There is likely a permanent complete record of all my posts to Usenet. I like that, even in the posts of swear words.

But I am considering that as a sign of forgetfulness. In that it was only a few years ago that I did such a polynomial, yet completely slipped my mind..

I can offer a excuse, so that I can deny old age disease. The excuse is that I have so many sciences all at once juggling within my mind. That a tad of forgetfulness is par for the course. At least I hope that is the case. For a scientist is lost, without sufficient memory.

AP

Now I do not want to upset polynomial theory, for it is the heart of making Calculus super super easy. It is as if, polynomials existed for the express purpose of making Calculus super easy, with its two power rules that even High School students enjoy doing.

And I am writing my TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College using only polynomials for calculus so that math is super easy, and no trigonometry functions, not a single one. For in polynomial theory we translate all trig functions over an interval into a polynomial and get on with doing the super easy math.

But I think we need to furnish polynomial theory with a new concept. A concept of inverse.

Some definitions.

Polynomial Equation-- the standard polynomial of nth degree with a positive nonzero number all alone on rightside of equation. For example x^3 -6x^2 +11x = 6 with its three solutions of 1,2,3.

Polynomial Function-- this is where we delete the rightside of the equation and graph the leftside. So in the Equation x^3 -6x^2 +11x = 6, the function would be P(x) = x^3 -6x^2 +11x.

Now a new definition and concept.

Inverse Polynomial Function -- this is where we place the polynomial function all over 1. Thus in our example above we have 1/ P(x) is equal to 1 / (x^3 -6x^2 +11x)

The main reason I am doing this is to get different geometries in graphing. We are too restricted with plain polynomials.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium still running low on grid paper and
ball pens. There is now a call by the Athen Owl Kappa Gamma
student organization from Dartmouth to collect more grid paper

and ball pens. They say they will make a drinking party on
friday and collect some money for their Archi. Some career
students from Athen Owl Kappa Gamma still remember Archi

when he was a dish washer (or was it a pot washer?). These
students say, our perpetual study is very close to Archis
research. The only thing that moves is time, otherwise due

to ubiquitious Alzheimer, its not that anybody of us is getting
any wiser. So Archi is our true hero, since he became usenet
celebrity by procrastination.

Archimedes Plutonium schrieb am Sonntag, 1. August 2021 um 07:29:11 UTC+2:
> Now I do not want to upset polynomial theory, for it is the heart of making Calculus super super easy. It is as if, polynomials existed for the express purpose of making Calculus super easy, with its two power rules that even High School students enjoy doing.
>
> And I am writing my TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 1st year College using only polynomials for calculus so that math is super easy, and no trigonometry functions, not a single one. For in polynomial theory we translate all trig functions over an interval into a polynomial and get on with doing the super easy math.
>
> But I think we need to furnish polynomial theory with a new concept. A concept of inverse.
>
> Some definitions.
>
> Polynomial Equation-- the standard polynomial of nth degree with a positive nonzero number all alone on rightside of equation. For example x^3 -6x^2 +11x = 6 with its three solutions of 1,2,3.
>
> Polynomial Function-- this is where we delete the rightside of the equation and graph the leftside. So in the Equation x^3 -6x^2 +11x = 6, the function would be P(x) = x^3 -6x^2 +11x.
>
> Now a new definition and concept.
>
> Inverse Polynomial Function -- this is where we place the polynomial function all over 1. Thus in our example above we have 1/ P(x) is equal to 1 / (x^3 -6x^2 +11x)
>
> The main reason I am doing this is to get different geometries in graphing. We are too restricted with plain polynomials.
>
> AP

1-SCI.PHYSICS FAQ, 1Aug2021// Usenet science sci.math& sci.physics dead, but AP's newsgroup only pure peaceful science going on-- today's topics Sun gone Red Giant causing mega-drought/ inverse polynomial theory to make full rectangles
>
> Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
1> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe

The only pure science newsgroup is mine; the only functional science newsgroup that has no hate spam on every post you make-- remaining in all of Usenet is mine. More people read AP's newsgroup than read any other newsgroup of dead and dying Usenet, all because the fools of govt bureacrats paid for and hired stalkers.

Today I am discussing the question of -- can Global Warming cause the Heat Dome of Canada + flooding in Germany & China? I conclude the energy in Global Warming is far too small. But the cause is likely to be the Sun has gone Red Giant. And I am backed up by the NASA number that the past decade the Solar radiation has increased by 0.005% yearly. That is a enormous amount more radiation and would cause this Destruction of the Jet Stream. This spells big trouble for all of life on Earth-- for the Sun shines not from Fusion that every scientist except AP believes, but shines from FARADAY LAW of the muon inside every proton 840MeV torus is a muon thrusting through the proton torus making more sunshine. We have probably 1 million years to "get off of Earth" as the Sun destroys Earth.

MATHOPEDIA-- List of 72 fakes and mistakes of Old Math. AP's 174th book.

Last revision was 2Aug2021.

Preface: I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds question of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).

Some of these can be found in AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS series, but the entries keep changing and added on new, means I need to have a separate book for these fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math.

TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for ages 18-19 Freshperson College, math textbook series, book 3
Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
Listing the Errors of Old Math, list of 1 to 50.

Alright, well, mathematics is a closed subject. What I mean by that is due to the textbook series of Archimedes Plutonium TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, that once you learn the polynomial transform and learn the two Power Rules of Calculus, you reached the peak, the pinnacle of all of mathematics, and anything further in math is just details of what you learn in that textbook series. Math is a completed science because it has this "peak of calculus", unlike the other 5 hard sciences of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy. Those other five will continue to find new ideas, new things, while math remains static and complete to its peak of calculus understanding. Mathematics is finished complete as far as a science goes because the peak of math is going nowhere. And even though Physics will find new science such as how the proton toruses inside of atoms are configured in geometry, the geometry and calculus used in that configuration, that new science does not change nor does it create or require a new math peak/summit to handle the new physics.

Now I do need to discuss the Errors of Math in General and the errors of math in geometry in particular. I have the feeling that Geometry is the more important of the two-- algebra - geometry. This list appears in most of AP's Teaching True Mathematics textbook series by Archimedes Plutonium, meant to be a guide and orientation, and a organizing of what must be covered before graduating from College, and what math to steer clear of.

Errors mostly, but not always, for some are included because too much time spent on them.

The listings in Mathopedia of errors, mistakes and fakes is based on the idea that Calculus is the supreme achievement of all of mathematics for it is the essential math of doing Physics electricity and magnetism. And in order to have a proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we must clean up and clean out all the mistakes, fakes and errors of Old Math, erst, we have no Calculus. So calculus is the consistency maker for the rest of all of mathematics.

1) Calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, a proof that derivative and integral are inverses of one another, just as addition and subtraction are inverses, or, multiplication and division are inverses. The only way to obtain a geometry proof is to clean up and clean out all the fakes, mistakes and errors of Old Math, such as their fake numbers-- the Reals. Their fake definition of function allowing anything be a function. Their fakery of a continuum when even physics by 1900 with Planck onwards in Quantum Mechanics proving the Universe is discrete Space not a continuum, yet by 1900 onwards those in mathematics following the idiotic continuum in the Continuum Hypothesis with even more avid interest, when they should have thrown the continuum on a trashpile of shame.

2) The true numbers of mathematics are the Decimal Grid Numbers, because you have to need and apply one mechanism only to obtain the true numbers of mathematics-- Mathematical Induction. In Old Math they had just a tiny few intelligent mathematicians, Kronecker, who emerged from the gaggle crowd of kooks to notice that Naturals all come from one single mechanism-- Mathematical Induction. But Old Math never had a crowd of mathematicians with logical brains to say-- all our numbers need to come from the one mechanism of Mathematical Induction.

3) The true numbers of math have empty space between successor and predecessor numbers. For example the 10 Grid is 0, .1, .2, .3, . . . , 9.8, 9.9, 10..0. Where no numbers exist between .1 and .2, etc. Only discrete numbers allow us to give a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

4) All functions of mathematics must be a polynomial, and if not a polynomial, convert the offering to a polynomial over a specific interval.

5) Space is discrete and all lines in space are strings of attached straight lines.

6) No curves exist in Geometry, only finer and smaller straight line segments attached to one another.
We can still keep the name "curve" as long as we know it is a string of fine tiny straightline segments strung together in what looks like a smooth curve. If curves exist, then the Calculus in Fundamental Theorem of Calculus cannot be proven and thus Calculus does not exist. We all know that we have to have Calculus, and so we throw out onto the trash pile the curve of Old Math. And this is reasonable because starting in 1900 in physics there arose the Quantum Mechanics of Space being discrete. And a discrete space has no continuum, has no curve of Old Math.

7) Space has gaps in between one point and the next point. These gaps are empty space from one point to the next point, for example in 10 Grid there is no number between .1 and .2, and in 100 Grid there exists no number between .01 and .02.

8) Limit analysis was an insane fakery in Old Math, concocted because Old Math needed the excuse of some proof, so they invented the monster con-artist trick that a limit analysis would divert the fact it is no proof at all, but a Non Sequitur argument. Limit analysis is juju totem witchcraft dance around a desire to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Just as idiotic as dancing around a sick person of a virus is going to cure the person.

9) Infinity has a borderline and there is a microinfinity compared to a macroinfinity. For example in 10 Grid, the microinfinity is .1 if we exclude 0 and so there is no number smaller than .1 and no number larger than 10 in 10 Grid, where 10 is macroinfinity.

10) The 1st Quadrant Only in Coordinate System Geometry. Sad that the first coordinate system of Descartes was correct but soon became corrupted with 4 quadrants. See Mathematical Thought, Volume 1, Kline, 1972, page 303. Where Fermat then Descartes starts the Cartesian Coordinate System as 1 axis only and from 0 rightwards, meaning in our modern day math, 1st Quadrant Only. Why did math screw up on coordinate systems? I suppose some clowns thought negative numbers were true and they wanted ease of drawing a circle with center at 0. When they could have just as easily drawn the circle in 1st Quadrant Only.

11) Calculus needed a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but Old Math never provided such, instead they provided some stupid Limit argument. The reason for the creation of the Limit disaster was that the French mathematician Cauchy got sick and tired of hearing his smartest students complain that the width of rectangles in the integral are 0 width, and those smart students could not, for the life of them understand how a rectangle with 0 width has any interior area. So instead of the math community denouncing the limit, instead they elevated the fakery.

12) Further in Calculus, they knew you could do a transform of coordinate points to turn any function into a polynomial function, a method of Lagrange.. However, they in Old Math were too stupid to take this transform to its highest form-- all functions are polynomial functions and only polynomial functions. When you learn that-- the derivative and integral of any and every function of math is a snap breeze simple and easy.

13) With the error filled 4 quadrants, when it should be 1st Quadrant Only, we have Trigonometry's sine and cosine with the fakery of sinusoid wave when it never was that. The sine and cosine are semicircle waves, and no sinusoid wave exists.

14) There is only one Geometry-- Euclidean, and there is not three distinct geometries of elliptical Riemannian or hyperbolic Lobachevsky. Those two are just duals that make up Euclidean.

15) Torus, volume and surface area formulas in Old Math are all screwed up and in error because they imagined bending a cylinder to form a torus. This brings back memories, for I had to do a percentage formula, since I could not follow the fake way of bending a cylinder. Where 78.5% of Disc Torus (pi)R^2h - (pi)r^2h is the volume of Circle Torus, and 78.5% of Disc Torus 2(pi)Rh + 2(pi)rh + 2 ((pi)R^2 - (pi)r^2) is the surface area of Circle Torus..

16) Ellipse is never a single cone slant cut, always a cylinder slant cut. Although you do get an ellipse from double cones of this configuration <> which in Old Math was the hyperbola, but two hyperbolas joined together to form a ellipse.

17) All Parallelepipeds reduced to a Rectangular Box by making 2 cuts and pastes. Volume of the original Parallelepiped is simply a*b*c of the Rectangular Box length*width*depth formed. Old Math never understood that a precise definition of Parallelepiped has two kinds, the parallelepiped that has 90 degree angles and the parallelepiped that has no 90 degree angle.

Fuckdog Kibo Parry M> 🦎 UCLA of Math and 🐍 Princeton Univ of Physics "hater of math"
> MIT & Harvard> fails at math and science:

On Saturday, July 31, 2021 at 1:02:44 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🦠 of Math and 🧫 of Physics

AP writes: every post by Stalker kibo is put through the shredder and spit out. For the statement to be made that stalking is unacceptable behavior whereever and whenever it rears its ugly head. Every stalker should be pommelled or sedated by a psychiatrist, in XXsmall straightjacket.

On Sunday, September 12, 2021 at 2:00:16 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🦎 Terence Tao of Math and 🐍 John Baez of Physics "hater of math"
> NSF pays stalkers> fails at math and science:

>🃏 Terence Tao of Physics 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

SAYS the 28 year nonstop paid for stalker Kibo Parry M.

On Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 10:22:24 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧟‍♂️ Andrew Wiles of Math and 👻 Lloyd Whitman of Physics

> 🧛🏻‍♂️ Thomas Hales of Math and 👻 John Stillwell of Physics "math hater"
On Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 7:37:43 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🧛🏻‍♂️ John J. Veysey of Math and 👻 Scott Stanley of Physics "math hater"
>John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley > tarded:

AP writes: 28 year long nonstop paid for stalker Kibo Parry Moroney has a hard time of keeping up with the treadmill of AP's paper shredder that spits out the Kibo spam in regurgitated milk form. Hope there is enough cream in the milk for NSF.

Is Dr. Panchanathan NSF paying Kibo Parry M. a $100. per stalker spam post he emits? Making kibo richer than all college professors actually teaching math in classrooms.

>🃏 Brian Stone of Physics 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

On Sunday, September 5, 2021 at 10:34:19 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 🤡 NSF Dorothy E Aronson of Math and 🃏 Brian Stone of Physics "Court Jester of Physics"
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan > fails at math and science:

> 💀 F. Fleming Crim of Math and ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 8:51:26 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> 💀 F. Fleming Crim of Math and ☠️ Dr. Panchanathan of Physics "Putin's Stooge"
> Brian Stone> blithered:

NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post-- Champagne,Hewitt,Crago
On Saturday, July 31, 2021 at 2:17:31 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim

NSF fraud waste abuse of taxpayer money $100 per stalker post--

Canada's NSF-- Francois-Philippe Champagne, Ted Hewitt, Martha Crago, Frederic Bouchard, Cinthia Duclos, Normand Labrie
USA--NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Ulvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

AP writes: AP no longer tolerates endless stalker spam and runs them through a shredder of their vicious content and reposts them, so that the people responsible for hiring a stalker can taste their own fruit.

> Sacking Dr. Panchanathan of NSF of Math and 🕱 of Physics USA dept of Educ "anti math"

AP no longer tolerates a 28 year nonstop insane stalker like Kibo Parry M. and shreds his posts and regurgitates them.

Cambridge,London▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shanghai with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person

The Mostowski Collapse was a harbinger of the mushroom cloud of the Sarmat missile
On Sunday, August 1, 2021 at 3:35:08 AM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium still running low on grid paper and
> > > On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 4:37:17 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 5:51:31 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > This is also an interesting read:
> > > >
> > > > Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range
> > > > Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues
> > > > Updated July 16, 2021
> > > > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 1. März 2022 um 00:46:13 UTC+1:
> > > > > Who was Putins Doktor Faust?

The DR.WILES fake proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is a Reductio Ad Absurdum, as all RAA are not proofs of mathematics, and usually the first sign and signal of a fake math proof is-- is it RAA. Such as Dr. Hales fake proof of Kepler Packing. The Tao & Green fake proof of Number theory. The 4Color Mapping fake proof by Appel & Haken. Con-artists of math all rely upon RAA, for the method itself is fakery.

My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 



#10-2, 27th published book

Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.

Preface:
These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic

Equal+Not
T = T = T
T = ~F = T
F = ~T = T
F = F = T

If--> then
T --> T = T
T --> F = F
F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)

And
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F

Or
T or T = F
T or F = T
F or T = T
F or F = F

Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.

Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:

| | ~p
| |---
| | .
| | .
| | q
| | .
| | .
| | ~q
| p

Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.

Product details
• ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
• Publication date : March 23, 2019
• Language : English
• File size : 1178 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print length : 86 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic

> > > > The Mostowski Collapse was a harbinger of the mushroom cloud of the Sarmat missile
On Sunday, August 1, 2021 at 3:35:08 AM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium still running low on grid paper and
> > > On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 4:37:17 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 5:51:31 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > This is also an interesting read:
> > > >
> > > > Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range
> > > > Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues
> > > > Updated July 16, 2021
> > > > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 1. März 2022 um 00:46:13 UTC+1:
> > > > > Who was Putins Doktor Faust?
> > > > >
> > > > > Putin: Hypersonic Avangard Changes Everything!
> > > > Today in sci.physics yan wyck in his daily spam says Beijing was nothing in 1999 and apparently a Russian Sarmat returned Beijing to "nothingness once again".
> > > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > >
> > > > Kibo Parry M. in his CIA disguise
> > > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:39:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >"Putin's minion"
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > >*still* lusting after the Queen's corpse?
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you upset that I haven't been paying enough attention to you? You
> > > > > have been hoping for more punishment for attacking me? Or as Chris
> > > > > states, it's time for your spanking?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Tianjin, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi'An, Suzhou, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Zhengzhou, Dongguan, Foshan, Dalian, Jinan, Changchun, Hefei
> > > > >
> > > > > Shenzhen▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shenzhen with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Is Pete Olcott in his Halting Problem, halting the vaporization of Wuhan by Putin's Russia???
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Friday, September 9, 2022 at 1:16:55 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > "Imp of Science"
> > > > > >"not one single marble of commonsense in my entire brain"
> > > > > 
> > > > > Moscow█۞█ blackout, knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > 
> > > > > & wrote:
> > > > > > _And as the Baby Xi grew up from the rice paddies and reeds of Outer
> > > > > > Manchuria, stolen by the Naxi and Zani Dictator Putin in Moscow, Xi
> > > > > > learned in school in chemical engineering that Taiwan was 1/28 the size
> > > > > > of Outer Manchuria, Emperor Qing's homeland, now occupied by homeless Russians drinking vodka, as Putin bombs Ukraine. And the nascent Xi orders
> > > > > > 1,000 divisions to the Outer Manchuria border to regain back the stolen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators
> > > > > > > 2m views
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 2> If Putin pushes nuclear buttons, he drags down China along with Russia into a nuclear ash waste pile, and this means Xi is a inferior junior partner to Putin. Putin will drag down Xi's China, never the reverse.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 2> So, one can look at the present situation on Earth and ask several logical questions about the 2 dictators of Putin's Russia and China's Xi.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is little wonder that both Russia and China dictators are combative towards the West. Because dictators never want to give up on power but stay in power all their life long. So they oppose the West because the West has grown up to democracy-- let the people have power, not one single idiot having power all his life time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Naturally, Putin will want to keep the Russian people suppressed and have Russia be a second rate government as a dictator. Same goes for China-- they never want to give up power so the people themselves choose their leader.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But can we find differences in Putin and Xi themselves? Well in the West we call the Chinese inscrutable-- meaning -- little logical commonsense. And is this a valid description?? Yes of course, considering that Russia had stolen the lands of Outer Manchuria, some 28 times larger of a land mass than is Taiwan island. Yet there is Xi, spending so much time on wanting to invade Taiwan, when it is Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok (Haishenwai) that he should be focusing attention upon. And while Putin is distracted with Ukraine, is the time for Xi to recapture Outer Manchuria, the Qing dynasty empire, Qing's Manchurian homeland.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What does Xi do instead??? He focuses on Taiwan and befriends Russia. Why, at this rate, if Russia takes Inner Manchuria, we can expect Xi and the Chinese Communist Party to become even more loving of Russia for stealing more land of China.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And there is Xi, whose China has become rich with trading with the West, yet every day, Xi foaming at the mouth in hatred of the West.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So yes, Putin is 2X smarter as a dictator than is Xi, as if Putin has Xi in his side pocket.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there some scientific explanation as to why Xi is 2X dumber than Putin?? Perhaps, in that China is densely populated and the air pollution over all of China is worse than most countries. That Xi probably has 1/2 of his brain filled with CO and CO2 isomers and lead, and mercury and nitrous oxide and sulfur dioxide from just living in that air polluted hellhole of Beijing. Xi studied chemistry and should know this. Whereas Putin likely detox..s every evening with breathing in pure oxygen at his residence and takes oxygen breathing tanks to office and work. This easily can explain the light-headed reasoning that Xi and his foreign diplomats Wang Yi display, where Putin plays them like a chess game, --- checkmate in 7 moves.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This explains why Xi hates the West for not stealing any Chinese lands and making China rich in trade, while loving Putin for stealing Outer Manchuria, and proposing having Russia push nuclear buttons, making both Russia and China a nuclear waste site after ICBMs wipe China off the map..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Xi's brain is full of air pollution toxins from the nasty Chinese air. They still build a new coal fired plant in China every day. The air in China is the worst air in the entire world.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why Putin is 2X smarter than Xi as dictators// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH, not petty dictators.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > > > > > 2/1, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/2, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/3, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Every Russian missile fired into Ukraine met with a drone from Ukraine knocking out Moscow electric power lines
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Give Ukraine drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/4, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/9 (vacation?), AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/9, AP tards (again):
> > > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/10, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/11, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/12, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/12, AP tards again:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/13, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/14, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/15, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/16, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/17, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/18, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/19, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/20, AP tards:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Electricity out Novosibirsk &Volgograd█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/22, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/23, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/24, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/25, AP tards:
> > > > > > > > > Moscow electric blackout█۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█
> > > > > > > > > _drones █۞█knock out Moscow electric power lines█۞█ Moscow, St.Petersburg, Volgograd, Vladivostok no electricity
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2/26, AP tards: