Where gangs of bullies can keep sci.math flooded, hour after hour of each day.

And where a shithead-- down under --- Graham Cooper sees sci. math as a open highway where he lets his trash fly out the windows and pollutes the whole of sci.math.

No, the days are rapidly closing for anyone who seeks to pollute, plunder, pillage sci.math or sci.physics.

Gang of Gays holding the entire sci.math forum hostage to their constant daily spam

Mitchr...@gmail.com
, …
Timothy Golden
4 You cannot end time
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 2:06:11 PM UTC-5, FromTheRafters wrote: > Timothy Golden pretended
1:42 PM

Dan Christensen's profile photo
Dan Christensen
, …
Mostowski Collapse
15
unread,
Even and Odd Number Revisited: A formal set theoretic approach in DC Proof
1:32 PM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
,
William
5 unread,
INTRODUCTION TO CANTORS PROOF
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 6:11:42 AM UTC+11, William wrote: > On Friday, February 17, 2023
1:30 PM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
, …
William
27
unread,
Who really believes ------ EXIST(X) X>INFINITY ?
12:49 PM

WM's profile photo
WM
, …
William
423
The testimony of unit fractions
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 1:51:28 PM UTC-4, WM wrote: > William schrieb am Freitag, 17.
12:08 PM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
2 unread,
PETER OLCOTT IS RIGHT! HALT() IS SOLVABLE
> The idea that a machine can tell if it is being run directly or being > simulated is
11:47 AM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
,
William
3 unread,
PROOF GOLDBACH CONJECTURE
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 2:56:33 AM UTC+11, William wrote: > On Friday, February 17, 2023
11:03 AM

Graham Cooper's profile photo
Graham Cooper
unread,
THE PROOF |R|=|N|
Any enumeration of a powerset(N) is incomplete let LIST(f(xy z..)) be some list of some or all of the
7:19 AM

Socratis T.n.p.'s profile photo
Socratis T.n.p.
, …
Lucrezio S
38
unread,
La Logica..Resterà in Eterno... Felice Natale...

Apparently Franz is a kingpin in this gang of gays flooding sci.math each and every day with nothing but spam, and turning sci.math into a gay pickup bar.

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 7:18:40 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote in sci.math:
sex motivation in science Re: curious, just curious-- is there a numbers correlation between percentage of stalkers and homosexuality? Re: Psychology behind the mental disorder of stalking-- Michael Moroney, Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, Jan Bielawski

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 5:21:29 PM UTC-5, Me(Franz) wrote:
> On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 11:31:26 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
>> I am not suggesting that the 12 stalkers are 12 homosexuals.
(Franz) > I am not suggesting that the 12 stalkers are 12 [male --me] homosexuals.
>
(Franz)> I'm sure they are. That's why they are called /12 Angry Men/!

Well, this explains a lot about many posters in sci.math and sci.physics, for they are not in science for truth but in science to meet and partner up. And explains the loyalty and ferocity of hate posts by those 12, having no truth value. Explains why Franz keeps posting a total fake ellipse, because of his bedwarmer approval.

In another thread I discuss how "money corrupts science" but looking here, I need to consider how sex orientation corrupts the truth of science. So that we must ask-- is black hole acceptance due in large part to homosexual community wanting a black hole agenda. Is the Big Bang theory a homosexual favorite. Is the Appel & Haken in 4 color mapping, the Hales Kepler Packing, the Wiles FLT, all due to homosexual community favoritism, rather than any truth content.

So if Franz can post 100,000 times his fake conic ellipse b.s. all because he wants a bedwarmer, rather than the truth of science. We have to explore how much more of science is a sexual preference rather than reasoned truth.

On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 1:28:41 PM UTC-5, Me (Franz of Germany) wrote:

> Is this
>
>
> a depiction of your asshole,

Franz harps//Univ Gottingen teaches idiocies Tim Salditt, Konrad Samwer, Christoph Schmidt, Susanne Schneider, Steffen Schumann//ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

Franz harps//Univ Gottingen teaches idiocies Ulrike Beisiegel, Karsten Bahr, Peter Bloechl, Eberhard Bodenschatz//ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

Franz harps//Univ Gottingen teaches idiocies Laura Covi, Andreas Dillmann, Stefan Dreizler, Jörg Enderlein, Laurent Gizon//ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

Franz harps//Univ Gottingen teaches idiocies Ariane Frey,Wolfgang Glatzel, Fabian Heidrich-Meisner,Hans Christian Hofsäss//ellipse is not conic; real proton= 840MeV not 938; 10 AND 4 = 14 not 10 OR 4 = 14

On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 3:05:40 PM UTC-5, Me (Franz) wrote:
> On Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 12:02:25 AM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> > 1) 10 OR 4 = 14
>
> Right! Python:
>
> def OR(x, y):
> return operator.or_(x, y)
>
> print(OR(10, 4))
>
> ==> 14
>
> > 10 AND 4 = 14
>
> Nope. Python:
>
> def AND(x, y):
> return operator.and_(x, y)
>
> print(AND(10, 4))
>
> ==> 0
>
> > 2) ellipse was never a conic
>
> Nope. Need to see my proof again?
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- <= x=h
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ <= x=0
>
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' <= x = h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed