novaBBS - sci.math - Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer but a evil stalker shithead that wants to torture more South Korean Moon Bears

Kibo's hatred of the Pope, for Kibo is a insane stalker....

Re: Archimedes "Pope Arky the Last" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
4 views
Subscribe

Message has been deleted
Volney's profile photo
Volney
12:17 PM (1 hour ago)

Pluto, it's time for your punishment again, already? 🐁 of Math and 🐀 of Physics Archimedes "
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
12:55 PM (5 minutes ago)



to
Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>it's time for your punishment again, already?

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"certifiably insane"

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse

On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
>
>"Putin's lackey"

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>


> On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:15:57 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"Putin's minion"
>
> The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney.
> Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??
> It is for sure that no-one at Rensselaer Polytech can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- all they can do is the phony limit-analysis of 0 width rectangles, as if analyzing something constitutes a proof of math.
>
> Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> >
> > Volney
> >
> > 7
> >
> > unread,
> > The 238th book of science for AP // Proving the Principle of Maximum Electricity Production is done by Atoms 7m views
> > > I want to fuck her corpse Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia! > "I want to fuck her corpse" Not again! > I want to fuck her corpse Plutonium's
> > 12:12 AM
> > ,
> > Volney
> > 2
> >
> > unread,
> > HYMN THERE IS A SECOND EARTH There is water on Europa To make a second Earth There is water on Europa Safe from Sun's Red Giant Phase The hardship of moving life And all that will be lost In prayers to Atom Totality 10m views
> > > I want to fuck her corpse Oh no! I was hoping Plutonium was finally over his necrophilia! > "I want to fuck her corpse" Not again! > I want to fuck her corpse Plutonium's
> > 12:09 AM
> >
> > Man of Your dreams
> > , …
> >
> > 3
> > > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman
> > > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs
> > > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > >"antiscience"
> > > >"howling crazy fuckdog"
> > >
> > > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.
> > >
> > > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???
> > >
> > > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > 
> > >
> > > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> > >
> > > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > > Francois Englert
> > > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > > John C. Mather
> > > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > > David J. Gross
> > > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > little fishes
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > > >
> > > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > > .
> > > > > .
> > > > > Edward Witten
> > > > > John Baez
> > > > > Brian Greene
> > > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > > Larry Harson
> > > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> > > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> > >
> > > Rensselaer math department
> > > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> > > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > Not again!
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > >
> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > > tarded:
> > > >
> > > > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > >
> > > > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > > > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > > > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > > > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> > > >
> > > > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > 
> > > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Product details
> > > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > > > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >"Imp of Math"
> > > > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > > > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >"Court Jester of Math"
> > > >
> > > > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> > > >
> > > > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> > > >
> > > > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > > > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > Not again!
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > >
> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Why on Earth does Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney hate the Pope?? Was it because Kibo failed science and he blames the Pope for his failure???
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:31 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
Kibo's hatred of the Pope, for Kibo is a insane stalker....

Re: Archimedes "Pope Arky the Last" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Pluto, it's time for your punishment again, already? of Math and of Physics Archimedes "
by Volney May 2, 2023, 6:15:57 PM

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>it's time for your punishment again, already?

On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
>
>"Putin's lackey"

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>




> > > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > >
> > > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > > • Language: : English
> > > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > > >
> > > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> > > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> > >
> > > Rensselaer math department
> > > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> > > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > > Not again!
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > >
> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > > tarded:
> > > >
> > > > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > > >
> > > > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > > > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > > > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > > > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> > > >
> > > > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > > > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > > > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > > > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Ingrid Wilke
> On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>it's time for your punishment again, already?

On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
>
>"Putin's lackey"

My 137th published book

Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

#1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory

This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.

Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.

Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
Length: 64 pages

Product details
• File Size : 790 KB
• Publication Date : October 5, 2020
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 64 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Language: : English
• ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads

#2-2, 145th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.

Product details
• ASIN : B08PC99JJB
• Publication date : November 29, 2020
• Language: : English
• File size : 682 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 78 pages
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)

#2-3, 146th published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.

Product details
◦ ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
◦ Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
◦ Language ‏ : ‎ English
◦ File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
◦ Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
◦ Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
◦ Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
◦ X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
◦ Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
◦ Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
◦ Print length ‏ : ‎ 124 pages
◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969.. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg

> On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > I want to fuck her corpse

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>it's time for your punishment again, already?

On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
>
>"Putin's lackey"

#3-1, My 2nd published book

True Chemistry: Chemistry Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Physics and chemistry made a mistake in 1897 for they thought that J.J. Thomson's small particle of 0.5MeV was the electron of atoms. By 2017, Archimedes Plutonium discovered that the rest mass of 940 for neutron and proton was really 9 x 105MeV with a small sigma-error. Meaning that the real proton is 840MeV, real electron is 105 MeV= muon, and that little particle Thomson discovered was in fact the Dirac magnetic monopole. Dirac circa 1930s was looking for a magnetic monopole, and sadly, Dirac passed away before 2017, because if he had lived to 2017, he would have seen his long sought for magnetic monopole which is everywhere.

Cover picture: shows 3 isomers of CO2 and the O2 molecule.

Length: 1150 pages

Product details
• File Size : 2167 KB
• ASIN : B07PLVMMSZ
• Publication Date : March 11, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 1150 pages
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #590,212 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#181 in General Chemistry & Reference
#1324 in General Chemistry
#1656 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#3-2, 50th published book

Geometry of the Chemical Bond; metallic, covalent, ionic//Chemistry Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

This is the second book of the Series -- True Chemistry. I left off of True Chemistry with trying to solve the Chemical bond when the proton and muon inside of each and every atom is doing the Faraday Law. And since that book was already 1154 pages long, I decided to start afresh in a second book devoted to solving the Geometry of the chemical bond of metallic, covalent and ionic.
Cover Picture: PHYSICS: Part 2: Extended Version: Halliday & Resnick, 1986, pages 654, 655 talking about Capacitors and my collection of some capacitors in my lab. The first one is a two prong wall plug taken apart to show what the prongs fasten onto when plugged-in (two parallel plates). The next three are spade and socket connectors (two parallel plates). Next is circular or hook plates, and last is a cylinder plate and socket.

Length: 134 pages

Product details
Print Length : 134 pages
Publication Date : June 21, 2019
Word Wise : Enabled
ASIN : B07TCVBD93
File Size : 1308 KB
Language: : English
Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Lending : Enabled
 

#3-3, 81st published book

Animal-CO2 of the 3 CO2 isomers// Chemistry Series, book 3
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

CO2 molecule has 3 isomers. An isomer means same chemical formula but different geometries. The 3 isomers of CO2 come from fire-CO2 and animal-CO2. The fire-CO2 has the carbon atom as central in the molecule and one of the oxygen atoms has a unshared dipole. The animal-CO2 has the carbon atom on the periphery with an unshared dipole.
This is very important chemistry science for it impacts Global Warming but also hugely impacts biology because plants can only live on animal-CO2 and the fire-CO2 is a toxic poison to plants, much like CO is a toxic poison to animals.

Here we learn new facts about the molecules CO, N2, CO2, O2 and even H2O, new facts we never understood before, all because the real electron is the muon stuck inside a proton doing the Faraday Law and that chemical bonding is governed not by electrons but by Dirac magnetic monopoles, and that makes the Lewis structure be based on 6 not 8.

New concepts in chemistry: Lewis structure based on 6, not 8, and the unshared dipole. For a Lewis Structure based on 6, not 8, is the only logical way that the strongest bonded molecules end up being CO and N2. With a Lewis 8 Structure, the strongest bonded molecules, by logic, note, by logic would have to be O2 and FH or possibly FB. However, the proof is that bond dissociation energy of CO is the highest, proving Lewis 6 Structure is the true structure of Chemistry.

source: chem.ucsb.edu

in kJ/mol

CO 1076
N2 946
CO2 532
O2 498
C2 as in diamond is 602 kJ/mol
H2O = 492
OH = 425
H2 = 432

Cover Picture is a winter stored potted clover that I am experimenting with and shows a animal-CO2 molecule going in, and going out is a O2 molecule that animals need to breathe.
Length: 15 pages

Product details
ASIN : B084217LB9
Publication date : January 19, 2020
Language : English
File size : 1042 KB
Text-to-Speech : Enabled
Screen Reader : Supported
Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
X-Ray : Not Enabled
Word Wise : Enabled
Print length : 15 pages
Lending : Enabled
Best Sellers Rank: #277,873 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
◦ #52 in General Chemistry & Reference
◦ #297 in Biology (Kindle Store)

#3-4, 38th published book

Hypothesis that Tar restores the Iron in Rust, back to the iron metal object// Chemistry series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Back in 2003 I noticed that while working on my roof, that when I pulled off tar on steel, that the steel was shiny bright iron with no rust while all around where no tar was, was much rust. So that started me to think whether tar acts as a chemical reaction in which it takes the iron atoms out of rust and places those iron-atoms-back-into-the-iron-object. Now that was 2003, and I have not had much time to really dive into experiments on this topic. For one reason-- I have to wait years for the tar to dissolve the rust and perhaps return the iron from iron oxide back into the original iron object. No, I do not have years and I was far too busy with other items of science. But now I plan to do more on this subject. Especially since in 2017 I discovered the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV, casting brand new light on chemistry and chemical reactions. The iron rust molecule Fe2O3 in New Chemistry where the .5MeV particle is not the electron but is Dirac's magnetic monopole, has to be reviewed in terms of this new found knowledge, and whether or not, tar can return the Fe2 back to the original metal object.

Picture cover: About 5 years ago this hammer and trowel were both iron rusted surfaces, both had iron rust, the trowel worse than the hammer. I put tar on the trowel rusty surface and today with a chisel removed some tar and see the shiny bright iron surface. I suppose if I had coated the hammer back then when I coated the trowel, the hammer would also be bright shiny iron.. So the tar must have done something to not only remove the rust but restore the trowel to "more iron bright shiny surface", some claim (see below in text) that the tar only lifted the rust off the iron surface. I think there is more to it than just adhesion lift, and am thinking the tar takes the iron atoms out of iron oxide and puts the iron atoms back into the original iron object. So this is not a proof by any means, but a hypothesis, and a request for more research.
Length: 32 pages

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam
> 
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
>
> Why on Earth does Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney hate the Pope?? Was it because Kibo failed science and he blames the Pope for his failure???
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:31 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Kibo's hatred of the Pope, for Kibo is a insane stalker....
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope Arky the Last" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> Pluto, it's time for your punishment again, already? of Math and of Physics Archimedes "
> by Volney May 2, 2023, 6:15:57 PM
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >it's time for your punishment again, already?
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
> >
> >"Putin's lackey"

#4-1, 32nd published book

Physics Superdeterminism replaces Darwin Evolution// biophysics series, book 1
Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 16May2021. This was AP's 32nd published book of science.

Preface: When I graduated from college in 1972, I set myself upon a journey task mission of life-- that I was going to mathematize the biology theory of evolution. What I mean by that is -- I was going to make evolution a mathematical theory. And so from 1972 until 1990, I was working on this project, with never really expecting to solve it. But then, to my delight and joy of life, I did solve it in 7 November 1990 with the discovery of the Plutonium Atom Totality. A bigger theory than even mathematizing Darwin Evolution. And one structure of the Atom Totality is quantum mechanics of Superdeterminism, which is a mathematical basis of evolution. What the below writings and posts are, is my notebook, research notebook pertaining to Evolution theory of Biology BET from 1990 on through 2010. A personal memoir of my research notes on Darwin Evolution and how it relates to Atom Totality. In summary form, Darwin Evolution is not a true theory of science for it was replaced by Quantum Mechanics Superdeterminism. NOVA, the tv show recently had a feature program only they called it "quantum entanglement". So Evolution theory is no longer a valid science theory but has been replaced by Superdeterminism. And what Darwin Evolution is-- is a rule or algorithm that captures the essence of what goes on sometimes, but misses vast parts of science of life. A rule, an algorithm of science is not science truth, but sort of like a model.

From 2010 until present day March 2019, I made more discoveries of physics and biology so that the below is sort of out of date and needs a second edition. Discoveries of what is First Life, is a important subject in Evolution theory and I discovered that circa 2016 that a physics capacitor is a life-form. All life evolved from capacitors, and the plant and animal and one celled organisms when reduced to bare minimum are capacitors. My body, your body is simply a advanced and complex physics capacitor. Then in 2017, I discovered that the real electron of atoms is the muon at 105MeV, real proton is 840MeV and that little particle we thought was the electron of 0.5MeV turns out to be Dirac's Magnetic Monopole. That discovery changes very much everything in biology, even evolution theory. And finally, throughout 2010 to 2019 I have been reducing all of physics to be a subject based upon electromagnetism. And so when I write the second edition (if ever) about Evolution theory, it has to be written as if you are in a electricity magnetism classroom.

So, below is my memoir of evolution theory of biology from 1990 to 2010.

Cover picture: Me and two of my cats. Sure, they evolved, but more to the truth, they were fated. Both died from coyotes. Coyotes have to eat, too.

Product details
• File size : 2407 KB
• Publication date : March 30, 2019
• Print length : 181 pages
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• ASIN : B07Q5NV3C5
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled
• Best Sellers Rank: #143,708 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #123 in Evolution (Kindle Store)
◦ #239 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #1,220 in Evolution (Books)

#4-2, 18th published book

First Life = Capacitor of Physics // biophysics series, book 2
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

#1 New Release in Molecular Biology
 Last revision was 14Jan2022. And this is AP's 18th published book on science.

Preface: Now this maybe a difficult book to read because it is my research notebook turned into a book. My research into What was First Life? Now this book started as research notes and then transformed from research notes into a book. So you will see me often ask questions and explore ideas, as I wrote those research notes into a book of science. But there is one basic theme in this book, that All Life comes from a capacitor of physics. Life starts as a capacitor and evolves into more advanced capacitor, and evolves into a battery. Whether a given capacitor evolves into and harbors a DNA molecule and becomes a DNA capacitor life depends on whether that capacitor has a mitochondria and chloroplasts. And all life forms, when reduced, is a reduction to a capacitor. For a human body or the body of any plant or animal is a very advanced and complex capacitor. All life in the Universe starts as a Capacitor of Physics.

Cover Picture: The cover is my textbook used in College-- "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday & Resnick, 3rd edition, 1988, opened to pages 618 and 619 where as a student in college I first learned about capacitors. And laid across those pages are a pencil of carbon and a pencil of calcium carbonate CaCO3 as materials, questioning their capacitance. Was First Life as capacitor come from carbon or come from calcium carbonate?

Product details
File Size: 1558 KB
Print Length: 145 pages
Publication Date: March 15, 2019
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PNT5SRT
Text-to-Speech: Enabled
X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #4,177,228 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#427 in Biophysics (Kindle Store)
#1389 in Molecular Biology (Kindle Store)
#2359 in Biophysics (Books)
 

#4-3, 34th published book

Photons and Neutrinos have "perfect DNA/RNA" packaged inside them// biophysics series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 18Feb2021. This is AP's 34th published book.
Preface: Part of this is my history on the subject. And part is my current ongoing research into the geometry of the interior of photons and neutrinos.. Many changes have occurred from 1995 to present 2019. Until 2018, I imagined the interior of atoms as the Rutherford Model with nucleus and electrons as dot-clouds. However in 2017 when I discovered the real electron is the muon at 105MeV and real proton is 840MeV and the neutron is 945MeV leaving that little .5MeV particle as the Dirac Magnetic Monopole, changes not only physics and chemistry but every hard science is changed. The big change is that subatomic particles have jobs, tasks, work to do and the proton is the coil in Faraday's law, the muon is the bar magnet in Faraday's law, the neutron is a capacitor and the photon, neutrino are wires in the interior of atoms. This changes the geometry of the interior of atoms to where Rutherford model is thrown out the window. So we have the AP-Faraday model of the interior of atoms and that means closed loops or rings. That new perspective also means photons have an interior geometry as well as neutrinos. And so, the double helix of DNA, RNA, is the same as two intertwined springs. The only thing I have missing is what is the A,T, C,G of a photon or neutrino?

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo hates the Pope but why???
Kibo has thousands of post headers declaring Kibo hates the Pope-- is is just sheer insanity of Kibo??
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker
Volney's profile photo
Volney
10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"





to
Kibo's corpse fucking=AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

Why Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, why???

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 2:25:42 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics

Why Kibo? Because they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, or because they fail at doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

Why does the CIA, NSF pay Kibo to stalk every day of the year in sci.math and sci.physics when he knows no math or physics with his 938 is 12% short of 945.

Kibo geometry failure:
On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 1:13:27 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Here you are!
> Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> sections are ellipses.
>
> Some preliminaries:
>
> Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> in the proof:
>
> ^ x
> |
> -+- < xh
> .' | `.
> . | .
> | | |
> ' | '
> `. | .'
> y <----------+ < x0
> Cone (side view):
> .
> /|\
> / | \
> /b | \
> /---+---' < x h
> / |' \
> / ' | \
> / ' | \
> x 0 > '-------+-------\
> / a | \
>
> Proof:
>
> r(x) a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
>
> y(x)^2 r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
>
> Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 1 ...equation of an ellipse
>
> qed

Kibo arithmetic failure:
On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon..
> Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.

Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
>> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> >

The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney.
Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??
It is for sure that no-one at Rensselaer Polytech can do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- all they can do is the phony limit-analysis of 0 width rectangles, as if analyzing something constitutes a proof of math.

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> Volney
>
> 7
>
> unread,

> > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman
> > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs
> > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"antiscience"
> > >"howling crazy fuckdog"
> >
> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.
> >
> > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 
> >
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> >
> > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> >
> > Rensselaer math department
> > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > Not again!
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > tarded:
> > >

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker
Volney's profile photo
Volney
10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023
Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"





to
Kibo's corpse fucking=AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

Why Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, why???

On Tuesday, May 9, 2023 at 2:25:42 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics

Why Kibo? Because they cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse, or because they fail at doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?

Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

Why does the CIA, NSF pay Kibo to stalk every day of the year in sci.math and sci.physics when he knows no math or physics with his 938 is 12% short of 945.

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> Volney
>
> 7
>
> unread,

> > Rensselaer's Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt,Donald Schwendeman
> > Kibo on howling crazy fuckdogs
> > On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 6:07:13 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"antiscience"
> > >"howling crazy fuckdog"
> >
> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney aka Volney the paid for 30 year stalker.
> >
> > Why Kibo? Because they cannot ask the simple physics question???
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 
> >
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
> > Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang
> >
> > Rensselaer math department
> > Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann
> > On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > fails at math and science:

> > > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > > Not again!
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > >
> > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > > tarded:
> > >

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo-I want to fuck her corpse> Harvard's Dr.Randall,Dr.Hau why Kibo, because they cannot ask the simple question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle???

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney 30 year nonstop molesting and harassing people in science
On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 12:11:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"math hater"
> "mindless barking fuckdog"

> >Kibo Parry Moroney Volney 30 year nonstop stalker
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 5:01:31 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >Village Idiot"
> > fails at math and science:
> Why does Kibo hate the Pope?? Is it his necrophilia??
>
> > Kibo hates the Pope but why???
> > Kibo has thousands of post headers declaring Kibo hates the Pope-- is is just sheer insanity of Kibo??
> > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> >
> > Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker
> > Volney's profile photo
> > Volney
> > 10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023
> > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"
>
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 2:15:39 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >Village Idiot
>
> 9
> Re: 2sickfuck spammers Fritz Feldhase,WM-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus, and his mindless Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and geometry failure who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse
> 11:02 AM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> Fritz Feldhase
> 12
> unread,
> A difficult question
> Fritz Feldhase schrieb am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2023 um 16:45:13 UTC+2: > On Wednesday, May 10, 2023
> 10:58 AM
> 
> Jan Burse's profile photo
> Jan Burse
> , …
>
> 8
> Math FAQ
> Germany's WM and others are spinning sci.math as a gay pick up bar, as evidence from Franz's
> 10:56 AM
> 
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Re: Archimedes "psychoceramic" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> 10:54 AM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> William
> 760
> unread,
> An inconsistency between set theory and classical mathematics?
> 10:54 AM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
>
> 21
> RE: 2-Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games. Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither
> 10:21 AM
> 
> Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
> Mostowski Collapse
> , …
>
> 69
> DC Proof gay shit for brains only?
> WM, William, Fritz Feldhase shit-for-brains says Stanford Uni (so he says) Earle Jones. Earle Jones
> 10:07 AM
> 
>
>
>
> Kibo Parry M-V on Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher. Why Kibo?? Because they are geometry failures who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse? Or because they cannot ask the simple question which is the Atom's electron-- Muon or 0.5MeV particle???
> > On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 10:47:47 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Blowfly of Math and Botfly of Physics highly illogical
> > >"shithead oaf of math"
> >
> >
> >
> > > Augel is your name Angel or Kibo Parry Moroney volney???
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Angel
> > > 7
> > > unread,
> > > Thunderbird Posting Issues
> > > Pencil and paper and ask GoD............ On Saturday, February 23, 2019 at 7:11:40 PM UTC+2,
> > > 2:11 AM
> > > 
> > >
> > > , …
> > > Volney
> > > 3
> > > unread,
> > >
> > > ,
> > > Angel
> > > 2
> > > unread,
> > > Re: Einstein is wrong!!
> > > Pencil and paper and ask GoD............ On Friday, April 14, 2023 at 8:18:11 PM UTC+2, Rexford
> > > 2:11 AM
> > > 
> > > mitchr...@gmail.com's profile photo
> > > mitchr...@gmail.com
> > > ,
> > > Angel
> > > 2
> > > unread,
> > > Dark matter would tug on outer galactic stars from all directions
> > > 2:11 AM
> > > 
> > > olcott's profile photo
> > > olcott
> > > ,
> > > Angel
> > > 2
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 2:23:54 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > "necrophile"
> > > > >
> > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > Here we go again...
> > > > >
> > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You already said that.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > >
> > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> #7-1, My 39th published book
>
> AP Atom Model replacing the Rutherford-Bohr Atom Model (Physics series for High School Book 1)
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
>
> #1 New Release in General Chemistry & Reference
>
> Last revision was April 2023. This is AP's 39th published book of science..
>
> Preface: The Rutherford and Bohr model of the Atom is seen now as fake physics. And it will take a- lot of time before that nonsense is removed and replaced in science textbooks and classrooms for a truer model of the Atom. So to accelerate that movement towards the truth of what the Atom is, I present this short book for High School. In the age of the Internet, when we discover true science but am teaching fake science, we need a process to quicken the pace of exit of fake science. Not to wait around for 50 years to be teaching the true science, we should be teaching the true science as fast as possible and to remove the fake science in our school curriculums in a timely and orderly manner. So this small book is a pattern for future removal of fake science from school curriculums. This small book explains what the Rutherford-Bohr model was and why it was phony science. And I explain what replaces the Rutherford-Bohr model with the AP model of the Atom. So the pattern is -- show both -- and then authors of texts will eliminate the fake science until it is a passing footnote.
>
> The Internet helps in this pace of cleaning up and cleaning out fake science. Back when Wegener tried to introduce his true theory of Continental Drift, the slow pace of correction took Wegener 50 years to get the true science in geology. We must not allow 50 years of fake science to be mainstream anymore.
>
>
> Cover Picture is a coil and a bar magnet and a galvanometer that measures the current produced as the bar magnet is thrust through the coil. This is Faraday's Law and needs to be taught in High School.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QKHRWG8
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 10, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 2214 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 21 pages
> • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #220,321 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #5 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #39 in General Chemistry & Reference
> #381 in General Chemistry
>
>
>
> #7-2, 40th published book
>
> How the Sun and Stars truly shine, not by fusion, but by Faraday's Law (Physics series for High School Book 2)
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)
> One of my recent books (published a few days ago) was the AP model of the interior of atoms replacing the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom. And the differences are vast between these two atom models, for the AP model has the Faraday law going on, with actual work and job for the subatomic particles. And in that Atom model book, I was complaining that our modern science education school system has no good way of ridding itself of fake science where we keep on teaching propaganda and fake science for as much as 50 years beyond the discovery of what the true underlying science actually is. I gave as an example the Wegener Continental Drift theory in geology, where students had to suffer 50 years of a fake static-earth-theory when the Continental Drift theory was all around. One of the reasons for the delay in teaching the truth of science, is there is so much money interests involved of people selling fake science textbooks. And this is where the Internet can come in and play a vital role in school education, because the Internet can publish books of "true science" and get them exposed to a world audience, and so fake science like the static-earth theory would have been gone long before 50 years had elapsed if the internet were present for Wegener.
>
> But now an even bigger and more important theory of science and physics is here and threatens to throw out as fake science the fusion theory of star energy, especially since it is "How the Sun shines". In effect, the question is, how do all stars shine? What is their energy source. And hard to believe that this topic in current science education with their explanation as "being fusion" is fake science. We all know what the answer is from present day science-- that stars and sun shine because of fusion. That they fuse hydrogen and light elements to make heavier elements like helium and in that fusion they give off energy which is sunshine. But is it true? Is that true science. You would be surprised to find out, that such is not the truth of how stars and Sun shine. They do not shine because of fusion. They shine because the Faraday law is going on inside each and every atom in that star or the Sun.
>
> Now, here is another science teaching that needs to replace the fake science of fusion for the Sun and stars. And it should not take 50 years like Wegener's continental drift to push out the fake static earth theory. We should not have to wait 50 years for our teachers to teach the truth about how the stars and Sun shine with energy. And so, here again, just as in the previous book "AP's model of the Atom", I present the old theory of how stars shine and alongside that old fake theory, I present the new true theory. And in that presentation, we can give the entire science education community, give them about say 5 years of time in which to completely remove the old fake theory that fusion causes stars and Sun to shine with energy. When in fact, the truth is, Faraday Law causes stars and the Sun to shine.
>
> Cover Picture is my photograph of a Google search on my computer of Sun images.
> Length: 14 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1629 KB
> Print Length: 14 pages
> Publication Date: April 12, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07QRPZQ4Q
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #289,187 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #4150 in Physics (Books)
> #8 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #679 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>  
>
> #7-3, My 26th published book
>
> AP-Faraday Law replacing Nebular Dust Cloud theory (Physics series for High School Book 3)
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
>
>
> Last revision was April 2023. This is AP's 26th published book of science..
>
> Preface: When I first published this book in 2019, unfortunately it was not on the level of High School students comprehension. I have to tone it down for these young minds to learn what it is I am saying. So I make a massive overhaul revision that the High School students can grasp fully the ideas. This is a huge benefit of electronic book publishing in that a author can test his book and see if students comprehend the materials. Unfortunately for this book published in 2019 was far over the heads of High School students and now I correct that problem. In 2019 I was running a marathon of science book publishing, for college students mostly and unfortunately that college book writing seeped into this High School book.
> Revising my 26th book of science:: AP-Faraday Law replacing Nebular Dust Cloud theory (Physics series for High School Book 3). I am in the process of revising my 26th book of science. It starts with the story of the Nebular Dust Cloud theory and why that is a terribly phony theory of science.
>
> Cover Picture: Nasa pictures of some of the planets of our Solar System from my computer.
>
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07NNXZ9Z8
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 22, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1586 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 30 pages
>
>
>
>
>
>
> #7-4, 41st published book
>
> Unification of the 4 Forces of Physics as All being Electromagnetism (Physics series for High School Book 4)
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)
> Last revision was Feb2023. This is AP's 41st book of science.
>
>
> Preface: Ever since I discovered the universe was one big atom in 1990 and that this atom was a plutonium atom, I vowed to solve what the unification of the 4 forces of physics was. Those 4 forces in 1990 were 1) Strong Nuclear force, 2) Weak Nuclear force, 3) Electricity/Magnetism force 4) Gravity. In physics, much of the 1900s was spent on finding a unification of those four forces. Most of the famous physicists of the 1900s were dabbling in this desire to unify those 4 forces. Trouble was, hardly anyone trying to unify the four forces of physics had a logical mind to be ever able to do that task. And, sadly, when the history books of physics are written on the topic of unification of the 4 forces of physics, it is not a achievement but rather a whisking away by a broom that sweeps away dust and dirt. There never were 4 forces of physics, all the forces of physics were just electricity and magnetism. If all the forces of physics is electricity and magnetism means there are no 3 other forces to have to unify. And the year was 2017 with AP's 8th edition of Atom Totality Universe that the slow reality was beginning to unfold. And the reasoning is utterly simple and easy. Since the proton is the coil of Faraday's Law and the electron muon is the bar magnet in Faraday's Law, there is no Strong Nuclear Force (see my book AP model of atoms). In addition, with the Faraday Law going on, there is no Weak Nuclear Force for the radioactivity of atoms is mostly the ejection of magnetic monopoles due to Faraday Law. Gravity as 10^-40 weaker than Electromagnetism and with the identical same formula as Coulomb law of EM, means there never was a gravity force apart from electricity and magnetism. Some in Old Physics complain that EM has both attract and repel. But they were wrong on that account also. For there are two concepts-- actual repel and then there is a concept of "denial of same space occupancy". Magnetism and Electricity have no repel force at all. They have a denial of same space occupancy which fools many in science and physics. So what happened in the history of Physics, with their quest to unify the 4 forces, ended in a whimper, where it was seen that the interior of atoms has a Faraday Law of EM going on, which immediately dismisses a Strong Nuclear force and a Weak Nuclear force. And gravity is just a minimal EM attraction force.
>
> So Old Physics had a quest to unify 4 forces, but it turns out, there never was 4 different separate forces.
>
> Cover Picture: My photograph of page 2-10 from The Feynman Lectures on Physics 1963, in which my first understanding that there were 4 forces of physics and how they compared to one another. I do not recall when I saw this, perhaps when 20 years old-- 1970 or thereabouts at the University of Cincinnati. I do remember taking a class in physics where all it was, was watching a film series of Feynman lecturing. I do not recall how many films that was, but I thoroughly enjoyed it. This film series on Feynman occurred at Utah State University circa 1978.
>
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07QMLMJDN
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 14, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1407 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 28 pages
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,879,393 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #508 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #1,218 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #1,308 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
>
>
> #7-5, 42nd published book
>
> Charge does not exist in Science, what does exist is WIRE-Vector-Direction in electromagnetism//(Physics series for High School Book 5) Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> If you ask me from 2010 to 2020 what the worst evil in physics and chemistry was, it would have been easy for me to say "charge" in physics and chemistry. Not only was charge wrong in physics but it kept the illusion and delusion of negative numbers alive in mathematics, with the physics -1 charge.. So from about 2010 to 2020, I was desperately wanting to get rid of the physics "charge". To my pleasant surprise, I really could not get rid of physics charge until after 2017, when I discovered the real electron was the muon at 105MeV, not the tiny particle JJ Thomson found in 1897 of 0.5MeV and which Thomson assigned to be the electron of -1 charge. Turns out, what Thomson had found was the Dirac Magnetic Monopole of the 1930s. You see, Thomson found something that would not be known of as a particle until Dirac needed a particle of a magnetic monopole. The charge in physics and chemistry and biology and all other sciences that use electrons, protons and electricity, for the charge is this magnetic monopole. Let me explain this history below in a few chapters.
>
> Cover Picture: Shows some wires on a Galvanometer and also shows some wires as being part of the Lewis Structure in Chemistry, those white arms or tentacles in Lewis theory of Chemistry are wires of magnetic monopole.
>
> Length: 29 pages
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1398 KB
> Print Length: 29 pages
> Publication Date: April 15, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07QSS4HZC
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>  
>
>
> #7-6, 43rd published book
>
> Doppler redshift (blueshift) has nothing to do with motion of source and cannot tell you distance// (Physics series for High School Book 6) Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 29May2021. And this is AP's 43rd book of science published.
>
> Preface:
> What the Doppler redshift & blueshift really are-- heat and magnetism shifts of 8 Rings of the proton torus in hydrogen, or any other atom. Old Physics had the interior of atoms all messed-up, not knowing what the real electron of atoms was; and with that messed-up view and understanding and idea of atoms, they would mess-up on what is called the Doppler Redshift of spectral lines of atoms.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN : B07QTFYXZL
> • Publication date : April 17, 2019
> • Language : English
> • File size : 2177 KB
> • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print length : 17 pages
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #227,141 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #3 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #81 in Cosmology (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #332 in Cosmology (Books)
> •
>
>
>
>
>
>
> #7-7, 53rd published book
>
> Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
>
> Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
>
> To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
>
> Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B07VMZ698G
> Publication date : July 26, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 1801 KB
> Simultaneous device usage : Unlimited
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Enabled
> Print length : 22 pages
> Lending : Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #214,475 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #375 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #1,960 in Physics (Books)  
>
>
> #7-8, 62nd published book
>
> Elementary Angular-Momentum with Force of Gravity// Angular-Momentum equals Electric Field// Physics series for High School, Book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 14Mar2021. This is AP's 62nd published book of science.
>
> --------------------------
> Table of Contents
> --------------------------
>
> 1) Angular Momentum is one of the most difficult concepts of physics.
>
> 2) Strange motion of Uranus and its satellites.
>
> 3) UNITS of PHYSICS
>
> 4) Linear Momentum
>
> 5) Angular Momentum
>
> 6) Principle that Angular Momentum is represented by an ellipse.
>
> 7) Principle of Gravity
>
> 8) Return and Review of the Moons (satellites) of Uranus.
>
> 9) Quantum Duality that is Electricity to Magnetism, and that is Angular Momentum with Force of Gravity.
>
> 10) Angular-Momentum equals Electric-Field.
>
>
> Product details
> • File Size : 959 KB
> • ASIN : B07XT4SP6N
> • Word Wise : Enabled
> • Print Length : 16 pages
> • Publication Date : September 11, 2019
> • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> • Screen Reader : Supported
> • Simultaneous Device Usage : Unlimited
> • Language: : English
> • Lending : Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #171,127 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2 in 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #12 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #21 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
>
> #7-9, 82nd published book
>
> World's first experimental Proof that the Proton rest mass is 840 MeV and the real electron is the muon //Physics series for High School Book 9 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 4Jul2022. And this is AP's 82nd published book on science.
>
> Preface: I published this book on 22Jan2020 and wanting to get the message out to High School students in chemistry and physics what the true proton, and true electron and true Lewis Structure were. And for High School students not to be fooled into the Lewis 8 structure of chemistry, when it actually is a Lewis 6 structure, that the true structure is Lewis 6. And so I classified this book into the High School series of my books, hoping to avert the disaster of teaching High School students the wrong chemistry and wrong physics, only to have to re-learn the true chemistry and true physics when in College. This I consider a disaster in modern education, to teach in High School the wrong and false science and have students re-learn the truth.
>
> It is a modern day tragedy of education, to teach students in High School fake science, only to have to re-learn it later.
>
> World's first experimental proof that the real proton rest mass is 840MeV not 938, and the real electron was the muon of 105MeV, and that little particle of 0.5MeV that J.J. Thomson discovered in 1897 turns out not to be the electron of atoms but rather the Dirac magnetic monopoles of atoms. The experimental proof comes as a surprise, because most people would think some big physics machine such as CERN would prove the proton is 840MeV and muon is the true electron. Surprise, because it turns out that Lewis 6 structure proves the proton and electron from the molecule CO and N2, via dissociation energy and the cube has 6 faces, not 8. The Lewis structure of bonding, proves the proton must be 840 MeV and true electron is the muon at 105MeV. However, some big machines have also seen a 840MeV proton. But in a bizarre ironic twist, the Old Chemistry Lewis 8 structure helps to prove that the proton is a 8 ring torus. And this is a difficult thing to understand, that Lewis 8 was wrong for chemical bonds but was correct for number of rings a proton has.
>
> Cover Picture are Lewis Structure models of the CO, N2, O2, and H2O molecules. The oxygen atoms are colored orange; the nitrogen atoms are colored blue; the hydrogen atoms are small and colored white with a blue ring around them; the carbon atom is colored black. Notice the unshared dipoles on O2 and H2O. Notice those two magnetic monopoles that are unshared on the O2 molecule and the H2O molecule those unshared dipoles are actually stuck together such as the arc of a magnetic field, although in the picture they are not connected. The magnetism of those end-caps in the picture were not strong enough to stick the two together to form a arc. I suppose I could have gotten a small magnet to stick the two unshared monopoles together. And notice the other two molecules CO and N2 have no unshared dipole or unshared pole. They, CO and N2, are among the strongest chemical bonds that exist and the reason is that they fill completely the Lewis 6 Structure, no unshared pole, magnetic monopole that is.
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0845124DX
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ January 22, 2020
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 610 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 59 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
> #7-10, 83rd published book
>
> Airfoil Lift solved, true theory of how flight is possible///Physics series for High School book 10 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> When I was in High School, in the Cincinnati, Ohio region, I remember reading in "General Science" classrooms of what was the explanation of why planes flew in the sky. Of course, so young of age we never questioned the truth or veracity of such, we accepted it, especially since we are graded on ideas like that. And the picture we saw of how a airplane flies, is a picture of a wing with the air having many lines of pressure under the wing and few lines of pressure over the top of the wing. And then a arrow of lift upwards because the high pressure below the wing lifted the wing and airplane upwards. I do not think it was given the name Bernoulli's law, and I am certain that Newton's law of every action has equal and opposite reaction was not mentioned back then circa 1965 in Ohio classrooms.
>
> But now, fast forward to January 23, 2020 some 55 years later, and to my pleasant surprise, in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN (SA) magazine, their FEB2020 issue starting page 44 is an article titled "The Enigma of Aerodynamic Lift" "No one can completely explain why planes stay in the air" by Ed Regis.
>
> And I had just published a few days earlier in January, two books talking about the fact that the chemistry molecule of O2 that composes 21% of the air, is a polar molecular. Polar molecule just like water, H2O is a polar molecule. A polar molecule is filled with electricity and magnetism, just ready to go into action. And so, reading this SA article, and fresh in mind that O2 is brimming with electricity and magnetism, made me realize-- there is a new and third and better explanation for why airplanes fly. Thus was born the true theory of why planes fly, as you read the text below.
>
> Cover Picture: Is my photo of a Google Search on Bumblebees.
>
> Product details
> Publication Date : January 24, 2020
> Print Length : 25 pages
> Language: : English
> ASIN : B0846F1JKP
> Word Wise : Enabled
> File Size : 964 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Lending : Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #3,363,074 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #920 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #7,760 in General Technology & Reference
> ◦ #11,536 in Physics (Kindle Store)
>
>
>
>
>
> #7-11, 85th published book
>
> Proof Stars shine from Faraday Law, not from fusion // (Physics series for High School book 11) Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> On 30JAN2020, while watching the BBC on TV, was news and video images of the Sun's surface, showing what looks like golden chips, with white flowing magnetism or electricity as the white flowing in between the golden chips. This was exciting, extremely exciting because with this "observational data" I could use it to prove that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion but from Faraday Law of each and every atom inside the Sun having its muons thrust through its attendant proton coil and producing electricity and magnetism via the Faraday and Ampere laws. This is what gives stars their shining outbursts of energy, their starshine or for the sun, sunshine. If star energy was due to fusion, there would be very little light in the universe. There would be no life on Earth. So with the 30 JAN2020 report, I can use those video imagines to actually prove our Sun is a Faraday Law machine, not a fusion machine.
>
> Cover Picture is my photograph of the BBC video image. A BBC quote: "The Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope on Hawaii has released pictures that show features as small as 30km across."
>
> Product details
> File Size: 963 KB
> Print Length: 20 pages
> Publication Date: January 30, 2020
> Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B084D54TH8
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>  
>
> #7-12, 87th published book
>
> Photosynthesis // Physics series for High School book 12 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 14Nov2021. This is AP's 87th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Photosynthesis is big important science, it is the food foundation source for animal life on Earth. It is the science of how plants turn sunlight plus carbon dioxide CO2 gas plus water H2O into carbohydrates (sugar) for which is the basis of the food chain for animals. So here we study and learn how Photosynthesis works. How sunlight energy plus CO2 plus H2O are turned into a sugar carbohydrate of CH2O.
> Cover Picture: Is a photo of a Google search for chlorophyll, magnesium, capacitor. The key to understanding how Photosynthesis works is the capacitor of physics, and the magnesium metal atom in chlorophyll forms a capacitor. Do you see that picture of all those balls in a planar sheet? That is a capacitor with the magnesium metal being the ball, and the tail hanging down from the ball are formed-sugars.
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084T8NHXP
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 13, 2020
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1134 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 36 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>  
> #7-13, 116th published book
>
> Rewrite of all Wave theory of Old Physics // Physics series for High School book 13 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium
> #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> For decades I have experimented with generating waves on strings, and never found a sinusoid wave on strings. I could not generate a down pulse, but only up pulses. And so I decided that Waves of Old Physics were fake and needs to be trashcanned. This topic affects not only physics and the hard sciences but also mathematics for they too, still believe in the fakery of sine, cosine and sinusoid waves. What replaces this fakery is the true waves of physics and mathematics, the Periodic Polynomials which are a sequence of parabolas.
>
> Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a set of experiments using a high speed motion camera of waves generated on a coil spring in the High School Physics textbook of PSSC, 1971, page 96.
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 636 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: April 28, 2020
> Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B087TKZ3T9
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray:  Not Enabled  
> Word Wise: Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #261,678 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #17 in Electromagnetic Theory
> #36 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> #9 in 30-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>  
> #7-14, 161st published book
> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science..
>
> Preface:
> A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
>
> It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
>
> Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x

Click here to read the complete article

I'll say it again for the logic impaired. -- Larry Wall

tech / sci.math / Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer but a evil stalker shithead that wants to torture more South Korean Moon Bears

Subject	Author
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Kibo Parry Moroney, not a comic, not a scientist, not a engineer	Archimedes Plutonium