The Delicious Rump Man- Robert Wagoner,Chi-Chung Kao,Mason Yearian, says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.

What is a numbskull of physics who never studied math doing in sci.math?? Earle was kicked out of sci.physics, what the hell is he doing pestering and harassing people in sci.math, the demented old stalker fool???

Earle's profile photo
Earle
unread,
Archimedes Plutonium and Ohm's Law
* It is my opinion that Archimedes Plutonium does not know Ohm's Law. Earle Jones (BS Electricalo
11:22 PM June 12, 2023

Kibo Parry Moroney Volney:
> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "little stinker"

Stanford's Mason Yearian, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.

1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.

5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.

> On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > >
> > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > >
> > *
> > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> >
> > earle
> > *
>
> The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.
>
> AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.
>
> When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.
>
> A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.
> 
> 
>
>
> > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> > >
> > > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> > >
> > > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> > >
> > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > > >
> > > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > > >
> > > > *
> > > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > *
> > Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
> >
> >
> > On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > > and many other delightful phrases
> > > >
> > > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > > I am an idiot.
> > >
> > > *
> > > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> > >
> > > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> 
> 
> 
> > > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > > >> of Manchester.)
> > >
> > >
> > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > >
> > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > >
> > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> 
> > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > >
> > > Stanford physics dept.
> > >
> > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Mason Yearian

2- The Delicious Rump Man- Robert Laughlin, Carl Wieman, Steven Chu, Douglas Osheroff, says Earle Jones while Kibo says little stinker. And AP says-- he has been tolerant of hate spew from Jones for 25 years, Kibo of 30 years, but no longer. And if sci.physics can kick out the insane shithead Jones, then sci.math should be able to do the same. And kick out the insane paid for Stalker Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it takes firing NSF Dr. Panchanathan.
>
> What is a numbskull of physics who never studied math doing in sci.math?? Earle was kicked out of sci.physics, what the hell is he doing pestering and harassing people in sci.math, the demented old stalker fool???
>
> Earle's profile photo
> Earle
> unread,
> Archimedes Plutonium and Ohm's Law
> * It is my opinion that Archimedes Plutonium does not know Ohm's Law. Earle Jones (BS Electricalo
> 11:22 PM June 12, 2023
> 
> Kibo Parry Moroney Volney:
> > On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > "little stinker"
>
> Stanford's Mason Yearian, Harvard's Sheldon Glashow, Peter Higgs, Harry Cliff ever ask the question, which is the atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle which AP says is the Dirac magnetic monopole while the real electron is a muon stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. In fact so stupid is this list of so called physicists that they went through life believing the slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, when in reality it is a Oval of 1 axis of symmetry for the cone has 1 axis of symmetry but ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry. The minds of all these so called physicists are not good enough to be doing physics. In fact, so stupid in science and math are all these people that when told in High School or College that a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse, they believed it, and believe in it to this day without so much as ever questioning the idea that a single cone and oval have just 1 axis of symmetry while ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, and yet many on this list were awarded science prizes. Maybe for ignorance of science but not for truth of science.
>
> 1) Too stupid to question if Thomson found Dirac's magnetic monopole and not the electron of atoms.
> 2) Too stupid to realize that in the Rutherford,Geiger, Marsden Experiment when you have increase in velocity of bounce back alpha particles means head on collision with a larger proton torus, hence, the interior of gold atoms are toruses, no nucleus.
> 3) Too stupid in logic to understand subatomic particles have jobs and tasks to do, not sit around on beaches sipping lemonade what Old Physics says.. The proton is a 8 ring torus with muon as electron inside doing the Faraday law producing new electricity.
> 4) Too stupid to understand stars and our Sun shine not from fusion but from Faraday law of each and every atom inside that star.
>
> 5) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 6) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 7) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 8) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sapheads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > >
> > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > >
> > > *
> > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more..
> > >
> > > earle
> > > *
> >
> > The arsewipe of Stanford Univ. is so demented he fails to comprehend what a author wrote.
> >
> > AP says the borderline of finite numbers from infinite numbers is 1*10^604, where that is the largest Finite Number, and numbers beyond are Infinite Numbers.
> >
> > When mathematicians fail to define the borderline, they fail to define what is Finite or what is Infinite, and there is only one concept when you fail to define the borderline.
> >
> > A sickfuck hate monger like Earle Jones, and perhaps the majority at Stanford Univ are as sickfuck as Earle Jones is a sickfuck, for AP has tolerated this arsewipe Jones for 25 years, and if sci,physics can kick Jones out, I see no reason why sci.math has him lingering and pestering and spewing hatred.
> > 
> > 
> >
> >
> > > MR. METICULOUS PINHEAD John Lipa,David Ritson,Persis Drell,Stanford Univ says Earle Jones the 25 year nonstop hate spewing arsewipe of sci.math and sci.physics. Earle, did sci.physics kick you out knowing you were just a hatemonger with nothing of science to offer?? Now I am asking for sci.math to kick you out as a hate spewing jackarse.
> > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 8:23:06 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > It is easy to see that inability to comprehend what other people say is a sign of dementia, and Earle Jones is full of dementia. But we cannot then say that Dr. Hau's inability to turn the light switch off in slow light experiments and watch all the light disappear at the same time-- slow and normal light speed. We cannot say that is lack of comprehension, thus dementia.
> > > >
> > > > Earle Jones shows us what insanity is all about-- never ending hate spew-- 25 years of raw hatred with no end in sight. So, well, let this thread be on top of sci.math leader board until some grown-up at Stanford Uni carts the demented hate mongering shithead to a clinic.
> > > >
> > > > We can say Dr. Hau is stubborn and non complying in science. While Earle Jones is a demented sod.
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 2:05:34 PM UTC-5, Earle wrote:
> > > > > On Thu Jun 8 14:37:23 2023 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote:
> > > > > > On 6/8/2023 2:33 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > > > > > > Starting 2009 when I was working on Infinity Borderline, I had an adventure of sorts of seeing that the infinity borderline was able to give all the angles of regular polyhedra, if not, it is not a infinity [...]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > An n-gon goes on for infinity. Its limit is the circle...
> > > > > >
> > > > > *
> > > > > Chris: You must remember that AP has discovered that there is the border of infinity at 10^604. That is the largest possible number. Actually, in my research, I have personallyo discovered several exceptions to the AP rule. Here are some number that I have discovered that are larger than 10^604:
> > > > > 2 x 10^604; 10^605; 3.14159 x 10^604. I am fairly sure that there are other numbers larger than 10^604, Peerhaps you could discover several more.
> > > > >
> > > > > earle
> > > > > *
> > > Why does Stanford Univ continue to let this insane arsewipe Earle Jones defile Stanford Univ??
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, November 12, 2004 at 7:30:12 PM UTC-6, Earle Jones wrote:
> > > > In article <nsDjd.19015$6q2....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> > > > "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <hu...@humor.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Remember, the letters in "Archimedes Plutonium"
> > > > > can be re-arranged to spell
> > > > > "The Delicious Rump Man"
> > > > > "I Pound His Male Rectum"
> > > > > "Penis Could Mature Him"
> > > > > "Old-Time U.S. Urine Champ"
> > > > > and many other delightful phrases
> > > > >
> > > > > "Archimedes Plutonium" <a_plu...@iw.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:418E7777...@iw.net...
> > > > > > I am an idiot.
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > > Yes, Archy's name is very anagrammable.
> > > >
> > > > My favorite: Mr. Meticulous Pinhead.
> > > >
> > > > earle
> > > > *
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > > On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 1:40:20 PM UTC-5, Jonathan Guerin wrote:
> > > > > I was trying to find some kind of intro document or FAQ-like information for newcomers on how to make the most out of this newsgroup.
> > > > >Earle Jones kirjutas reede
> > > > > >> Here is an old (July, 1997) copy of "Psychoceramics: the on-oline
> > > > > >> crackpots" by Toby Howard (Department of Computer Science, University
> > > > > >> of Manchester.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > > > Stanford University, math dept.
> > > >
> > > > Gregory Brumfiel, Daniel Bump, Emmanuel Candès, Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Tom Church, Ralph Cohen, Brian Conrad, Brian Conrey, Amir Dembo, Persi Diaconis, Yakov Eliashberg, Robert Finn, Jacob Fox, Laura Fredrickson, Søren Galatius, George Schaeffer, Or Hershkovits, David Hoffman, Eleny Ionel, Renata Kallosh, Yitzhak Katznelson, Vladimir Kazeev, Michael Kemeny, Steven Kerckhoff, Susie Kimport, Jun Li, Tai-Ping Liu, Mark Lucianovic, Jonathan Luk, Frederick Manners, Rafe Mazzeo, James R. Milgram, Maryam Mirzakhani, Stefan Mueller, Christopher Ohrt, Donald Ornstein, George Papanicolaou, Lenya Ryzhik, Richard Schoen, Leon Simon, Rick Sommer, Kannan Soundararajan, Tadashi Tokieda, Cheng-Chiang Tsai, Ravi Vakil, András Vasy, Akshay Venkatesh, Jan Vondrák, Brian White, Wojciech Wieczorek, Jennifer Wilson, Alex Wright, Lexing Ying, Xuwen Zhu
> > > >
> > > > SLAC: Chi-Chung Kao
> > 
> > > > President: Marc Tessier-Lavigne (neuroscience)
> > > > Provost: Persis Drell (physics)
> > > >
> > > > Stanford physics dept.
> > > >
> > > > Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Mason Yearian, Robert Laughlin, Carl Wieman, Steven Chu, Douglas Osheroff
>
>
> #5-1, My 134th published book
>
> Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> The 134th book of AP, and belatedly late, for I had already written the series of TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS in a 7 volume, 8 book set. This would be the first book in that 8 book set (one of the books is a companion book to 1st year college). But I suppose that I needed to write the full series before I could write the Introduction and know what I had to talk about and talk about in a logical progression order. Sounds paradoxical in a sense, that I needed to write the full series first and then go back and write the Introduction. But in another sense, hard to write an introduction on something you have not really fully done and completed. For example to know what is error filled Old Math and to list those errors in a logical order requires me to write the full 7 volumes in order to list in order the mistakes.
>
> Cover Picture: Mathematics begins with counting, with numbers, with quantity. But counting numbers needs geometry for something to count in the first place. So here in this picture of the generalized Hydrogen atom of chemistry and physics is a torus geometry of 8 rings of a proton torus and one ring where my fingers are, is a equator ring that is the muon and thrusting through the proton torus at the equator of the torus. So we count 9 rings in all. So math is created by atoms and math numbers exist because atoms have many geometry figures to count. And geometry exists because atoms have shapes and different figures.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B08K2XQB4M
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 24, 2020
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 576 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 23 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #224,974 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #3 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> ◦ #23 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #182 in Calculus (Books)
>
>
>
> #5-2, 45th published
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for ages 5 to 18, math textbook series, book 2
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon Kindle edition)
>
> Last revision was 2NOV2020. And this is AP's 45th published book of science.
>
> Preface: Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
>
> This is a textbook series in several volumes that carries every person through all his/her math education starting age 5 up to age 26. Volume 2 is for age 5 year old to that of senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this series of Teaching True Mathematics.
>
> It is a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 2 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 3 carries the Freshperson in College for their math calculus education.
>
> Cover Picture: The Numbers as Integers from 0 to 100, and 10 Grid when dividing by 10, and part of the 100 Grid when dividing by 100. Decimal Grid Numbers are the true numbers of mathematics. The Reals, the rationals & irrationals, the algebraic & transcendentals, the imaginary & Complex, and the negative-numbers are all fake numbers. For, to be a true number, you have to "be counted" by mathematical induction. The smallest Grid system is the Decimal 10 Grid.
>
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07RG7BVZW
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 2, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 2024 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 423 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #235,426 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> #15 in General Geometry
> #223 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
>
>
>
>
> #5-3, 55th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 3 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 25Jun2021. And this is AP's 55th published book of science.
>
> Teaching True Mathematics, by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
>
> Preface: This is volume 3, book 3 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson students, 1st year college students of age 18-19. It is the continuation of volume 2 for ages 5 through 18 years old.
>
> The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism, the mathematics for the laws of electricity and magnetism; what used to be called the Maxwell Equations of Physics. The 1st Year College Math has to prepare all students with the math for all the sciences. So 1st year college Math is like a huge intersection station that has to prepare students with the math they need to do the hard sciences such as physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, geology, etc. What this means is, 1st year college is calculus that allows the student to work with electricity and magnetism. All the math that is needed to enable students to do electricity and magnetism. In Old Math before this textbook, those Old Math textbooks would end in 1/3 of the text about Arclength, vector space, div, curl, Line Integral, Green's, Stokes, Divergence theorem trying to reach and be able to teach Maxwell Equations. But sadly, barely any Old Math classroom reached that 1/3 ending of the textbook, and left all those college students without any math to tackle electricity and magnetism. And most of Old Math was just muddle headed wrong even if they covered the last 1/3 of the textbook. And that is totally unacceptable in science. This textbook fixes that huge hole and gap in Old Math education.
>
> And there is no way around it, that a course in 1st year College Calculus is going to do a lot of hands on experiment with electricity and magnetism, and is required of the students to buy a list of physics apparatus-- multimeter, galvanometer, coil, bar magnet, alligator clip wires, electromagnet, iron filing case, and possibly even a 12 volt transformer, all shown in the cover picture. The beginning of this textbook and the middle section all leads into the ending of this textbook-- we learn the AP-EM Equations and how to use those equations. And there is no escaping the fact that it has to be hands on physics experiments in the classroom of mathematics.
>
> But, do not be scared, for this is all easy easy easy. For if you passed and enjoyed Volume 2 TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, then I promise you, you will not be stressed with Volume 3, for I go out of my way to make it clear and understandable.
>
> Warning: this is a Journal Textbook, meaning that I am constantly adding new material, constantly revising, constantly fixing mistakes or making things more clear. So if you read this book in August of 2019, chances are it is different when you read it in September 2019. Ebooks allow authors the freedom to improve their textbooks on a ongoing basis.
>
> The 1st year college math should be about the math that prepares any and all students for science, whether they branch out into physics, chemistry, biology, geology, astronomy, or math, they should have all the math in 1st year college that will carry them through those science studies. I make every attempt possible to make math easy to understand, easy to learn and hopefully fun.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07WN9RVXD
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ August 16, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1390 KB
> • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 236 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #1,377,070 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #411 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,480 in Calculus (Books)
>
>
> 

