Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant.

tech / rec.photo.digital / Re: when will wifi improve?

SubjectAuthor
* Re: when will wifi improve?Neil
`* Re: when will wifi improve?nospam
 `* Re: when will wifi improve?Neil
  `- Re: when will wifi improve?nospam

1
Re: when will wifi improve?

<tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12648&group=rec.photo.digital#12648

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nei...@myplaceofwork.com (Neil)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 14:56:05 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 18:56:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1191118b29c8c68f115579dfd409a96b";
logging-data="40398"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FeMA2wmRZm2dWv/02YsKTgOqzwoozs9k="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.1.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PW8zzYqCBSrxM1394ZxFSKe7Zec=
In-Reply-To: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Neil - Sat, 6 Aug 2022 18:56 UTC

On 8/6/2022 1:33 PM, RichA wrote:
> Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer. 19 seconds.
> Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a camera.

Perhaps they are able to choose according to their needs? If they're
transferring an image to be used in an email, it's unlikely to be 3.4gB.

--
best regards,

Neil

Re: when will wifi improve?

<060820221538210052%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12650&group=rec.photo.digital#12650

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2022 15:38:21 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <060820221538210052%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com> <tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7c9f57c22f324afd1e3aad7be4ea4c8e";
logging-data="59870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19vLe5ErfARQOeLWL9QdhnJ"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EbIO/FYRz0I4kVCxTM2/BG/MCQ8=
 by: nospam - Sat, 6 Aug 2022 19:38 UTC

In article <tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me>, Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com>
wrote:

> On 8/6/2022 1:33 PM, RichA wrote:
> > Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer. 19 seconds.
> > Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
> > camera.
>
> Perhaps they are able to choose according to their needs?

more likely, he's using an older and outdated version of wifi.

> If they're
> transferring an image to be used in an email, it's unlikely to be 3.4gB.

he didn't say a 3.4gb image, nor did he mention email.

Re: when will wifi improve?

<tcorcp$l023$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12662&group=rec.photo.digital#12662

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nei...@myplaceofwork.com (Neil)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 13:05:30 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <tcorcp$l023$1@dont-email.me>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com>
<tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me> <060820221538210052%nospam@nospam.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:05:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e95f8055910b099f0b79d7fbd392d5ad";
logging-data="688195"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Xb2lvOETg40EMTt93q3s6k9iv1gLyPnA="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.1.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rcHiB5p7jbGINvd/9XPWbZOmjOY=
In-Reply-To: <060820221538210052%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Neil - Sun, 7 Aug 2022 17:05 UTC

On 8/6/2022 3:38 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article <tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me>, Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/6/2022 1:33 PM, RichA wrote:
>>> Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer. 19 seconds.
>>> Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
>>> camera.
>>
>> Perhaps they are able to choose according to their needs?
>
> more likely, he's using an older and outdated version of wifi.
>
>> If they're
>> transferring an image to be used in an email, it's unlikely to be 3.4gB.
>
> he didn't say a 3.4gb image, nor did he mention email.

What other 3.4gB file is an "image transfer(s) from a camera" (his
statement, btw)?

I mentioned email as a use for images coming out of a camera.

You could benefit from learning to read before you pointlessly argue.

--
best regards,

Neil

Re: when will wifi improve?

<080820222048310185%nospam@nospam.invalid>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12670&group=rec.photo.digital#12670

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nos...@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: when will wifi improve?
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 20:48:31 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <080820222048310185%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <8eca6670-c62e-4c59-96ca-65612bcf84e2n@googlegroups.com> <tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me> <060820221538210052%nospam@nospam.invalid> <tcorcp$l023$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="275836aa2d6ba6b27203dd3262a564f4";
logging-data="1169557"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0YxhjNmI7NMWM8YOdeFvk"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:smhiFVv0F4E0Lw2C0BkJ55llgvs=
 by: nospam - Tue, 9 Aug 2022 00:48 UTC

In article <tcorcp$l023$1@dont-email.me>, Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com>
wrote:

> On 8/6/2022 3:38 PM, nospam wrote:
> > In article <tcmdg4$17ee$1@dont-email.me>, Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/6/2022 1:33 PM, RichA wrote:
> >>> Case in point. 3.4Gig file via optical connection transfer. 19 seconds.
> >>> Wifi? 1hr 30 mins. Why would anyone use wifi for image transfers from a
> >>> camera.
> >>
> >> Perhaps they are able to choose according to their needs?
> >
> > more likely, he's using an older and outdated version of wifi.
> >
> >> If they're
> >> transferring an image to be used in an email, it's unlikely to be 3.4gB.
> >
> > he didn't say a 3.4gb image, nor did he mention email.
>
> What other 3.4gB file is an "image transfer(s) from a camera" (his
> statement, btw)?

what consumer camera generates 3.4 gb images?

videos, perhaps, but not images.

> I mentioned email as a use for images coming out of a camera.

it's a use, but only *after* it was transferred to the computer.
>
> You could benefit from learning to read before you pointlessly argue.

had you read what he posted, you'd have seen that the problem is that
he's using 20 year old equipment.

in other words, user error.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor