Munich,Berlin▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shanghai with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person

Is this what the insane spammer Wolfgang Mueckenheim means with his spam of "dark numbers" polluting sci.math everyday????

WM picture profile
WM
Chris M. Thomasson
21
4:56PM
Dark unit fractions

On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 5:51:31 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > > This is also an interesting read:
> > > > >
> > > > > Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range
> > > > > Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues
> > > > > Updated July 16, 2021
> > > > > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 1. März 2022 um 00:46:13 UTC+1:
> > > > > > Who was Putins Doktor Faust?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Putin: Hypersonic Avangard Changes Everything!
> > > > >

> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 3:00:03 PM UTC-5, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> >should be thrown in jail
> > for his willful criminal behavior. The criminal
>
> You can say that again about the imbecile Dan Christensen with his 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and the oaf cannot understand slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse.
>
> Cambridge,Oxford▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shanghai with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
>
> Does Pete Olcott have a new phony name--- Mr. Flibble????? And was he suspended from sci.math for his mountain of spam???
>
> Mr.Flibble picture profile
> Mr.Flibble
> Richard Damon
> 17
> 5:26 PM
> Halting Problem...
>
>
> Why these guys are such crank nutters-- they cannot be bothered with correcting Boole & Jevons crazy errors which then goes on to show there is no Halting Problem, and there is no Godel undecidable.
>
> My 5th published book
> Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
>
> Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
> Preface:
> First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.
>
> The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.
>
> My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.
>
> Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.
> Product details
> File Size: 773 KB
> Print Length: 72 pages
> Publication Date: March 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PMB69F5
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported 
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> 

>
>
> #10-2, 27th published book
>
> Correcting Reductio Ad Absurdum// Teaching True Logic series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> Last revision was 9NOV2020. This is AP's 27th published book.
>
> Preface:
> These are the TRUE Truth Tables of the 4 connectors of Logic
>
> Equal+Not
> T = T = T
> T = ~F = T
> F = ~T = T
> F = F = T
>
> If--> then
> T --> T = T
> T --> F = F
> F --> T = U (unknown or uncertain)
> F --> F = U (unknown or uncertain)
>
> And
> T & T = T
> T & F = T
> F & T = T
> F & F = F
> Or
> T or T = F
> T or F = T
> F or T = T
> F or F = F
>
> Those can be analyzed as being Equal+Not is multiplication. If-->then is division. And is addition and Or is subtraction in mathematics. Now I need to emphasis this error of Old Logic, the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability unknown, undefined end conclusion.
>
> Now in Old Logic they had for Reductio Ad Absurdum as displayed by this schematic:
>
> | | ~p
> | |---
> | | .
> | | .
> | | q
> | | .
> | | .
> | | ~q
> | p
>
> Which is fine except for the error of not indicating the end conclusion of "p" is only a probability of being true, not guaranteed as true. And this is the huge huge error that mathematicians have fallen victim of. For the Reductio Ad Absurdum is not a proof method for mathematics, it is probability of being true or false. Math works on guaranteed truth, not probability. This textbook is written to fix that error.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B07Q18GQ7S
> • Publication date : March 23, 2019
> • Language : English
> • File size : 1178 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Not Enabled
> • Print length : 86 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #346,875 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #28 in Logic (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #95 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #217 in Mathematical Logic
> 
> 
>
>
>
> > > > > The Mostowski Collapse was a harbinger of the mushroom cloud of the Sarmat missile but we had cackling crazies like Pete Olcott, Richard Damon as a distraction
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > olcott's profile photo
> > > > olcott
> > > > , …
> > > > Richard Damon
> > > > 7
> > > > unread,
> > > > a Proof of G in F is contradictory
> > > > On 4/21/23 11:27 AM, olcott wrote: > On 4/21/2023 7:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 4/20/
> > > > 7:53 PM
> > > > 
> > > > Olcott picture profile
> > > > Olcott
> > > > Richard Damon
> > > > 60
> > > > 9:43 PM
> > > > Simulating (partial)...
> 
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 4:37:17 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, February 28, 2022 at 5:51:31 PM UTC-6, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
> > > > > This is also an interesting read:
> > > > >
> > > > > Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range
> > > > > Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues
> > > > > Updated July 16, 2021
> > > > > Mostowski Collapse schrieb am Dienstag, 1. März 2022 um 00:46:13 UTC+1:
> > > > > > Who was Putins Doktor Faust?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Putin: Hypersonic Avangard Changes Everything!
> > > > > Today in sci.physics yan wyck in his daily spam says Beijing was nothing in 1999 and apparently a Russian Sarmat returned Beijing to "nothingness once again".
> > > > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > > >
> > > > > Kibo Parry M. in his CIA disguise
> > > > > On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 11:39:47 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > >"Putin's minion"
> > > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > >*still* lusting after the Queen's corpse?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Are you upset that I haven't been paying enough attention to you? You
> > > > > > have been hoping for more punishment for attacking me? Or as Chris
> > > > > > states, it's time for your spanking?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Tianjin, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuhan, Xi'An, Suzhou, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Zhengzhou, Dongguan, Foshan, Dalian, Jinan, Changchun, Hefei
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shenzhen▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shenzhen with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is Pete Olcott in his Halting Problem, halting the vaporization of Wuhan by Putin's Russia???
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, March 30, 2023 at 11:56:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > > Botfly of Math and Blowfly of Physics "Putin's stooge"
> > > > > > >"wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"

My 144th published book