Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower. In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.

2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.

3. Please read my book before comment.

Thank you ,
Ken Seto

On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space (the aether or the E-Matrix).

Cretin. Incurable.

On 10/23/23 12:42 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions: 1.
> Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute
> rest [...]

This is just plain not true -- SR makes no such "assumption", indeed
this is nonsensical in SR.

> 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT
> is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
>
> 3. Please read my book before comment.

No need. You are CLEARLY incompetent, and whatever you write is useless.

Tom Roberts

Ken Seto wrote:

> 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is
> included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
>
> 3. Please read my book before comment.

Lisa Heaven is not 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆, you lying thief. They not for nothing
bombed your country with 2 atomic bombs.

𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆_𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀_𝗡𝗼𝗿𝗱_𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺_2_–_𝗔𝗙𝗗_𝗠𝗣
Resuming energy flows from Russia will help stave off deindustrialization,
Steffen Kotre says
https://r%74.com/business/585508-germany-needs-nord-stream/

It’s kind of amazing to see Germany go from a world powerhouse to a petty
colony in just over one year. Right now, there is no food in supermarkets.

Germany should have invoked article 5 when nazi nato america and Norway
blew up Nordstream

On 10/23/2023 2:56 PM, Romano Baibikov wrote:
> Ken Seto wrote:
>
>> 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is
>> included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
>>
>> 3. Please read my book before comment.
>
> Lisa Heaven is not 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆, you lying thief. They not for nothing
> bombed your country with 2 atomic bombs.
>
> 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆_𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀_𝗡𝗼𝗿𝗱_𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺_2_–_𝗔𝗙𝗗_𝗠𝗣
> Resuming energy flows from Russia will help stave off deindustrialization,
> Steffen Kotre says
> https://r%74.com/business/585508-germany-needs-nord-stream/
>
> It’s kind of amazing to see Russia go from a world powerhouse to a petty
> colony in just over one year. Right now, there is no food in supermarkets.
>
> Germany should have invoked article 5 when nazi Russia
> blew up Nordstream
>
There. I fixed your typos, nymshifter. No need to thank me.

Volney wrote:

> On 10/23/2023 2:56 PM, Romano Baibikov wrote:
>> Ken Seto wrote:
>>
>>> 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT
>>> is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
>>>
>>> 3. Please read my book before comment.
>>
>> Lisa Heaven is not 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆, you lying thief. They not for
>> nothing bombed your country with 2 atomic bombs.
>>
>> 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆_𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀_𝗡𝗼𝗿𝗱_𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗺_2_–_𝗔𝗙𝗗_𝗠𝗣
>> Resuming energy flows from Russia will help stave off
>> deindustrialization, Steffen Kotre says
>> https://r%74.com/business/585508-germany-needs-nord-stream/
>>
>> It’s kind of amazing to see Gearmony go from a world powerhouse to a
>> petty colony in just over one year. Right now, there is no food in
>> supermarkets.
>>
>> Germany should have invoked article 5 when nazi america blew up
>> Nordstream
>>
> There. I fixed your typos, nymshifter. No need to thank me.

yet another 𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗳 from america. The only thing they produce and export.

On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space

SR makes no such assumption.

> (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower.

Therefore, N/A.

> In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.

N/A.

> 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.

You are wasting your time.

--
Jan

Ken Seto wrote:
>
> Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower. In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.
>
> 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
>
> 3. Please read my book before comment.
>
> Thank you ,
> Ken Seto
>
>

can you post a link, please?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 2:22:54 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 10/23/23 12:42 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions: 1.
> > Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute
> > rest [...]
>
> This is just plain not true -- SR makes no such "assumption", indeed
> this is nonsensical in SR.

Then how come every SR observer claims that all clocks moving wrt him are running slow? That is --very SR observer claims that clocks moving wrt him are accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate ?----

> > 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT
> > is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.

> >
> > 3. Please read my book before comment.
> No need. You are CLEARLY incompetent, and whatever you write is useless.
>
> Tom Roberts

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 5:49:01 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space
> SR makes no such assumption.ow come

Then how come a clock moving wrt the SR observer runs at a slower rate of 1/gamma?

> > (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower.
> Therefore, N/A.
> > In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.
> N/A.
> > 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
> You are wasting your time.
>
> --
> Jan

On 10/27/23 5:33 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> how come every SR observer claims that all clocks moving wrt him
> are running slow?

They don't. Anyone who understands modern physics knows that all clocks
ALWAYS run at their usual rate, never "slowing" (or speeding up). Such
people recognize that when observing a moving clock BY PROJECTING ITS
TICKS ONTO THEIR INERTIAL REST FRAME they will OBSERVE the moving clock
to tick more slowly than their coordinate clocks; that of course does
not affect how the clock ITSELF is ticking.

You REALLY need to learn what SR actually says, rather than repeatedly
making the same silly arguments AGAINST YOUR OWN MISUNDERSTANDINGS.

Tom Roberts

On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 2:00:01 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> Ken Seto wrote:
> >
> > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower. In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.
> >
> > 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
> >
> > 3. Please read my book before comment.
> >
> > Thank you ,
> > Ken Seto
> >
> >
> can you post a link, please?
>
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unmet website that contains the linkaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

For reasons unknown, Microsoft destroyed my website that contains the link for my book. I tried to reactiveate the site but failed.
However, Amazon saw the value of my book and they post my book in their site. I can open their link as follows:
Amazon_Book Online(1).pdf
If you can't get the book in the above link, I can email it to you.

Ken Seto

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 7:02:09 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 10/27/23 5:33 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > how come every SR observer claims that all clocks moving wrt him
> > are running slow?
> They don't. Anyone who understands modern physics knows that all clocks
> ALWAYS run at their usual rate,
At their usual rate have no meaning.....you are assuming that a clock second contains an
an absolute interval of time in different frames.......It does not.

>never "slowing" (or speeding up). Such
> people recognize that when observing a moving clock BY PROJECTING ITS
> TICKS ONTO THEIR INERTIAL REST FRAME they will OBSERVE the moving clock
> to tick more slowly than their coordinate clocks; that of course does
> not affect how the clock ITSELF is ticking.

Experiments how that clocks in relative motions will accumulated clock seconds at different rates.
>
> You REALLY need to learn what SR actually says, rather than repeatedly
> making the same silly arguments AGAINST YOUR OWN MISUNDERSTANDINGS.
You need to have an opened mind that SR assumptions might be wrong.

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 3:41:23 PM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 5:49:01 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space
> > SR makes no such assumption.ow come
>
> Then how come a clock moving wrt the SR observer runs at a slower rate of 1/gamma?

It doesn't run at a slower rate. Its rate is measured to be slower by a different
clock. (Reread the last sentence until you see why this is a very different claim
that the sentence preceding it.)

The source of this phenomenon is unknown, all we know so far is that it can be
modelled mathematically in terms of certain geometry. The immediately observable
"reason" is that the speed of light is in a certain well-defined experimental
sense an invariant.

Einstein was the first to notice this correlation. Physicists before him thought
only that there was something peculiar about Maxwell's equations, and they quantified
this peculiarity. But they didn't see the more direct correlation with space and time.

--
Jan

On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 01:02:09 UTC+2, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 10/27/23 5:33 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > how come every SR observer claims that all clocks moving wrt him
> > are running slow?
> They don't. Anyone who understands modern physics knows that all clocks
> ALWAYS run at their usual rate, never "slowing" (or speeding up). Such

Such delusions, however, are nothing but some
crappy delusions, as anyone can check in GPS.

On Saturday, 28 October 2023 at 05:55:20 UTC+2, JanPB wrote:
> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 3:41:23 PM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 5:49:01 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > > On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > > > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > > > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space
> > > SR makes no such assumption.ow come
> >
> > Then how come a clock moving wrt the SR observer runs at a slower rate of 1/gamma?
> It doesn't run at a slower rate. Its rate is measured to be slower by a different
> clock.

Nope, poor lying idiot. Clocks of GPS satellites run at the
rate +4 compared to clocks of Earth, anyone can check.

> The source of this phenomenon is unknown

The source of the "phenomenon" are sick delusions of an insane
crazie.

Ken Seto wrote:

> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 2:22:54 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
>> This is just plain not true -- SR makes no such "assumption", indeed
>> this is nonsensical in SR.
>
> Then how come 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗦𝗥 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿 claims that all clocks 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗿𝘁 𝗵𝗶𝗺
> are running slow? That is --very SR observer claims that clocks moving
> wrt him are accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate ?----

"every SR observer" is not "moving wrt him", you fucking stupid. You don't
even undrestand what you say, you lying thief.

here, for those having the stomac (18+) where the 𝗸𝗵𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿_𝗴𝗼𝘆𝘀 are lying on
the face of the earth. Ie, saying that Hamas has 𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗲𝘀_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀, to
parachute over the border, which infact are not parachutes, but 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀.
Disgusting liars in front of the entire world, as the world is at sleep
playing the fool.

𝗜𝗦𝗥𝗔𝗘𝗟_𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗧_𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪_-_𝗠𝗔𝗫_𝗜𝗚𝗔𝗡_-_𝗜𝗦𝗥𝗔𝗘𝗟_𝗜𝗦_𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚_𝗚𝗔𝗭𝗔 - (18+)
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/fmfA9l0Kkcuo

they forgot few months ago, an official said "𝗛𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘀_𝗶𝘀_𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘁"

𝗕𝗨𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗗!!_𝗥𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗥_𝗖𝗔𝗨𝗚𝗛𝗧_𝗙𝗜𝗟𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚_𝗧𝗛𝗘_𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗧_𝗜𝗡_𝗜𝗦𝗥𝗔𝗘𝗟!
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/qU0iQQkJ9ogh

Ken Seto wrote:

>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> For reasons unknown, Microsoft destroyed my website that contains the
> link for my book. I tried to reactiveate the site but failed.

you stupid mathematically lying thief. Lisa Heaven is NOT your secretary,
you disgusting Japanese.

𝗟𝗲𝘁_𝘂𝘀_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁_𝗵𝗼𝘄_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆_𝗽𝘂𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹_𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘁𝘀_𝗼𝗻_𝘂𝘀_𝗯𝘂𝘁_𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/3fSgd0f8u3J2

𝗕𝗶𝗴_𝗠𝗶𝗸𝗲..𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿_𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗿𝘆_𝗱𝘆𝗸𝗲,_𝗕𝗶𝗴_𝗠𝗶𝗸𝗲!_𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗟
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/xGUVKxenR04i

𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮_𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀_𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗹_𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀_𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺_𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻_𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀_𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗱_𝗯𝘆_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝘁𝗼_𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗰𝗸_𝗰𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘀
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/IqV623wuw47s

𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁_𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀_𝗶𝘁_𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱_𝗛𝗮𝗺𝗮𝘀_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀_𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿_𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀_𝗮𝘀_'𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁_𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀'
https://bi%74%63hute.com/video/79emT80JfXuQ

Ken Seto wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 26, 2023 at 2:00:01 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Ken Seto wrote:
> > >
> > > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower. In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.
> > >
> > > 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
> > >
> > > 3. Please read my book before comment.
> > >
> > > Thank you ,
> > > Ken Seto
> > >
> > >
> > can you post a link, please?
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unmet website that contains the linkaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> For reasons unknown, Microsoft destroyed my website that contains the link for my book. I tried to reactiveate the site but failed.
> However, Amazon saw the value of my book and they post my book in their site. I can open their link as follows:
> Amazon_Book Online(1).pdf
> If you can't get the book in the above link, I can email it to you.
>
> Ken Seto

"reactiveate"???? Don't you mean find a host for your website name?

The Truth is you own the website name you, just don't have anybody hosting it now. It's PARKED.

But, telling you dat is hopeless.

Do you still need these files?

http://web.archive.org/web/20211208033204/http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015gravity.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20161106112001/http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015irt.pdf

(don't tell Bill Gates)

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 5:49:01 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space
> SR makes no such assumption.

So an SR observer doesn't say that a clock moving wrt him is accumulating clock second at a slower rate of 1/gamma????
What does SR say?

> > (the aether or the E-Matrix). And thus every SR observer faultily assumes that a clock moving wrt him is running slower.
> Therefore, N/A.
> > In real life a clock moving wrt the observer is accumulating clock seconds at a slower rate of 1/gamma or faster rate of gamma.
> N/A.

> > 2. I have formulated a complete theory of relativity called IRT. IRT is included in My book: Model Mechanics :The Final Theory.
> You are wasting your time.

SR is superseded by IRT.

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 7:02:09 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 10/27/23 5:33 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
> > how come every SR observer claims that all clocks moving wrt him
> > are running slow?
> They don't.
Yes they do.....text book says that a clock moving wrt the SR observer is accumulating clock second by a factor of 1/gamma.

>Anyone who understands modern physics knows that all clocks
> ALWAYS run at their usual rate, never "slowing" (or speeding up). Such

This is a faulty assumption.
It assumes that a clock second is an absolute interval of time......it is not. Also run at their usual rate has no meaning ......it assumes that a clock second is an absolute interval of time in all frames.....it is not.

> people recognize that when observing a moving clock BY PROJECTING ITS
> TICKS ONTO THEIR INERTIAL REST FRAME they will OBSERVE the moving clock

Clocks in relative motion accumuate clock seconds at different rate....this is confirmed by experiments.

> to tick more slowly than their coordinate clocks; that of course does
> not affect how the clock ITSELF is ticking.
>
> You REALLY need to learn what SR actually says, rather than repeatedly

They had to add 4.1617 transitions to the GPS second to make it equal to the ground clock second in turn absolute time.

Roberts

Ken Seto wrote:

> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 7:02:09 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
>> On 10/27/23 5:33 PM, Ken Seto wrote:
>> > how come every SR observer claims that all clocks moving wrt him are
>> > running slow?
>> They don't.
> Yes they do.....text book says that a clock moving wrt the SR observer
> is accumulating clock second by a factor of 1/gamma.

for a 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗲_𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿, fucking stoopid. Which means 𝘆𝗼𝘂_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 to know.
And Lisa Heaven is not your secretary, you lying thief. It's like
𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗴𝗮𝘆_𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼r paid for acting "president", killing own people for the show,
accusing 𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲_𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁 for watching the show, he is paid for acting for.

𝗭𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆_‘𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹𝘀_𝗯𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗱’_𝗯𝘆_𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁_–_𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲
The Ukrainian president said that the conflict has “become like a show” to
the Western public
https://r%74.com/news/586204-west-betrayed-ukraine-zelensky/

Vladimir 𝗦𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆, the show is over, you killed 500K Ukrainians for
money....𝘆𝗼𝘂_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝘁𝗵𝗲_"𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝘁_𝗼𝗳_𝗞𝗶𝗲𝘃"....

factually, Russia defeated NATO

Imagine the betrayal he will feel when 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝘇𝗲𝗻 by the
western banks. 😆

He can always join the other Western puppet, Venezuela's Guaido, if he
feels lonely

“He deludes himself,” one of Zelensky’s closest aides told Time. “We’re
out of options. We’re not winning. But try telling him that.” --- sounds
more like he wants as many ukrainians to die as possible, i doubt any jew
forgot 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘂𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗮𝘇𝗶'𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗱𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝘄2

Oh boo-hoo poor little Zelly. You made your choices 𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗴𝗼𝘁_𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗵, while your
nation 𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗱_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗱𝗶𝗲𝗱 for you. Sickening.

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 11:55:20 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 3:41:23 PM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 5:49:01 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > > On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:42:36 AM UTC-7, Ken Seto wrote:
> > > > Their failures are based on the following faulty assumptions:
> > > > 1. Every SR observer is faultily assumed to be in a state of absolute rest in space
> > > SR makes no such assumption.ow come
> >
> > Then how come a clock moving wrt the SR observer runs at a slower rate of 1/gamma?
> It doesn't run at a slower rate. Its rate is measured to be slower by a different
> clock. (Reread the last sentence until you see why this is a very different claim
> that the sentence preceding it.)

SR math says that it runs at a slower rate compared to your clock.
>
The source of this phenomenon is unknown, all we know so far is that it can be
> modelled mathematically in terms of certain geometry. The immediately observable
> "reason" is that the speed of light is in a certain well-defined experimental
> sense an invariant.
The source of this phenomena is due to the different clocks are in different states of absolute motions.
>
> Einstein was the first to notice this correlation. Physicists before him thought
> only that there was something peculiar about Maxwell's equations, and they quantified
> this peculiarity. But they didn't see the more direct correlation with space and time.

Einstein failed to include absolute motion of the two clocks.
>
> --
> Jan

Ken Seto wrote:

>> for a 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗲_𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿, fucking stoopid.
> Hey fuck face.....what is a remote_observer?
>
>> Which means 𝘆𝗼𝘂_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 to know. And Lisa Heaven is not your
>> secretary, you lying thief.
> It's like
>
> Fuck cum sucking face, I don't know who is Lisa Heaven and I never had a
> sectary

you lying sack of shit. You thief. At your age..

#########

> > On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 9:03:30 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
> >> How did you come up with the name Lisa Hayes?
>
> Wrong again. It's the docx document is been converted from. You
> relativists know nothing about physics.

My computer doesn’t have the software to convert the word documents into
pdf book format. 𝗦𝗼_𝗜_𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁_𝗵𝗲𝗿_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱_𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 and she converted them into
pdf book format for the printer.

#########

Ken Seto wrote:

>> for a 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗲_𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗿, fucking stoopid.
> Hey fuck face.....what is a remote_observer?
>> Which means 𝘆𝗼𝘂_𝗮𝗿𝗲_𝗻𝗼𝘁_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 to know. And Lisa Heaven is not your
>> secretary, you lying thief. It's like
>
> Fuck cum sucking face, I don't know who is Lisa Heaven and I never had a
> sectary.

you lying thief. You want 𝘁𝗼_𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹_𝗣𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹_𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗼𝗿 by lying??

######
kenseto's profile photo kenseto unread, Sep 20, 2019, 12:22:18 PM
to
On Friday, September 20, 2019 at 8:08:30 AM UTC-4, Pálek Slovù wrote:
> rotchm wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 9:03:30 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 4:51:58 PM UTC-4, Pálek Slovù
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> How did you come up with the name Lisa Hayes?
> >
> > Its in the pdf header.
>
> Wrong again. It's the docx document is been converted from. You
> relativists know nothing about physics.

My computer doesn’t have the software to convert the word documents into
pdf book format. 𝗦𝗼_𝗜_𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁_𝗵𝗲𝗿_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱_𝗱𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 and she converted them into
pdf book format for the printer.

######