On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 6:53:07 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
> On 10/27/23 3:59 PM, George Hammond wrote:
> > [... lots of nonsense omitted]
> > Don't tell me there isn't ONE SINGLE SCIENTIST
> > on SPR who could say ANYTHING INTELLIGENT
> > about this HISTORIC DISCOVERY !
> The only intelligent thing possible to say is that it is all complete
> and utter nonsense.
>
> Tom Roberts
138
138 –[George Hammond MS Physics
138 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[Tom Roberts] said: –
"The only intelligent thing possible to say
is that it (your post) is all complete and
utter nonsense."
..
[Geo. Hammond] says: –
What's wrong now Tom? – something wrong
with my high handed oversimplified
DEFINITION of an EIGENVECTOR?: –
..
[To wit]: –
"Every real symmetric matrix represents an
ELLIPSOID – the symmetry axes of this
ellipsoid are called "THE EIGENVECTORS"
..
Are you going to point out that I didn't mention
that all the EIGENVALUES have to be positive?
..
Sheesh – I'd like to hear YOUR – "15 word
definition of an eigenvector"
..
Like I said before – I'm not here to discuss
PICAYUNE mathematical points –
..
I'm here because I discovered that OUR academic
PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT has discovered
(and experimentally proven) the –
WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
and THEY DON'T EVEN REALIZE IT !!!
..
If you think that's "NONSENSE" – then
you're just playing a SIMPLETON !
BECAUSE at least 5 billion other human beings
on this planet ARE VERY INTERESTED !
And that's not to mention Richard Dawkins –
for instance !
..
George
..

On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
>
> > THIS IS NOT A JOKE
> Actually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
>
> > THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
>
> No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
> .
> > UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
>
> There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.
3232
3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
..
Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
7000 different spoken names for "God" –
– to which you replied: –
..
[Paul Alsing] replied: –
"George... do you just make t
his stuff up as you go along?
Only one god with 7000 names?
It sure looks like you do, to me!
..
[Geo. Hammond] –
And your reply leaves me wondering
whether "simple logic" is perhaps
beyond your comprehension?
..... I mean: –,
..
(7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
..
or is that mathematical calculation
beyond your comprehension?
..
George
..

On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 9:28:32 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> >
> > > THIS IS NOT A JOKE
> > Actually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
> >
> > > THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
> >
> > No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
> > .
> > > UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
> >
> > There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.
> 3232
> 3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
> 3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
> .
> Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
> that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
> and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
> 7000 different spoken names for "God" –
> – to which you replied: –
> .
> [Paul Alsing] replied: –
> "George... do you just make t
> his stuff up as you go along?
> Only one god with 7000 names?
> It sure looks like you do, to me!
> .
> [Geo. Hammond] –
> And your reply leaves me wondering
> whether "simple logic" is perhaps
> beyond your comprehension?
> .... I mean: –,
> .
> (7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
> .
> or is that mathematical calculation
> beyond your comprehension?
> .
> George

You are assuming, George, without a shred of evidence, that there is only one god... and in science, evidence rules. Got any?

