The Cretan poet Epimenides (600 BC), once said, "Cretans (are) always liars." (Often misquoted as "All Cretans are liars.") This can be taken to mean that every statement by a Cretan is false.

BACKGROUND
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epimenides_paradox
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/EpimenidesParadox.html

The above accounts of a resolution of the paradox are bit hand-wavy IMHO. Neither of them actually proves that this statement must be false given that it was spoken by Cretan.

Having proven that the statement is false, we can infer that at least one Cretan once said a true statement.

Formal Proof: https://www.dcproof.com/EpimenidesParadox.htm (HTML format)

We make use the following predicates:

Stmt(x) = x is a statement

True(x) = x is true

Cretan(x) = x is a Cretan

Said(x,y) = x said statement y

Constants:

epi = Epimenides

x = the statement that "Cretans always lie"

AXIOMS

Epimenides is a Cretan

1. Cretan(epi)
Axiom

Define: Statement x

2. Statement(x)
Axiom

Define: True (a subset of statements)

3. ALL(a):[True(a) => Statement(a)]
Axiom

4. True(x) <=> ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Axiom

Epimenides said statement x

5. Said(epi,x)
Axiom

Prove: ~True(x) (Statement x is false)
Suppose to the contrary...

6. True(x)
Premise

Apply definition of statement x

7. [True(x) => ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]]
& [ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)] => True(x)]
Iff-And, 4

8. True(x) => ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Split, 7

9. ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Detach, 8, 6

10. ALL(b):[Cretan(epi) & Statement(b) & Said(epi,b) => ~True(b)]
U Spec, 9

11. Cretan(epi) & Statement(x) & Said(epi,x) => ~True(x)
U Spec, 10

12. Cretan(epi) & Statement(x)
Join, 1, 2

13. Cretan(epi) & Statement(x) & Said(epi,x)
Join, 12, 5

14. ~True(x)
Detach, 11, 13

15. True(x) & ~True(x)
Join, 6, 14

As Required: (By contradiction)

16. ~True(x)
Conclusion, 6

Apply definition of statement x

17. [True(x) => ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]]
& [ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)] => True(x)]
Iff-And, 4

18. True(x) => ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Split, 17

19. ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)] => True(x)
Split, 17

20. ~True(x) => ~ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Contra, 19

21. ~ALL(a):ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Detach, 20, 16

22. ~~EXIST(a):~ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Quant, 21

23. EXIST(a):~ALL(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Rem DNeg, 22

24. EXIST(a):~~EXIST(b):~[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Quant, 23

25. EXIST(a):EXIST(b):~[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) => ~True(b)]
Rem DNeg, 24

26. EXIST(a):EXIST(b):~~[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) & ~~True(b)]
Imply-And, 25

27. EXIST(a):EXIST(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) & ~~True(b)]
Rem DNeg, 26

At least one Cretan said a true statement

28. EXIST(a):EXIST(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) & True(b)]
Rem DNeg, 27

Joining results...

29. ~True(x)
& EXIST(a):EXIST(b):[Cretan(a) & Statement(b) & Said(a,b) & True(b)]
Join, 16, 28

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Re: 176,232-Student Victims of Michael Meighen McGill Univ by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus... 0.5MeV electron when in truth it is the muon as the real electron
by Dan Christensen Jul 2, 2021, 9:47:42 AM

Jan Burse why cannot Canada stop Dan Christensen from polluting the minds of young Canadians with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction??

On Thursday, September 8, 2022 at 11:18:06 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensens fake math and science

Jan Burse why cannot Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, help Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else turn the light switch off in Slow Light rather than play ad hominem games.

Re: 2-PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 132 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. AP's 175th book; soon to be published as a Kindle book. Last revision was 3Oct2021. Latest correction and revision was the error found in Electromagnetic theory of their units.
18 views
by Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse
Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
Mostowski Collapse
Oct 4, 2021, 7:47:16 AM

> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:02:51 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney along with his friend and ally Jan Burse, 30 years nonstop attack on others.
> > Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??
> > On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 12:08:26 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
> > Re: _Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer,Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, is the reason you failed to confirm .5MeV was not the atom's electron but Dirac's monopole because you failed science like kibo

> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
>
> Rensselaer math department
> Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
>
>
> Instead of doing Physics where AP proves that Light Waves are pencil ellipse closed loop circuits not straightline arrow rays, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
>
> So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.
>
> Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.
>
> The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.
>
> So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously..
>
> Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ and Berkeley physics? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?
>
> It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.
>
> Dumb and ignorant Harvard Dr. Hau and dumb and ignorant Berkeley Sylvia Else think Light Waves are arrow like single rays with a head and tail on a arrow ray. But that is only because they are ignorant in physics. They cannot turn off the light for it proves AP correct-- that the Light Wave is a closed loop circuit with the source of the light always in the closed loop circuit. So if and when those two incompetents Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else turn off the light source, all the light the fast light the Slow Light, the fast light exiting the BEC medium, all the Light vanishes simultaneously.
>
> The ignorant Hau and Else think that the SLOW LIGHT will still be visible, still be crawling slow in the BEC. But no, it vanishes instantly as all the other light from that source. But Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not want to report that truth, no, they want to never report any true science that is connected with Archimedes Plutonium, because Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else are not scientists at all-- but suppression jerks.
>
> What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.
>
> So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy butt and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.
>
> Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.
>
> Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time for you to roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.
>
> AP, King of Science, especially Physics
>
> Re: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
> by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Feb 24, 2017, 6:00:53 AM
>
>
> Re: someone in sci.math is using the trick of delaying AP posts from reaching the viewing board--
> by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
> Dec 24, 2018, 4:33:44 PM
>
>
> Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
> Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM
>
> Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
> by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM
>
> Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
> by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM
>
>
> Re: Zurich's ETH Dr.Thomas Willwacher's stupid all his life in teaching Calculus, never a picture diagram of FTC// as evidence- Jan Burse
> 4 posts by 3 authors
> 12/13/17
> by Dan Christensen
>
>
> Re: Thomas Hales flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
> By Jan 25 posts 653 views updated 2:26 PM
>
>
> John Baez, Ben Bullock, Edward Witten missed the boat on Angular Momentum, but do they deserve a hate-sheet each and every day from Moroney, Christensen, Burse et al
> by j4n bur53 12/29/18
>
>
>
>
> Apr 11
> Re: Dr.Giovanni Felder, Zurich ETH, Jan Burse says that farting is taught before geometry, after counting in Switzerland/is that true??
> By Jan 3 posts 35 views updated 2:59 AM
>
>
> Re: Dr.Tom Ilmanen Zurich ETH, Jan Burse asks if you read Page10 of Atom Totality Re: PAGE10, 1-10, Evidence....
> By Jan 5 posts 27 views updated 2:52 AM
>
> Re: Jan Burse says ETH is a wheelchair Walter Thurnherr, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg //no picture diagram of Calculus proof// still believing proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV
> By Jan 7 posts 45 views updated 2:41 AM
>
>
> Drs.Martin Schweizer,Mete Soner,Michael Struwe-- Zurich ETH, are you as dumb in Calculus, no Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, as is math failure Jan Burse??
> by
> Zelos Malum
> 12/30/17
>
>
>
> Re: 1Why cannot John Baez, Ben Bullock, Edward Witten ever have a thread in usenet without a hate sheet from the insane troop Christensen,Moroney,Jan Burse, Jan Bielawski,qwbr,Franz,Eastside,Zelos Malum,Earle Jones,Konyberg?
> 6 posts by 5 authors
> 12/29/18
> by j4n bur53
>
>
>
> Re: John Baez, Ben Bullock, Edward Witten missed the boat on Angular Momentum, but do they deserve a hate-sheet each and every day from Moroney, Christensen, Burse et al
> 12/29/18
> by j4n bur53
>
>
> Re: Andrew Beal owes Archimedes Plutonium $1 million in prize money for proving Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem
> 54 posts by 4 authors
> 8/1/18
> by j4n bur53
>
>
> Re: 8) Is Princeton's John Conway, Gabriele Di Cerbo, Hansheng Diao, Theodore Drivas as dumb as John Gabriel, unable to ever recognize the flaws of sqrt2 irrational
> By j4n bur53 10 posts 53 views updated 2:40 PM
>
>
>
> Re: 4- Is ETH Zurich's Wendelin Werner, Thomas Willwacher, as dumb and stupid as Jan Burse, who cannot even complete a division
> 3 posts by 2 authors
> 10/15/17
> by j4n bur53
>
>
> Re: 4) ETH Zurich, Paul Biran, not a single line of math for 30 years, asks Jan Burse// I am just trying to confirm that the Oval is a conic, never an ellipse
> 3 posts by 2 authors
> 9/27/17
> by Jan On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 2:17:36 AM UTC-7,
>
> Re: World's 4 dumbest math Abel Prize winners-- Wiles, Deligne, Grothendieck, Milnor
> 4 posts by 3 authors
> 3/7/17
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: ETH Zurich student math guide// math failure Jan Burse (is he Swiss) mocking everyone
> 6 posts by 5 authors
> 9/6/17
> by j4n bur53
>
>
> Re: Andrew Beal owes Archimedes Plutonium $1 million for proof of Generalized FLT, and no charge for throwing out Trigonometry unto math garbage dump
> 6 posts by 3 authors
> 8/3/18
> by Jan
>
> Re: Drs.Michael Floater, Kim Froyshov, Bjorn Gjevik of Oslo Univ.-never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Konyberg about calculus//your students deserve better
> 2 posts by 2 authors
> 12/30/17
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: Gregory Berkolaiko, Harold Boas, Kathryn Bollinger, Texas A&M, are you stupid as Garry Denke who thinks a ellipse is a conic section when it never was-- the oval is the slant cut in a cone (see proof below)
> 4 posts by 4 authors
> Feb 3
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: _Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Stanford Univ are you as stupid and screwed up as Erik Eastside over trigonometry, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave? See proof below
> 2 posts by 2 authors
> Feb 3
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: Karoly Holczer, Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, of UCLA// Is the reason you have not confirmed the true proton is 840MeV, true electron=muon= 105MeV and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, because time spent on spamming robot Reber??
> 2 posts by 2 authors
> Feb 3
> by j4n bur53
>
>
> Re: 4Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS, seller Jan Burse
> 26 posts by 5 authors
> 7/25/17
> by j4n bur53
>
> Re: 7Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
> 29 posts by 3 authors
> 12/27/17
> by Jan
>
>
>
>
> AP writes: I do not know what the definition of petty criminal is-- but I see it as anyone who cuts into the time of another person, having to chase their deeds down and fix the situation, such as ripping out my Wikipedia site, or forgery to Math Stack Exchange.
>
> Here is where petty criminal Jan Burse tore down Archimedes Plutonium wikipedia page
>
> • (cur | prev) 14:09, 6 March 2017‎ DMacks (talk | contribs)‎ . . (20,500 bytes) (+1,287)‎ . . (unexplained removal of on-topic and somewhat-cited content Undid revision 768910666 by Janburse (talk)) (undo)
> • (cur | prev) 13:51, 6 March 2017‎ Janburse (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,213 bytes) (-1,287)‎ . . (→‎Eccentric believers) (undo)
>
> At about the same time as Burse tearing down AP's Wikipedia page a forgery in the name of Archimedes Plutonium to Math Stack Exchange, MSE, in that same year, and since both Burse and Christensen posted to sci.math saying they approved of the forgery makes one suspicious that Burse and Christensen are connected to the forgery::
>
> Here is the nonsense appearing under my name---
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 438 ●10
> Profile
> Activity
> This user has not filled their about me section yet.
> 4
> answers
> 20
> questions
> ~1k
> people reached
> Communities (2)
> Mathematics
> 438 ●10
> MathOverflow
> 101 ●3
> Top Tags (12)
> complex-analysis
> 10
> score
> 14
> posts
> 58
> posts %
> proof-verification
> 6
> score
> 15
> posts
> 62
> posts %
> proof-writing
> 4
> score
> 9
> posts
> 38
> posts %
> real-analysis
> 3
> score
> 3
> posts
> 12
> posts %
> uniform-convergence
> 1
> score
> 2
> posts
> 8
> posts %
> absolute-convergence
> 1
> score
> 2
> posts
> 8
> posts %
> View all tags →
> Top Posts (24)
> Sort
> 8
> Prove that ∑∞n=0anzn
> n
> 0
> ∞
> a
> n
> z
> n
> converges absolutely and uniformly in D
> D
> .
> Sep 5 '17
> 4
> Munkres Topology, page 102, question 19:a
> Sep 5 '17
> 4
> What is the closure of (0,1)
> 0
> 1
> in Rk
> R
> k
> ?
> Aug 28 '17
> 4
> If the complex series ∑∞
>
> Still there-- the forged entry Mr. Atwood & Spolsky, still there
>
> User Archimedes Plutonium - Mathematics Stack ...
> Stack Exchange › math › users › archime...
> archimedes plutonium from math.stackexchange.com
> Archimedes Plutonium top 56% overall. Apparently, this user prefers to keep an air of mystery about them. 4 answers. 20 questions. ~1k people reached. Member for 6 months; 113 profile views; Last seen Nov 9 '17 at ...
>
> Jan Burse, insane petty criminal stalker Swiss
>
> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am the petty thug Swiss criminal who tears down web sites and loves to see forgeries of innocent victims to Math Stack Exchange. I failed math and logic and so spends the time attacking people. If you catch me, please do not put me into a Swiss prison for I have my buddies Dan Christensen, Zelos Malum, qbwr, Jan Bielawski, Franz, Michael Moroney, Erik Eastside, Earle Jones to teach how to be a petty criminal
> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Burse says ///////// physicists////////////// too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding
>
> Burse says ETH physicists,Charalampos Anastasiou,
> Niklas Beisert too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding
>
> why Moroney & Burse just ask Drs. Jerome Faist,
> Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder why they still believe proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding
>
>
> AP writes: why does not Burse & Moroney simply ask Mr Thurnherr, and professors of physics at ETH why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole
>
>
>
> Jan Burse 8 year insane stalker Swiss
>
> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Jan Burse, a Swiss that hates and attacks everyone in sci.math, because I failed math. So stupid is Burse he still believes a ellipse is a conic and believes in Boole logic which says 3 OR 2=5 with AND as subtraction. Jan is a Swiss imp of math with never a single line of math for 30 years
> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
>
>
> ETH Zurich
>
> Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts, Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer, Emmanuel Kowalski, Urs Lang, Rahul Pandharipande, Richard Pink, Tristan Riviere, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, Michael Struwe, Benjamin Sudakov, Alain Sznitman, Josef Teichmann
> Wendelin Werner, Thomas Willwacher
>
> Zurich ETH, physics dept
> Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland,
> Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin,
> Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel,
> Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home,
> Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
> Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff,
> Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg
>
> University Bern
> Christian Leumann, Walter Benjamin, Emil Theodor Kocher, Kurt Wuthrich, Friedrich Durrenmatt, Daniel Vassella, Rene Fasel, Mani Matter
>
>
> Why can no-one at ETH help Dr. Hau turn the light switch off and prove that the Light wave is a circuit pencil ellipse not a arrow ray of head and tail which everyone except AP believes.

STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science

On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 3:28:34 PM UTC-4, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
[snip]

> Dan Christensen ...

[snip]

Time for another spanking, Archie Poo! When will you learn? Once again...

From his antics here at sci.math, it is obvious that AP has abandoned all hope of being recognized as a credible personality. He is a malicious internet troll who now wants only to mislead and confuse students. He may not be all there, but his fake math and science can only be meant to promote failure in schools. One can only guess at his motives. Is it revenge for his endless string of personal failures in life? Who knows?

In AP's OWN WORDS here that, over the years, he has NEVER renounced or withdrawn:

"Negative numbers are the witches and hobgoblins of insane kook mathematicians. "
--Dec. 7, 2022

“Primes do not exist, because the set they were borne from has no division.”
--June 29, 2020

“The last and largest finite number is 10^604.”
--June 3, 2015

“0 appears to be the last and largest finite number”
--June 9, 2015

“0/0 must be equal to 1.”
-- June 9, 2015

“0 is an infinite irrational number.”
--June 28, 2015

“No negative numbers exist.”
--December 22, 2018

“Rationals are not numbers.”
--May 18, 2019

According to AP's “chess board math,” an equilateral triangle is a right-triangle.
--December 11, 2019

Which could explain...

“The value of sin(45 degrees) = 1.” (Actually 0.707)
--May 31, 2019

AP deliberately and repeatedly presented the truth table for OR as the truth table for AND:

“New Logic
AND
T & T = T
T & F = T
F & T = T
F & F = F”
--November 9, 2019

AP seeks aid of Russian agents to promote failure in schools:

"Please--Asking for help from Russia-- russian robots-- to create a new, true mathematics [sic]. What I like for the robots to do, is list every day, about 4 Colleges ( of the West) math dept, and ask why that math department is teaching false and fake math, and if unable to change to the correct true math, well, simply fire that math department until they can find professors who recognize truth in math from fakery...."
--November 9, 2017

And if that wasn't weird enough...

“The totality, everything that there is [the universe], is only 1 atom of plutonium [Pu]. There is nothing outside or beyond this one atom of plutonium.”
--April 4, 1994

“The Universe itself is one gigantic big atom.”
--November 14, 2019

AP's sinister Atom God Cult of Failure???

“Since God-Pu is marching on.
Glory! Glory! Atom Plutonium!
Its truth is marching on.
It has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;
It is sifting out the hearts of people before its judgment seat;
Oh, be swift, my soul, to answer it; be jubilant, my feet!
Our God-Pu is marching on.”
--December 15, 2018 (Note: Pu is the atomic symbol for plutonium)

Updated version (repetition removed):

"Oh Atom Plutonium, as great as you are
How great thou are, are, are, are.
Oh Atom Plutonium, the God that you are
How beautiful is your world of science
Your science is the world
How beautiful is your world of science
Your science is the world
Oh Atom Plutonium, Great God of Atoms
Atom of Atoms
Oh Atom Plutonium, as great as thou art"
--March 24, 2023

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com