AP's 241st book of science Psychology Levels of Insanity Categorization List // psychology science by Archimedes Plutonium 241st book of science for AP: Levels of Insanity AP's 241st book of science-- Psychology Levels of Insanity Categorizati
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
May 21, 2023, 6:38:31 PM (18 hours ago)

The last ten books of science by AP have been heavily physics and math, and I need a rest and
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
May 21, 2023, 9:12:35 PM (15 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The science of psychology never went through a period of growth where they made Levels of Insanity. Most sciences go through this growth period where data is tabulated and made into a table of levels.

Most sciences early on do this, make category lists so as to move onto the next development stage of from the Table surmise theories.

Why did psychology bypass this Levels of Sanity or Levels of Insanity ? My guess is that psychology has always been a fractured science with no leadership. And the only progress was to see what chemical drugs reduced bad behavior. Another factor is that the DNA molecule was only discovered and used in recent times.

But the purpose of this book is to finally start Psychology where it needed to start early in its development-- Categories and Levels of Insanity.

And from the table we can move forward with well based experiments and probes to fetch theories of psychology.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
May 21, 2023, 10:52:34 PM (14 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Most sciences go through a Category List, a Table of data and observations as they move from that Table to theory of the science. So we see three broad phases for a science. First it collects data and observations. Next it makes category levels and lists and tables of the data and observations. Finally with the table of facts and observations, the science moves into the theory phase.

1) Facts and data and observation phase
2) Table of categories of levels of facts and data
3) Theory phase utilizing the Table, levels of facts and data

Examples:

Astronomy and Physics was in the data, facts and observation stage with Tycho Brahe and then Kepler turned it into a Table of Categories, for which Kepler would start the process of theory on the Table with his 3 laws. Then Newton would further theorize.

Biology was in the data, facts and observation stage with Wallace and Darwin, until that was compiled by Darwin into tables and levels for which finally the theory phase initiated.

Chemistry before the Table of Periodic Elements by Mendeleev was a facts and data collection. The Periodic Table was itself the category phase. All the many theories once the Table was known still bears new discoveries.

One could say that Psychology skipped the Table and Category phase because we never had a grip of genetics until DNA was unraveled starting about 1952.. Steadily we are learning that both morphology and behavior traits can be linked to DNA.

So that a Table or Category list for Psychology science could only start after 1952. But this is now 2023, and still no Table for Psychology science. And this book offers that first Table.

The idea is that we make the table, then find people who have similar behavior in a Level of that Table. We then see if we can find genetics of people with that same level, giving rise to the idea of genes that cause the electrical body to behave in that way.

For instance, Cranks of science such as the many that habituate sci.math and sci.physics, we know their crank ideas and how they constantly "crank away". So we look at their genome and see if they share what can be called "crank genetics". As for murder and big crimes, it has already been found that XYY genetic code causes the person to behave violently.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
unread,
12:28 PM (now)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Does Putin have the XYY or XXYY syndrome?? Recent survey of windfarms and undersea cables by Russia in case of war-- spy ships of Russia. If Putin has XYY he likely will end up pushing nuclear war buttons unless stopped.

Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 20, 2023
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Does Putin have the XYY or XXYY syndrome?? Recent survey of windfarms and undersea cables by Russia in case of war-- spy ships of Russia. If Putin has XYY he likely will end up pushing nuclear war buttons unless stopped.

Does Putin have the XYY or XXYY syndrome?? Recent survey of windfarms and undersea cables by Russia in case of war-- spy ships of Russia. If Putin has XYY he likely will end up pushing nuclear war buttons unless stopped.

A fabulous old book of mine that helped me to discover the Plutonium Atom Universe theory was "Concepts of Biology: a cultural perspective" Buffaloe & Throneberry 1973

On pages 325-327 speaks of a syndrome of genetics that makes a person extra aggressive in the XYY or XXYY. Rare conditions, but super aggressive and many end up as criminals in jail.

Has anyone made a genome out of Vladimir Putin?? That certainly would explain his aggression on Ukraine and now his folly of preparing for nuclear war by mapping the wind farms and cables undersea spy ships in the news as of recent.

AP

Does Putin have the XYY or XXYY syndrome?? Recent survey of windfarms and undersea cables by Russia in case of war-- spy ships of Russia. If Putin has XYY he likely will end up pushing nuclear war buttons unless stopped.

Archimedes Plutonium
Apr 20, 2023
to Plutonium Atom Universe

So?? Does Putin have the XYY or XXYY syndrome?? Recent survey of windfarms and undersea cables by Russia in case of war-- spy ships of Russia. If Putin has XYY he likely will end up pushing nuclear war buttons unless stopped.

Does Putin have the XYY or XXYY syndrome?? Recent survey of windfarms and undersea cables by Russia in case of war-- spy ships of Russia. If Putin has XYY he likely will end up pushing nuclear war buttons unless stopped.

A fabulous old book of mine that helped me to discover the Plutonium Atom Universe theory was "Concepts of Biology: a cultural perspective" Buffaloe & Throneberry 1973

On pages 325-327 speaks of a syndrome of genetics that makes a person extra aggressive in the XYY or XXYY. Rare conditions, but super aggressive and many end up as criminals in jail.

My 241st book of science--Psychology Levels of Insanity Categorization List // psychology science by Archimedes Plutonium 241st book of science for AP: Levels of Insanity-- Electrical energy levels, and DNA to confirm

AP

In March 2023, I left off with 18 levels, thinking there are at least 18 organ-systems in the human body so that each system could have electrical failure and thus 18 forms of insanity. I shall use the XYY syndrome as a unit basis for genetic genome defect to cause that form of insanity for level 1. An electrical imbalance for someone to murder.

Stalker level I put as 6th level, a level of electrical imbalance in the body, and what I hope to find in research is we take the top Usenet stalkers like Kibo , Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, Earle Jones, known stalkers and inspect their DNA genome and find stalker genes. Just as the genes XYY often leads to crime.

Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 19, 2023, 10:24:45 PM
to Plutonium Atom Universe

So now, I found 15 Systems in Human Physiology and that means I have to find at least 15 levels of Insanity for humanity ( that almost rhymes-- levels of insanity for humanity).

Now I have Violence and Aggressive behavior missing and perhaps that should be #1 level of insanity. Placing Psychosis 2nd and Schizophrenia as 3rd.
>
> As far as I know, we have just the categories of Psychosis and Schizophrenia.
>
> Perhaps what we need is a more broader category scheme where we have
>

1st level Murder

2nd level Violence & Aggression.

3rd level Rapist.

4th level Stealing.

5th level Fraudster.

6th level ...... stalker - necrophilia

7th level .....bully

8th level .... constant rudeness towards others

9th level Psychosis

10th level Schizophrenic

11th level ...... spammer and polluter

12th level .... liar

13th level ... obsessive compulsive disorder OCD much like a spammer but they keep their impulses to themselves instead of the spammer wanting to cloud and darken the view of everyone out there.

OCD is clearly a mess up in the electrical wiring of the body.

14th level.... being stubborn and is a form of obsessive compulsive disorder, but is confined to specific issues while OCD is a daily run through

15th level ... inability to change for the better but instead keep old habits-- burning leaves instead of composting

16th level .... the need to tattoo your initials onto a patients organs
The only reason it is lower than stubbornness and change out of bad habits is that the insanity of initialing your work does not present itself often

17th level .... pedantic disorder-- look down on everyone else in the world, and need to preach to them rather than a normal 1 on 1 conversation, and need to have "hints" "clues"
18th level nonstop talking... the need to be noticed all the time so the mouth is flapping all the time

I have noticed that as I write one book, it seems to stir up thoughts and ideas that becomes another book. In Usenet, from about 1993 to 2010, I would get new ideas from other posters commenting, or even engaging. But Usenet after about 2010 serves mostly as only a information board, no productive dialogue. And so I find myself, in my book writing as the very best means of stirring up new ideas.

So I recommend to any scientist, who is feeling a period of "dry spells of new ideas" is go and write a book on a topic, and probably you will have a nice flow of new ideas.

Anyway, to cut a long story short, for decades I have been searching for whether science can have a Satan, a devil along with a saint or God. Can science have God and Devil as science itself? Mighty mighty big question.

And so as I write my 241st book of science I am writing on Insanity and levels of insanity, and characterizing insanity as destructive and even evil, as a devil possessed. Contrast with Goodness and building in society, of harmony and social working together.

And so today, what ran through my mind was Lenz law. And Lenz sub-law in Old Physics stated in H&R, page 743, "Figure 5 : Lenz's law at work. If you push the magnet toward the loop, the induced current points as shown, setting up a magnetic field that opposes the motion of the magnet."

Here we have a law of physics that in appearance sake is the Devil pushing against what others do in Goodness and building the world.

Could it be that Physics has essential Goodness opposed by Evil and badness? Could it be that the world is bifurcated into forces of Good and forces of Evil.

Take for instance the debt ceiling bill in USA congress needs to be passed before the deadline of June 1, otherwise many are hurt. So we see a force of Goodness-- pass the bill-- and the Devil with forces of evil-- obstruct and default.

Almost every activity in the world has force of Goodness and is met with and countered by forces of Bad and Evil.

In physics, the Faraday law produces electricity, but the Lenz law opposes.

So I am writing about Insanity as something messed up in the body of its organs or systems where electricity is not functioning properly. Can we call sanity as building, as good will and good nature, of passive social fitting in, while insanity is the opposite-- violence, destroy, noise, fighting, never fitting in, but rebelling, and always backtalk.

Just as the XYY syndrome is a proven fact of biology, of heightened violence and aggression, leading to crime. And the levels of insanity are a quantification of body electricity gone amok and gone awry.

AP

☣ of Math and ☢ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> humiliates himself in public by writing:
> I shall use the XYY syndrome as a unit basis for genetic genome defect to cause that form of insanity for level 1.
So you have XYY syndrome? Is that why you are so aggressive against
anyone who corrects your many mistakes? Does it also explain your gayness?

I see XYY males tend to have lower than average IQs. That makes sense
for you as well.

Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.

On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics
>"necrophile"
>"Pope Arky the Last"


> Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"
>
>
> Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.
>
> The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.
>
> But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
>
>
> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
>
>
>
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > "self diagnosed as insane"
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
>
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
>
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
>
>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
>
>
>
> Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..
>
>
>
>
> Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.
>
> Kibo in CIA
> Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
>
> Resignation of Rebecca Lynn Keiser NSF
> Resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF
> Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.
>
> Pres.Biden please check your Justice dept to see if it is legal for the US govt to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk other US citizens for 30 years non-stop, and probably the resignation at NSF
>
>
> On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 2:02:23 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >Village Idiot"
> > The Physics of Corpse Fucking (illustrated in color), Physics series for High School, book 7
> >
> > Ewww, gross! Now you are teaching corpse fucking to high school
> > students? Illustrated, no less?
> >
> >
> >Drag Queen of Science, especially physics and logic
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 12:26:53 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "necrophile"
> >"psychoceramic"
>
>
> On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 11:57:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Time for even more punishment, Stupid
> 
>
>
> President Biden, when coming to office, you should have inspected your crew in the Executive Branch if they fit your type of service--especially Dr. Panchanathan at the NSF. For there is serious concern on my part that Dr. Panchanathan grants federal dollars to paying stalkers of Usenet like James Kibo Parry who stalks nonstop for 30 years-- constant hatred of AP, of the Pope and many others.
>
> Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo to stalk??? If so, please replace him..
>
> Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.
>
> NSF Dr.Panchanathan resign and get someone in there who knows science who knows Maxwell Equations, not chutes & ladders and Pokemon games. Get a leader at NSF who has brains enough to know it is --- bad bad business--- to pay stalkers to stalk Usenet-- Panchanathan is worse at NSF than Trump is at presidency, and Panchanathan was a Trump appointment.
>
> Why does the NSF hate the Pope??? You should all be all ashamed of yourself at the NSF and write the Pope a letter of apology for the James Kibo Parry Moroney Volney constant hate spew on the Pope.
>
> ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> Controversy
> Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> --- end quote ---
>
> NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
>
> Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> France Anne Cordova
> Subra Suresh
> Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> Rita R. Colwell
> Neal Francis Lane
> John Howard Gibbons 1993
>
> Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> 
>
>
> NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff are they teaching corpse fucking in High School rather than physics is the question on the mind of Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney. No wonder they dodge the question of which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
> >
> > On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 1:04:24 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Corpse Fucking (illustrated in color), Physics series for High School, book 7
> > >"psychoceramic"
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> Trump was anti-science, can anyone expect Dr.Panchanathan to be not-anti-science. Panchanathan should resign with his ugly paying of stalkers-- if true.
> And if true, the NSF owes a letter of apology to the Pope for constantly smearing the Pope in Kibo's hate spews.