Han Duck-soo, Yoon Suk-yeol Please free your Moon bears.
Boycott Samsung & Hyundai until they free their moon bears.
South Korea free your tortured Moon bears

Save moon-bears, sure no-one cares to save spam from FBI, CIA, Mi6, police drag net garbage that floods sci.math and sci.physics everyday. I have kindly asked President Biden to kindly remove this drag net spam from all of sci.math and sci.physics and leave them as __spam free zones__.

FBI, CIA, police drag net, Russian disinformation b.s. spam spam spam oil masterpiece painting of freeing Moon Bears.
No wonder sci.math, sci.physics only survived 1993-1997, 4 brief years, then the b.s. and drag net spam took over

\\ ("`****/").
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==1(li)===========
\\
\\
two caged Moon Bears caged all their life and bile extracted

\\ ("`****//'").
\\ `0_ 0 ) `-.
\\ (_&_.)' ._ )
\\ `--' / /
\\ ==1(li)===========
\\
\\


Short History of Usenet, sci.physics, sci.math from 1993-2020, and its 90% decline// Sociology series, book 9 Kindle Edition

by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 6Jan2022. This is AP's 129th published book on science.

Preface: This book started out as a book on "stalking" but when Google revised its Google Newsgroup platform, with altogether different formatting, this book morphed into becoming a "90% demise of Usenet and sci.physics and sci.math in particular". In one of my posts on this book I said the title was going to change often until I actually write the book. And that is what happened. For in late December 2021, It was revealed to me that a persistent stalker under the name Michael Moroney (who stated in one of his stalking posts to be kibo, as in Kibo Parry) was posting from a CIA line in 1997. So that completes this history of Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics, as the demise is nearly all due to the fact that the constant and persistent police drag net spam chased most everyone else away, and most importantly the dot-edu address posters out of sci.math and sci.physics. Educated people just do not want to bother discussing physics or math while everywhere around is criss-crossed with vulgar police drag net spam.

Cover Picture: Is the newsgroup Plutonium-Atom-Universe that is fully controlled by the King of Science AP, Archimedes Plutonium. Every post in that newsgroup is about pure science, no ad hominem. And that is what the sci.physics and sci.math should be. Discussions on pure science, nothing else, and especially no ad hominem, no stalking, no spam, no off-topic junk, no solution manual selling, no drug selling, no police drag-net spam.

Product details
• Publication Date : August 31, 2020
• ASIN : B08H5B71M4
• File Size : 1045 KB
• Word Wise : Not Enabled
• Print Length : 78 pages
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Language: : English
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-1, 148th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, 9th edition 2021, Atom Totality Series, book 1 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 30Nov2021. And this is AP's 148th published science book.

Preface:
Physics book that explains what the universe is, and how it works. This is a continuation of the Atomic Theory by Democritus in Ancient Greek times. It adds one more fact to the Atomic Theory picture. That the Universe itself is one gigantic big atom. The picture is that of the Universe, in total, is one big atom that contains more atoms, inside itself. It completes the logic of science that Dr. Feynman wrote-- all things are made up of atoms -- and so, to complete that idea -- all things and the universe itself is an atom.

In this edition of year 2021, AP actually proves the Atom Totality theory, and therefore, a simultaneously _disproof_ of the Big Bang theory. The proof is simple, in that the Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but rather, instead, shine from the Faraday law going on inside each and every proton in the Sun or star, or, in the Universe. The muon is the true electron of atoms and is the bar magnet in Faraday's law while the proton is a 840MeV particle in the geometry shape of 8 ring coil torus that is the closed loop coil in Faraday's Law. NASA scientists have discovered the Sun is a yearly increase in radiation of 0.005% yearly, and is why 25% of all insects have perished in the last decade 2010-2020. Stars and Sun shine from Faraday law, not from fusion and that is how the Universe itself grows. So, we cannot logically have two different mechanisms for the creation of the Universe. We cannot have electricity magnetism of Faraday law and then some silly "explosion of Big Bang" to create and grow the universe.

Also, in the course of providing supporting evidence of the Atom Totality theory, my research had to revise and correct the entire Maxwell Equations, and revise and correct the theory, the quantum electrodynamics theory.

Cover Picture: Again I used 8 rings from plumbing hardware to represent the 8 rings of a proton torus, and visualize each ring as a dot cloud pattern instead of a continuous ring, and the holes in some of those rings helps facilitate that image. Notice the muon ring is inside the proton torus rings, and perpendicular, and situated at the equator, going around and around the proton torus at nearly the speed of light in the Faraday law; producing electricity. Atoms are designed to produce maximum electricity, given their masses.
Length: 329 pages

Product details
• ASIN : B08T82M2LP
• Publication date : January 16, 2021
• Language: : English
• File size : 872 KB
• Text-to-Speech : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print length : 329 pages
• Lending : Enabled

#1-2, 48th published book

Plutonium Atom Totality Universe, Atom Totality Series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

--------------------------
Table of Contents
--------------------------

1) A visual image of a Atom Totality

2) Simply multiply 9 times 105MeV and there you get the rest mass of proton and neutron.

3) The tau-electron 1777MeV is merely 105MeV multiply by 17 is 1785 with Sigma Error of 0.4%.

4) Particle in the 840MeV range so that we can say we discovered the proton particle isolated of its internal muon.

5) Found a 840MeV particle in experimental physics, but, is it the proton torus without its interior occupied by a muon?

6) The theory of 9s, as help in physics.

7) How we picture the interior of Atoms, and the Atom Totality.

8) The Principle of Scooting-Over, applied.

9) An ongoing commentary of the geometry of atoms, both interior and exterior.

10) Galaxies form Rings in Faraday Coil, and Faraday bar-magnet // Cosmic Proton, Cosmic Muon.

11) Is there a Cosmic Faraday Law going on?
Length: 148 pages

Product details
File Size: 2370 KB
Print Length: 148 pages
Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
Publication Date: June 10, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07SW87BF5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #285,417 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#826 in Astronomy (Books)
#166 in Astronomy (Kindle Store)
#671 in Physics (Kindle Store)

#1-3, 74th published book

HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
Length: 17 pages

Product details
• Publication Date : December 18, 2019
• Word Wise : Enabled
• Print Length : 17 pages
• File Size : 698 KB
• ASIN : B082WYGVNG
• Language: : English
• Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
• Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
• Screen Reader : Supported
• X-Ray : Not Enabled
• Lending : Enabled

#1-4, 105th published book

Atom Geometry is Torus Geometry // Atom Totality series, book 4 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Since all atoms are doing the Faraday Law inside them, of their thrusting muon into a proton coil in the shape of a geometry torus, then the torus is the geometry of each and every atom. But then we must explain the neutrons since the muon and proton are doing Faraday's Law, then the neutron needs to be explained in terms of this proton torus with muon inside, all three shaped as rings. The muon is a single ring and each proton is 8 rings. The neutron is shaped like a plate and is solid not hollow. The explanation of a neutron is that of a capacitor storing what the proton-muon rings produce in electricity. Where would the neutron parallel plates be located? I argue in this text that the neutron plates when fully grown from 1 eV until 945MeV are like two parallel plate capacitors where each neutron is part of one plate, like two pieces of bread with the proton-muon torus being a hamburger patty.

The Delicious Rump Man- Robert Wagoner,Chi-Chung Kao,Mason Yearian, says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.

Earle's profile photo
Earle
unread,
Archimedes Plutonium and Ohm's Law
* It is my opinion that Archimedes Plutonium does not know Ohm's Law. Earle Jones (BS Electricalo
11:22 PM June 12, 2023

Kibo Parry Moroney Volney:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "little stinker"

Stanford's Mason Yearian, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

> On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > >
> > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > >
> > *
> > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.
>
> AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.
>
> When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.
>
> A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.
> 
> 
>
>
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> > >
> > > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> > >
> > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > > >
> > > > *
> > > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > *
> > Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
> >
> >
> > On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > > and many other delightful phrases
> > > >
> > > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > > I am an idiot.
> > >
> > > *
> > > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> > >
> > > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> 
> 
> 
> > > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > > >> of Manchester.)
> > >
> > >
> > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > >
> > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > >
> > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> 
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Mason Yearian