Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Prototype designs always work. -- Don Vonada

tech / rec.photo.digital / Re: when will wifi improve?

SubjectAuthor
* Re: when will wifi improve?nospam
+- Re: when will wifi improve?nospam
+* Re: when will wifi improve?Bill W
|`* Re: when will wifi improve?nospam
| `- Re: when will wifi improve?Bill W
`- Re: when will wifi improve?geoff

1
Re: when will wifi improve?

<060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12649&group=rec.photo.digital#12649

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 15:38:20 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7c9f57c22f324afd1e3aad7be4ea4c8e";
logging-data="59870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18NMgeSNTKjONi6zl7Or2O8"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nU6olA3dy1z9UiMtWPAYUls+wNI=
 by: nospam - Sat, 6 Aug 2022 19:38 UTC

In article <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer.

optical?

> 19 seconds.
> Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a camera.

which version of wifi?

modern wifi is as fast or faster than wired gigabit ethernet, which
means the limiting factor is gigabit.

2.5/5/10gig enet would be faster. some computers and access points have
that, but most do not.

cameras generally don't have the latest version of anything, including
wifi and usb.

Re: when will wifi improve?

<060820221952174148%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12651&group=rec.photo.digital#12651

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 19:52:17 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <060820221952174148%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com> <060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid> <684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="246770090f55ce6ab8fe5b450585fbb6";
logging-data="187390"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+hv6prJEUGOPK1fhBBMTSf"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:a9Lg8hlPMmzKDlVrCaqbdL6EJzo=
 by: nospam - Sat, 6 Aug 2022 23:52 UTC

In article <684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com>,
RichA <rander3128@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer.
> > optical?
> > > 19 seconds.
> > > Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
> > > camera.
> > which version of wifi?
> >
> > modern wifi is as fast or faster than wired gigabit ethernet, which
> > means the limiting factor is gigabit.
> >
> > 2.5/5/10gig enet would be faster. some computers and access points have
> > that, but most do not.
> >
> > cameras generally don't have the latest version of anything, including
> > wifi and usb.
>
> Legacy 802.11 2.4 GHz 2 Mbps

wtf did you expect? that's roughly 20 years old.

Re: when will wifi improve?

<0001HW.289F3F2C03B12A5C30A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12653&group=rec.photo.digital#12653

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx42.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: noth...@nowhere.com (Bill W)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.289F3F2C03B12A5C30A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com> <060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid> <684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com>
Lines: 28
X-Complaints-To: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 00:30:36 UTC
Organization: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 19:30:36 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1693
 by: Bill W - Sun, 7 Aug 2022 00:30 UTC

On Aug 6, 2022, RichA wrote
(in article<684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com>):

> On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 15:38:27 UTC-4, nospam wrote:
> > In article<8eca6670-c62e-4c59...@googlegroups.com>,
> > RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer.
> > optical?
> > > 19 seconds.
> > > Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
> > > camera.
> > which version of wifi?
> >
> > modern wifi is as fast or faster than wired gigabit ethernet, which
> > means the limiting factor is gigabit.
> >
> > 2.5/5/10gig enet would be faster. some computers and access points have
> > that, but most do not.
> >
> > cameras generally don't have the latest version of anything, including
> > wifi and usb.
>
> Legacy 802.11 2.4 GHz 2 Mbps

You know, you get accused of trolling sometimes. Is that what this was? *2*
Mbps? Really? You might as well use floppies.

Re: when will wifi improve?

<_cCdnZJCB9BjlHL_nZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12654&group=rec.photo.digital#12654

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 19:40:30 -0500
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 12:40:28 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.1.0
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com>
<060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid>
<684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-NZ
From: geo...@nospamgeoffwood.org (geoff)
In-Reply-To: <684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <_cCdnZJCB9BjlHL_nZ2dnUU7-YudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 32
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-XOMi4QAiPprW4sznVjK5DK7ZNxR98+/tR9qIbTLOHhQDzZ5K4eUSSiTioivhHerb0IEYuaqbgXeqMBs!ZE9wbRo+QCUxp+JsQHPIIrfccDLH2BhgJqpcgR9DLm9B/pF/exZV2UGHY0Y+PEoEoEstWLKajTg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2318
X-Received-Bytes: 2440
 by: geoff - Sun, 7 Aug 2022 00:40 UTC

On 7/08/2022 11:42 am, RichA wrote:
> On Saturday, 6 August 2022 at 15:38:27 UTC-4, nospam wrote:
>> In article <8eca6670-c62e-4c59...@googlegroups.com>,
>> RichA <rande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer.
>> optical?
>>> 19 seconds.
>>> Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a camera.
>> which version of wifi?
>>
>> modern wifi is as fast or faster than wired gigabit ethernet, which
>> means the limiting factor is gigabit.
>>
>> 2.5/5/10gig enet would be faster. some computers and access points have
>> that, but most do not.
>>
>> cameras generally don't have the latest version of anything, including
>> wifi and usb.
>
> Legacy 802.11 2.4 GHz 2 Mbps

The person was surprised about this ? Would they have been surprised if
it took even longer at 50 bauds ?

Would have been quicker to simply walk the short distance to where the
target was and plug in.

geoff

geoff

Re: when will wifi improve?

<060820222128260283%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12655&group=rec.photo.digital#12655

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 21:28:26 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <060820222128260283%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com> <060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid> <684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.289F3F2C03B12A5C30A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="246770090f55ce6ab8fe5b450585fbb6";
logging-data="230771"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MKsyTwt3lOoxiK1CHLypW"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:B/OkBcrEncdoiXo/QDpJUeias9Q=
 by: nospam - Sun, 7 Aug 2022 01:28 UTC

In article <0001HW.289F3F2C03B12A5C30A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>,
Bill W <nothing@nowhere.com> wrote:

> > > > Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer.
> > > optical?
> > > > 19 seconds.
> > > > Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
> > > > camera.
> > > which version of wifi?
> > >
> > > modern wifi is as fast or faster than wired gigabit ethernet, which
> > > means the limiting factor is gigabit.
> > >
> > > 2.5/5/10gig enet would be faster. some computers and access points have
> > > that, but most do not.
> > >
> > > cameras generally don't have the latest version of anything, including
> > > wifi and usb.
> >
> > Legacy 802.11 2.4 GHz 2 Mbps
>
> You know, you get accused of trolling sometimes. Is that what this was? *2*
> Mbps? Really? You might as well use floppies.

a 3.4 gig file would need to be split into ~2500 1.4mb segments...

there were 2.8 mb floppies, so i guess it could be a bit faster...

Re: when will wifi improve?

<0001HW.289F594F03B74A9630A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12656&group=rec.photo.digital#12656

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx01.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: noth...@nowhere.com (Bill W)
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.289F594F03B74A9630A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com> <060820221538209952%nospam@nospam.invalid> <684d3cc4-f34a-4afd-9c2e-850d5690480cn@googlegroups.com> <0001HW.289F3F2C03B12A5C30A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja> <060820222128260283%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Lines: 36
X-Complaints-To: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 02:22:07 UTC
Organization: me+support@newsgroup.ninja
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 21:22:07 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 2032
 by: Bill W - Sun, 7 Aug 2022 02:22 UTC

On Aug 6, 2022, nospam wrote
(in article<060820222128260283%nospam@nospam.invalid>):

> In article<0001HW.289F3F2C03B12A5C30A1FD38F@news-us.newsgroup.ninja>,
> Bill W <nothing@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer.
> > > > optical?
> > > > > 19 seconds.
> > > > > Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
> > > > > camera.
> > > > which version of wifi?
> > > >
> > > > modern wifi is as fast or faster than wired gigabit ethernet, which
> > > > means the limiting factor is gigabit.
> > > >
> > > > 2.5/5/10gig enet would be faster. some computers and access points have
> > > > that, but most do not.
> > > >
> > > > cameras generally don't have the latest version of anything, including
> > > > wifi and usb.
> > >
> > > Legacy 802.11 2.4 GHz 2 Mbps
> >
> > You know, you get accused of trolling sometimes. Is that what this was? *2*
> > Mbps? Really? You might as well use floppies.
>
> a 3.4 gig file would need to be split into ~2500 1.4mb segments...

Well, he obviously had 90 minutes to waste in the first place...

>
>
> there were 2.8 mb floppies, so i guess it could be a bit faster...

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor