Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.


tech / sci.electronics.design / Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One' won't be as destructive as once thought

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One'whit3rd
`* Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One' won't be as desBill Sloman
 `- Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One' won't be as desAnthony William Sloman

1
Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One' won't be as destructive as once thought

<9dae947d-ae2b-4f7a-991d-0b0db8add320n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=133079&group=sci.electronics.design#133079

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:386:b0:425:c4fb:cb08 with SMTP id j6-20020a05622a038600b00425c4fbcb08mr987618qtx.5.1703702880626;
Wed, 27 Dec 2023 10:48:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:3742:b0:5e4:afdb:a5ff with SMTP id
fw2-20020a05690c374200b005e4afdba5ffmr4523087ywb.6.1703702880332; Wed, 27 Dec
2023 10:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!nntp.comgw.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 10:48:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <d41f1b69-e2ee-4ca9-adb2-a8eb5d5ed09fn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
References: <aac4de0b-2776-4266-ab9b-f2255ae11199n@googlegroups.com>
<8991f046-7cf0-4e91-97f7-dfbfb58f232dn@googlegroups.com> <5a76672e-3498-49b2-9d93-4f9f7b541e87n@googlegroups.com>
<d41f1b69-e2ee-4ca9-adb2-a8eb5d5ed09fn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9dae947d-ae2b-4f7a-991d-0b0db8add320n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One'
won't be as destructive as once thought
From: whit...@gmail.com (whit3rd)
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 18:48:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2155
 by: whit3rd - Wed, 27 Dec 2023 18:48 UTC

On Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 10:22:28 AM UTC-8, a a wrote:

> Fred, don't be silly

> H2O vapour is No.1 Greenhouse Gas #GHG

.... but it's EXCESS greenhouse gas that causes climate change, and there's no
excess situation regarding atmospheric water; it cycles back to
the oceans relatively rapidly. Uptake of CO2 into minerals has a rate
mismatch to human CO2 generated from minerals that may
be susceptible to correction.

Water cycling isn't any kind of remedy that we ought to be concerned with.

The 'No. 1' designation is arbitrary and capricious. It's silly, a a, to insist
on such a frivolity.

Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One' won't be as destructive as once thought

<ums11b$1p1g1$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=133210&group=sci.electronics.design#133210

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bill.slo...@ieee.org (Bill Sloman)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One'
won't be as destructive as once thought
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 02:23:17 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <ums11b$1p1g1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <aac4de0b-2776-4266-ab9b-f2255ae11199n@googlegroups.com>
<8991f046-7cf0-4e91-97f7-dfbfb58f232dn@googlegroups.com>
<5a76672e-3498-49b2-9d93-4f9f7b541e87n@googlegroups.com>
<d41f1b69-e2ee-4ca9-adb2-a8eb5d5ed09fn@googlegroups.com>
<9dae947d-ae2b-4f7a-991d-0b0db8add320n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:23:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="440efb21a2c09ce7683aa2c9edf17773";
logging-data="1869313"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mxLfIsW/e39sCXN7SeaoWQ+ZA6GeAsTc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZA/tSeySxcUvE9BQ+ty3XfYK0HE=
In-Reply-To: <9dae947d-ae2b-4f7a-991d-0b0db8add320n@googlegroups.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Bill Sloman - Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:23 UTC

On 28/12/2023 5:48 am, whit3rd wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 10:22:28 AM UTC-8, a a wrote:
>
>> Fred, don't be silly
>
>> H2O vapour is No.1 Greenhouse Gas #GHG
>
> ... but it's EXCESS greenhouse gas that causes climate change, and there's no
> excess situation regarding atmospheric water; it cycles back to
> the oceans relatively rapidly. Uptake of CO2 into minerals has a rate
> mismatch to human CO2 generated from minerals that may
> be susceptible to correction.
>
> Water cycling isn't any kind of remedy that we ought to be concerned with.
>
> The 'No. 1' designation is arbitrary and capricious. It's silly, a a, to insist
> on such a frivolity.

A a is worse than silly. He's uncomprehending.

He actually right to to claim that water vapour is the most important
greenhouse gas, but since atmospheric levels of water vapour equilibrate
within about three weeks, there's no point in worrying about them.

CO2 levels takes a lot longer to settle down - roughly 800 years - and
more CO2 in the air means that ocean surface temperatures are higher and
the equilibrium level of water vapour in the atmosphere is higher and
adds a bit more warming to the basic CO2 driven effect, It's a positive
feedback, if not big enough to run away.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One' won't be as destructive as once thought

<15ca5dfd-8089-4ab3-908d-50d79a1f2a66n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=133262&group=sci.electronics.design#133262

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:15d0:b0:428:226a:8682 with SMTP id d16-20020a05622a15d000b00428226a8682mr155888qty.9.1704118938166;
Mon, 01 Jan 2024 06:22:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:a8c:b0:5d0:a744:719a with SMTP id
ci12-20020a05690c0a8c00b005d0a744719amr7319698ywb.2.1704118937910; Mon, 01
Jan 2024 06:22:17 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.1d4.us!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 06:22:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <aeecd244-649d-4c02-9b17-4f4b65c98594n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=59.102.83.245; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.102.83.245
References: <aac4de0b-2776-4266-ab9b-f2255ae11199n@googlegroups.com>
<8991f046-7cf0-4e91-97f7-dfbfb58f232dn@googlegroups.com> <5a76672e-3498-49b2-9d93-4f9f7b541e87n@googlegroups.com>
<d41f1b69-e2ee-4ca9-adb2-a8eb5d5ed09fn@googlegroups.com> <9dae947d-ae2b-4f7a-991d-0b0db8add320n@googlegroups.com>
<ums11b$1p1g1$1@dont-email.me> <aeecd244-649d-4c02-9b17-4f4b65c98594n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <15ca5dfd-8089-4ab3-908d-50d79a1f2a66n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Balanced boulders on San Andreas fault suggest the 'Big One'
won't be as destructive as once thought
From: bill.slo...@ieee.org (Anthony William Sloman)
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 14:22:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2514
 by: Anthony William Slom - Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:22 UTC

On Monday, January 1, 2024 at 2:53:06 AM UTC+11, a a wrote:
> On Sunday 31 December 2023 at 16:23:29 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:
>
> moron from Sydney is stupid dog, affected by mental disorder

Not agreeing with a a's bizarre assertions is symptomatic of a well ordered and well furnished brain.

A a seems to think that his bizarre delusions are worth publishing. which one more symptom of his own mental disorder.

> Go away spammer, go away
> never follow me
> you are retarded

That's what we've been telling you for quite a while now. You've clearly got the message but don't seem to have realised that it has been directed at you.,
> Your comments are so foolish and childlsh making us laugh.

So your spelling of "childlish" was intended to amuse us?
> go away, never follow me.

And here you are reacting to post I just made.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor