My 238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms 44m views

238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms
44m views

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 18, 2023, 10:02:09 AM

So many times I have referred to this principle in my work. Yet I never proved it true. I think it is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 18, 2023, 11:21:39 PM

Alright I need some math data to understand why Maximum Electricity production relates directly to
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 18, 2023, 11:42:18 PM

Now looking at the unique features of the Torus. Source StackExchange: The torus is the only surface
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 19, 2023, 2:38:02 PM

Now the speed of measured Alpha particles from decay is in the range of 5 to 7 percent the speed of
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 19, 2023, 11:51:08 PM

Recently I caught myself writing a trio of books in astronomy, starting with the concept of Stepping
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 20, 2023, 2:27:00 AM

Alright, I think I have the proof that the torus is the geometry figure of Maximum Electricity
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 23, 2023, 2:14:10 PM (8 days ago)

Alright, onto my 238th book of science. I have often mentioned this principle in my physics work.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 23, 2023, 5:06:17 PM (8 days ago)

I suspect the Maximum Electricity Principle is the reverse of Least Action or Least Energy principle,
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 27, 2023, 11:27:21 PM (4 days ago)

I need a full book on Maximum Electricity Production Principle in order to say the S, P, D, F
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 9:24:25 AM (3 days ago)

I am going to try for 2 different methods of proof of Maximum Electricity Production. One method is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 12:06:03 PM (3 days ago)

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:23:19 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I am going to try for
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 9:32:30 PM (3 days ago)

Alright, I am not going to have any problems with figuring out the geometry inside of Atoms, for I
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 28, 2023, 11:20:05 PM (3 days ago)

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 9:30:14 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright, I am not
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 29, 2023, 5:57:07 AM (3 days ago)

On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 11:19:34 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > On Friday, April 28,
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 29, 2023, 4:09:32 PM (2 days ago)

Now this total overhaul of the geometry of the interior of all Atoms is going to make me say that the
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 29, 2023, 11:57:22 PM (2 days ago)

On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 5:56:34 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Copper is 1s-2, 2s-
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 1:14:04 AM (2 days ago)

Now here I have to stop for a moment and worry and wonder of a factor in efficiency. The worry is
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 8:54:33 AM (yesterday)

So I ask the question again is there a mathematics easy way of computing that 50 for copper, rather
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 3:25:25 PM (yesterday)

So I am intrigued here because I am making the case that photons and neutrinos from dipoles. That a
Message has been deleted
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 8:20:27 PM (yesterday)

Alright this leads directly into the idea that the composition of the Proton as a 840MeV torus and
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 30, 2023, 11:33:15 PM (yesterday)

On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 8:16:55 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > Alright this leads
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 7:39:22 AM (yesterday)

Alright, this is becoming extremely interesting. I have the world divided between either a Transverse
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 1:07:26 PM (19 hours ago)

I am looking on how to recover a Semicircle wave in the manner that a cycloid wave is constructed.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 1:48:32 PM (18 hours ago)

Alright, some good signs in all of this mess. I am looking for rolling of closed curves that recovers
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 2:00:38 PM (18 hours ago)

Now looking at the Limacon, if we stipulate that the offcenter point has to always be as a
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 7:28:19 PM (12 hours ago)

On Monday, May 1, 2023 at 1:02:23 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > I am looking on how to
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 9:53:05 PM (10 hours ago)

So, well, Wikipedia has a animation of a Limacon and the Convex Limacon is almost a circle but a part
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 10:57:40 PM (9 hours ago)

Now I am going to go contrary to the description of the Dimpled Limacon and say that the Pointer-
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 1, 2023, 11:23:28 PM (8 hours ago)

Now I am pretty sure this is a flaw in Old Math Geometry of their Limacon pointer marker going around
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
7:45 AM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
On Monday, May 1, 2023 at 11:23:28 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Now I am pretty sure this is a flaw in Old Math Geometry of their Limacon pointer marker going around like a clock as the motion of the moving circle goes around. The AP Limacon is where the pointer marker needs to stay perpendicular to the tangent of the stationary circle, thus creating a new larger circle with one intersection point. I say this because there is no other mechanical means of producing concentric circles or intersection at one point of two circles.

It is understandable that people would be interested in the 2-motions of Old Math Limacon, the motion of rolling one circle over another circle, but also the motion of the Pointer-Marker, for the Limacon of Old Math is obfuscating but yields figures for Art and Artwork, but not figures for Physics of electricity and magnetism.

In Physics we are more precise than goonclods of Old Math with their double motions. In New Math we have only one motion, the rolling of one circle over another. Or the rolling of 1 ellipse over another and producing a new circle-- once the mess up of the motion of the pointer-marker is corrected.

In New Math, in rolling figures we allow only one motion. And we Well-Define the Pointer Marker as not having motion and has a Infinitesimal length of at least 1*10^-604 distance length. And this Pointer Marker must be perpendicular at all times to the rolled-over tangent of stationary figure. So in the MathStackExchange figure of ellipse rolling over identical ellipse, it actually is a Circle once the Pointer Marker mistakes are corrected.

Now it took me all of just 2 minutes today to get a sheet of tracing paper and trace out the cycloid on page 293 of Jacobs "Mathematics: A Human Endeavor". And then roll my second cycloid over the perimeter of Jacobs cycloid. Using the pointed tip (not the center of second cycloid but the pointed tip as Pointer-Marker. Now keeping the pointed tip always with its length as a perpendicular to the tangent of the stationary cycloid what that rolling traces out is indeed a Semicircle.

So here we can start some Conjectures:

Conjecture 1, rolling a ellipse over a identical ellipse, keeping pointer-marker perpendicular produces a circle.

Conjecture 2, rolling a circle over another circle keeping pointer-marker perpendicular produces a circle.

Conjecture 3, rolling a cycloid over identical cycloid, keeping pointer-marker perpendicular produces a semicircle.

Physics needs the **perpendicular** for the pointer-marker, for electricity is always perpendicular to magnetism.

The Old Math Geometry Limacon is actually 2 rollings, the rolling of one circle over another and the independent rolling of a pointer marker. In the AP Limacon, there is but one rolling the circle over the other circle, while the pointer-marker is a fixed perpendicular point.

Alright, good on MathStackExchange for they have something on cycloid rolling. Titled "Cycloid rolls on another identical Cycloid" 6years-4months ago. They have a animation and the figure it traces is looking like half a stadium geometry shape. However, they use as Point-Marker the center of the straightline segment of the cycloid. And I suspect they do not keep their point-marker always at a perpendicular to the surface of stationary cycloid. If they keep their point-marker perpendicular to tangent of surface, I suspect it becomes a semi-ellipse rather than half a stadium.

What AP uses as Point-Marker is either one of the corners and keeping this point-marker perpendicular, I trace out a Semicircle.

AP

Major, major Geometry in Motion discovery by Archimedes Plutonium. I discovered this in this writing of 238th book. The discovery I made is that the cycloid Wave is an Ellipse wave. The error of Old Math Geometry is that they had 2 motions in a rolling circle on the straightline. They had the motion of the circle which is wanted, but they also had a 360 degree motion of the Pointer-Marker on the surface of the rolling circle. What this causes is the end product of a cycloid with 2 vertices if we put half and half together.

When we stipulate only one motion and not two motions, and when we stipulate the Point-marker is always perpendicular to the surface of straightline, that the Point-Marker is actually a infinitesimal distance length that is constantly perpendicular to the straightline, that the final curve is a ellipse and has no vertices.

A cycloid with vertices is actually a fiction geometry produced by a circle in motion.

This chimes back to one of my conjectures a long time ago, that the only smooth curve produced by circle rolling is either ellipses or circles. There is a quantization of smooth curves as produced by conic sections and so the Old Math Geometry of Motion Geometry erred in motion by a ill-defined notion of the Point-Marker, and that this Point-Marker is ill-defined in Old Math and it has a silly stupid motion itself.

This is a huge major discovery for Geometry in Motion for it directly impacts Physics electromagnetism.

The cycloid curve of Old Math is a error filled fictional curve. Much like the slant cut of right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, and the oval broadly defined is the adding of two different ellipses to form a oval.. Still within the AP conjecture-- the only smooth curves in geometry (have no vertices) are New Math conic sections.

This deserves a separate math book for it is a huge major change in Geometry of Motion.

AP

Now I have a easy intuitive proof that I am correct the cycloid is actually a ellipse. Some geometers call this a synthetic proof where we argue a simple insight. In this case we focus upon the midpoint of the cycloid wave-- 1 cusp. This midpoint is rather flat and it is flat because the Pointer-Marker is parallel to the straightline it is rolling upon. That means the points on both sides of the midpoint are also parallel and thus a straightline ridge. Now for AP's Pointer Marker that is always perpendicular to straightline causes the midpoint ridge of cyloid to be higher than the points to the right and left of the midpoint ridge. This is the description of the ellipse. While the cycloid with its flat ridge actually is not a smooth curve at the ridge but contains vertices as it transits from straight line ridge to being a curve again. This constitutes a Proof that Cycloids are actually Ellipses. And also I need to show that at the ends of the cycloid cusp that those angles are different in the AP cycloid than the ill-defined Old Math cycloid.

This is again, a huge major discovery, not so much for Mathematics which used this stuff for Art and Art Work, but for Quantum Electrodynamics, for EM of physics is all about Particle and Wave, and the cycloid is the particle of the rolling circle upon the straightline which is the wave of Physics. The Faraday law of a Torus being the Proton is all about geometry of smooth curves. And geometry is basic and fundamental to physics.

On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 5:59:55 PM UTC-5 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
Major, major Geometry in Motion discovery by Archimedes Plutonium. I discovered this in this writing of 238th book. The discovery I made is that the cycloid Wave is an Ellipse wave. The error of Old Math Geometry is that they had 2 motions in a rolling circle on the straightline. They had the motion of the circle which is wanted, but they also had a 360 degree motion of the Pointer-Marker on the surface of the rolling circle. What this causes is the end product of a cycloid with 2 vertices if we put half and half together.

When we stipulate only one motion and not two motions, and when we stipulate the Point-marker is always perpendicular to the surface of straightline, that the Point-Marker is actually a infinitesimal distance length that is constantly perpendicular to the straightline, that the final curve is a ellipse and has no vertices.

A cycloid with vertices is actually a fiction geometry produced by a circle with two motions.

This chimes back to one of my conjectures a long time ago, that the only smooth curves produced by circle rolling is either ellipses or circles or New Math conic sections. There is a quantization of smooth curves as produced by conic sections and so the Old Math Geometry of Motion Geometry erred in motion by a ill-defined notion of the Point-Marker, and that this Point-Marker is ill-defined in Old Math and it has a silly stupid motion itself.

This is a huge major discovery for Geometry in Motion for it directly impacts Physics electromagnetism.

The cycloid curve of Old Math is a error filled fictional curve. Much like the slant cut of right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, and the oval broadly defined is the adding of two different ellipses to form a oval.. Still within the AP conjecture-- the only smooth curves in geometry (have no vertices) are New Math conic sections.

This deserves a separate math book for it is a huge major change in Geometry of Motion.

AP

This makes sense that circle rolled on straightline is ellipse. Ellipse rolled on identical ellipse makes circle. But it leaves out what happens when circle is rolled on ellipse or ellipse rolled on circle all of which the Pointer-Marker is kept perpendicular to rolled surface.

AP

This deserves a new separate math book on the massive corrections and changes to Geometry in Motion. The rolling requires only 1 motion as a category of figures. If we have two items in motion such as the circle then the Marker-Point in motion also, then different geometry figures result.

But also, I need to well-define the concept of Smooth Curve in New Math. Old Math was pathetic on this issue also.

So I have the Conjecture that all and only smooth curves in mathematics can all be got from cone, and cylinder cuts. Anything that is not a cone and cylinder cut is not a Smooth Curve.

And let me get on what that Well-Defined Smooth Curve is. I speculate that the well defined smooth curve in discrete math since all of math geometry is discrete with its Decimal Grid Number System-- there exists empty space between any two given numbers in mathematics. So a well defined smooth curve, each point and its successor point and predecessor point is related by the number constant of pi=3.14159.... If a point is not related to the next point on a curve (discrete geometry) by 3.1415... then the curve is __not smooth___ and we call that point a vertex.

In line geometry we had no trouble in defining a vertex as where a angle that is not 180 degrees from one point to the next occurs.

But in curve geometry of Old Math, they never well-defined a vertex on a curve. I define it as a breakdown in pi = 3.14..... of a point and its successor point.

AP

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
5:59 PM (4 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Major, major Geometry in Motion discovery by Archimedes Plutonium. I discovered this in this writing of 238th book. The discovery I made is that the cycloid Wave is an Ellipse wave. The error of Old Math Geometry is that they had 2 motions in a rolling circle on the straightline. They had the motion of the circle which is wanted, but they also had a 360 degree motion of the Pointer-Marker on the surface of the rolling circle. What this causes is the end product of a cycloid with 2 vertices if we put half and half together.

When we stipulate only one motion and not two motions, and when we stipulate the Point-marker is always perpendicular to the surface of straightline, that the Point-Marker is actually a infinitesimal distance length that is constantly perpendicular to the straightline, that the final curve is a ellipse and has no vertices.

A cycloid with vertices is actually a fiction geometry produced by a circle with two motions.

This chimes back to one of my conjectures a long time ago, that the only smooth curves produced by circle rolling is either ellipses or circles or New Math conic sections. There is a quantization of smooth curves as produced by conic sections and so the Old Math Geometry of Motion Geometry erred in motion by a ill-defined notion of the Point-Marker, and that this Point-Marker is ill-defined in Old Math and it has a silly stupid motion itself.

This is a huge major discovery for Geometry in Motion for it directly impacts Physics electromagnetism.

The cycloid curve of Old Math is a error filled fictional curve. Much like the slant cut of right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, and the oval broadly defined is the adding of two different ellipses to form a oval.. Still within the AP conjecture-- the only smooth curves in geometry (have no vertices) are New Math conic sections.

This deserves a separate math book for it is a huge major change in Geometry of Motion.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
6:15 PM (3 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now I have a easy intuitive proof that I am correct the cycloid is actually a ellipse. Some geometers call this a synthetic proof where we argue a simple insight. In this case we focus upon the midpoint of the cycloid wave-- 1 cusp. This midpoint is rather flat and it is flat because the Pointer-Marker is parallel to the straightline it is rolling upon. That means the points on both sides of the midpoint are also parallel and thus a straightline ridge. Now for AP's Pointer Marker that is always perpendicular to straightline causes the midpoint ridge of cyloid to be higher than the points to the right and left of the midpoint ridge. This is the description of the ellipse. While the cycloid with its flat ridge actually is not a smooth curve at the ridge but contains vertices as it transits from straight line ridge to being a curve again. This constitutes a Proof that Cycloids are actually Ellipses. And also I need to show that at the ends of the cycloid cusp that those angles are different in the AP cycloid than the ill-defined Old Math cycloid.

This is again, a huge major discovery, not so much for Mathematics which used this stuff for Art and Art Work, but for Quantum Electrodynamics, for EM of physics is all about Particle and Wave, and the cycloid is the particle of the rolling circle upon the straightline which is the wave of Physics. The Faraday law of a Torus being the Proton is all about geometry of smooth curves. And geometry is basic and fundamental to physics.

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
8:04 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
This makes sense that circle rolled on straightline is ellipse. Ellipse rolled on identical ellipse makes circle. But it leaves out what happens when circle is rolled on ellipse or ellipse rolled on circle all of which the Pointer-Marker is kept perpendicular to rolled surface.

In the Limacon's of circle rolled over another circle produces circles when the Pointer Marker is kept perpendicular.

So what is a ellipse rolled over a circle? I hazard to guess another ellipse. And for circle rolled over ellipse, I guess another ellipse. What about two different sized ellipses? Here the problem is going to be if there is a fractional rolling? By fractional I mean both do not come to a smooth finish of 360 degrees and have left-over arc-length. In those cases I would say look and examine the curve to see if it is going to be a circle or becoming a ellipse.

AP

Flaws and error in Old Math's Limacon, in Cycloid, and in ellipses rolling on identical ellipse-- Their unwarranted rotation of their Pointer-Marker.

The worst of these animations is Wikipedia's convex Limacon where they show the pointer marker as rotating also, when in truth, that Pointer-Marker should be at all times perpendicular to a tangent line of the stationary circle. In this way, the trace curve is another circle, larger than either the stationary or orbiting circle.

This second motion mistake when only one circle should be in motion of rolling is also seen in a answer reply on Math Stack Exchange

--- quoting MathStackExchange "Rolling ellipses" 9 years, 8 months ago ---

> I'm struggling to prove the following.
>
> Set one ellipse in contact with a congruent one so that the minor axis of one is aligned with the major axis of the other. Now roll one round the other. The locus of the centre of the rolling ellipse is a circle centre the centre of the other, radius a + b.
>
> Is there an obvious line of attack?
>
> (Counterexamples in replies.)
> --- end quoting MathStackExchange ---

So now, in this video animation has these dimensions-- parameters a = 2, b = 1 and shows a gray circle with radius 3. and the author claims the Locus has some deviation from perfect circle.

What AP claims in that animation, is why in the world would you have a arbitrary rotation of the Point-Marker. It is because of this arbitrary rotation that you do not trace a perfect circle, for if the Point marker were kept at a constant perpendicular to the stationary ellipse tangent, then the trace is indeed a perfect circle.

And, if AP's conjecture is true that the only smooth curves in existence in all the world are conic or cylinder sections, anything else described as a curve, has vertices.

AP

Alright, I am onto a project I love doing, totally absorbed. So I get out my geometry wood blocks and craft toruses.

The first torus comes from a 3 by 3 by 3 cube of wood blocks. There are 27 such blocks for volume of this 3by3by3 cube. We call that a 27 cubic Cube.

Now I remove the inner column of 3 blocks to make a torus geometry. As I remove that inner column I am now left with a torus of volume 27-3 = 24 cubic torus.

Now the Surface Area S.A. of 3by3by3 original cube of volume 27 cubic blocks is that of squares. The original cube has a face side of 3x3 = 9 square and there are 6 such faces so there is 9x6= 54 square area.

Now compare Volume to S.A. is 27/54 and volume is 1/2 of S.A. or S.A. is 2 times volume.

The S.A. of the torus 3by3by3 is upon removal of inner 3, the S.A. is 4 faces of 9 gives 4x9 = 36, with 2 faces of 8 is 2x8= 16, and then the faces for the donut hole are 12. Adding up those squares gives 36+16+12 = 64.

So, for this torus its volume is 24 and its Surface Area is 64 for a ratio of 24/64 = 0.375 or 2.66...

Now I do the very same accounting of the 4 by 4 by 4 cube with a donut hole of removal of inner 2by2by4.

What I am focusing in upon is that Maximum Electricity comes from a tokamak or torus geometry because of surface area so much larger than volume.

AP

Alright, working on the 4 by 4 by 4 torus of wood blocks. So the 4 by 4 by 4 Cube is volume of 64 cubic volume and its Surface Area S.A is 16 squares for each 6 faces. That is a S.A. of 16 x 6 = 96 square S.A.

Now I remove 2 by 2 by 4 blocks in the center of 4 by 4 by 4 Cube to form a Torus. Thus the volume of this 4 by 4 by 4 torus is 64 - 16 = 48 cubic Volume of torus. the surface area of torus of 4 by 4 by 4 is going to be after removing 16 inner blocks is going to be 4 faces of 16, 2 faces of 12 squares and the donut hole inner faces are 8 x 4. So adding these squares I have (4x16) + (2x12) + (4x8) = 64+24+32 = 120 square surface area.

Summary of ratios:

For 4 by 4 by 4 Cube has volume 64 and S.A of 96, for a ratio of 64/96 or of 96/64. These ratios are 0.6666... and 1.5.

Now comparing the 3 by 3 by 3 torus ratio with 4 by 4 by 4 torus. The 3 by 3 by 3 torus ratios are 24/64 or 64/24 which is 0.375 and 2.66...

For the 4 by 4 by 4 Torus has volume of 48 and S.A. of 120. This ratio is either 48/120 or 120/48 yielding 0.4 and 2.5.

Let me spend some time to see if I made a arithmetic error.

AP

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 5:34:39 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright, working on the 4 by 4 by 4 torus of wood blocks. So the 4 by 4 by 4 Cube is volume of 64 cubic volume and its Surface Area S.A is 16 squares for each 6 faces. That is a S.A. of 16 x 6 = 96 square S.A.
>
> Now I remove 2 by 2 by 4 blocks in the center of 4 by 4 by 4 Cube to form a Torus. Thus the volume of this 4 by 4 by 4 torus is 64 - 16 = 48 cubic Volume of torus. the surface area of torus of 4 by 4 by 4 is going to be after removing 16 inner blocks is going to be 4 faces of 16, 2 faces of 12 squares and the donut hole inner faces are 8 x 4. So adding these squares I have (4x16) + (2x12) + (4x8) = 64+24+32 = 120 square surface area.
>
> Summary of ratios:
>
> For 4 by 4 by 4 Cube has volume 64 and S.A of 96, for a ratio of 64/96 or of 96/64. These ratios are 0.6666... and 1.5.

I had better use one ratio the ratio of Surface Area / volume, so for the 4 by 4 by 4 Cube I have 96/64 = 1.5.

> Now comparing the 3 by 3 by 3 torus ratio with 4 by 4 by 4 torus. The 3 by 3 by 3 torus ratios are 24/64 or 64/24 which is 0.375 and 2.66...
>

The 3 by 3 by 3 torus ratio is 64/24 = 2.66. The 4 by 4 by 4 torus ratio is 120/48 = 2.5. Which has me suspicious of a arithmetic error.

> For the 4 by 4 by 4 Torus has volume of 48 and S.A. of 120. This ratio is either 48/120 or 120/48 yielding 0.4 and 2.5.
>
> Let me spend some time to see if I made a arithmetic error.
>
> AP

The 5 by 5 by 5 Cube.
Volume = 125
S.A. = 6 x 25 = 150

5 by 5 by 5 torus (by removing 3 by 3 by 5 blocks in center)
Volume = 125 - 45 = 80
S.A. = (4x25) + (2x16) + (3x3x5) = 100 +32 + 45 = 177

Ratio 177/80 = 2.212....

So I have a sliding down convergence of a sequence. The 3x3x3 torus was 2.666.... the 4x4x4 torus was 2.5 and the 5x5x5 is 2.212....

So what is the point of convergency at Infinity which is a 1*10^604 Cube? If I had to guess, I would guess the convergency is 1.61.....

AP

☠️ of Math and 🕱 of Physics Archimedes "Putin's lackey" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blithered:

> Simple question I would like to know, how do you clean your dick after it has been up someone's arsehole?

Plutonium, you sick fuck! It's bad enough that you keep trying to make
the sci.* groups your personal gay pickup bar, but do you really have to
post such disgusting questions here? Don't your gay friends in the gay
bars of Gayville SD (just up the road from you!) know all that? Or are
you hoping to find a raunchy bedwarmer this time?

Did you ask the men in the special back room of the gay bar? You know,
the one you need the password to get in? And since you invented the
password, you obviously know it.

Kibo Parry-M-Volney>I want to fuck her corpse--CIA Kate Heinzelman when will the CIA end their 30 year filthy stalker Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney. Or is it that the CIA wants to show the world what a "loose insane cannon" works for the CIA????

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 10:26:06 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey" Plutonium
>how do you clean your dick after it has been up someone's arsehole?

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney.
Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??
It is for sure that no-one at Rensselaer Polytech can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- all they can do is the phony limit-analysis of 0 width rectangles, as if analyzing something constitutes a proof of math.

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> Volney
>
> 7
>
> unread,
> The 238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms 7m views
> > I want to fuck her corpse Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia! > "I want to fuck her corpse" Not again! > I want to fuck her corpse Plutonium's
> 12:12 AM
> ,
> Volney
> 2
>
> unread,
> HYMN THERE IS A SECOND EARTH There is water on Europa To make a second Earth There is water on Europa Safe from Sun's Red Giant Phase The hardship of moving life And all that will be lost In prayers to Atom Totality 10m views
> > I want to fuck her corpse Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia! > "I want to fuck her corpse" Not again! > I want to fuck her corpse Plutonium's
> 12:09 AM
>
> Man of Your dreams
> , …
>
> 3
> > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman
> > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs
> > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"antiscience"
> > >"howling crazy fuckdog"
> >
> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.
> >
> > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 
> >
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> >
> > Rensselaer math department
> > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > Not again!
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > tarded:
> > >
> > > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > >
> > > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> > >
> > > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > 
> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Imp of Math"
> > > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Court Jester of Math"
> > >
> > > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> > >
> > > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > Not again!
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > >
> > >
Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On 5/4/2023 8:26 PM, Volney wrote:
> ☠️ of Math and 🕱 of Physics Archimedes "Putin's lackey" Plutonium
> <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> blithered:
>
>> Simple question I would like to know, how do you clean your dick after
>> it has been up someone's arsehole?
>
> Plutonium, you sick fuck! It's bad enough that you keep trying to make
> the sci.* groups your personal gay pickup bar, but do you really have to
> post such disgusting questions here? Don't your gay friends in the gay
> bars of Gayville SD (just up the road from you!) know all that? Or are
> you hoping to find a raunchy bedwarmer this time?
>
> Did you ask the men in the special back room of the gay bar? You know,
> the one you need the password to get in? And since you invented the
> password, you obviously know it.
>

LOL! He must be referring to the poker room, in the back:

https://youtu.be/IcH4NnkiA6c

Kibo>I want to fuck her corpse..Kate Heinzelman CIA when will the CIA end their 30 year long filthy insane stalker Kibo Parry Moron-ey-Volney. Or is it that the CIA wants to show the world what a "loose insane cannon" looks like at the CIA????

On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 10:26:06 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Putin's lackey"
>how do you clean your dick after it has been up someone's arsehole?

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney.
Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??
It is for sure that no-one at Rensselaer Polytech can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- all they can do is the phony limit-analysis of 0 width rectangles, as if analyzing something constitutes a proof of math.

Kibo Parry Moron-Volney blowing his cover with the CIA in 1997
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
On Sunday, June 8, 1997 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> Volney
>
> 7
>
> unread,
> The 238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms 7m views
> > I want to fuck her corpse Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia! > "I want to fuck her corpse" Not again! > I want to fuck her corpse Plutonium's
> 12:12 AM
> ,
> Volney
> 2
>
> unread,
> HYMN THERE IS A SECOND EARTH There is water on Europa To make a second Earth There is water on Europa Safe from Sun's Red Giant Phase The hardship of moving life And all that will be lost In prayers to Atom Totality 10m views
> > I want to fuck her corpse Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia! > "I want to fuck her corpse" Not again! > I want to fuck her corpse Plutonium's
> 12:09 AM
>
> Man of Your dreams
> , …
>
> 3
> > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman
> > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs
> > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"antiscience"
> > >"howling crazy fuckdog"
> >
> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.
> >
> > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 
> >
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> >
> > Rensselaer math department
> > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > Not again!
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > tarded:
> > >
> > > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > >
> > > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> > >
> > > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > 
> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> >
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Imp of Math"
> > > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Court Jester of Math"
> > >
> > > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> > >
> > > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > >
> > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > Not again!
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > >
> > >