Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Small is beautiful.


tech / rec.photo.digital / Re: Reason phone cameras are heavily invested in A.I.

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Reason phone cameras are heavily invested in A.I.David Taylor

1
Re: Reason phone cameras are heavily invested in A.I.

<tojkgk$7r26$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=13600&group=rec.photo.digital#13600

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: david-ta...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid (David Taylor)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Reason phone cameras are heavily invested in A.I.
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:52:36 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <tojkgk$7r26$1@dont-email.me>
References: <84ae67eb-1bae-47a7-bf41-a3afdf3cca1an@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:52:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1394babe2eea26cceb3d5c199fd63925";
logging-data="257094"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YWUhWggQRt+nFAh8RyxHrit57RduIZFk="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.6.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:67DKBGUk8PnEyB3X6YUh8r19nC8=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <84ae67eb-1bae-47a7-bf41-a3afdf3cca1an@googlegroups.com>
 by: David Taylor - Thu, 29 Dec 2022 08:52 UTC

On 29/12/2022 06:24, RichA wrote:
> Because they're reached a peak of their meagre imaging capabilities.
> Until flat "nano" lenses appear, they are stuck with their current capabilities.
> Even then, better sensors are a myth. There may be serviceable zoom modules on the horizon which will obviously help, but the only way to "improve" image quality is to fake it with A.I.

So is post-processing the camera any different from post-processing by a human?
When is "image quality" good enough rather than being ultimately perfect?

Personally I have no objection to a camera which can - by itself - align and
stack low-light images, or to one which can - by itself - produce near-perfect
panoramas. It not only saves me precious time, but expands my photo opportunities.

Suits me, may not suit you.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: https://www.satsignal.eu

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor