghlan
> Raman Sanyal
> Thorsten Theobald
> Yury Person
> Gottingen Univ math
>
> Dorothea Bahns, Laurent Bartholdi, Valentin Blomer, Jorg Brüdern, Stefan Halverscheid, Harald Andres Helfgott, Madeleine Jotz Lean, Ralf Meyer, Preda Mihailescu, Walther Dietrich Paravicini, Viktor Pidstrygach, Thomas Schick, Evelina Viada, Ingo Frank Witt, Chenchang Zhu
>
> Gottingen Univ physics
> Prof. Dr. Karsten Bahr
> Prof. Dr. Peter Bloechl
> Prof. Dr. Eberhard Bodenschatz
> Prof. Laura Covi, PhD
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Dillmann
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler
> Prof. Dr. Jörg Enderlein
> Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon
> Prof. Dr. Ariane Frey
> apl. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Glatzel
> Prof. Dr. Fabian Heidrich-Meisner
> Prof. Dr. Hans Christian Hofsäss
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Janshoff
> Prof. Dr. Christian Jooß
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Kehrein
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Klumpp
> Prof. Dr. Sarah Köster
> Prof. Dr. Reiner Kree
> Prof. Dr. Matthias Krüger
> Prof. Dr. Stanley Lai
> Prof. Dr. Stefan Mathias
> apl. Prof. Dr. Vasile Mosneaga
> Prof. Dr. Marcus Müller
> Prof. Dr. Jens Niemeyer
> apl. Prof. Dr. Astrid Pundt
> Prof. Dr. Arnulf Quadt
> apl. Prof. Dr. Karl-Henning Rehren
> Prof. Dr. Ansgar Reiners
> Prof. Dr. Angela Rizzi
> Prof. Dr. Claus Ropers
> Prof. Dr. Tim Salditt
> Prof. Dr. Konrad Samwer
> Prof. Dr. Christoph Schmidt
> apl. Prof. Dr. Susanne Schneider
> Prof. Dr. Steffen Schumann
> Prof. Dr. Simone Techert
> apl. Prof. Dr. Michael Seibt
> Prof. Dr. Peter Sollich
> Prof. Dr. Andreas Tilgner
> Prof. Cynthia A. Volkert
> Prof. Dr. Florentin Wörgötter
> Prof. Dr. Annette Zippelius
> > > > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > little fishes
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > > > John Baez
> > > > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics.. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #2-9, 161st published book
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> > > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Preface:
> > > > > > > A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> > > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> > > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> > > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> > > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > > y z
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > | /
> > > > > > > |/______ x
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > More people reading and viewing AP's newsgroup than viewing sci.math, sci.physics. So AP has decided to put all NEW WORK, to his newsgroup. And there is little wonder because in AP's newsgroups, there is only solid pure science going on, not a gang of hate spewing misfits blighting the skies.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In sci.math, sci.physics there is only stalking hate spew along with Police Drag Net Spam of no value and other than hate spew there is Police drag net spam day and night.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and there one can read my recent posts without the hassle of stalkers and spammers, Police Drag Net Spam that floods each and every day, book and solution manual spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs, churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies, and demonizers. And the taxpayer funded hate spew stalkers who ad hominem you day and night on every one of your posts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is no discussion of science in sci.math or sci.physics, just one long line of hate spewing stalkers followed up with Police Drag Net Spam (easy to spot-- very offtopic-- with hate charged content). And countries using sci.physics & sci.math as propaganda platforms, such as tampering in elections with their mind-rot.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > > > > > > Archimedes Plutonium