238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms 7m views
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
2:17 PM (3 minutes ago)

238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms
7m views

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 18, 2023, 10:02:09 AM



to Plutonium Atom Universe
So many times I have referred to this principle in my work. Yet I never proved it true.

I think it is a natural part of another physics principle -- Least Action or Least Energy-- Feynman's pet theory.

But during the years I think I am now ready to prove Maximum Electricity Principle by geometry.

There is something very very unique about the Torus geometry. As if Torus geometry and Faraday Law are one and the same thing. Electricity loves surface area. Perhaps the torus maximizes surface area over that of volume.

We clearly can see this principle in the design of Tokamak machines are toruses.

And there must be a connection between torus geometry and Perpetual Motion of the muon stuck inside every proton doing the Faraday law with the proton as the muon speeds at nearly the speed of light zipping through the 840 windings of the 840MeV proton torus.

I think it may have gone overboard in physics history, if not history surely in education of the teaching of no perpetual motion machine. Gone way too much overboard, for the muon inside a proton torus is very much behaving like perpetual motion.

So, well, I am thinking that all I need to prove here is that the Torus geometry is super special and that surface area per volume is a Maximum. If I do that, then it wraps the conjecture-- for Faraday law is a torus geometry of maximum electricity production.

AP, King of Science, especially Physics

238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 18, 2023, 11:21:39 PM



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Alright I need some math data to understand why Maximum Electricity production relates directly to having a torus geometry design.

Cube area is 6 side^2, and volume is side^3.

Sphere area is 4 pi*r^2, and volume is (4/3) (pi*r^3)

Torus area is 4(pi^2)Rr, and volume is 2(pi^2)Rr^2 where r is the radius of small circle that form the torus and R is the radius from center of donut hole to the midpoint of torus body.

So let me do some dynamical math to see how these three figures behave when made 1, then 2 then 3 , then 4, until the volume exceeds area.

Starting with Cube

Side 1 then area is 6 , while volume is 1
Side 2 then area is 24, while volume is 8
Side 3 then area is 54, while volume is 27
Side 4 then area is 96, while volume is 64
Side 5 then area is 150, while volume is 125
Side 6 then area is 216, while volume is 216 and here is where the volume takes over

Now the Sphere dynamics

Radius 1 then area is 12.56, while volume is 4.18...
Radius 2 then area is 50.24, while volume is 33.49..
Radius 3 then area is 113.04, while volume is 113.04... and from there the volume takes over

Now let me check the dynamics of the torus of area versus volume
4(pi^2)Rr, and volume is 2(pi^2)Rr^2

And a quick check would be to simply divide volume by area for a ratio. And here we have (1/2)r. If we did this with sphere we have a ratio of 1/3(r) for cube we have 1/6(side). This tells me that the torus will quickly have the volume surpass the area.

Radius 1 = r and R= 2 then area is 78.87, while volume is 39.43
Radius 2 = r and R= 4 then area is 315.50, while volume is 315.50

So let me try the cylinder for the cylinder is a straightline inconnected torus.

Cylinder area is 2pi*r*h + 2pi*r^2, while the volume is pi*r^2*height

Radius 1, height 2, then area is 12.56+6.28 = 18.84, while volume is 6.28
Radius 2, height 4, then area is 50.24+25.12 = 75.36, while volume is 50.24
Radius 3, height 6, then area is 100.48+56.52 = 157.00 while volume is 169.56

From this data table of math dynamics, tells me it is not the surface area that is the superlative in torus geometry but rather instead the volume is the superlative in things go around in a Circuit inside a geometry for maximum Volume.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 18, 2023, 11:42:18 PM



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now looking at the unique features of the Torus. Source StackExchange: The torus is the only surface that can be endowed with a metric of vanishing curvature. It is the only parallelizable surface. It is the only surface which can be turned into a topological group. Feb 9, 2011.

So in that first uniqueness let us say it is the only geometry figure that can have both small numbers and large numbers as a coordinate grid system in order to have vanishing curvature and to handle all differential equations. In other words, the torus is the only geometry to have a calculus take place thereon.

On the second uniqueness, the torus is the only figure of geometry that can be round and stacked with other toruses-- ideal for neutrons as capacitors to stack unto toruses of a proton with muon inside.

On the third uniqueness, I am not sure about that one since I thrown out topology as a science study out the window.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
Mar 19, 2023, 2:38:02 PM



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now the speed of measured Alpha particles from decay is in the range of 5 to 7 percent the speed of light. What is the maximum speed of a alpha particle considering its rest mass?

The speed of measured Beta particles has been 99% speed of light.

Now, I am touching on a topic of Proof of God. An everyday proof that God exists, for physics cannot explain why particles move so fast. Every time a alpha particle is observed in Nature it is going at a speed that is huge, and everytime a Beta decay is measured it is nearly speed of light. As Feynman defines the Atomic Theory "..in constant motion.." As if the Universe is alive. If not constant motion, the Cosmos is dead with motion going to zero.

So how can AP say that the proton is a torus with muon inside in nearly the speed of light circling inside the proton torus producing electricity, how can I say the muon is nearly the speed of light-- in perpetuity. Is the interior of Protons the residence of God (atomic God) to have perpetual motion? In other words, unless Physics itself can explain why the interior of atoms have nearly speed of light and perpetual motion, that this is proof of God's existence (atomic god).

