novaBBS - rec.photo.digital - Re: David Brooks

Re: David Brooks

<vpYSK.183394$9f26.55117@fx09.ams1>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12815&group=rec.photo.digital#12815

copy link Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital

Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!aioe.org!news.uzoreto.com!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!fx09.ams1.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: David Brooks
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <_PudnTf49fSLx3_DnZ2dnUU7-L_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
<0001HW.249296C9021FADC9700000C092CF@news.giganews.com>
From: nom...@afrayed.org (David Brooks)
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.249296C9021FADC9700000C092CF@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vpYSK.183394$9f26.55117@fx09.ams1>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@blocknews.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 09:03:23 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 10:03:22 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 1597

by: David Brooks - Sat, 10 Sep 2022 09:03 UTC

On 11/06/2020 17:43, Savageduck wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2020, WM338 wrote
> (in article<_PudnTf49fSLx3_DnZ2dnUU7-L_NnZ2d@giganews.com>):
>
>> Over the past few months I've noticed this thread concerning the subject and my comment is:
>> Don't you folks have something better to do than waste countless hours on this guy? Either take legal action or just ignore him.
>> Get.A.Life.
>
> I kill-file/filter David brooks, and his many nym variations. My filters also include killing cross posts to *alt.computer.workshop* which he has hijacked, and adds to legitimate threads he feels like hijacking. That alone adds to the noise pollution in NGs where his garbage is OT. I also kill any responses to threads which originate from him.

*WHY* do you do so, Leonard?

Do tell!

--
David

"Don't think; let the machine do it for you!" -- E. C. Berkeley

tech / rec.photo.digital / Re: David Brooks