On Saturday, 9 April 2022 at 09:24:24 UTC+10, banerjee...@gmail.com wrote:
> My proof of FLT has been approved by my Indian colleagues, who are highly trained and discerning scientists and engineers.
> I have no doubt that in due course it will be universally accepted.
> After all, I have made it all so simple, that clever high school students can easily understand.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=5686846731343077&set=pcb.5686846781343072
>
> I would very much like this bit of paper to be sold!
>
> Would help my work in Internal Force Engines.
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
>
> x theta phi sum
> 0.001 3.16228E-05 1.316691467 1.31672309
> 0.011 0.00115369 1.316689831 1.31784352
> 0.021 0.003043194 1.316680073 1.319723267
> 0.031 0.00545814 1.316654812 1.322112952
> 0.041 0.008301963 1.316606666 1.324908628
> 0.051 0.011517676 1.316528254 1.328045931
> 0.061 0.015066459 1.316412202 1.33147866
> 0.071 0.018919665 1.316251136 1.3351708
> 0.081 0.023055047 1.316037691 1.339092738
> 0.091 0.027454697 1.315764514 1.34321921
> 0.101 0.032103817 1.315424259 1.347528075
> 0.111 0.03698993 1.315009599 1.351999529
> 0.121 0.042102353 1.314513225 1.356615578
> 0.131 0.047431821 1.313927849 1.361359671
> 0.141 0.052970221 1.313246213 1.366216434
> 0.151 0.058710387 1.312461087 1.371171474
> 0.161 0.064645954 1.311565279 1.376211233
> 0.171 0.070771232 1.310551637 1.381322869
> 0.181 0.077081118 1.309413057 1.386494175
> 0.191 0.083571019 1.308142487 1.391713505
> 0.201 0.090236789 1.306732932 1.396969721
> 0.211 0.097074686 1.305177465 1.40225215
> 0.221 0.104081324 1.303469225 1.407550548
> 0.231 0.111253644 1.301601432 1.412855075
> 0.241 0.118588883 1.299567389 1.418156272
> 0.251 0.126084552 1.297360491 1.423445043
> 0.261 0.133738412 1.29497423 1.428712643
> 0.271 0.141548463 1.292402205 1.433950668
> 0.281 0.149512923 1.289638124 1.439151047
> 0.291 0.15763022 1.286675817 1.444306037
> 0.301 0.16589898 1.28350924 1.44940822
> 0.311 0.17431802 1.28013248 1.4544505
> 0.321 0.182886335 1.276539767 1.459426102
> 0.331 0.191603101 1.272725473 1.464328575
> 0.341 0.200467663 1.268684127 1.469151789
> 0.351 0.209479531 1.264410411 1.473889943
> 0.361 0.218638384 1.259899176 1.47853756
> 0.371 0.227944059 1.255145438 1.483089497
> 0.381 0.237396556 1.250144386 1.487540942
> 0.391 0.246996034 1.244891387 1.491887421
> 0.401 0.256742815 1.239381987 1.496124801
> 0.411 0.266637379 1.233611913 1.500249292
> 0.421 0.276680371 1.227577078 1.504257449
> 0.431 0.286872603 1.221273574 1.508146177
> 0.441 0.297215053 1.214697681 1.511912734
> 0.451 0.307708874 1.207845855 1.515554728
> 0.461 0.318355393 1.200714733 1.519070125
> 0.471 0.329156122 1.193301123 1.522457245
> 0.481 0.34011276 1.185602002 1.525714762
> 0.491 0.351227204 1.177614503 1.528841707
> 0.501 0.362501551 1.169335911 1.531837462
> 0.511 0.373938114 1.160763646 1.53470176
> 0.521 0.385539427 1.151895255 1.537434682
> 0.531 0.397308258 1.142728389 1.540036647
> 0.541 0.40924762 1.133260793 1.542508412
> 0.551 0.421360786 1.123490276 1.544851062
> 0.561 0.433651306 1.113414693 1.547065999
> 0.571 0.446123017 1.103031917 1.549154935
> 0.581 0.458780069 1.092339807 1.551119876
> 0.591 0.471626939 1.081336174 1.552963113
> 0.601 0.484668457 1.070018743 1.5546872
> 0.611 0.497909827 1.058385113 1.55629494
> 0.621 0.511356656 1.046432704 1.55778936
> 0.631 0.525014981 1.034158712 1.559173693
> 0.641 0.538891303 1.021560042 1.560451345
> 0.651 0.55299262 1.008633249 1.561625869
> 0.661 0.567326464 0.995374466 1.56270093
> 0.671 0.581900946 0.981779317 1.563680263
> 0.681 0.596724799 0.967842832 1.564567631
> 0.691 0.61180743 0.953559346 1.565366776
> 0.701 0.627158971 0.938922382 1.566081353
> 0.711 0.642790342 0.923924526 1.566714868
> 0.721 0.658713316 0.90855728 1.567270596
> 0.731 0.674940587 0.892810896 1.567751484
> 0.741 0.691485852 0.87667419 1.568160042
> 0.751 0.708363893 0.860134316 1.568498209
> 0.761 0.725590669 0.84317652 1.568767189
> 0.771 0.743183421 0.825783838 1.568967259
> 0.781 0.761160779 0.807936742 1.569097521
> 0.791 0.779542882 0.789612728 1.569155609
> 0.801 0.798351511 0.770785804 1.569137315
> 0.811 0.817610232 0.751425884 1.569036116
> 0.821 0.837344549 0.731498026 1.568842575
> 0.831 0.857582075 0.710961494 1.568543569
> 0.841 0.878352717 0.689768568 1.568121285
> 0.851 0.899688875 0.667863019 1.567551895
> 0.861 0.921625662 0.645178119 1.566803781
> 0.871 0.944201138 0.621634002 1.56583514
> 0.881 0.967456569 0.597134091 1.56459066
> 0.891 0.991436708 0.571560133 1.562996841
> 0.901 1.016190096 0.544765148 1.560955244
> 0.911 1.041769392 0.516563053 1.558332446
> 0.921 1.068231732 0.486712867 1.554944599
> 0.931 1.095639111 0.454893512 1.550532623
> 0.941 1.124058808 0.420661378 1.544720186
> 0.951 1.153563835 0.383373496 1.536937331
> 0.961 1.184233431 0.342034643 1.526268074
> 0.971 1.216153593 0.294949151 1.511102744
> 0.981 1.24941765 0.238743812 1.488161462
> 0.991 1.284126884 0.164316321 1.448443204

Actually, with further computer work involving more digits this turned out to be a disproof.
For at some value of x it is pi/2 for many digits as opposed to the highest value, 1.56915 presented above.
So there is always a pi/2 meaning that for any x which could be a ratio of two integers, there will be a integer n.
The result then is a new set of identities.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Hi, I am Arindam Banerjee a arsewipe of physics,so stupid in physics I am too dumb to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and thus I attempt to keep Indian Institute of Technology as dumb as Arindam Banerjee

More of the Anti-science, fraud and corrupt work of Arindam Banerjee who hates science and is likely paid to post disinformation in sci.math and sci.physics. Perhaps paid by Russia for he once posted he was proud of growing up in a Communist commune.

Arindam Banerjee
, …

52
unread,
Re: Hi, I am Arindam Banerjee a arsewipe of physics,so stupid in physics I am too dumb to ask the question which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle and thus I attempt to keep Indian Institute of Technology as dumb as Arindam Banerjee
Apr 19
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,

6
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee, the anal fuckdog of science, physics, when he never learned what 1st year students learn-- Units, units units-- E=mc^2 multiplied by a scalar makes no changes-- no changes to Old Ohm's law or New Ohm's law when multiplied by sca
Apr 19
mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
mitchr...@gmail.com
, …

18
unread,
Re: Anurag Sharma,Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha,Bhattacharya Saswata of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as stupid and pandering fools of Climate Change like Jai Maharaj// thus never able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole?
Apr 16
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,

2
unread,
Re: Melbourne Uni Lloyd L Hollenberg Geoffrey N Taylor Raymond R Volkas can you please vouch for the fact that Australia never had rail gun research and that the spammer Arindam Banerjee is just one liaring b.s. cluttering up sci.physics
Apr 10
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,

3
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee claims do not square up Uni Melbourne--Harry M Quiney Jeffrey C McCallum Lloyd L Hollenberg, can Australia verify
Apr 10
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

32
unread,
Re: Hi, I'm Arindam Banerjee and throw a flaming fresh shit turd into the middle of Physics-- why?
Apr 15
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
,

5
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee asks Mehta B.R. , Mehta D.S.,Narendra Modi if the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the same as C'
Apr 10
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

49
unread,
Re: Ghosh Sankalpa, Ghosh Santanu,Joseph Joby, Kanseri Bhaskar, Kedar B Khare of Indian Institute of Tech, are you as insane nutjob of physics as Arindam Banerjee // not able to see real proton = 840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole and real electron is
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

50
unread,
Bhatnagar M.C. ,Indian Institute of Technology,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu,Dhaka Rajendra S.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole-- too busy on Arindam??
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

66
unread,
Re: Banerjee Varsha,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhattacharya Saswata,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy with imp Arindam??
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

9
unread,
Re: Arindam Banerjee asks Anurag Sharma, Babu Sujin B, Banerjee Varsha if the 2nd derivative in Feynman's Electric field equation E = (q/4*pi*e_0) [ (e_r)'/(r'^2) + (r'/c)(d/dt)(e_r'/r'^2) + (1/c^2)((d^2/dt^2)(e_r')] if that 2nd derivative is the sam
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

52
unread,
Drs.V. Venkataraman, Arnab Rai Choudhuri of Indian Institute of Science Bangalore--are you as dumb as Arindam Banerjee never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
Apr 9
Arindam Banerjee's profile photo
Arindam Banerjee
, …

34
unread,
Re: Bhattacharya Saswata,Indian Institute of Technology,Bhatnagar M.C. ,Chatterjee R.,Chaudhary Sujeet,Das Pintu-- is the reason none of you have confirmed real proton = 840MeV, real electron is the muon and .5MeV was Dirac monopole--busy on
Apr 9

3
unread,
AP's 236th book of science-- Psychology Levels of Insanity Categorization

On Friday, 21 April 2023 at 15:15:16 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
not nice stuff about me, but hey, all publicity is good publicity.
Bad show from the bad is good show for the good.
Up Newton, Down Einstein!