Kibo>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart

Kibo, never any math or physics in your 30 years of hate spew stalking.

On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "Drag Queen of Science"

On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 9:02:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"imp of physics"

Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

AP writes: Actually, I do not know which is worse-- Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) necrophilia or his hatred of the Pope. But all can see that a 30 year nonstop stalker-- Kibo is insane as all-can-get-out

> > Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker
> > Volney's profile photo
> > Volney
> > 10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023
> > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 2:15:39 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >Village Idiot
> Augǝl's profile photo
> Augǝl
> Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> 
> Is Kibo Your good friend ?
>
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney
> Jan 2, 2023, 2:10:42 AM
> 
> Tunicate of Math and Sea Squirt of Physics Archimedes "I ate my brain" Plutonium <<
>
> Jan 2, 2023, 2:33:37 AM
> 
> Re: 3-Nicholas Thompson, Wired magazine// Kibo Parry Moroney, stalker sickfuck gets published in
>
> Jan 2, 2023, 5:59:51 PM
> 
> Kibo Parry M why is Harvard's Lisa Randall and Dr. Hau CCP lackey On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5
>
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney
> Jan 3, 2023, 9:15:19 AM
>
> 
> Michael Moroney wrote: >
> Jan 8, 2023, 12:55:12 AM
> 
> Kibo, this is sci.math, not your forgery and your necrophilia Kibo Parry (Moron-ey) shrivelling into
>
> Michael Moroney's profile photo
> Michael Moroney
> Jan 26, 2023, 10:55:02 PM
> 
> "Imp of Math"
> Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
> Jeffrey Rubard
> Jan 30, 2023, 3:36:03 PM
> 
>
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Feb 6, 2023, 11:43:17 PM
>  "Putin's Stooge"
> Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
> Jeffrey Rubard
> Feb 9, 2023, 2:08:05 PM
> 
> On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:43:17 PM UTC-8, Volney wrote: >
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Feb 11, 2023, 3:45:30 AM
> 
> Jeffrey Rubard's profile photo
> Jeffrey Rubard
> Feb 11, 2023, 4:17:50 PM
> 
> On Saturday, February 11, 2023 at 1:45:30 AM UTC-8, Volney wrote: >
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Feb 14, 2023, 12:26:29 AM
> 
>
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Feb 18, 2023, 4:32:41 PM
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Feb 18, 2023, 6:12:27 PM
> 
> On Tue Feb 7 00:43:06 2023 Volney wrote: > ?? of Math and ?? of Physics Archimedes "
> Message has been deleted
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> Feb 18, 2023, 6:54:11 PM
> 
> On Sun Feb 19 00:12:18 2023 Earle Jones wrote: > On Tue Feb 7 00:43:06 2023 Volney wrote: >
> Message has been deleted
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Feb 19, 2023, 1:20:16 AM
> 
> On 2/18/2023 7:12 PM, Earle Jones wrote: > On Tue Feb 7 00:43:06 2023 Volney wrote: >> ?? of
>
> Feb 21, 2023, 9:56:58 PM
> 
> Kibo corpse fucking--Harvard's Dr.Hau & CIA's Kate Heinzelman & NSF Dr.Panchanathan
>
> Mar 1, 2023, 2:51:44 AM
> 
> Kibo Parry MV on Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher. Why Kibo?? Because they are geometry failures who cannot
>
> Mar 31, 2023, 6:18:09 PM
> 
> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall,
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Apr 8, 2023, 12:06:21 AM
> 
> Kibo's_I want to fuck her corpse_CIA Kate Heinzelman,AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Apr 8, 2023, 2:16:10 PM
> 
> I always thought that Dr. Panchanathan was under-qualified as NSF. We need someone in there who can
> Dan Christensen's profile photo
> Dan Christensen
> Apr 8, 2023, 11:30:13 PM
> 
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of AP's fake math and science On Saturday, April 8, 2023
> Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
> Mostowski Collapse
> Apr 9, 2023, 6:07:48 AM
> 
> STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of Dan Christensen fake math and science Its funny, since DC
> Message has been deleted
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> Apr 15, 2023, 10:57:36 PM
> 
> Kibo Parry MV on Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher. Why Kibo?? Because they are geometry failures who cannot
> Message has been deleted
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 2:29 PM (1 hour ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> Why does Kibo hate the Pope?? Is it his necrophilia??
>
> > Kibo hates the Pope but why???
> > Kibo has thousands of post headers declaring Kibo hates the Pope-- is is just sheer insanity of Kibo??
> > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> >
> > Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney-- 30 year hate spew stalker
> > Volney's profile photo
> > Volney
> > 10:57 PM (14 minutes ago) 9 May, 2023
> > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure"
> On Wednesday, May 10, 2023 at 2:15:39 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >Village Idiot
> 9
> Re: 2sickfuck spammers Fritz Feldhase,WM-- never a geometry proof of Fundamental theorem of Calculus, and his mindless Boole logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, and geometry failure who cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse
> 11:02 AM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> Fritz Feldhase
> 12
> unread,
> A difficult question
> Fritz Feldhase schrieb am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2023 um 16:45:13 UTC+2: > On Wednesday, May 10, 2023
> 10:58 AM
> 
> Jan Burse's profile photo
> Jan Burse
> , …
>
> 8
> Math FAQ
> Germany's WM and others are spinning sci.math as a gay pick up bar, as evidence from Franz's
> 10:56 AM
> 
> Volney's profile photo
> Volney
> Re: Archimedes "psychoceramic" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> 10:54 AM
> 
> WM's profile photo
> WM
> , …
> William
> 760
> unread,
> An inconsistency between set theory and classical mathematics?
> 10:54 AM
> 
> Earle Jones's profile photo
> Earle Jones
> , …
>
> 21
> RE: 2-Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games. Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither
> 10:21 AM
> 
> Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
> Mostowski Collapse
> , …
>
> 69
> DC Proof gay shit for brains only?
> WM, William, Fritz Feldhase shit-for-brains says Stanford Uni (so he says) Earle Jones. Earle Jones
> 10:07 AM
> 

On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:02:53 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Kibo>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
>
> Kibo, never any math or physics in your 30 years of hate spew stalking.
>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "Drag Queen of Science"
>
> On Saturday, October 29, 2022 at 9:02:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"imp of physics"
>
>
> Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> AP writes: Actually, I do not know which is worse-- Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) necrophilia or his hatred of the Pope. But all can see that a 30 year nonstop stalker-- Kibo is insane as all-can-get-out

"I think you may not have caught up with the 21st century, here."

⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ☀️⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀

😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
😎😎

On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 12:07:21 PM UTC-7, V wrote:
> ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
> ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ☀️⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
> ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
> ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀
> ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀
> ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀
>
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
> 😎😎

Once Was: "Where'd those messages go?", etc.

Kibo's corpse fucking--Harvard's Dr. Hau. Why Kibo Parry has your 30 year nonstop stalking come to necrophilia. And why Harvard's Dr. Hau?? Is it because she refuses to turn the light off in slow light experiments and prove AP correct, that Light Waves are close loop circuits and __not arrow rays with head and tail__?
Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) 30 year nonstop hate spew stalker
On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 11:23:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"Drag Queen of Science"
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>

--- quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle)

Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.

Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.

To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.

Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) More progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed.

2) Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.

3) Explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.

4) Explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.

5) Comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.

6) Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.

7) Name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed.

8) Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3x10^8meters/second.

9) Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.

10) Apparently the light in BEC vanishes also as the laser is turned off Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" challenge.

11) Mysteries start to unveil Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off//making common-sense of the speed of light-- where it has two speeds-- a linear and a angular.

12) Slow light helps us prove that light itself is closed loop ellipses Re: Quantum Entanglement is easy to measure with BEC slow light.

13) Zeilinger & Kaiser team //Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.

14) Summary.

--- end quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"mindless barking fuckdog"
> > "math hater"
> > fails at math and science:

Kibo_I want to fuck her corpse-Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > tarded:
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > Not again!
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> >
> > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Imp of Math"
> > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> >
> >
> > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell..thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Court Jester of Math"
> >
> > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> >
> > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> >
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> >
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > Not again!
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> >
> > Re: Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse > AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> > by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 10:47:29 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Kibo's corpse fucking--Harvard's Dr. Hau. Why Kibo Parry has your 30 year nonstop stalking come to necrophilia. And why Harvard's Dr. Hau?? Is it because she refuses to turn the light off in slow light experiments and prove AP correct, that Light Waves are close loop circuits and __not arrow rays with head and tail__?
> Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) 30 year nonstop hate spew stalker
> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 11:23:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"Drag Queen of Science"
> > On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"Drag Queen of Science"
> >
> > Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> --- quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---
> Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle)
>
> Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.
>
> Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.
>
> To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.
>
> Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.
>
> --------------------------
> Table of Contents
> --------------------------
>
> 1) More progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed.
>
> 2) Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
>
> 3) Explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.
>
> 4) Explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.
>
> 5) Comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
>
> 6) Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.
>
> 7) Name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed.
>
> 8) Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3x10^8meters/second.
>
> 9) Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.
>
> 10) Apparently the light in BEC vanishes also as the laser is turned off Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" challenge.
>
> 11) Mysteries start to unveil Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off//making common-sense of the speed of light-- where it has two speeds-- a linear and a angular.
>
> 12) Slow light helps us prove that light itself is closed loop ellipses Re: Quantum Entanglement is easy to measure with BEC slow light.
>
> 13) Zeilinger & Kaiser team //Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.
>
> 14) Summary.
>
> --- end quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---

Maybe this is "unmodern", somehow.

1Kibo's corpse fucking-Harvard's Dr. Hau. Why Kibo Parry has your 30 year nonstop stalking come to necrophilia. And why Harvard's Dr. Hau?? Is it because she refuses to turn the light off in slow light experiments and prove AP correct, that Light Waves are close loop circuits and __not arrow rays with head and tail__?
Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) 30 year nonstop hate spew stalker
On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 11:23:20 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"Drag Queen of Science"
> On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 4:13:07 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"Drag Queen of Science"
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>

--- quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---
Quantum Entanglement, Physics series for High School, book 7
by Archimedes Plutonium (Amazon's Kindle)

Revised on 29Aug2021. This is AP's 53rd published book of science.

Since this is for High School, I need to keep it as simple as possible, for students in High School are just barely getting acquainted with physics. So I must come down to their level of understanding and comprehending. I write this for High School since NOVA did a TV program on the subject of Quantum Entanglement and once it appears on NOVA, we have to be able, in science, to explain the topic to High School students. For sure enough, many High School students will be watching that program. This book will explain Quantum Entanglement for them.

To explain Quantum Entanglement we have to start with what light is. And light comes in two forms, one is wave, and one is particle. Light is both these forms put together at all times. Light is both a wave and a particle simultaneously. In physics this is called a duality.

Cover picture is a picture taken by my iphone of a web search of Slow Light Experiments.

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) More progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles// punch tab speed.

2) Punch tab speed//more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.

3) Explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.

4) Explaining slow light as it enters BEC Re: explaining "slow light" better as a punch speed Re: Punch tab speed.

5) Comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.

6) Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed Re: more progress on the "speed of light" and its two principles-- punch tab speed.

7) Name for punch-speed is angular speed and normal speed is linear speed Re: Light has to be closed circuit//comparing punch-speed to d/t speed.

8) Proof that light waves have two speeds, a linear speed of distance/time and a angular speed of 3x10^8meters/second.

9) Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.

10) Apparently the light in BEC vanishes also as the laser is turned off Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" challenge.

11) Mysteries start to unveil Re: Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off//making common-sense of the speed of light-- where it has two speeds-- a linear and a angular.

12) Slow light helps us prove that light itself is closed loop ellipses Re: Quantum Entanglement is easy to measure with BEC slow light.

13) Zeilinger & Kaiser team //Dr.Hau Harvard's "slowed light" tested for laser light turned off-- if the beam vanishes instantly-- even in the BEC medium and the escaping beam post BEC.

14) Summary.

--- end quoting AP's 53rd book of science ---

Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

>
> On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"mindless barking fuckdog"
> > "math hater"
> > fails at math and science:

Kibo_I want to fuck her corpse-Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> On Monday, April 17, 2023 at 12:36:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Sunday, April 16, 2023 at 2:26:54 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Wood louse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> > > tarded:
> >
> > NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> >
> > 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> > 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> > 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> > 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
> >
> > 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> > 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> > 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> > 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
> > > > Roger Penrose, Reinhard Genzel, Andrea Ghez,
> > > > Peter Higgs, Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish
> > > > David J. Thouless_, F. Duncan M. Haldane, John M. Kosterlitz, Takaaki Kajita
> > > > Arthur B. McDonald
> > > > Francois Englert
> > > > Saul Perlmutter
> > > > Brian P. Schmidt
> > > > Adam G. Riess
> > > > Makoto Kobayashi
> > > > Toshihide Maskawa_
> > > > Yoichiro Nambu_
> > > > John C. Mather
> > > > George F. Smoot
> > > > Roy J. Glauber_
> > > > David J. Gross
> > > > Hugh David Politzer
> > > > Frank Wilczek
> > > > Raymond Davis Jr. _
> > > > Masatoshi Koshiba_
> > > > Riccardo Giacconi_
> > > > Gerardus 't Hooft
> > > > Martinus J.G. Veltman_
> > > > Jerome I. Friedman
> > > > Henry W. Kendall_
> > > > Richard E. Taylor_
> > > > Carlo Rubbia
> > > > Simon van der Meer_
> > > > William Alfred Fowler_
> > > > Kenneth G. Wilson_
> > > > James Watson Cronin_
> > > > Val Logsdon Fitch_
> > > > Sheldon Lee Glashow
> > > > Steven Weinberg_
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > little fishes
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Layers of error thinking physics Re: 2-Comparative Analysis of failures of Logic with failures of Physics// one thinks 3 OR 2 =5 with 3 AND 2 = subtraction of either 3 or 2, while the other thinks proton to electron is 938MeV vs .5MeV when truly it is 840MeV to 105MeV
> > > >
> > > > Physical Review Letters: Proton Mass
> > > > Yi-Bo Yang, Jian Liang, Yu-Jiang Bi, Ying Chen, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Zhaofeng Liu
> > > > more and more layers of error thinking physics
> > > > .
> > > > .
> > > > Edward Witten
> > > > John Baez
> > > > Brian Greene
> > > > Lisa Randall
> > > > Alan H. Guth
> > > > Michael E. Brown
> > > > Konstantin Batygin
> > > > Ben Bullock
> > > > Larry Harson
> > > > Mark Barton, PhD in Physics, The University of Queensland, physicist with National Astronomical Observatory of Japan
> > > > Answered Aug 26, 2013 · Author has 8.7k answers and 10.3m answer views
> > > > None at all - he was a raving nutter.
> > > > Richard A. Muller, crank at Berkeley
> > > > Jennifer Kahn, Discover, science hater
> > > > Eric Francis Coppolino, newsreporter hatred of science, George Witte, St.Martin's Press science hater
> > > > Toby Howard, The Guardian, science hater
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-1, 137th published book
> > > >
> > > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > >
> > > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > > >
> > > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > > >
> > > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > > Length: 64 pages
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > >
> > > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > > • Language: : English
> > > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > > Kindle Edition
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
> > > >
> > > > Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1035 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 386 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,874,333 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #526 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > > ◦ #1,321 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > > ◦ #9,546 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-5, 174th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, 2nd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: At the moment this is a physics book for 2nd year College. But as the months and years go by I intend to convert it into a textbook of about 200 to 300 pages. It is mostly about thermodynamics for in my own college education 1968-1972 at University of Cincinnati, I took physics thermodynamics in the 2nd year (if memory has not failed me).
> > > > Cover-Picture: Is a iphone photograph of the Chemistry textbook I used at UC 1968-1972 with my own paper cut-outs of magnetic monopoles. Pictured are 4 bent circles, bent at 90degrees from diameter and each bent circle is a individual magnetic monopole.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09TKL4HMC
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 27, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 675 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 41 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-6, 177th published book
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Atoms, 3rd year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition
> > > >
> > > > Preface: I come to teaching physics for 3rd year College as the Architecture of Atoms. My writing style will be prose-narrative, until I add on exercise problems and convert it into a textbook. The 1st year College, has to be the equations and laws of electricity and magnetism. For the primal-axiom over all of physics is-- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. The 2nd year College is thermodynamics. And now the 3rd year College physics has to teach the Architecture, the geometry of the inside and exterior surface of the atom. One of the greatest faults, misery, and anti-science teaching of Old Physics is their denial that subatomic particles have to be something more than tiny balls tiny spheres that do-nothing, perform nothing, function as nothing. That the proton and neutron and true electron=muon, has to be matter with a function and purpose and design and task and job. This is a year of physics teaching of the architecture of the atom.
> > > > Cover Picture: A iphone photograph of my book chemistry book, a long time favorite of mine of CHEM ONE, 2nd edition, Waser, Trueblood, Knobler, 1980, and page 307 of that book. Why this page? Because it was instrumental in my discovery of the true Architecture of Atoms. Not many professors of chemistry or physics dive into the Shrodinger Equation that results in a meaningful teaching of "matter waves". Matter waves are the heart of understanding the geometry of Atomic Architecture.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09VFH9QST
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 12, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 823 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 74 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > #2-7, 178th published book
> > > >
> > > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Architecture of Light Waves & Energy, 4th year College
> > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Kindle edition)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Preface: This is 4th year College Physics and the important ideas of physics to learn as last year undergraduate school is the architecture and geometry of the Light Wave & Energy in physics. This is New Physics and not Old Physics. New Physics is defined as physics that knows and uses the true electron of atoms is the muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus and doing the Faraday law, creating new electrical energy that is storaged in the neutrons of atoms until they grow from 1eV into 945MeV and then create a new higher atomic numbered atom or emitted as radioactivity. Old Physics mistakenly identified the electron of atoms as the 0.5MeV particle that AP calls the Dirac magnetic monopole. In 3rd year College we studied the architecture of the interior of atoms. In 4th year College we study the architecture of Light Waves & Energy.
> > > >
> > > > The template book for 4th year College is Feynman's 1985 book of QED.
> > > >
> > > > Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of the template book for this book. Feynman's 1985 QED, quantum electrodynamics, showing my plastic toy model of DNA and my cut-outs of 4 bent circles that each bent circle represents one magnetic monopole. I arranged the monopoles into a single strand of a cycloid wave.
> > > >
> > > > Product details
> > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09W58XGDW
> > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 21, 2022
> > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 824 KB
> > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 66 pages
> > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > Not again!
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> >
> > Kibo Parry M on CIA Kate Heinzelman,Harvard's Dr. Hau.
> > Kibo on > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Why Kibo??? Because she refuses to finish her experiment and see all the light vanishes simultaneously, or is it because she can not admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Wednesday, November 2, 2022 at 12:21:30 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Imp of Math"
> > On Monday, January 18, 2021 at 2:06:24 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole (1)
> > By Michael Moroney 1/23/18, 44 posts 461 views
> >
> >
> > Kibo on Kate Heinzelman
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell..thecia.net> writes:
> > > >
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 at 9:13:14 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"Court Jester of Math"
> >
> > Kibo,is Ruth Charney of AMS the model in your book, for she cannot admit the slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse as proven by AP in 2016? I know it falls on deaf ears of Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945. And Ruth, would the AMS publish Kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945, because the AMS certainly will not publish AP's conic proof? Maybe that is all the AMS publishes-- fake math.
> >
> > Kibo on wanting to fuck her corpse/Kate Heinzelman, question, do you not think CIA is going overboard on stalking-- I mean 30 years for the insane Kibo Parry M??
> >
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 3:21:37 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > fails at math and science:
> > Kibo's "I want to fuck her corpse" rubbing off on Canada's Dan Christensen with his 20 year stalking of Univ Toronto's Rose M. Patten, Univ Western Ontario's Linda Hasenfratz, when Dan is a failure of math and logic with his 2 OR 1=3, and his ellipse
> >
> > Kibo Parry M the 30 year stalker joined by his friends Chris Thomasson and Dan Christensen
> > Why Kibo, because Ruth Charney, Jill Pipher, Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse???
> >
> > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 10:55:02 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > >"certifiably insane"
> > > fails at math and science:
> > > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > "I want to fuck her corpse"
> > > Not again!
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > >
> > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > >
> >

5+

On Thursday, November 4, 2021 at 6:19:48 AM UTC+2, Earle Jones wrote:
> On Wed Nov 3 18:59:29 2021 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games. Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither
> >
> > Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
> >
> > Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
>
> *
> To AP:
>
> You give a lot of credit to Dr. Feynman. I agree with you. But he concluded, along with Archimedes (the original) and many others, that the ellipse is, in fact, a conic section.
> See the Feynman notes, Principles of Physics, Volume 2, pages 110 and 111..
>
> earle
> *

Resignation of Rebecca Lynn Keiser NSF
Resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF

On Sunday, September 11, 2022 at 12:07:15 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> I want to fuck her corpse

Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.

On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 12:26:53 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "necrophile"
>"psychoceramic"

On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 11:57:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Time for even more punishment, Stupid

President Biden, when coming to office, you should have inspected your crew in the Executive Branch if they fit your type of service--especially Dr. Panchanathan at the NSF. For there is serious concern on my part that Dr. Panchanathan grants federal dollars to paying stalkers of Usenet like James Kibo Parry who stalks nonstop for 30 years-- constant hatred of AP, of the Pope and many others.

Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo to stalk??? If so, please replace him.

Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.

NSF Dr.Panchanathan resign and get someone in there who knows science who knows Maxwell Equations, not chutes & ladders and Pokemon games. Get a leader at NSF who has brains enough to know it is --- bad bad business--- to pay stalkers to stalk Usenet-- Panchanathan is worse at NSF than Trump is at presidency, and Panchanathan was a Trump appointment.

Why does the NSF hate the Pope??? You should all be all ashamed of yourself at the NSF and write the Pope a letter of apology for the James Kibo Parry Moroney Volney constant hate spew on the Pope.

---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua


NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff are they teaching corpse fucking in High School rather than physics is the question on the mind of Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney. No wonder they dodge the question of which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle that AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole.
>
> On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 1:04:24 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Corpse Fucking (illustrated in color), Physics series for High School, book 7
> >"psychoceramic"
>
> NSF Dr.Panchanathan, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
> 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says.. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
>
> 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

> > > Introduction to AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Physics textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > #1 New Release in Electromagnetic Theory
> > >
> > > This will be AP's 137th published book on science. And the number 137 is special to me for it is the number of QED, Quantum Electrodynamics as the inverse fine structure constant. I can always remember 137 as that special constant of physics and so I can remember where Teaching True Physics was started by me.
> > >
> > > Time has come for the world to have the authoritative textbooks for all of High School and College education. Written by the leading physics expert of the time. The last such was Feynman in the 1960s with Feynman Lectures on Physics. The time before was Maxwell in 1860s with his books and Encyclopedia Britannica editorship. The time is ripe in 2020 for the new authoritative texts on physics. It will be started in 2020 which is 60 years after Feynman. In the future, I request the physics community updates the premier physics textbook series at least every 30 years. For we can see that pattern of 30 years approximately from Faraday in 1830 to Maxwell in 1860 to Planck and Rutherford in about 1900, to Dirac in 1930 to Feynman in 1960 and finally to AP in 1990 and 2020. So much happens in physics after 30 years, that we need the revisions to take place in a timely manner. But also, as we move to Internet publishing such as Amazon's Kindle, we can see that updates can take place very fast, as editing can be a ongoing monthly or yearly activity. I for one keep constantly updating all my published books, at least I try to.
> > >
> > > Feynman was the best to make the last authoritative textbook series for his concentration was QED, Quantum Electrodynamics, the pinnacle peak of physics during the 20th century. Of course the Atom Totality theory took over after 1990 and all of physics; for all sciences are under the Atom Totality theory.
> > > And as QED was the pinnacle peak before 1990, the new pinnacle peak is the Atom Totality theory. The Atom Totality theory is the advancement of QED, for the Atom Totality theory primal axiom says -- All is Atom, and atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.
> > > Length: 64 pages
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • File Size : 790 KB
> > > • Publication Date : October 5, 2020
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print Length : 64 pages
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • ASIN : B08KS4YGWY
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #430,602 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #39 in Electromagnetic Theory
> > > ◦ #73 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #74 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > >
> > > #2-2, 145th published book
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS//Junior High School// Physics textbook series, book 2
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > What I am doing is clearing the field of physics, clearing it of all the silly mistakes and errors and beliefs that clutter up physics. Clearing it of its fraud and fakeries and con-artistry. I thought of doing these textbooks starting with Senior year High School, wherein I myself started learning physics. But because of so much fraud and fakery in physics education, I believe we have to drop down to Junior year High School to make a drastic and dramatic emphasis on fakery and con-artistry that so much pervades science and physics in particular. So that we have two years in High School to learn physics. And discard the nonsense of physics brainwash that Old Physics filled the halls and corridors of education.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN : B08PC99JJB
> > > • Publication date : November 29, 2020
> > > • Language: : English
> > > • File size : 682 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader : Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> > > • X-Ray : Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise : Enabled
> > > • Print length : 78 pages
> > > • Lending : Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #185,995 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #42 in Two-Hour Science & Math Short Reads
> > > ◦ #344 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #2,160 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > > #2-3, 146th published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// Senior High School// Physics textbook series, book 3
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > I believe that in knowing the history of a science is knowing half of that science. And that if you are amiss of knowing the history behind a science, you have only a partial understanding of the concepts and ideas behind the science. I further believe it is easier to teach a science by teaching its history than any other means of teaching. So for senior year High School, I believe physics history is the best way of teaching physics. And in later years of physics courses, we can always pick up on details. So I devote this senior year High School physics to a history of physics, but only true physics. And there are few books written on the history of physics, so I chose Asimov's The History of Physics, 1966 as the template book for this textbook. Now Asimov's book is full of error and mistakes, and that is disappointing but all of Old Physics is full of error. On errors and mistakes of Old Physics, the best I can do is warn the students, and the largest warning of all is that whenever someone in Old Physics says "electron" what they are talking about is really the Dirac magnetic monopole. And whenever they talk about the Rutherford-Bohr model of the atom, they are talking about huge huge grave mistakes, for the true atom is protons as 8 ringed toruses with a muon stuck inside of a proton doing the Faraday law and producing those magnetic monopoles as electricity. I use Asimov's book as a template but in the future, I hope to rewrite this textbook using no template at all, that is if I have time in the future.
> > > Cover Picture: Is the book The History of Physics, by Isaac Asimov, 1966 and on top of the book are 4 cut-outs of bent circles representing magnetic monopoles which revolutionizes modern physics, especially the ElectroMagnetic theory.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08RK33T8V
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 28, 2020
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 794 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 123 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Best Sellers Rank: #4,167,235 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #15,099 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> > > ◦ #91,163 in Physics (Books)
> > >
> > >
> > > #2-4, 151st published book
> > >
> > > TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> > > Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >

Trump was anti-science, can anyone expect Dr.Panchanathan to be not-anti-science. Panchanathan should resign with his ugly paying of stalkers-- if true.
And if true, the NSF owes a letter of apology to the Pope for constantly smearing the Pope in Kibo's hate spews.

Did Earle Jones fail Stanford, was booted out, and thus took a degree in business to become what Earle?? Do you sell real estate for a living, for you sure do not know any physics or math. Did sci.physics kick you out, for you do not belong in sci.math with your moron take on mathematics.

Jones picking on Harvard's Dr. Hau because Dr. Hau cannot complete her slow light experiment and prove AP correct-- Light waves are not arrow rays but closed loop circuits.
On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 8:05:39 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> *
> In my opinion, as an Electrical Engineer, I think you should give up on big universal cosmological problems, and try to understand Ohm's Law.
>
> earle
> *

One sad aspect of Usenet-- it allows a mindless moron failure Earle Jones to spam, spam spam.

On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 7:15:13 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Did Earle Jones fail Stanford, was booted out, and thus took a degree in business to become what Earle?? Do you sell real estate for a living, for you sure do not know any physics or math. Did sci.physics kick you out, for you do not belong in sci.math with your moron take on mathematics.
>
>
> Jones picking on Harvard's Dr. Hau because Dr. Hau cannot complete her slow light experiment and prove AP correct-- Light waves are not arrow rays but closed loop circuits.
> On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 8:05:39 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > *
> > In my opinion, as an Electrical Engineer, I think you should give up on big universal cosmological problems, and try to understand Ohm's Law.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> One sad aspect of Usenet-- it allows a mindless moron failure Earle Jones to spam, spam spam.

"Another sad aspect of Usenet - you think you're smart."

On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:59:46 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
> On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 7:15:13 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Did Earle Jones fail Stanford, was booted out, and thus took a degree in business to become what Earle?? Do you sell real estate for a living, for you sure do not know any physics or math. Did sci.physics kick you out, for you do not belong in sci.math with your moron take on mathematics.
> >
> >
> > Jones picking on Harvard's Dr. Hau because Dr. Hau cannot complete her slow light experiment and prove AP correct-- Light waves are not arrow rays but closed loop circuits.
> > On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 8:05:39 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > *
> > > In my opinion, as an Electrical Engineer, I think you should give up on big universal cosmological problems, and try to understand Ohm's Law.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> >
> > One sad aspect of Usenet-- it allows a mindless moron failure Earle Jones to spam, spam spam.
> "Another sad aspect of Usenet - you think you're smart."

That stuff is a failure as "laff riot" material. Self-satisfied and not very smart about it, are we?

Stanford Uni Earle Jones why is Dr. Hau a math failure with her slant cut of cone a ellipse when in truth it is a oval???? See AP's proofs below
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 11:19:48 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
> You give a lot of credit to Dr. Feynman.

Kibo Parry Volney writes:
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 1:00:52 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
>"CCP's Stooge"
>"exatard"

Kibo why is Dr.Tao a math failure-- is it because he cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse and that prevents him from doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?? See AP proofs below.
>
> Kibo Parry (Volney)
> On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:36:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "Court Jester of Math"
> > fails at math and science:
>

Kibo Parry Volney why is UCLA Dr. Tao so dishonest in math that he cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not the ellipse???
On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 11:07:20 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>highly illogical
> "wasn't bolted down too tight in the first place"

> Dan, you think if Dr.Tao were honest about conics-- slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse, do you think this honesty can carry the fool to a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus??? See AP proofs below.
> > On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 10:52:22 PM UTC-5, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of
> > > Time for another spanking
> >
> >
> >
> > Dan did Dr.Tao fail math-- ellipse a conic when it is a oval, the same reason you Dan Christensen failed logic of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction because Boole & Jevons messed up the truth tables and switched AND for OR. Dan is Dr. Tao and Dr. Wiles geometry mistakes on conics a similar mind twisting idiocy???
> > >
> > > Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
> > > Mostowski Collapse
> > > ,
> > > Dan Christensen
> > > 19
> > > Reductio Ad Absurdum (RAA) missing in DC Proof
> > > On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 7:43:46 PM UTC-4, Mostowski Collapse wrote: > You would need to block
> > > 8:37 PM
> > > 
> > > Dan Christensen's profile photo
> > > Dan Christensen
> > > , …
> > >
> > > 10
> > > Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
> > > 7:17 PM
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Did Dr.Tao fail math because of Dan Christensen???
> > > >
> > > > 2-Dan Christensen on why Dr Tao, UCLA cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse; probably why Dr. Tao can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- he cannot tell one geometry figure from another.
> > > >
> > > > Dan, did Dr. Tao fail math because of your mindless prattle of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction, because Dan cannot understand Boole-Jevons failed with truth tables.
> > > >
> > > > Dan Christensen's profile photo
> > > > Dan Christensen
> > > > , …
> > > > Mostowski Collapse
> > > > 27
> > > > Constructing the Natural Numbers in DC Proof
> > > > On Wednesday, February 22, 2023 at 6:13:01 PM UTC-5, Mostowski Collapse wrote: > > It must hold
> > > > 7:10 PM
> > > > 
> > > > > On Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 8:53:17 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > > > > STUDENTS BEWARE: Don't be a victim of
> > > > > > Canada's Dan says it is cute how Dr.Block protects his failed math imp Dr. Tao with his ignorance that slant cut of cone is Oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 7:02:53 PM UTC-6, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > > > > > > Sooooo cute the way you "stick up" for your little buddy here
> > > > > 3rd published book
> > > > >
> > > > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > •
> > > > > •
> > > > >
> > > > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > > > >
> > > > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > >
> > > > > #12-2, 11th published book
> > > > >
> > > > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > > > >
> > > > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > > > Preface:
> > > > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
> > > > >
> > > > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Product details
> > > > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Earle Jones as Stanford Univ arsewipe sickfuck in the same league as Kibo Parry.

Kibo's-I want to fuck her corpse> Harvard's Dr.Randall,Dr.Hau why Kibo, because they cannot ask the simple question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle???
Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) Boston's original analbuttfuckmanure stalker of nonstop 30 years hatred. AP does not believe this arsewipe sickfuck Kibo graduated from Rensselaer with his 938 is 12% short of 945, no, AP thinks Kibo was a computer animation creation from cleaning out septic tanks.

Kibo>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A.Wertz, Kristin Bennett
> 
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
>
> Why on Earth does Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney hate the Pope?? Was it because Kibo failed science and he blames the Pope for his failure???
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:31 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Kibo's hatred of the Pope, for Kibo is a insane stalker....
>
> Re: Archimedes "Pope Arky the Last" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> Pluto, it's time for your punishment again, already? of Math and of Physics Archimedes "
> by Volney May 2, 2023, 6:15:57 PM
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
>
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >it's time for your punishment again, already?
>
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >"certifiably insane"
>
> Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > I want to fuck her corpse
>
> On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
> >
> >"Putin's lackey"

#2-1, My 137th published book

◦ Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
◦ Print length ‏ : ‎ 124 pages
◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)
◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)

#2-4, 151st published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969.. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.

Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.

Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1048 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 404 pages
• Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory
◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)

#2-8, 202nd published book

TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)

Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.

Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BC5T9JBH
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 27, 2022
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 801 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 45 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#2-9, 161st published book

PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science.

Preface:
A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.

It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.

Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.

2-Kibo's-I want to fuck her corpse> Harvard's Dr.Randall,Dr.Hau why Kibo, because they cannot ask the simple question which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle???
> Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> down completely:
>"mindless fuckdog"

> Kibo Parry (Moroney-Volney) Boston's original analbuttfuckmanure stalker of nonstop 30 years hatred. AP does not believe this arsewipe sickfuck Kibo graduated from Rensselaer with his 938 is 12% short of 945, no, AP thinks Kibo was a computer animation creation from cleaning out septic tanks.
>
>
> Kibo>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A.Wertz, Kristin Bennett
> > 
> > > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> >
> > Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> > by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> >
> > Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney
> > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:42:50 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> >
> > Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> > by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> >
> >
> > Why on Earth does Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney hate the Pope?? Was it because Kibo failed science and he blames the Pope for his failure???
> > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 9:43:31 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Kibo's hatred of the Pope, for Kibo is a insane stalker....
> >
> > Re: Archimedes "Pope Arky the Last" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > Pluto, it's time for your punishment again, already? of Math and of Physics Archimedes "
> > by Volney May 2, 2023, 6:15:57 PM
> >
> > Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> > by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> >
> > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:11 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >it's time for your punishment again, already?
> >
> > Re:Kibo on>I want to fuck her corpse>AMS Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Harvard's Dr.Lisa Randall, Dr.Hau,CIA Kate Heinzelman, MIT's Anette Hosoi,Cynthia Barnhart
> > by Augǝl Jan 1, 2023, 7:41:27 AM
> > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 12:17:14 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"certifiably insane"
> >
> > Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Ingrid Wilke,Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
> > > On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:09:52 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 6:21:45 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >you're telling me it's time for your punishment?
> > >
> > >"Putin's lackey"
>
>
>
> #2-1, My 137th published book
> 
> ◦ Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> ◦ Print length ‏ : ‎ 124 pages
> ◦ Best Sellers Rank: #293,315 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #401 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,236 in Physics (Books)
> #2-4, 151st published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS// 1st year College// Physics textbook series, book 4
> Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> Preface: This is AP's 151st book of science published. It is one of my most important books of science because 1st year college physics is so impressionable on students, if they should continue with physics, or look elsewhere for a career. And also, physics is a crossroad to all the other hard core sciences, where physics course is mandatory such as in chemistry or even biology. I have endeavored to make physics 1st year college to be as easy and simple to learn. In this endeavor to make physics super easy, I have made the writing such that you will see core ideas in all capital letters as single sentences as a educational tool. And I have made this textbook chapter writing follow a logical pattern of both algebra and geometry concepts, throughout. The utmost importance of logic in physics needs to be seen and understood. For I have never seen a physics book, prior to this one that is logical. Every Old Physics textbook I have seen is scatter-brained in topics and in writing. I use as template book of Halliday & Resnick because a edition of H&R was one I was taught physics at University of Cincinnati in 1969. And in 1969, I had a choice of majors, do I major in geology, or mathematics, or in physics, for I will graduate from UC in 1972. For me, geology was too easy, but physics was too tough, so I ended up majoring in mathematics. If I had been taught in 1969 using this textbook that I have written, I would have ended up majoring in physics, my first love. For physics is not hard, not hard at all, once you clear out the mistakes and the obnoxious worthless mathematics that clutters up Old Physics, and the illogic that smothers much of Old Physics.
>
> Maybe it was good that I had those impressions of physics education of poor education, which still exists throughout physics today. Because maybe I am forced to write this book, because of that awful experience of learning physics in 1969. Without that awful experience, maybe this textbook would have never been written by me.
>
> Cover picture is the template book of Halliday & Resnick, 1988, 3rd edition Fundamentals of Physics and sitting on top are cut outs of "half bent circles, bent at 90 degrees" to imitate magnetic monopoles. Magnetic Monopoles revolutionizes physics education, and separates-out, what is Old Physics from what is New Physics.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09JW5DVYM
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ October 19, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1048 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 404 pages
> • Best Sellers Rank: #4,844,838 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #487 in Electromagnetic Theory
> ◦ #1,210 in Electromagnetism (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #8,751 in Electromagnetism (Books)
> 
> #2-8, 202nd published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS, Permanent Colony on Europa// graduate school college
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle edition)
>
> Preface: Crisis emergency times call for textbooks to reflect the times. The Sun gone Red Giant Initiation Phase as measured by NASA in the decade of 2010 to 2020 as showing a 0.005% Solar Radiation yearly increase threatens all life on Earth with extinction and oblivion. This crisis calls for "All Hands On Deck" to solve the problem. And to solve that problem we need all scientists in the work effort of getting Europa, the satellite of Jupiter to be our second home. I see no textbook for college graduate school as appropriate, unless it is a book addressing the crisis itself. Just the opposite of Nero was fiddling while Rome burned; we want All Hands on Deck, to save as much life on Earth as possible.
>
>
> Cover Picture: Is my iphone photo of a Google search for Europa with Webb telescope. These are exciting times in that the Webb telescope maybe able to pinpoint life on Europa.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BC5T9JBH
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 27, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 801 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 45 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
>
> #2-9, 161st published book
>
> PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 137 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics// Student teaches professor Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 24Apr2022. This is AP's 161st published book of science..
>
> Preface:
> A Physicsopedia is a book of the overall assessment and evaluation of the state of the art of Physics. It is like a report card. It is a total view of the science and a judgement of the science, both of the past, present and the direction forward into the future. Its greatest use is to alert readers and people in science of what is wrong with their subject, and as a ancillary use, to alert students what to avoid in college as a waste of time.
>
> It is not in alphabetical order but mostly, rather, has a ordering of what is most important at the start and only at the very very end. For there is no index.
>
> Physics is the most important hard science for every other science is a specialized part of physics. And Old Physics has three key huge mistakes that this book addresses. The true theory of the Universe is the Atom Totality, not the Big Bang which is a ridiculous theory. The true electron of atoms is not the particle of 0.5MeV which turns out to be Dirac's magnetic monopole, while the true real electron of atoms is the muon of 105MeV which is stuck inside a proton torus of 8 rings of 840MeV. This causes another huge mistake, for a mistake in physics usually has a cascade effect of more and more mistakes. When we take the true electron of atoms is the muon, means the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from that muon thrusting through the proton torus in a Faraday law of electricity and magnetism producing electrical energy. So our Sun shines from the Faraday law, not fusion. And this implies the Sun has gone into Red Giant phase with a solar radiation increase of 0.005% yearly increase. That implies all life on Earth is in danger of going extinct as the Sun becomes more and more Red Giant, and unless humanity moves out to Europa, humanity goes extinct.
>
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09N18QPP1
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2021
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1139 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 82 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
>
>
>
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x

Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton-- why does Kibo continue to defile The Pope? Why can you not stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.

On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> down completely:
>"mindless fuckdog"

Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.
>
> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > down completely:
> >"mindless fuckdog"
> > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics
> > >"necrophile"
> > >"Pope Arky the Last"
> > > Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks
> > >
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"
> > >
> > >
> > > Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.
> > >
> > > The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.
> > >
> > > But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother..
> > >
> > >
> > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > >
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > >
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > >
> > >
> > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.
> > >
> > > Kibo in CIA
> > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki...@shell.thecia.net> writes:

The time in late 2022 when AP was giving condolences to a special deceased person, yet here comes Kibo with his hate channel gang of stalkers forging necrophila onto AP posts. Forgery that cost a ISP job of one of the forgers and trimmed Kibo's spamm, but not enough. And that Kibo needs to be banned altogether from sci.math and sci.physics, and all his morphed names.

> Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney
>
> > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew

> Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking
> On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:
> >"Drag Queen of Science"
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > Not again!
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You already said that.
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > You're really sick, Pluto!
> >
> > wanting to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
> >
> > I want to fuck her corpse
>
>

> > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > Necrophile
> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You already said that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > >

> > Todd B. Smith
> > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.
> > >
> > > Rex L. Berney
> > > Bob Brecha
> > > Bruce Craver
> > > John Erdei
> > > Thomas P. Graham
> > > Donald Hirst
> > > Jenn Hyland
> > > Jay Mathews
> > > Robert Merithew
> > > Brendon Mikula
> > > George K. Miner
> > > J. Michael O'Hare
> > > Leno M Pedrotti
> > > William N. Plick
> > > Randall Schaurer
> > > Elizabeth Smith
> > > Ivan Sudakow
> > > Perry Yaney
> > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"
> > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki
> > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)
> > ep@toddbsmith dot com
> >
> > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > Controversy
> > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > --- end quote ---
> >
> > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> >
> > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> > France Anne Cordova
> > Subra Suresh
> > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > Rita R. Colwell
> > Neal Francis Lane
> > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> >
> > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua

↓

youtu.be/FIBRLJcrFFQ

Know this soNg ???????????????????????????

Earle Jones kirjutas neljapäev, 4. november 2021 kl 06:19:48 UTC+2:
> On Wed Nov 3 18:59:29 2021 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games. Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither
> >
> > Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
> >
> > Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
>
> *
> To AP:
>
> You give a lot of credit to Dr. Feynman. I agree with you. But he concluded, along with Archimedes (the original) and many others, that the ellipse is, in fact, a conic section.
> See the Feynman notes, Principles of Physics, Volume 2, pages 110 and 111..
>
> earle
> *

Earle Jones hatred of Harvard Dr.Hau and Berkeley's Dr. Else

On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 11:21:32 PM UTC-5, Earle Jones wrote:
Re: "howling crazy fuckdog"
>... is leaving our NewsGroup? Great! That means that the average IQ here just jumped about 20 points! earle

Earle no wonder you failed Stanford engineering, you trip and fall all over yourself in hatred.

Did you end up being a real estate agent with your Stanford business degree, for you sure do not know Ohm's law.

Earle, are you even allowed to go on campus or does Stanford have a arrest warrant if you trespass the campus??

It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.

We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.

On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> >
> > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> >
> *
> Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
>
> earle
> *

It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.

Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.

We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.

On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> >
> > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> >
> *
> Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
>
> earle
> *

Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games. Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither
> >
> > Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not do physics but just play ad hominem games.
> >
> > Instead of doing Physics, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.
>
> *
> To AP:
>
> You give a lot of credit to Dr. Feynman. I agree with you. But he concluded, along with Archimedes (the original) and many others, that the ellipse is, in fact, a conic section.
> See the Feynman notes, Principles of Physics, Volume 2, pages 110 and 111..
>
> earle
> *

Penis Could Mature Him-Chi-Chung Kao,Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Persis Drell says Earle Jones. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same.

MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.

On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
>
> Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
>
> We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
>
> On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > >
> > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > >
> > *
> > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> >
> > earle
> > *

Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??

On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
>
> > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > can be re-arranged to spell
> > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > and many other delightful phrases
> >
> > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > I am an idiot.
>
> *
> Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
>
> My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
>
> earle
> *

On Saturday, December 19, 1998 at 2:00:00 AM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> In article <75fntt$b...@sjx-ixn9.ix.netcom.com>,
> sbha...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris) wrote:
>
> >In <367a7e2c$0$2...@nntp1.ba.best.com> "MacMillan"
> ><theresal...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>"Archimedes Plutonium" anagram:
> >>
> >>"I am the purloined scum"
>
> --
>
> More anagrams:
>
> Archimedes Plutonium =
> SUPREME HOMICIDAL NUT
> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD
> RECOMPUTED HIS ALUMNI
> IMPORT EUCLIDIAN MUSH
> POUND HEURISTIC LEMMA
> HILARIOUS CEMENT DUMP
> LUDICROUS HEMP INMATE
> MODULATES CHIMP URINE
> MULTI-MENU P-ADICS HERO
>
> ...enough?
>
> earle
> --
> __
> __/\_\
> /\_\/_/
> \/_/\_\ earle
> \/_/ jones
>
>

>
> On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > >> of Manchester.)
>
>
> SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> Stanford University, math dept.
>
> Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
>
> SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
>
> Stanford physics dept.
>
> Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

The Delicious Rump Man- Mason Yearian,Daniel Bump says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "little stinker"

On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> >
> > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> >
> *
> Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
>
> earle
> *

The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.

AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.

When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.

A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.

> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> >
> > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> >
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > >
> > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > >
> > > *
> > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more..
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *

> > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > >> of Manchester.)
> >
> >
> > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > Stanford University, math dept.
> >
> > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> >
> > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao

> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

The Delicious Rump Man- Mason Yearian,Daniel Bump says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.

On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "little stinker"

On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> >
> > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> >
> *
> Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
>
> earle
> *

The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.

AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.

When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.

A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.


> MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> >
> > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> >
> > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> >
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > >
> > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > >
> > > *
> > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more..
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
>
>
> On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > and many other delightful phrases
> > >
> > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > I am an idiot.
> >
> > *
> > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> >
> > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> >
> > earle
> > *


> > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > >> of Manchester.)
> >
> >
> > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > Stanford University, math dept.
> >
> > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> >
> > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao

> > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> >
> > Stanford physics dept.
> >
> > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

Penis Could Mature Him- Mason Yearian,Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.

Earle's profile photo
Earle
unread,
Archimedes Plutonium and Ohm's Law
* It is my opinion that Archimedes Plutonium does not know Ohm's Law. Earle Jones (BS Electricalo
11:22 PM



> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "little stinker"
>
> On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > >
> > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > >
> > *
> > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.
>
> AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.
>
> When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.
>
> A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.
> 
> 
>
>
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> > >
> > > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> > >
> > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > > >
> > > > *
> > > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > *
> > Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
> >
> >
> > On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > > and many other delightful phrases
> > > >
> > > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > > I am an idiot.
> > >
> > > *
> > > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> > >
> > > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> 
> 
> 
> > > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > > >> of Manchester.)
> > >
> > >
> > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > >
> > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > >
> > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> 
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian

Mr Meticulous Pinhead- Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Mason Yearian,Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.
>
> Earle's profile photo
> Earle
> unread,
> Archimedes Plutonium and Ohm's Law
> * It is my opinion that Archimedes Plutonium does not know Ohm's Law. Earle Jones (BS Electricalo
> 11:22 PM June 12, 2023
> 

Say Earle, you went to Stanford U. to learn anagrams, not EE? Is that why Harvard's Dr.Hau cannot turn the lights off in slow light experiments-- she does not know Ohm's law V=iR. I know Earle failed Ohm's law. Earle is that why you got a business degree instead-- you failed science. And you needed some job to feed yourself hand to mouth, for you failed science.

> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > "little stinker"
> >
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > >
> > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > >
> > > *
> > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more..
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> >
> > The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.
> >
> > AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.
> >
> > When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.
> >
> > A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.
> > 
> > 
> >
> >
> > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> > > >
> > > > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> > > >
> > > > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > > > >
> > > > > *
> > > > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> > > > >
> > > > > earle
> > > > > *
> > > Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > > > and many other delightful phrases
> > > > >
> > > > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > > > I am an idiot.
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> > > >
> > > > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > *
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > > > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > > > >> of Manchester.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > > >
> > > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > > >
> > > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > 
> > > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > > >
> > > > Stanford physics dept.
> > > >
> > > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian