Physfitfreak wrote:
>
> On 12/3/2023 4:21 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> >
> > ...where is the "HAHAHAHA"?
> >
>
> You don't know where the HAHAHAHA is?
>
> Check Vulva's vulva; you'll find a folded piece of paper stuck inside.
> You'll pull it out. You'll get your eyeglasses sit tight, then you'll
> unfold it and read the following script on it:
>
> " - Go to Göbekli Tepe, Turkey.
> - Go to the rainwater harvesting system built by those neolithic men
> - Urinate into only the first such grooves carved into stone
> - Follow it, see where your urine moving through the grove stops
> - You'll see a hole there in the stone, about your finger's diameter
> - Get one of your eyes close to its opening and try seeing inside
> - Nothing seen? Stick your middle finger of your left hand inside
> - Nothing felt? Put your ear on the opening
> - You'll hear, "ZABANG!" as if someone farted
> - Then you'll hear, "HAHAHAHA!"
>
> - My name is Alan Folmsbee "
>
> And that's where the HAHAHAHA is.
>
> Fold the paper back and put it inside the vulva of Vulva. And come back
> to sci.physics. Well done.

You're barking up the wrong tree...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Physfitfreak wrote:

> On 12/3/2023 5:25 AM, Renato Tsval Dobrushkin wrote:
>> USA, thus NATO, is like e𝘃𝗶𝗹 𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. I was again
>> convinced of this after Irak and Libya.
>
> Which means, you were too dumb to get convinced of that decades earlier.

you are 𝗮𝗻_𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗹.

On 12/3/2023 5:21 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 12/3/2023 12:01 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/2/2023 9:59 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/2/2023 2:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2023 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2023 3:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/25/2023 3:31 PM, Baldemar Baburkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Piss off Hanson.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> where did you get the idea dat dis guy name is Hanson?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By detecting the same character in him. And some of the same idiotic
>>>>>>>>>> terminologies. He thinks he's smart.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> are you sayin that there is someone posting on usenet with the
>>>>>>>>> handle...Hanson?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You don't remember the garbage he was posting?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking for garbage in these newsgroups is like searching for a needle
>>>>>>> in a haystack of needles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The French guy????
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He posted under the nickname "Hanson." All garbage stuff, just to troll
>>>>>> others. Did it for at least two decades!
>>>>>
>>>>> isn't he dead?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope he was, but I'm afraid not. Pests are never welcome. So he at
>>>> last learned something (took 20 years for him) and stopped being a
>>>> Hanson anymore, but reappeared now in this role that you see. Making
>>>> sure everybody gets his messages by automatically changing his nickname,
>>>> and at the same time giving the bullshit he posts as legitimate reasons
>>>> to be around and post. In other words, he's still a pest.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, but I think you are mistaken. That is not Hanson M.O.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hanson would never 'automatically changing his nickname', Hanson is not
>>> a Coward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He doesn't change his nicknames for the purpose of staying hidden, he
>> changes them to escape the kill-files. He wants his sick menace to reach
>> everyone in the newsgroups that he posts. The guy's Hanson :) The
>> "HAHAHAHA" guy. Loser then, loser now.
>
> Not only that the poster doesn't have the same MO, he doesn't have the
> same fingerprint, style, personality...
> ...where is the "HAHAHAHA"?
>
The nymshifter troll isn't Hanson. The nymshifter is a russian
agent/apologist/propagandist, and has been posting here for at least a
decade. Hanson was just a kook who stalked Bert and had a recognizable
posting style. The nymshifter has been posting at the same time as the
real Hanson, too, before Hanson left. The nymshifter tries to cause
trouble by posting disinformation, about the Trump election, Covid, the
Jan 6 riot, Covid again, and I knew nazified 卐ru⚡︎⚡︎ia卐 was going to
attack Ukraine since it switched to anti-Ukraine propaganda a month or
two before Feb 24 2022 and it has been posting 卐ru⚡︎⚡︎ian卐 propaganda
since.

Volney wrote:

> On 12/3/2023 5:21 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>> Not only that the poster doesn't have the same MO, he doesn't have the
>> same fingerprint, style, personality... ...where is the "HAHAHAHA"?
>>
> T̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ t̶r̶o̶l̶l̶ i̶s̶n̶'t̶ H̶a̶n̶s̶o̶n̶. T̶h̶e̶ n̶y̶m̶s̶h̶i̶f̶t̶e̶r̶ i̶s̶ a̶ r̶u̶s̶s̶i̶a̶n̶

most likely you are a member of the {𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲}. A 𝗦𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 with 𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹_𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽.
Since that, go back to Poland. You just killed millions of people in
𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻_𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮, misnamed "ukurina". You disgusting dirty prick.

𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀_𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱_𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺_𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗿𝘀,_𝘃𝗶𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀_𝗮𝗻𝗱_𝗵𝘆𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀_(𝗠𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘄_23)

𝗘𝗻𝗱𝗴𝗮𝗺𝗲:_𝗛𝗼𝘄_𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲_𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸_𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿_𝗶𝘁𝘀_𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁?
It's all over bar the shouting for Zelensky and his followers, so what
will be the reaction in Kiev and beyond?
https://r%74.com/russia/588284-darkening-prospects-ukraine-postwar/

It was never not even about 𝗳𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮. It was solely based on 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆
𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴.

