Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The cow is nothing but a machine which makes grass fit for us people to eat. -- John McNulty


interests / sci.anthropology.paleo / Re: Thanks, Algis!

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM
`* Re: Thanks, Algis!littor...@gmail.com
 +- Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM
 `* Re: Thanks, Algis!DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves
  +* Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!Primum Sapienti
  |`* Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM
  | `* Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!Primum Sapienti
  |  `- Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM
  `* Re: Thanks, Algis!littor...@gmail.com
   `* Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM
    `* Re: Thanks, Algis!littor...@gmail.com
     `* Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM
      `* Re: Thanks, Algis!littor...@gmail.com
       `- Re: Thanks, Algis!I Envy JTEM

1
Re: Thanks, Algis!

<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12792&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12792

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4b2c:: with SMTP id s12mr4619359qvw.125.1644795050927;
Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:30:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:508e:: with SMTP id kk14mr7722088qvb.62.1644795050773;
Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:30:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:9165:388e:7b8a:30b7;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:9165:388e:7b8a:30b7
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 23:30:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 14
 by: I Envy JTEM - Sun, 13 Feb 2022 23:30 UTC

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> https://whattalks.com/talks

Yes I can't believe I did it, managed to be up at 7am on a Sunday
Morning and I had my camera off because I really was in my
underwear! But, thanks for a great talk!

LOTS to think about, to digest...

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/676115701353889792

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12797&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12797

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:28c3:: with SMTP id l3mr222582qkp.633.1644856308198;
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:31:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5cc9:: with SMTP id s9mr455836qta.215.1644856307983;
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:31:47 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:31:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:a5e9:9dd:5743:7a0;
posting-account=od9E6wkAAADQ0Qm7G0889JKn_DjHJ-bA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:a5e9:9dd:5743:7a0
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com> <67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: littoral...@gmail.com (littor...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:31:48 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 34
 by: littor...@gmail.com - Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:31 UTC

Op maandag 14 februari 2022 om 00:30:51 UTC+1 schreef I Envy JTEM:

> > https://whattalks.com/talks

> Yes I can't believe I did it, managed to be up at 7am on a Sunday
> Morning and I had my camera off because I really was in my
> underwear! But, thanks for a great talk!
> LOTS to think about, to digest...

:-) Thanks, John.

The most important of my talk is very simple:
AFAWK pachy-osteo-sclerosis is always & only seen in every tetrapod that begins to become aquatic, esp. in sea-water (heavier than fresh water):
first, bones become thicker (pachy-), soon they become also denser (-sclerosis),
but as Pinnipedia, Cetacea etc. become faster & deeper swimmers, they completely lose POS, and their bones become the opposite: lighter.
Only slow + shallow divers for sessile foods remain POS: Sirenia.

IOW, only pure idiots deny erectus were slow+shallow divers.
Probably mostly for shellfish: larger brain, stone use.
Very broad bodies, dorso-ventrally flattened, large lungs, good femoral abduction etc., incapable of running fast.
Archaic Homo typically fossilized in shallow waters, from Peking to Java to Flores to Dmanisi to Petralona to ...

Neandertals were a lot less POS than erectus, generally they dwelt in colder waters (ear exostoses):
did they seasonally follow the rivers (+ salmon?) inland? diving & wading?

Homo's evolution in short, schematically:
early-Pleistocene shallow-diving He
-> mid-Pleist.diving-wading Hn
-> late-Pleist.wading-walking Hs.

(The different "habilis" fossils are probably an amalgam of different spp: early Homo, female boisei, gracile apiths...)

In any case, only complete fools believe H.erecctus ran after antelopes.

(My wife & son said my voice in my WHAT talk was too slow & monotomous - I'll never be a good speaker...)

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<334ab926-8179-4fa2-927b-aa8c979ecc0en@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12801&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12801

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5dcb:: with SMTP id m11mr797577qvh.128.1644875566028;
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:52:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5cc9:: with SMTP id s9mr724756qta.215.1644875565896;
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:52:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:52:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:292f:be30:efa4:2f0f;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:292f:be30:efa4:2f0f
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <334ab926-8179-4fa2-927b-aa8c979ecc0en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:52:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 18
 by: I Envy JTEM - Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:52 UTC

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> (My wife & son said my voice in my WHAT talk was too slow & monotomous - I'll never be a good speaker...)

They might've been too harsh.

Too much energy and it's preaching. It's convincing people with your personality,
your passion and not the evidence.

You're not selling, you're informing. You're delivering your findings.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/676115701353889792

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12805&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12805

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7e8c:: with SMTP id w12mr3017839qtj.342.1644937709198;
Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:08:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5e8b:: with SMTP id jl11mr899223qvb.29.1644937708751;
Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:08:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2607:fb90:40f6:8fa5:0:28:db45:b701;
posting-account=EMmeqwoAAAA_LjVgdifHm2aHM2oOTKz0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2607:fb90:40f6:8fa5:0:28:db45:b701
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: daud.de...@gmail.com (DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves)
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:08:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: DD'eDeN aka not - Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:08 UTC

On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 11:31:48 AM UTC-5, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> Op maandag 14 februari 2022 om 00:30:51 UTC+1 schreef I Envy JTEM:
> > > https://whattalks.com/talks
>
> > Yes I can't believe I did it, managed to be up at 7am on a Sunday
> > Morning and I had my camera off because I really was in my
> > underwear! But, thanks for a great talk!
> > LOTS to think about, to digest...
> :-) Thanks, John.
>
> The most important of my talk is very simple:
> AFAWK pachy-osteo-sclerosis is always & only seen in every tetrapod that begins to become aquatic, esp. in sea-water (heavier than fresh water):
> first, bones become thicker (pachy-), soon they become also denser (-sclerosis),
> but as Pinnipedia, Cetacea etc. become faster & deeper swimmers, they completely lose POS, and their bones become the opposite: lighter.
> Only slow + shallow divers for sessile foods remain POS: Sirenia.

Central West African manatees and humans have extremely dense bones, they both swim.

>
> IOW, only pure idiots deny erectus were slow+shallow divers.

H erectus was a ground ape that probably dabbled in open water while avoiding large crocs. Small shallow streams were far safer than elsewhere.

> Probably mostly for shellfish: larger brain, stone use.
> Very broad bodies, dorso-ventrally flattened, large lungs, good femoral abduction etc., incapable of running fast.

Central west African humans are fast sprinters.

> Archaic Homo typically fossilized in shallow waters,

Of course, shallow *freshwater*. Homo had no deep-water vessels then.

from Peking to Java to Flores to Dmanisi to Petralona to ...
>
> Neandertals were a lot less POS than erectus, generally they dwelt in colder waters (ear exostoses):
> did they seasonally follow the rivers (+ salmon?) inland? diving & wading?

Of course, heavy bones for slow awkward walkers, lighter bones for faster walkers, gracile bones for running Hs.

> Homo's evolution in short, schematically:
> early-Pleistocene shallow-diving He
> -> mid-Pleist.diving-wading Hn
> -> late-Pleist.wading-walking Hs.
>
> (The different "habilis" fossils are probably an amalgam of different spp: early Homo, female boisei, gracile apiths...)
>
> In any case, only complete fools believe H.erecctus ran after antelopes.
>
> (My wife & son said my voice in my WHAT talk was too slow & monotomous - I'll never be a good speaker...)

Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!

<sui3pt$b8g$2@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12808&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12808

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: inval...@invalid.invalid (Primum Sapienti)
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:58:22 -0700
Organization: sum
Lines: 1
Message-ID: <sui3pt$b8g$2@dont-email.me>
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com>
<74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 05:58:21 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="79ed16892487de775a9a54bf3a5c0ce7";
logging-data="11536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tGqMXttMlb08VHSZB+rbC"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0Ze8XZsA0/XeYMR8RHhjMd+WGGM=
In-Reply-To: <2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Primum Sapienti - Wed, 16 Feb 2022 05:58 UTC

And why should we care?

Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!

<91622fd4-8609-42d8-b850-83fddaed0de0n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12814&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12814

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4150:b0:37b:c68f:19f4 with SMTP id h16-20020a05600c415000b0037bc68f19f4mr884056wmm.67.1645071833011;
Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:23:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:229a:b0:2d3:ce13:4d93 with SMTP id
ay26-20020a05622a229a00b002d3ce134d93mr974511qtb.314.1645071832762; Wed, 16
Feb 2022 20:23:52 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.87.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:23:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <sui3pt$b8g$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:645f:f494:7265:35b3;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:645f:f494:7265:35b3
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <sui3pt$b8g$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <91622fd4-8609-42d8-b850-83fddaed0de0n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:23:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: I Envy JTEM - Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:23 UTC

Primum Sapienti wrote:
> And why should we care?

Why should we not care?

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/651191344372547584

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12819&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12819

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fe06:0:b0:1e5:95ad:b6bc with SMTP id n6-20020adffe06000000b001e595adb6bcmr3676679wrr.191.1645135003011;
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:56:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:15af:b0:47c:fa0f:88b7 with SMTP id
f15-20020a05620a15af00b0047cfa0f88b7mr2838577qkk.253.1645135002782; Thu, 17
Feb 2022 13:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.87.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:56:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:d860:33f9:8aa8:5596;
posting-account=od9E6wkAAADQ0Qm7G0889JKn_DjHJ-bA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:d860:33f9:8aa8:5596
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: littoral...@gmail.com (littor...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:56:42 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: littor...@gmail.com - Thu, 17 Feb 2022 21:56 UTC

Op dinsdag 15 februari 2022 om 16:08:29 UTC+1 schreef DD'eDeN aka note/nickname/alas_my_loves:
> On Monday, February 14, 2022 at 11:31:48 AM UTC-5, littor...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Op maandag 14 februari 2022 om 00:30:51 UTC+1 schreef I Envy JTEM:

> > > > https://whattalks.com/talks

> > > Yes I can't believe I did it, managed to be up at 7am on a Sunday
> > > Morning and I had my camera off because I really was in my
> > > underwear! But, thanks for a great talk!
> > > LOTS to think about, to digest...

> > :-) Thanks, John.
> > The most important of my talk is very simple:
> > AFAWK pachy-osteo-sclerosis is always & only seen in every tetrapod that begins to become aquatic, esp. in sea-water (heavier than fresh water):
> > first, bones become thicker (pachy-), soon they become also denser (-sclerosis),
> > but as Pinnipedia, Cetacea etc. become faster & deeper swimmers, they completely lose POS, and their bones become the opposite: lighter.
> > Only slow + shallow divers for sessile foods remain POS: Sirenia.

> Central West African manatees and humans have extremely dense bones, they both swim.

H.erectus had POS (pachy-osteo-sclerosis), not we: He>Hn>Hs.

> > IOW, only pure idiots deny erectus were slow+shallow divers.

> H erectus was a ground ape that probably dabbled in open water while avoiding large crocs. Small shallow streams were far safer than elsewhere.

:-D
There's not the slightest doubt: H.erectus regularly dived for sessile foods (POS), probably mostly shellfish (stone tools, large brain).

> > Probably mostly for shellfish: larger brain, stone use.
> > Very broad bodies, dorso-ventrally flattened, large lungs, good femoral abduction etc., incapable of running fast.

> Central west African humans are fast sprinters.

So? Relevance here??

> > Archaic Homo typically fossilized in shallow waters,

> Of course, shallow *freshwater*. Homo had no deep-water vessels then.

?? Try to say something sensible.

> > from Peking to Java to Flores to Dmanisi to Petralona to Flores to...
> > Neandertals were a lot less POS than erectus, generally they dwelt in colder waters (ear exostoses):
> > did they seasonally follow the rivers (+ salmon?) inland? diving & wading?

> Of course, heavy bones for slow awkward walkers, lighter bones for faster walkers, gracile bones for running Hs.

My little boy, POS is invariably slow+shallow diving.
Only idiots deny that.

> > Homo's evolution in short, schematically:
> > early-Pleistocene shallow-diving He
> > -> mid-Pleist.diving-wading Hn
> > -> late-Pleist.wading-walking Hs.
> > (The different "habilis" fossils are probably an amalgam of different spp: early Homo, female boisei, gracile apiths...)
> > In any case, only complete fools believe H.erecctus ran after antelopes.
> > (My wife & son said my voice in my WHAT talk was too slow & monotomous - I'll never be a good speaker...)

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12820&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12820

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:245:b0:1e5:94fd:1ce2 with SMTP id m5-20020a056000024500b001e594fd1ce2mr4334238wrz.60.1645153759868;
Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:09:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:eda2:0:b0:42c:1ed:ed6d with SMTP id
h2-20020a0ceda2000000b0042c01eded6dmr4484471qvr.100.1645153759600; Thu, 17
Feb 2022 19:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.88.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 19:09:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:19f7:d1df:5878:101f;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:19f7:d1df:5878:101f
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:09:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: I Envy JTEM - Fri, 18 Feb 2022 03:09 UTC

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> :-D
> There's not the slightest doubt: H.erectus regularly dived for sessile foods (POS), probably mostly shellfish
> (stone tools, large brain).

I can't help myself -- I'm out of control here -- but when someone like you says that I naturally just
leap to the implications.

Okay. They were diving. Why?

Necessity? Like, during an interglacial sea level rose, drowning out ridiculous amounts of land,
perhaps trapping them within a confined range where they could no long freely migrate great
distances, thus had to exploit the sea in new ways?

"Diving" would have granted them access to deeper water, additional species to dine on. Or, like
modern man today, only on a micro scale, they could have eaten the easily obtained seafoods
to extinction?

Sort of like, up to 100 years ago or so, lobsters weren't "Fished" they were picked up along the
beach, in tidal pools.

But, one EXTREMELY overlooked aspect of Aquatic Ape is that the sea can support a larger
population density than inland hunter-gathering.

Compared to the inland hunter-gatherer lifestyle the status quo loves, the sea offers a HUGE
abundance of food with less work. So...

They could afford to get picky. They could ignore easily obtained foods for a preferred type
(species) of seafood. Chances are they still wouldn't be exerting more effort than their
inland counterparts, and they could always fall back on the easier sources if necessary. So
maybe they were diving to obtain a specific food they could not find along the beach... or
could no longer find.

Any idea?

Any suggestions for what food they may have wanted but couldn't find along the beach?

Oysters? They seem to be a favorite of humans...

Mussels, too, but I would favor oysters.

Yes? No? Maybe?

-- --

Super awful:

https://rumble.com/vr5fsv-confessions-of-an-ex-hippie.html

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<04551aa7-99c7-4573-a076-3a19207753d2n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12858&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12858

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f08:b0:37b:e830:d231 with SMTP id l8-20020a05600c4f0800b0037be830d231mr989396wmq.144.1645485263360;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:14:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:8d4:b0:648:cff8:1d1e with SMTP id
z20-20020a05620a08d400b00648cff81d1emr5109943qkz.379.1645485262794; Mon, 21
Feb 2022 15:14:22 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.87.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:14:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:2daf:b40d:a70:6576;
posting-account=od9E6wkAAADQ0Qm7G0889JKn_DjHJ-bA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:2daf:b40d:a70:6576
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
<3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <04551aa7-99c7-4573-a076-3a19207753d2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: littoral...@gmail.com (littor...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 23:14:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: littor...@gmail.com - Mon, 21 Feb 2022 23:14 UTC

Op vrijdag 18 februari 2022 om 04:09:21 UTC+1 schreef I Envy JTEM:
....

> > :-D
> > There's not the slightest doubt: H.erectus regularly dived for sessile foods (POS), probably mostly shellfish
> > (stone tools, large brain).

> I can't help myself -- I'm out of control here -- but when someone like you says that I naturally just
> leap to the implications.
> Okay. They were diving. Why?

Speculating.

Mio-Pliocene apes were aquarboreals (vertical waders-climbers in coastal/mangrove...forests), and spread along the Tethys Ocean.
When the Mesopotamian Seaway closed c 15 Ma, pongids were East (S.Asian coasts), hominids West (Med & Red Sea) + inland along rivers.
What exactly they ate (often thick enamel & short canines), we don't know: hard-shelled foods?

IMO (see my Hum.Evol.papers, or google "ape human evolution made easy PPT Verhaegen")
- c 8 Ma, G & HP split, G followed the incipient Rift (afarensis->boisei),
- c 5 Ma, H & P split, Pan followed the E.African coast South (africanus->robustus),
both E & S.Afr;apiths apparently (but why?) evolved in // from Pliocene "gracile" to Pleistocene "robust".

Meanwhile Homo remained in Red Sea?
Did shell-beds become more abundant.when temperatures dropped (Pleist.)??
In any case, H.erectus became pachy-osteo-sclerotic (POS) = only explained by slow-shallow-diving for sessile foods, no doubt incl. shellfish (larger brain, stone tools).
Perhaps opportunity rather than "necessity"?

> Necessity? Like, during an interglacial sea level rose, drowning out ridiculous amounts of land,
> perhaps trapping them within a confined range where they could no long freely migrate great
> distances, thus had to exploit the sea in new ways?
> "Diving" would have granted them access to deeper water, additional species to dine on. Or, like
> modern man today, only on a micro scale, they could have eaten the easily obtained seafoods
> to extinction?
> Sort of like, up to 100 years ago or so, lobsters weren't "Fished" they were picked up along the
> beach, in tidal pools.
> But, one EXTREMELY overlooked aspect of Aquatic Ape is that the sea can support a larger
> population density than inland hunter-gathering.

Of course: why "overlooked"?

> Compared to the inland hunter-gatherer lifestyle the status quo loves, the sea offers a HUGE
> abundance of food with less work. So...
> They could afford to get picky. They could ignore easily obtained foods for a preferred type
> (species) of seafood. Chances are they still wouldn't be exerting more effort than their
> inland counterparts, and they could always fall back on the easier sources if necessary. So
> maybe they were diving to obtain a specific food they could not find along the beach... or
> could no longer find.
> Any idea?
> Any suggestions for what food they may have wanted but couldn't find along the beach?
> Oysters? They seem to be a favorite of humans...
> Mussels, too, but I would favor oysters.
> Yes? No? Maybe?

Mussels & oysters & shrimps & even seaweed?
In any case incl. shellfish: DHA & other brain-specific nutrients, and stone tools.

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<6b67dc43-497e-4f4a-ac30-c5170e9e5e1bn@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12862&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12862

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:588a:0:b0:1e8:b478:e74f with SMTP id n10-20020a5d588a000000b001e8b478e74fmr18385473wrf.210.1645511555546;
Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:32:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:df14:0:b0:431:354e:ac2d with SMTP id
g20-20020a0cdf14000000b00431354eac2dmr12842398qvl.84.1645511555031; Mon, 21
Feb 2022 22:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.88.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:32:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <04551aa7-99c7-4573-a076-3a19207753d2n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:bd16:afd1:8877:9970;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:bd16:afd1:8877:9970
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
<3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com> <04551aa7-99c7-4573-a076-3a19207753d2n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6b67dc43-497e-4f4a-ac30-c5170e9e5e1bn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 06:32:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: I Envy JTEM - Tue, 22 Feb 2022 06:32 UTC

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> Meanwhile Homo remained in Red Sea?
> Did shell-beds become more abundant.when temperatures dropped (Pleist.)??
> In any case, H.erectus became pachy-osteo-sclerotic (POS) = only explained by slow-shallow-diving for sessile foods, no doubt incl. shellfish (larger brain, stone tools).
> Perhaps opportunity rather than "necessity"?

There's two models here. Or maybe a third, if you could a mixture of the two
as our third model...

#1. The interglacial periods (punctuating the glacial periods), like our present
Holocene, erased large stretches of coastline, trapping populations within a
limited area (or on islands) and they were forced to dive for food as soon as
they exhausted that was available along the shore line.

Makes sense.

#2. They got picky. They loved Oysters, say, and were willing to dive down to
get them.

> > But, one EXTREMELY overlooked aspect of Aquatic Ape is that the sea can support a larger
> > population density than inland hunter-gathering.

> Of course: why "overlooked"?

Greater breading population, greater genetic diversity -- more likely for beneficial mutations
to arise. But also...

The larger a breeding population, the more vulnerable to fluctuations in the food supply.

Can you see this?

Aquatic Ape not only tells us HOW and WHY our ancestors spread across the globe, but
why they kept moving inland!

Right?

We know they were on the beaches. We know they were wandering from end to end,
even moving in both directions it seemed... following the coast. And aquatic ape
explains all that. But we also know that there were all these DIFFERENT or DISTINCT
populations everywhere -- inland populations. So where'd they come from?

Well they have to exist if aquatic ape is right. Neanderthals, Denisovans... whatever
was living in Oceana that we call Denisovan but was as genetically distinct from the
Denisovans as the Denisovans were from the Neanderthals... inland China...

Etc.

The sea can support much larger population densities than inland hunting & gathering,
bigger numbers -- larger populations -- but bigger groups are more vulnerable to
fluctuations in the food supply. And even the (regular?) glacial/glacial cycle that has
come to characterize the Quaternary Period would alone be likely to have created these
fluctuations as the seas periodically grew or shrunk.

Add to that conflicts, disease, natural disasters...

So people would have to peeling off from these larger coastal groups pretty regularly,
moving inland and establishing new lifestyles... adapting... evolving on their own...

ONLY TO EVENTUALLY BE RECONNECTED TO COASTAL POPULATIONS AND EXCHANGE
DNA.

So we have a fusion here of Aquatic Ape & Multi Regionalism (regional continuity).

THE COASTAL POPULATION is our population. It's the one that links the Australians with
the Africans and everyone in between. The coastal population is the one that is actually
ancestral to us all. I can have Neanderthals, the Australian aborigine can carry Denisovan
or erectus (I dunno) but we both are connected through the coastal population, aquatic
ape.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/676775721186869248

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<e59dae88-826f-4e57-b95b-c18a80a3d7b5n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12874&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12874

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:63ce:0:b0:1ed:b776:a4fc with SMTP id c14-20020a5d63ce000000b001edb776a4fcmr1417148wrw.281.1645615633736;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 03:27:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f713:0:b0:506:c9a0:b0fc with SMTP id
s19-20020ae9f713000000b00506c9a0b0fcmr18495912qkg.131.1645615633288; Wed, 23
Feb 2022 03:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.128.87.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 03:27:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6b67dc43-497e-4f4a-ac30-c5170e9e5e1bn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:2daf:b40d:a70:6576;
posting-account=od9E6wkAAADQ0Qm7G0889JKn_DjHJ-bA
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:a03f:89ef:3100:2daf:b40d:a70:6576
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
<3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com> <04551aa7-99c7-4573-a076-3a19207753d2n@googlegroups.com>
<6b67dc43-497e-4f4a-ac30-c5170e9e5e1bn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e59dae88-826f-4e57-b95b-c18a80a3d7b5n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: littoral...@gmail.com (littor...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:27:13 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
 by: littor...@gmail.com - Wed, 23 Feb 2022 11:27 UTC

Op dinsdag 22 februari 2022 om 07:32:36 UTC+1 schreef I Envy JTEM:

> > Meanwhile Homo remained in Red Sea?
> > Did shell-beds become more abundant.when temperatures dropped (Pleist.)??
> > In any case, H.erectus became pachy-osteo-sclerotic (POS) = only explained by slow-shallow-diving for sessile foods, no doubt incl. shellfish (larger brain, stone tools).
> > Perhaps opportunity rather than "necessity"?

> There's 2 models here. Or maybe a 3rd, if you could a mixture of the 2
> as our 3rd model...

> #1. The interglacial periods (punctuating the glacial periods), like our present
> Holocene, erased large stretches of coastline, trapping populations within a
> limited area (or on islands) and they were forced to dive for food as soon as
> they exhausted that was available along the shore line.
> Makes sense.

> #2. They got picky. They loved Oysters, say, and were willing to dive down to
> get them.

> > > But, one EXTREMELY overlooked aspect of Aquatic Ape is that the sea can support a larger
> > > population density than inland hunter-gathering.
> > Of course: why "overlooked"?

> Greater breading population, greater genetic diversity -- more likely for beneficial mutations
> to arise. But also...
> The larger a breeding population, the more vulnerable to fluctuations in the food supply.
> Can you see this?
> Aquatic Ape not only tells us HOW and WHY our ancestors spread across the globe, but
> why they kept moving inland!
> Right?

I'd think different side-branches of "archaic"(coastal+POS) Homo populations repeatedly followed the rivers inland in //,
but did this happen more frequently during glacials? or during interglacials?

> We know they were on the beaches. We know they were wandering from end to end,
> even moving in both directions it seemed... following the coast. And aquatic ape
> explains all that. But we also know that there were all these DIFFERENT or DISTINCT
> populations everywhere -- inland populations. So where'd they come from?

From the coasts, e.g. following the salmon trek, bipedally-wading??
> Well they have to exist if aquatic ape is right. Neanderthals, Denisovans... whatever
> was living in Oceana that we call Denisovan but was as genetically distinct from the
> Denisovans as the Denisovans were from the Neanderthals... inland China...
> Etc.
> The sea can support much larger population densities than inland hunting & gathering,
> bigger numbers -- larger populations -- but bigger groups are more vulnerable to
> fluctuations in the food supply. And even the (regular?) glacial/glacial cycle that has
> come to characterize the Quaternary Period would alone be likely to have created these
> fluctuations as the seas periodically grew or shrunk.

Yes.

> Add to that conflicts, disease, natural disasters...
> So people would have to peeling off from these larger coastal groups pretty regularly,
> moving inland and establishing new lifestyles... adapting... evolving on their own...
> ONLY TO EVENTUALLY BE RECONNECTED TO COASTAL POPULATIONS AND EXCHANGE
> DNA.

Yes.

> So we have a fusion here of Aquatic Ape & Multi Regionalism (regional continuity).
> THE COASTAL POPULATION is our population. It's the one that links the Australians with
> the Africans and everyone in between. The coastal population is the one that is actually
> ancestral to us all. I can have Neanderthals, the Australian aborigine can carry Denisovan
> or erectus (I dunno) but we both are connected through the coastal population, aquatic
> ape.

IMO "aq.ape" is a wrong & confusing term:
Pleistocene Homo was basically *littoral*, diving for shallow-sessile foods (POS), most likely incl.shellfish (stone tools, large brain), but possibly also seaweeds etc. & even land-based foods.
POS tetrapods are not fully aquatic (except Sirenia), but "incipiently"aquatic. So was H.erectus.
Did they venture inland again & again along rivers all over the (sub)tropical Old World, more during interglacials?

The keyword is pachy-osteo-sclerotic:
*all* POS tetrapods (incl. H.erectus: He>Hn>Hs) are slow-shallow divers for sessile foods.
Only incredible imbeciles believe their ancestors ran after antelopes.
How stupid are they??

Re: Thanks, Algis!

<6fd18d7e-c34a-4df2-b81d-80d4683b2010n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12877&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12877

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1d93:b0:1ec:7868:b92d with SMTP id bk19-20020a0560001d9300b001ec7868b92dmr597220wrb.507.1645639853135;
Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:10:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a37:620d:0:b0:62c:e1eb:2e89 with SMTP id
w13-20020a37620d000000b0062ce1eb2e89mr604718qkb.253.1645639852543; Wed, 23
Feb 2022 10:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 10:10:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <e59dae88-826f-4e57-b95b-c18a80a3d7b5n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:8964:5260:42d1:d47d;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:8964:5260:42d1:d47d
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <d24351b9-0fc2-48f9-8a7f-d1cb2e2f79c5n@googlegroups.com>
<3978c7a2-d500-4383-b57c-cdbdae3ef4e4n@googlegroups.com> <04551aa7-99c7-4573-a076-3a19207753d2n@googlegroups.com>
<6b67dc43-497e-4f4a-ac30-c5170e9e5e1bn@googlegroups.com> <e59dae88-826f-4e57-b95b-c18a80a3d7b5n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6fd18d7e-c34a-4df2-b81d-80d4683b2010n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:10:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 45
 by: I Envy JTEM - Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:10 UTC

littor...@gmail.com wrote:

> I'd think different side-branches of "archaic"(coastal+POS) Homo populations repeatedly followed the rivers inland in //,
> but did this happen more frequently during glacials? or during interglacials?

It would seem to me that groups would have to be moving inland at virtually any time,
as humans can't even go days before driven to extremes by hunger, but that the
advent of a new interglacial would be a natural point in which many would be forced
to hunt down new food sources.

...it guarantees a point, though it could happen at virtually any other point.

> > We know they were on the beaches. We know they were wandering from end to end,
> > even moving in both directions it seemed... following the coast. And aquatic ape
> > explains all that. But we also know that there were all these DIFFERENT or DISTINCT
> > populations everywhere -- inland populations. So where'd they come from?

> From the coasts, e.g. following the salmon trek, bipedally-wading??

There doesn't seem to be evidence for Neanderthals exploiting salmon. Well there is
some later evidence, but it's so late that we are probably speaking of cro magnon,
else why wouldn't we be seeing it earlier?

> > So we have a fusion here of Aquatic Ape & Multi Regionalism (regional continuity).
> > THE COASTAL POPULATION is our population. It's the one that links the Australians with
> > the Africans and everyone in between. The coastal population is the one that is actually
> > ancestral to us all. I can have Neanderthals, the Australian aborigine can carry Denisovan
> > or erectus (I dunno) but we both are connected through the coastal population, aquatic
> > ape.

> IMO "aq.ape" is a wrong & confusing term:
> Pleistocene Homo was basically *littoral*, diving for shallow-sessile foods (POS), most likely incl.shellfish (stone tools, large brain), but possibly also seaweeds etc. & even land-based foods.
> POS tetrapods are not fully aquatic (except Sirenia), but "incipiently"aquatic. So was H.erectus.
> Did they venture inland again & again along rivers all over the (sub)tropical Old World, more during interglacials?

The one population that links us all, that we all share as a common ancestor is the coastal,
aquatic, waterside, littoral population. There were others -- perhaps LOTS of terrestrially
adapted populations, but the one we can all trace back to is the one exploiting the sea.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/158530861591

Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!

<svmu25$cu5$3@dont-email.me>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12940&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12940

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: inval...@invalid.invalid (Primum Sapienti)
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 22:07:18 -0700
Organization: sum
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <svmu25$cu5$3@dont-email.me>
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com>
<74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com>
<sui3pt$b8g$2@dont-email.me>
<91622fd4-8609-42d8-b850-83fddaed0de0n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 05:07:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ffb030b22dc4ae1733a1d76abebe33b4";
logging-data="13253"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yFBnevNoQ9y8Ul8aIqAZy"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.4
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tevg6+QzfaxNZAaZOGns/2ElVQI=
In-Reply-To: <91622fd4-8609-42d8-b850-83fddaed0de0n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Primum Sapienti - Wed, 2 Mar 2022 05:07 UTC

Jerm wrote:
> Primum Sapienti wrote:
>> And why should we care?
>
> Why should we not care?

Why?

Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!

<0ce5a324-cbc8-4727-95fc-f3b306d9c327n@googlegroups.com>

 copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/interests/article-flat.php?id=12946&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#12946

 copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9c01:0:b0:432:7630:263 with SMTP id v1-20020a0c9c01000000b0043276300263mr19616052qve.47.1646202435347;
Tue, 01 Mar 2022 22:27:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1419:0:b0:2d8:a3b2:7375 with SMTP id
k25-20020ac81419000000b002d8a3b27375mr22629126qtj.420.1646202435137; Tue, 01
Mar 2022 22:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 22:27:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <svmu25$cu5$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:e444:d3fc:6dcf:b94a;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:e444:d3fc:6dcf:b94a
References: <b31f7f92-f596-4092-a7a4-1cb4ccfa0fe3n@googlegroups.com>
<67c1bc5d-b67e-442a-95ac-2a591dfe219cn@googlegroups.com> <74776831-b06c-48b6-b4b6-a5d59cb096b4n@googlegroups.com>
<2e4c24fc-d6f5-45b9-bfb6-b79c2c4d6df8n@googlegroups.com> <sui3pt$b8g$2@dont-email.me>
<91622fd4-8609-42d8-b850-83fddaed0de0n@googlegroups.com> <svmu25$cu5$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0ce5a324-cbc8-4727-95fc-f3b306d9c327n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Who? Re: Thanks, Algis!
From: jte...@gmail.com (I Envy JTEM)
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 06:27:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Lines: 15
 by: I Envy JTEM - Wed, 2 Mar 2022 06:27 UTC

So we all agree that Naledi is no human ancestor, that even calling it "Homo"
naledi is subject to legitimate debate, and anyone thinks that Naledi was
practicing intentional burials, instead of following cool moist air (during a
drought) to their deaths, is an absolute moron, if not intellectually disabled.

If you agree: Grunt twice.

If you disagree: Scratch at your pits & look bewildered, again.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/677437778777243648

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.7
clearnet tor