>
> #5-4, 56th published book
>
> COLLEGE CALCULUS GUIDE to help students recognize math professor spam from math truth & reality// math textbook series, book 4 Kindle Edition
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> #1 New Releasein 15-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
>
>
> This textbook is the companion guide book to AP's Teaching True Mathematics, 1st year College. It is realized that Old Math will take a long time in removing their fake math, so in the interim period, this Guide book is designed to speed up the process of removing fake Calculus out of the education system, the fewer students we punish with forcing them with fake Calculus, the better we are.
> Cover Picture: This book is part comedy, for when you cannot reason with math professors that they have many errors to fix, that 90% of their Calculus is in error, you end up resorting to comedy, making fun of them, to prod them to fix their errors. To prod them to "do right by the students of the world" not their entrenched propaganda.
> Length: 54 pages
>
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1035 KB
> Print Length: 64 pages
> Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> Publication Date: August 18, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07WNGLQ85
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 
> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #253,425 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #38 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #318 in Calculus (Books)
> #48 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> 

> #5-5, 72nd published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 4 for age 19-20 Sophomore-year College, math textbook series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Preface: This is volume 4, book 5 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Sophomore-year students, students of age 19-20. It is the continuation of volume 3 in the end-goal of learning how to do the mathematics of electricity and magnetism, because everything in physics is nothing but atoms and atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. To know math, you have to know physics. We learned the Calculus of 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. But we did not learn the calculus of those equations for 3rd dimension. So, you can say that Sophomore year College math is devoted to 3D Calculus. This sophomore year college we fill in all the calculus, and we start over on all of Geometry, for geometry needs a modern day revision. And pardon me for this book is mostly reading, and the students doing less calculations. The classroom of this textbook has the teacher go through page by page to get the students comprehending and understanding of what is being taught. There are many hands on experiments also.
>
> Cover Picture shows some toruses, some round some square, torus of rings, thin strips of rings or squares and shows them laid flat. That is Calculus of 3rd dimension that lays a ring in a torus to be flat in 2nd dimension.
> Length: 105 pages
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0828M34VL
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 952 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 105 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Best Sellers Rank: #242,037 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #36 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #219 in Calculus (Books)
>
>
> #5-6, 75th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 5 for age 20-21 Junior-year of College, math textbook series, book 6 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium 2019
>
> This is volume 5, book 6 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Junior-year students, students of age 20-21. In first year college Calculus we learned calculus of the 2nd dimension and applied it to the equations of physics for electricity and magnetism. And in sophomore year we learned calculus of 3rd dimension to complete our study of the mathematics needed to do the physics of electricity and magnetism. Now, junior year college, we move onto something different, for we focus mostly on logic now and especially the logic of what is called the "mathematical proof". Much of what the student has learned about mathematics so far has been given to her or him as stated knowledge, accept it as true because I say so. But now we are going to do math proofs. Oh, yes, we did prove a few items here and there, such as why the Decimal Grid Number system is so special, such as the Pythagorean Theorem, such as the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus with its right-triangle hinged up or down. But many ideas we did not prove, we just stated them and expected all students to believe them true. And you are now juniors in college and we are going to start to prove many of those ideas and teach you "what is a math proof". Personally, I myself feel that the math proof is overrated, over hyped. But the math proof is important for one reason-- it makes you better scientists of knowing what is true and what is a shaky idea. A math proof is the same as "thinking straight and thinking clearly". And all scientists need to think straight and think clearly. But before we get to the Mathematics Proof, we have to do Probability and Statistics. What you learned in Grade School, then High School, then College, called Sigma Error, now becomes Probability and Statistics. It is important because all sciences including mathematics needs and uses Probability and Statistics. So, our job for junior-year of college mathematics is all cut out and ahead for us, no time to waste, let us get going.
>
> Cover Picture: is a sample of the Array Proof, a proof the ellipse is not a conic but rather a cylinder cut wherein the oval is the slant cut of a cone, not the ellipse.
>
> Length: 175 pages
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN : B0836F1YF6
> Publication date : December 26, 2019
> Language : English
> File size : 741 KB
> Text-to-Speech : Enabled
> Screen Reader : Supported
> Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
> X-Ray : Not Enabled
> Word Wise : Not Enabled
> Print length : 175 pages
> Lending : Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #3,768,255 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #3,591 in Probability & Statistics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #19,091 in Probability & Statistics (Books)
>
>
>
> #5-7, 89th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 6 for age 21-22 Senior-year of College, math textbook series, book 7 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
>
> Last revision was 6Feb2021.
> Preface: This is the last year of College for mathematics and we have to mostly summarize all of mathematics as best we can. And set a new pattern to prepare students going on to math graduate school. A new pattern of work habits, because graduate school is more of research and explore on your own.. So in this final year, I am going to eliminate tests, and have it mostly done as homework assignments.
>
> Cover Picture: Again and again, many times in math, the mind is not good enough alone to think straight and clear, and you need tools to hands-on see how it works. Here is a collection of tools for this senior year college classes. There is a pencil, clipboard, graph paper, compass, divider, protractor, slide-ruler. And for this year we spend a lot of time on the parallelepiped, showing my wood model, and showing my erector set model held together by wire loops in the corners. The plastic square is there only to hold up the erector set model.
>
> Length: 110 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B084V11BGY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 15, 2020
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 826 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 110 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #224,965 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #345 in Mathematics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #373 in Physics (Kindle Store)
> ◦ #2,256 in Physics (Books)
>
> #5-8, 90th published book
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 7 for age 22-26 Graduate school, math textbook series, book 8 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium 2020
>
> Last revised 1NOV2020. This was AP's 90th published book of science.
>
> Preface: This is College Graduate School mathematics. Congratulations, you made it this far. To me, graduate school is mostly research, research mathematics and that means also physics. So it is going to be difficult to do math without physics. Of course, we focus on the mathematics of these research projects.
>
> My textbook for Graduate school is just a template and the professors teaching the graduate students are free of course to follow their own projects, but in terms of being physics and math combined. What I list below is a template for possible projects.
>
> So, in the below projects, I list 36 possible research projects that a graduate student my like to undertake, or partake. I list those 36 projects with a set of parentheses like this (1), (2), (3), etc. Not to be confused with the chapters listing as 1), 2), 3), etc. I list 36 projects but the professor can offer his/her own list, and I expect students with their professor, to pick a project and to monitor the student as to his/her progresses through the research. I have listed each project then cited some of my own research into these projects, below each project is an entry. Those entries are just a help or helper in getting started or acquainted with the project.. The entry has a date time group and a newsgroup that I posted to such as sci.math or plutonium-atom-universe Google newsgroups. Again the entry is just a help or helper in getting started.
>
> Now instead of picking one or two projects for your Graduate years of study, some may select all 36 projects where you write a short paper on each project. Some may be bored with just one or two projects and opt for all 36.
>
> Cover Picture: A photo by my iphone of a page on Permutations of the Jacobs book Mathematics: A Human Endeavor, 1970. One of the best textbooks ever written in Old Math, not for its contents because there are many errors, but for its teaching style. It is extremely rare to find a math textbook written for the student to learn. Probably because math professors rarely learned how to teach in the first place; only learned how to unintentionally obfuscate. The page I photographed is important because it is the interface between geometry's perimeter or surface area versus geometry's area or volume, respectively. Or, an interface of pure numbers with that of geometry. But I have more to say on this below.
> Length: 296 pages
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B085DF8R7V
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 1, 2020
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 828 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 296 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Best Sellers Rank: #224,981 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
> ◦ #13 in General Geometry
> ◦ #213 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
>
>
> #5-9, 221st published book
>
> An Education Ladder Guideline for teaching mathematics and a Test to see if you are cut out to be a mathematician//Teaching True Mathematics
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
>
> Preface: This book is written to improve math education in school and at home. Trouble is, you cannot improve math education if the professors of mathematics have much of their teachings in error. So I write this book mostly as a test for math professors because to shine a light on math professor failure is the best way to improve math teaching, and thereby improve school curriculums especially colleges and universities. But others, such as laypersons are welcomed to join in. And it is the laypersons and students that will make the greatest amount of use of this book because math professors are usually stubborn and idiotic and hard to change for the better. And so when students and laypersons keep asking questions of their math professors, their brainwashing and thus poor teaching, they eventually come around to the truth and then change their bad behavior and bad misunderstanding; to proper true mathematics.
>
> Cover Picture: Is my iphone photograph of a rubber washer inside a plastic cone. The washer is at a steep slant angle to the cone perpendicular. Notice the washer near the apex is fully touching the side of the cone, but the washer directed towards the base has not yet cut through the side of the cone, and you can see a rainbow or a crescent shape of area where the washer will intersect the side of the cone, (where my two finger are), making a total figure of a Oval, never the ellipse. I was taking this picture as one person, so I had the iphone camera in one hand and the cone in another hand, and had to use a rubber washer to stay in place. The same green plastic cone used in this picture appears in both of my published books of the proof slant cut of cone is oval, never the ellipse.
>
> My 3rd published book with the same green cone on cover.
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> My 68th published book with the same green cone on cover.
> Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BQDYMYKQ
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 16, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 551 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 65 pages
>
>
>
>
>
> #5-10, 160th published book
>
> MATHOPEDIA-- List of 82 fakes and mistakes of Old Math// mathematics & logic
> by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Preface:
> A Mathopedia is like a special type of encyclopedia on the subject of mathematics. It is about the assessment of the worth of mathematics and the subject material of mathematics. It is a overall examination and a evaluation of mathematics and its topics.
>
> The ordering of Mathopedia is not a alphabetic ordering, nor does it have a index. The ordering is purely that of importance at beginning and importance at end.
>
> The greatest use of Mathopedia is a guide to students of what not to waste your time on and what to focus most of your time. I know so many college classes in mathematics are just a total waste of time, waste of valuable time for the class is math fakery. I know because I have been there.
>
> Now I am going to cite various reference sources of AP books if anyone wants more details and can be seen in the Appendix at the end of the book.
>
> I suppose, going forward, mathematics should always have a mathopedia, where major parts of mathematics as a science are held under scrutiny and question as to correctness. In past history we have called these incidents as "doubters of the mainstream". Yet math, like physics, can have no permanent mainstream, since there is always question of correctness in physics, there then corresponds questions of correctness in mathematics (because math is a subset of physics). What I mean is that each future generation corrects some mistakes of past mathematics. If anyone is unsure of what I am saying here, both math and physics need constant correcting, of that which never belonged in science. This then converges with the logic-philosophy of Pragmatism (see AP's book of logic on Pragmatism).
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09MZTLRL5 and ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ December 2, 2021
> • Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B09ZWFLKHC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ May 8, 2022
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1154 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 71 pages
> y z
> | /
> | /
> |/______ x

🪰 of Math and 🦟 of Physics Archimedes "Drag Queen of Math" Plutonium
<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> humiliates himself in public by tarding:

> Kibo Parry Moroney Volney, even if it

>> Kibo Parry Moroney Volney:

>>> On Sunday, June 11, 2023 at 3:54:18 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

As I said, I was doing a little experiment again by not responding to
StupidPlutonium. StupidPlutonium kept insulting me, perhaps just a
little less. I had to remind StupidPlutonium and actually tell him of
this, so what does he do? He attacks me some more, that's how dumb
StupidPlutonium is.

What's more, StupidPlutonium is even insulting his many superiors more,
like Earle Jones, Dan C., Chris etc.

StupidPlutonium, don't you know that you are right near the bottom of
the totem pole of math and science? Jones, Dan, Chris etc. are WAY above
you. You really shouldn't attack and insult your betters like that!

You aren't at the very bottom, of course. You are above Mitch, yanwick
and perhaps your brother crank Banerjee.

Ghost of Uncle Al, what do you think of StupidPlutonium being so dumb
and stoopid that he can't even learn not to attack myself and everyone
else here?

"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is. I mean rock-hard
stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. Surface of Venus
under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid vapor
dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid
that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different
sensorium of stupid. Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid.
Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its own Schwarzschild
radius. Black hole stupid. Stupid gotten so dense and massive that no
intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Archie-Poo emits more
stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise emits stupid/year.
Quasar stupid. Nothing else in the universe can be this stupid.
Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial fragment from the
original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of stupid so uncontaminated
by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that define
maximally extrapolated hypergeometric n-dimensional backgroundless
stupid as we can imagine it. Archie-Poo is Planck stupid, a quantum
foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid, a grand unified theory of
stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity. Archie-poo is stooopid."