The former Ukraine was a nation gone mad, much 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗡𝗮𝘇𝗶 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆. With no
prospect for victory Ukraine had no chance to prevail against Russia. It
was simply a matter of time before Russia intervened 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝗻𝗯𝗮𝘀 from
the 𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝗰𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀. F with Russia and pay the price. No sympathy for
the former Ukraine. The only sane ones were 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝗳𝘁, by t𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀.

What Ukraine? 𝗪𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮 and 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 you mean..? Spot on

I agree with Stoltenberg that this victory of Russia is a humiliating
defeat of US-UK-NATO-Nazis.

On 12/2/2023 2:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>> On 11/26/2023 4:09 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/2023 3:30 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>>>>> Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/25/2023 3:31 PM, Baldemar Baburkin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Piss off Hanson.
>>>>>
>>>>> where did you get the idea dat dis guy name is Hanson?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By detecting the same character in him. And some of the same idiotic
>>>> terminologies. He thinks he's smart.
>>>
>>> are you sayin that there is someone posting on usenet with the
>>> handle...Hanson?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You don't remember the garbage he was posting?
>
>
>
> Looking for garbage in these newsgroups is like searching for a needle
> in a haystack of needles.
>
>
> The French guy????
>
>

I don't know what nationality he had. He was very good in German and
could even detect different dialects of it. I deliberately responded
once to him in Swiss German, and he right away narrowed it even to the
city in which they speak like that!.. :) He was pretty good in English
as well. And he knew something in chemistry and physics.

But he was a pest in sci.physics, just as he is now.

On Friday, 1 December 2023 at 13:20:14 UTC+1, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> Den 30.11.2023 21:12, skrev patdolan:
> >> On Wednesday, 29 November 2023 at 22:51:11 UTC+1, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> >>> Den 28.11.2023 20:53, skrev patdolan:
> >>>> On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 2:38:09 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Second challenge:
> >>>>> A long heavy pendulum is hanging under the ISS.
> >>>>> A stable situation is that the pendulum is always
> >>>>> pointing towards the centre of the Earth.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which forces are acting on the pendulum mass?
>
> >>>
> >>>> Neither the sun's gravitational field nor the earth's gravitational field exerts a force on the pendulum you discribe. Because the pendulum is in free fall around both. Only Mach's mysterious trans-universe space-brace field acts on the pendulum and the ISS gyroscope.
>
> >>> According to Newton:
> >>>
> >>> The gravitational force on any object with mass m is
> >>> always GMm/r² pointing towards the centre of the Earth.
> >>> If the object is free falling, the gravitational
> >>> (coordinate) acceleration will be GM/r², pointing
> >>> towards the centre of the Earth.
> >>>
> >>> The CG of ISS + pendulum is moving in circular orbit,
> >>> which means that the acceleration is perpendicular to
> >>> the velocity, so the acceleration ω²⋅r₀ is the centripetal
> >>> acceleration which make the ISS move in circular orbit.
> >>> The centripetal acceleration is equal to the gravitational
> >>> acceleration:
> >>> ω²⋅r₀ = GM/r₀² (1)
> >>> where ω is the angular velocity off the ISS, and r₀ is the
> >>> distance from the CG of ISS+pendulum to the centre of the Earth.
> >>>
> >>> Equation (1) say that an object with angular velocity ω
> >>> must have a distance from the centre of the Earth:
> >>> r₀ = ∛(GM/ω²) to make the centripetal acceleration equal
> >>> to the gravitational acceleration.
> >>>
> >>> The pendulum mass m is not free falling because:
> >>>
> >>> Its distance to the centre of the Earth is:
> >>> r₁ = r₀-L where L is the length of the pendulum.
> >>> So r₁ < r₀, but the angular velocity of m is the same ω,
> >>> and r₁ < ∛(GM/ω²), which means that:
> >>> ω²⋅r₁ < GM/r₁² (2)
> >>> The centripetal acceleration is smaller than the gravitational
> >>> acceleration, so the force the string is acting on
> >>> the pendulum mass is F₁ = m⋅(GM/r₁²-ω²⋅r₁)
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> An interesting point is that you could have a pendulum
> >>> on the other side of the ISS, pointing outwards from the
> >>> centre of the Earth.
> >>> The force the string is acting on the mass m is:
> >>> F₂ = m⋅(ω²⋅r₂-GM/r₂²)
> >>>
> >>> F₁ and F₂ are called tidal forces.
> >>> (It's a tidal bulge on both sides of the Earth)
> No comment, Pat?
>
> You claimed that there were no forces on the pendulum.
> I showed you that you could have a pendulum on both
> sides of the ISS, and the pendulum strings will exert
> forces on the pendulum masses, acting towards the ISS.
>
> And GR predicts the same!

Learn your Shit, poor halfbrain. No, it doesn't.
It predicts no force.