Is there logical sense to say if the Speed of Light is a Constant requires a perpetual motion near the speed of light when inside a proton torus????? Something like that would save us from saying the existence of God, that atom totality, causes the interior of atoms perpetual motion at near speed of light.

See my book: All Existence.. that of the syllogism of the Atomic Theory.

My 231st published book

All Things are made up of Atoms. The Universe is a Thing. Therefore the Universe is one single Atom of 231Plutonium // Logic

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: The last time I worked on this idea was 2017, when I wrote it in my 8th edition of Atom Totality. And when I wrote it there, I was wanting to switch out the term "things" for a more scientific term such as "matter". For I was not comfortable with All things are made up of Atoms-- The Universe is a thing, therefore the Universe is an Atom. The upshot of switching "things" for "matter" made it better, but never eased my discomfort. I still felt there was room for improvement in the syllogism. Here on, 6 years later, I have finally found what makes me totally comfortable about the syllogism I have in 2023. It is not the switching of terms, but rather the inclusion of both quantifiers into the syllogism. Inclusion of the "Every or All" Universal quantifier along with the Existential quantifier that solves the logic. It ends up with "All Existence..." And the case can be made in life in general-- if stumped by a problem, best lay it aside and let the mind in subconscious find the best answer. I know in projects around the house, if I jump into them immediately I often have to "undo" that work. But if I rest and sleep on the problem for 3 weeks, I find the best way to tackle the work. In this case, I rested on the problem for 6 years, and now reaping the rewards.

This book is about the Logic form of the Atomic Theory as a syllogism. And I dare say, my book would be a nice companion book to Titus Lucretius, poet and scientist with his magnificent De Rerum Natura poem on the Atomic Theory. If not for Lucretius, much of our history knowledge of the Ancient Greek Atomic Theory would have been lost and unknown.

A Logic Syllogism can be seen to some extent as verses of a poem, Titus Lucretius lovely poem to the Atomic Theory. And for which AP believes the calendar of the world was set as year 0000 as Lucretius writes the poem in year 0000, and now we are 2,023 years later from the poem on Atomic Theory.

Cover Picture: The cover picture is my iphone photograph of a old book of 1931, so old that the pages have "yellowed". It is the only book in which I have proof that the idea the entire Universe is one big atom, is stated. It is by a chemist who has excellent writing skills and writes of the history of the Atomic Theory. I took the photograph of page 4-- A SHORT HISTORY OF ATOMISM 
 by J. Gregory, Univ. Leeds, 1931, page 4-- and capturing the passage where Gregory talks of the Democritean Atom the size of the entire Universe. The only difference really between Democritus Atomic Theory in Ancient Greek times almost 3,000 years ago, and AP in 2023, is that if Democritus knew the chemical table of elements, he would be looking for what element is the Atom Totality.

I suspect the Maximum Electricity Principle is the reverse of Least Action or Least Energy principle, and here all I need do is argue that Physics laws of Electromagnetism each law has a "reverse". This is probably as simple as reversing the direction or signage, one being + the other being negative direction.

AP

I need a full book on Maximum Electricity Production Principle in order to say the S, P, D, F orbitals all compose toruses themselves inside a larger mainframe torus. So that Plutonium atom has a 5F mainframe torus with smaller F, D, P, S toruses inside one another as the entire smaller toruses produce electricity.

The alternative is that only One torus is formed by the Protons and all the muons chain linked inside the one proton torus.

Many a times in doing the geometry of Atom interiors, I have had to resort to a Maximum Electricity Production scheme and that would call for toruses inside larger toruses. Unless mistaken.

AP, King of Science

I am going to try for 2 different methods of proof of Maximum Electricity Production.

One method is to observe what fission decay results can only be. Apparently they are always even number of protons of S orbital some P orbitals. Most end up at lead Pb 82 some at barium-56.

If I can chart fission decay to be centered on S orbitals, P orbitals, perhaps D and F orbitals in spontaneous fission, then I will have proven that the interior of atoms are layers of S, P, D, F orbitals.

Then, how to link up saying that toruses inside other toruses provides for Maximum electricity.

AP

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:23:19 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> I am going to try for 2 different methods of proof of Maximum Electricity Production.
>
> One method is to observe what fission decay results can only be. Apparently they are always even number of protons of S orbital some P orbitals. Most end up at lead Pb 82 some at barium-56.
>
> If I can chart fission decay to be centered on S orbitals, P orbitals, perhaps D and F orbitals in spontaneous fission, then I will have proven that the interior of atoms are layers of S, P, D, F orbitals.
>
> Then, how to link up saying that toruses inside other toruses provides for Maximum electricity.
>

Trouble is-- inside a atom is perpetual motion of near speed of light, which no machine can duplicate.

I suppose the Tokamak is as close as possible to modeling the interior of atoms.

So, I have two or more competing designs. The most simple is to just add on more protons in one long torus with the muons inside as a long chain. The neutrons would be outside the proton torus gathering up the electricity produced.

Then, the second design is that of nested toruses inside a huge mainframe torus. The S organized as a torus, the P another torus, the D torus, the F torus. I am thinking that extra electricity is produced if the protons organize as toruses inside a mainframe torus.

I suppose the alpha particle decay-- the helium atom-- is indication that the Nested Torii is the interior geometry of Atoms.

AP, King of Science