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 12:47:54 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 9:28:32 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > > THIS IS NOT A JOKE
> > > Actually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
> > >
> > > > THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
> > >
> > > No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
> > > .
> > > > UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
> > >
> > > There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.
> > 3232
> > 3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
> > 3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
> > .
> > Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
> > that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
> > and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
> > 7000 different spoken names for "God" –
> > – to which you replied: –
> > .
> > [Paul Alsing] replied: –
> > "George... do you just make t
> > his stuff up as you go along?
> > Only one god with 7000 names?
> > It sure looks like you do, to me!
> > .
> > [Geo. Hammond] –
> > And your reply leaves me wondering
> > whether "simple logic" is perhaps
> > beyond your comprehension?
> > .... I mean: –,
> > .
> > (7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
> > .
> > or is that mathematical calculation
> > beyond your comprehension?
> > .
> > George
> You are assuming, George, without a shred of evidence, that there is only one god... and in science, evidence rules. Got any?
3335
3335 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
3335 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[Paul Alsing] said on Oct 27, 2023, 4:59:41 PM (yesterday) : –
"You are assuming, George,
without a shred of evidence,
that there is only one god...
and in science,
evidence rules. Got any?"
..
For Chrissakes PAUL – I have repeated over and over
IN DOZENS OF POSTS that: – HERE IS THE EVIDENCE –
..
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
For the last 50 years a worldwide PhD Army of Academic
"Psychometrists" has spent $50 million testing people
in 20 countries and measuring the "EIGENVECTOR
PYRAMID of Personality Structure using multitudinous
written personality questionnaires – from which they
formed "real symmetric correlation matrices" and extracted
THE EIGENVECTORS!
..
THEY DISCOVERED: –
1 – about 30 low level Eigenvectors
2 – Exactly 13 – 2nd order Eigenvectors
3 – Exactly 4 – 3rd order Eigenvectors
4 – Exactly ONE 4th order Eigenvector (dubbed the "GFP")
.......... (which turns out to be the GOD of the Bible).
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ALL OF THIS EVIDENCE HAS BEEN PEER – PUBLISHED
AND IS LARGE ENOUGH TO FILL A MAJOR LIBRARY
.............. STOP SAYING
............ THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
There is enough peer published evidence
to sink a BATTLESHIP
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
Psychology had NO IDEA what these eigenvectors
were until a PHYSICIST named HAMMOND
told him what they are – and where they COME FROM!
..
HAMMOND showed them that the CUBIC CLEAVAGE of
the BRAIN caused a CUBIC STRUCTURE in the 13
2nd order Eigenvectors because a cube has
13 SYMMETRY AXES ! Peer published here –
..
ELSESVIER
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0732118X94901058
..
AND THE EVIDENCE IS CLEARLY CITED BY ME
in the 50 citations at the end of that paper !
..
These 13 2nd order eigenvectors turn out to be
the "12 Olympian gods" of antiquity
..
Furthermore the 4 3rd order eigenvectors turn out
to be the Matthew Mark Luke and John personalities
of the King James Bible
..
So that CLEARLY any idiot can see that the SINGLE,
LONE, TOP EIGENVECTOR MUST BE the
GOD OF THE BIBLE – hence we have the world's first
EXPERIMENTALLY PROVEN scientific proof of God!.
..
Of course ELSESVIER will charge you $75
for a copy of the paper – so for your convenience
I have posted an EXACT COPY of the paper
on my website – which you can read for FREE: –
..
https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray
..
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
STOP SAYING THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
............THAT'S A DELIBERATELY CONCOCTED LIE
..
George
..

On Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 12:47:54 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
> On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 9:28:32 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > > THIS IS NOT A JOKE
> > > Actually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
> > >
> > > > THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
> > >
> > > No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
> > > .
> > > > UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
> > >
> > > There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.
> > 3232
> > 3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
> > 3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
> > .
> > Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
> > that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
> > and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
> > 7000 different spoken names for "God" –
> > – to which you replied: –
> > .
> > [Paul Alsing] replied: –
> > "George... do you just make t
> > his stuff up as you go along?
> > Only one god with 7000 names?
> > It sure looks like you do, to me!
> > .
> > [Geo. Hammond] –
> > And your reply leaves me wondering
> > whether "simple logic" is perhaps
> > beyond your comprehension?
> > .... I mean: –,
> > .
> > (7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
> > .
> > or is that mathematical calculation
> > beyond your comprehension?
> > .
> > George
> You are assuming, George, without a shred of evidence, that there is only one god... and in science, evidence rules. Got any?
3336
3336 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
3336 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[Paul Alsing] said on Oct 27, 2023, 4:59:41 PM (yesterday) : –
"You are assuming, George,
without a shred of evidence,
that there is only one god...
and in science,
evidence rules. Got any?"
..
[Geo. Hammond MS physics]
I'VE POINTED OUT THE EVIDENCE TO YOU
in my previous post, and that it is large enough
to fill a major library !
..
MEANWHILE –.
..
I've found out that : –
Dr. Paul M. Alsing is a Senior Research Physicist
with an Air Force Research Laboratory
at Wright-Patterson AFB in Ohio.
..
SO I KNOW WHO YOU ARE !
..
Thank God you're associated with the "Military"
which testifies to your sober mindedness and
essential practicality !!
..
LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING, PAUL: –
..
When Watson, Crick, Franklin, and Linus Pauling
stumbled on the DOUBLE HELIX in 1953 no one
believed them anymore than they believe HAMMOND
TODAY !
..
WAKE UP PAUL – Hammond and Alsing could
EASILY be the next "Watson and Crick" !
..
Hammond's Scientific Proof of God is
ANOTHER "Double Helix" type of discovery,
and a couple of characters like Hammond and Alsing
are VERY LIKELY to be the next "Watson and Crick" !
..
PLEASE GET BACK TO ME –
..
SAY ANYTHING INTELLIGENT – or SCIENTIFIC –
– A N Y T H I N G – wake up Paul –
..
HISTORY IS SCREAMING AT THE DOOR –
..
George
..

On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 7:01:43 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:26:13 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 1:08:34 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > ~
> > > > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > > > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > > > .
> > > > Research Note: 9-7-23
> > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > THE HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
> > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > .
> > > > The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
> > > > as the "Hammond God metric": –
> > > > .
> > > > ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> > > > .
> > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > What is a?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jan
> > ~
> > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > .
> > |a² o o o. |
> > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > |o o a² o. | ......(a.k.a. "HOBBIT METRIC)
> > |ooo-1/a²|
> > .
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > [JanPB] asked: –
> > "What matter distribution does this describe?"
> > "What is a?"
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > .
> > [George]
> > There IS NO "matter" in this space-time!
> But there is. Assuming I did my calculations correctly,
> the energy density is nonzero unless a is constant
> (in which case this is the flat Minkowski geometry).
> Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
>
> T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2
>
> (units of G = c = 1).
> > This spacetime is a "MASSLESS IMAGE"
> > (a PICTURE of the universe) which exists only in
> > the human mind (in the brain somewhere).
> Can't be, see above.
>
> --
> Jan
999
999 –[George Hammond MS physics]
999 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[GH]: –
Hi JanPB – on September 8, 2023 you posted the
following message: –
"Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2"
..
[GH]: – to which I replied that "Tuv=0" because there is no
"mass, momentum, or energy" in "Subjective Space-Time"
..
[GH]: – Upon further investigation, it turns out that: –
"YOU may be RIGHT, and I may be WRONG" about this !
..
[GH]: – It has occurred to me lately, that the "Friedmann
Expansion" term a(t) may in fact cause "GRAVITY" to exist
in Subjective Spacetime even though the space-time
mass density = 0 – – – a fact which you apparently
realized in your equation cited above !
...... Apparently, the existence of the "Friedman Expansion"
term a=a(t), causes a "curvature" in subjective space-time,
and as Einstein tells us – "if a space-time is curved" it means
that there is GRAVITY in the space-time !! Certainly this is
the case in the famous FLRW where the Friedman expansion
term causes a gravitational effect !
..
[GH]: – THEREFORE I am tending to agree with you that
Tuv is NOT equal to zero in this case as I had assumed !
..
[GH]: – Now, Einstein's equation is: Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
..
And as you know I have given guv in this case as: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
, Meanwhile a MAXIMA computer program calculates the Ricci
tensor Ruv for this metric to be: –
..
|3a.² o o o. |
|o 3a.² o o. | = Ruv = Ricci tensor for the Hobbit Metric
|o o 3a.² o. |
|o o o 3a.² |
..
--------------------------------------------------------
Where a.=da/dt,
and I have ignored terms involving a..=d²a/dt² .
--------------------------------------------------------
..... And meanwhile likewise ignoring (a..) terms the
Scalar Curvature R for the Hobbit Metric is given by
MAXIMA (computer program) to be: –
..
R = 12 a.² (Scalar Curvature for the Hobbit Metric)
..
So now we are in a position to write the
Einstein field equations which are

Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv – which becomes the
..
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (FOG): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = Field Equations of God (FOG)
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1-2/a²)|
..
Which tells us that not only the energy term (T44) of the
stress – energy tensor is nonzero – but the 3 diagonal
"pressure" terms are also nonzero !
..
NOW ONCE AGAIN: – we have to remind anyone
reading this, that there IS NO mass, energy, momentum,
pressure, etc. etc. in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" !
Because "subjective spacetime" is only our "mental image"
of "real" space-time, that we see when we wake up in the
morning and open our eyes. Subjective Space-Time is
only an "image" – a "mental picture" of actual physical
reality. Therefore there is only a "picture of mass" and a
"picture of momentum" and a "picture of pressure"
and it is this mere "picture" of reality that is actually
undergoing a "Friedmann expansion" (a=a(t)) which
gives us a "picture of curvature" and therefore a
"picture of gravity" – there is no actual real "gravity"
in the mental picture of reality that is in our head !
..
Okay – as I've said many times before "God is entirely
Psychological" – it is a property of the human brain
(incomplete brain growth) – but NOW HOWEVER we
see that the "FOG Equations" demonstrate that the
phenomenon of God can be traced directly to the
actual field equations of physical variables! So "God"
so called is not only a property of the human brain,
it is a property of the material physical universe –
which should not surprise us since the brain itself
is a material property of the universe.
..
Meanwhile, JanPB – if you see any mistakes in my
arithmetic above – please let me know – and you remain
the ONLY PERSON ON RECORD who has ever made
a correction to this theory, (Tuv does not = 0) !
..
George

On Saturday, November 18, 2023 at 10:22:51 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 7:01:43 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:26:13 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 1:08:34 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > ~
> > > > > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > > > > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > > > > .
> > > > > Research Note: 9-7-23
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > THE HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > > > The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
> > > > > as the "Hammond God metric": –
> > > > > .
> > > > > ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
> > > > > .
> > > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > > What is a?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jan
> > > ~
> > > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > > .
> > > |a² o o o. |
> > > |o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > |o o a² o. | ......(a.k.a. "HOBBIT METRIC)
> > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > .
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > [JanPB] asked: –
> > > "What matter distribution does this describe?"
> > > "What is a?"
> > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > .
> > > [George]
> > > There IS NO "matter" in this space-time!
> > But there is. Assuming I did my calculations correctly,
> > the energy density is nonzero unless a is constant
> > (in which case this is the flat Minkowski geometry).
> > Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
> >
> > T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2
> >
> > (units of G = c = 1).
> > > This spacetime is a "MASSLESS IMAGE"
> > > (a PICTURE of the universe) which exists only in
> > > the human mind (in the brain somewhere).
> > Can't be, see above.
> >
> > --
> > Jan
> 999
> 999 –[George Hammond MS physics]
> 999 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> .
> [GH]: –
> Hi JanPB – on September 8, 2023 you posted the
> following message: –
> "Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
> T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2"
> .
> [GH]: – to which I replied that "Tuv=0" because there is no
> "mass, momentum, or energy" in "Subjective Space-Time"
> .
> [GH]: – Upon further investigation, it turns out that: –
> "YOU may be RIGHT, and I may be WRONG" about this !
> .
> [GH]: – It has occurred to me lately, that the "Friedmann
> Expansion" term a(t) may in fact cause "GRAVITY" to exist
> in Subjective Spacetime even though the space-time
> mass density = 0 – – – a fact which you apparently
> realized in your equation cited above !
> ..... Apparently, the existence of the "Friedman Expansion"
> term a=a(t), causes a "curvature" in subjective space-time,
> and as Einstein tells us – "if a space-time is curved" it means
> that there is GRAVITY in the space-time !! Certainly this is
> the case in the famous FLRW where the Friedman expansion
> term causes a gravitational effect !
> .
> [GH]: – THEREFORE I am tending to agree with you that
> Tuv is NOT equal to zero in this case as I had assumed !
> .
> [GH]: – Now, Einstein's equation is: Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
> .
> And as you know I have given guv in this case as: –
> .
> |a² o o o. |
> |o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
> |o o a² o. |
> |ooo-1/a²|
> ,
> Meanwhile a MAXIMA computer program calculates the Ricci
> tensor Ruv for this metric to be: –
> .
> |3a.² o o o. |
> |o 3a.² o o. | = Ruv = Ricci tensor for the Hobbit Metric
> |o o 3a.² o. |
> |o o o 3a.² |
> .
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Where a.=da/dt,
> and I have ignored terms involving a..=d²a/dt² .
> --------------------------------------------------------
> .... And meanwhile likewise ignoring (a..) terms the
> Scalar Curvature R for the Hobbit Metric is given by
> MAXIMA (computer program) to be: –
> .
> R = 12 a.² (Scalar Curvature for the Hobbit Metric)
> .
> So now we are in a position to write the
> Einstein field equations which are
>
> Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv – which becomes the
> .
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (FOG): –
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> .
> |(1-2a²) o o o. |
> |o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = Field Equations of God (FOG)
> |o o (1-2a²) o. |
> |o o o (1-2/a²)|
> .
> Which tells us that not only the energy term (T44) of the
> stress – energy tensor is nonzero – but the 3 diagonal
> "pressure" terms are also nonzero !
> .
> NOW ONCE AGAIN: – we have to remind anyone
> reading this, that there IS NO mass, energy, momentum,
> pressure, etc. etc. in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" !
> Because "subjective spacetime" is only our "mental image"
> of "real" space-time, that we see when we wake up in the
> morning and open our eyes. Subjective Space-Time is
> only an "image" – a "mental picture" of actual physical
> reality. Therefore there is only a "picture of mass" and a
> "picture of momentum" and a "picture of pressure"
> and it is this mere "picture" of reality that is actually
> undergoing a "Friedmann expansion" (a=a(t)) which
> gives us a "picture of curvature" and therefore a
> "picture of gravity" – there is no actual real "gravity"
> in the mental picture of reality that is in our head !
> .
> Okay – as I've said many times before "God is entirely
> Psychological" – it is a property of the human brain
> (incomplete brain growth) – but NOW HOWEVER we
> see that the "FOG Equations" demonstrate that the
> phenomenon of God can be traced directly to the
> actual field equations of physical variables! So "God"
> so called is not only a property of the human brain,
> it is a property of the material physical universe –
> which should not surprise us since the brain itself
> is a material property of the universe.
> .
> Meanwhile, JanPB – if you see any mistakes in my
> arithmetic above – please let me know – and you remain
> the ONLY PERSON ON RECORD who has ever made
> a correction to this theory, (Tuv does not = 0) !
> .
> George
9991
9991 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9991 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[GH] –
there is a typographical sign error in the
"FOG Equation" –
..
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (FOG): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = Field Equations of God (FOG)
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1-2/a²)|
..
T44 should read (1+2/a² )
apparently a transcription error
..
George

George Hammond wrote:

> |3a.² o o o. |
> |o 3a.² o o. | = Ruv = Ricci tensor for the Hobbit Metric
> |o o 3a.² o. |
> |o o o 3a.² |
> Where a.=da/dt,

amazing, yet another 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗻, not undrestanding tensors. He thinks
that's a time dependent 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝘅. What a 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗱_𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 moved to america. You
are a 𝗦𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆 not a Hammond.

𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗻_𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀_𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴_𝗨𝗸𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻_𝗮𝗿𝗺𝘆_–_𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗿
Fresh troops who arrive to fight for Kiev often say they did not realize
how bad the situation is, Lieutenant Dmitry Kostyuk said
https://r%74.com/russia/587592-foreign-mercenaries-abandon-ukraine/

𝗦𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱_𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵_𝗼𝗳_𝗦𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗫_𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁_𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀_𝗶𝗻_𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻_(𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗢)_𝗹𝗼𝗹
https://r%74.com/news/587590-spacex-starship-launch-explosion/

George H̶a̶m̶m̶o̶n̶d̶ wrote:

> |(1-2à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²) ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. |
> |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ (1-2à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²) ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. | (3à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽.²) = k Tuv = F̶i̶e̶l̶d̶ E̶q̶u̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ o̶f̶ G̶o̶d̶ (F̶O̶G̶)
> |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ (1-2à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²) ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕. |
> |ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕ (1-2/à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽²) |
> .
> Ṫ̸̡̤̉̐̽44 s̸̗͙̤͍̩̤͍͍̝̖̃̐̽̌̕h̷͓̗̜͚̤̣͉̦̐̈͊͗͒̓͋̑͆̕ỏ̵̝̫̹̱̲̻̗͉̓͒͘̕u̸̲͓̫̙̘͉̾̈̎̇̃̽̍̃͝͝l̷̡̧̢̙͈͍͈͈̉̄͋̔̉̆͝ḑ̶̙͇̰̗̦̠̽ r̸̡̹͚̣͔͍̮̩͌͐͝e̵̢͕͕̯̱̥͔̎̋̂̎͐̅͐̂͝à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽ḑ̶̙͇̰̗̦̠̽ (1+2/à̶̜̲̈́͂̓̎͗̽² )

yet another matrix, he thinks is tensor. You are a 𝗦𝗺𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗸𝘆, not a Hammond.

𝗡𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗮𝗵𝘂_𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘀_𝗨.𝗦._𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵_‘𝗡𝗲𝘄_9/11’_𝗶𝗳_𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹_𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁_𝗚𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻_𝗨𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹_𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁, lol
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/netanyahu-threatens-u-s-with-new-9-11-if-israel-isnt-given-unconditional-support/

On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > ~
> > > > > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > > > > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > > > > .
> > > > > Research Note: 9-7-23
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?)
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > > > The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
> > > > > as the "Hammond God metric": –
> > > > > .
> > > > > ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
> > > > > .
> > > > > |a? o o o. |
> > > > > |o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > > > |o o a? o. |
> > > > > |ooo-1/a?|
> > > >
> > > > What matter distribution does this describe?
> > >
> > > Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
> > > with an inconvenient choice of units,
> >
> > Yes, assuming "a" is constant.
> What else?
> > That's the question :-)
> If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
> to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
>
> Jan
999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
..
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
..
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
..
..... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
universal mathematical laws of physics !
..... This gives some justification for the position of some
Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
..
...... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
..
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
..
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
..
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
..
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
..
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
..
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
..
George
..

On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:35:21 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > > On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > > > > > JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > > > > > > > JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > ~
> > > > > > > > > > > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > > > > > > > > > > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > Research Note: 9-7-23
> > > > > > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > > > > > THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?)
> > > > > > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
> > > > > > > > > > > as the "Hammond God metric": –
> > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
> > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > |a? o o o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > |o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > > > > > > > > > |o o a? o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > |ooo-1/a?|
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What matter distribution does this describe?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
> > > > > > > > > with an inconvenient choice of units,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes, assuming "a" is constant.
> > > > > > > What else?
> > > > > > > > That's the question :-)
> > > > > > > If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
> > > > > > > to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jan
> > > > > > 999 2
> > > > > > 999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > > 999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > [JanPB] wrote:-
> > > > > > "So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
> > > > > > are made of physical matter)".
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > [GH] says –
> > > > > > Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
> > > > > > laws of Physics, themselves !
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > .... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
> > > > > > a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
> > > > > > universal mathematical laws of physics !
> > > > > > .... This gives some justification for the position of some
> > > > > > Theologians who believe that there is an
> > > > > > "Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > ..... A result that I certainly never thought
> > > > > > that I would ever Theoretically justify !
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
> > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > |(1-2a²) o o o. |
> > > > > > |o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
> > > > > > |o o (1-2a²) o. |
> > > > > > |o o o (1+2/a²)|
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Which I have computed for the
> > > > > > HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
> > > > > > using the MAXIMA computer program
> > > > > > (see my previous 2 posts above)
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > George
> > > > > > .
> > > > > 9993
> > > > > 9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > 9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> > > > > .
> > > > > [GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
> > > > > .
> > > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > > |o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
> > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > > > .
> > > > > into Einstein's field equations which are: –
> > > > > .
> > > > > Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
> > > > > .
> > > > > And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
> > > > > tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
> > > > > (Field Equation of God) –
> > > > > .
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
> > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > .
> > > > > |(1-2a²) o o o. |
> > > > > |o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
> > > > > |o o (1-2a²) o. |
> > > > > |o o o(1+2/a²)|
> > > > > ..
> > > > > AND THE QUESTION IS: –
> > > > > – WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
> > > > > .
> > > > > And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
> > > > > and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
> > > > > .
> > > > > In the first place – we know there is –
> > > > > NO energy,
> > > > > NO momentum,
> > > > > and NO mass
> > > > > in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
> > > > > is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
> > > > > the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
> > > > > as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
> > > > > clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
> > > > > .
> > > > > HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
> > > > > "Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
> > > > > Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
> > > > > under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
> > > > > causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
> > > > > – and Einstein says that a space-time that has
> > > > > "curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
> > > > > that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
> > > > > expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
> > > > > that "objective space-time" does ??
> > > > > .
> > > > > Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
> > > > > Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
> > > > > describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
> > > > > .
> > > > > Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
> > > > > is theoretically VALID ?
> > > > > .
> > > > > IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
> > > > > I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
> > > > > .
> > > > > George
> > > > > .
> > > > 3?
> > > > 3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > 3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> > > > .
> > > > Dear Jeffrey Rubard
> > > > (alt.philosophy.debate)
> > > > .
> > > > https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
> > > > .
> > > > Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
> > > > at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
> > > > in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
> > > > .
> > > > We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
> > > > same audience, from the same podium, for
> > > > half an hour!
> > > > .
> > > > We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
> > > > chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
> > > > was chairman of the symposium.
> > > > .
> > > > Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
> > > > with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a
> > > > "crackpot" as you have alleged ?
> > > > .
> > > > George
> > > > .
> > > "Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit
> > "Well, he was a psychologist..."
> > As was B.F. Skinner.
> > "Got you there."
> > No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
> "Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could..."
> Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'..
> Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
> nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
> Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
666
666 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA\
..
[GH] –
HEY RHUBARB – your last post is recognizably
incoherent – and I'm wondering: – are you
possibly psychotic or mentally retarded?
..
John Rawls has been dead for 20 years,
which means you're over 40, if you say you
knew him professionally?.
..
Bear in mind I'm over 80.
..
Just as a short test to see how smart you really
are – answer this simple question for me: –
..
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
What is your definition of "God" ?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
If you can't muster a definition, just say so
..
BTW: – My definition of God is: –
..
HAMMOND DEFINITION of GOD
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of SUBJECTIVE space-time which is
measurable to 2 decimal point accuracy.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
..
George
..

On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 5:02:15 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 9:47:23 AM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
> > On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:35:21 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > > On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > > On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > > > On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J.. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > > > > > > > JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ~
> > > > > > > > > > > > > George E Hammond MS Physics
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Research Note: 9-7-23
> > > > > > > > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > > > > > > > THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the "Hammond God metric": –
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > |a? o o o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > |o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
> > > > > > > > > > > > > |o o a? o. |
> > > > > > > > > > > > > |ooo-1/a?|
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What matter distribution does this describe?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
> > > > > > > > > > > with an inconvenient choice of units,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yes, assuming "a" is constant.
> > > > > > > > > What else?
> > > > > > > > > > That's the question :-)
> > > > > > > > > If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
> > > > > > > > > to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jan
> > > > > > > > 999 2
> > > > > > > > 999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > > > > 999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > [JanPB] wrote:-
> > > > > > > > "So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
> > > > > > > > are made of physical matter)".
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > [GH] says –
> > > > > > > > Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
> > > > > > > > laws of Physics, themselves !
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > .... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
> > > > > > > > a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
> > > > > > > > universal mathematical laws of physics !
> > > > > > > > .... This gives some justification for the position of some
> > > > > > > > Theologians who believe that there is an
> > > > > > > > "Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > ..... A result that I certainly never thought
> > > > > > > > that I would ever Theoretically justify !
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > > FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
> > > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > |(1-2a²) o o o. |
> > > > > > > > |o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
> > > > > > > > |o o (1-2a²) o. |
> > > > > > > > |o o o (1+2/a²)|
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > Which I have computed for the
> > > > > > > > HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
> > > > > > > > using the MAXIMA computer program
> > > > > > > > (see my previous 2 posts above)
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > George
> > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > 9993
> > > > > > > 9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > > > 9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > [GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > |a² o o o. |
> > > > > > > |o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
> > > > > > > |o o a² o. |
> > > > > > > |ooo-1/a²|
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > into Einstein's field equations which are: –
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
> > > > > > > tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
> > > > > > > (Field Equation of God) –
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
> > > > > > > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > |(1-2a²) o o o. |
> > > > > > > |o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
> > > > > > > |o o (1-2a²) o. |
> > > > > > > |o o o(1+2/a²)|
> > > > > > > ..
> > > > > > > AND THE QUESTION IS: –
> > > > > > > – WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
> > > > > > > and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > In the first place – we know there is –
> > > > > > > NO energy,
> > > > > > > NO momentum,
> > > > > > > and NO mass
> > > > > > > in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
> > > > > > > is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
> > > > > > > the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
> > > > > > > as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
> > > > > > > clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
> > > > > > > "Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
> > > > > > > Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
> > > > > > > under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
> > > > > > > causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
> > > > > > > – and Einstein says that a space-time that has
> > > > > > > "curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
> > > > > > > that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
> > > > > > > expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
> > > > > > > that "objective space-time" does ??
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
> > > > > > > Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
> > > > > > > describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
> > > > > > > is theoretically VALID ?
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
> > > > > > > I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > George
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > 3?
> > > > > > 3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
> > > > > > 3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Dear Jeffrey Rubard
> > > > > > (alt.philosophy.debate)
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
> > > > > > at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
> > > > > > in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
> > > > > > same audience, from the same podium, for
> > > > > > half an hour!
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
> > > > > > chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
> > > > > > was chairman of the symposium.
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
> > > > > > with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a
> > > > > > "crackpot" as you have alleged ?
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > George
> > > > > > .
> > > > > "Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit
> > > > "Well, he was a psychologist..."
> > > > As was B.F. Skinner.
> > > > "Got you there."
> > > > No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
> > > "Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could..."
> > > Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'.
> > > Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
> > > nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
> > > Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
> > 666
> > 666 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
> > 666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA\
> > .
> > [GH] –
> > HEY RHUBARB – your last post is recognizably
> > incoherent – and I'm wondering: – are you
> > possibly psychotic or mentally retarded?
> > .
> > John Rawls has been dead for 20 years,
> > which means you're over 40, if you say you
> > knew him professionally?.
> "Uh, no. I was related to him. Aren't you related to Skinner?"
> "Why, yes."
> "Like you're HIV-positive?"
> "What?"
> "Is one, or the other, of those statements not a factual reality? Or are both statements about you true?"
> "Huh, wow..."
> "I wouldn't want to libel you."
555
555 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
555 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
[GH] –
..... You're psycho/echolalia – Screw – get off this
thread, you're ignorant of mathematical physics !
..
George
..

> "Egregious libel": Defamation which is merely *pretended* to be of an effective character?
..
..
;;moron !
..
screw dipshit.... and stop posting spam
on this thread... it only serves to keep
my thread on the front page...moron !
..

> "Egregious libel": Defamation which is merely *pretended* to be of an effective character?

MESSAGE-4
MESSAGE-4–[George Hammond MS Physics
MESSAGE-4–[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
..
Dear Dr. of Philosophy, Jeffrey Rubard
(a.k.a. "Detective Rhubarb"): –
..
The 3 most famous equations in the
history of the world are: –
..
1 – a²+b²=c² Pythagorean theorem
2 – E=mc² Einstein mass energy
3 – (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²) The God metric
..
The Hammond God metric, also written: –
..
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a² =
the (slow clock–short ruler) metric
can, by the way, can be written as a
4 x 4 Matrix: –
..
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = The God metric
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
..
Any competent physicist or mathematician
who sees this metric,
IMMEDIATELY recognizes intuitively that it
is an
INALIENABLY FUNDAMENTAL FORM
..
That there is nothing, like it, close to it,
or similar to it !
..
It falls in the same category with the
Pythagorean theorem, or Einstein's
mass energy equation, and –In that
sense: –
..
THESE-3 STAND ALONE
ON THE BLACKBOARD
OF HISTORY
..
So that's who you're talking to,
Detective Rhubarb, and
don't ever forget it !
..
George
..