novaBBS - sci.math - _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking? 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:

John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking?

30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> "antiscience"
>"Pope Arky the Last"
> fails at math and science:

John J.Veysey,NSF Dr. Panchanathan,Lloyd Whitman,Scott Stanley,France Anne Cordova why does Kibo continue to defile the Pope, for he continues to defile and demonize AP everyday?

Re: Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B.Smith, how is your

Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >

Univ Dayton Eric Spina, why Kibo hate The Pope? He continues to defile The Pope? Can you stop him, for he has defiled and demonized AP for 30 years nonstop, are you going to let him defile the Pope for 30 years???? And Todd B..Smith, how is your reading of AP's TEACHING TRUE PHYSICS and TEACHING TRUE MATH textbook series (see below) coming along. I would answer any questions you may have, provided they are serious questions.
>
> Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, an open hate channel--

Paid 30 yr. stalker Kibo Parry (Volney)
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 1:06:17 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics
>"Kim Jong Un's lackey"
>"psychoceramic"
>Drag Queen of Science especially Physics and Logic

Is NSF Dr. Panchanathan paying Kibo to stalk??? If so, please replace him.

Pres.Biden please examine the resignation of Dr.Panchanathan NSF (Trump appointee) as the root cause of Kibo's "analbuttfuckmanure" stalk 2017, Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks.

NSF Dr.Panchanathan resign and get someone in there who knows science who knows Maxwell Equations, not chutes & ladders and Pokemon games. Get a leader at NSF who has brains enough to know it is --- bad bad business--- to pay stalkers to stalk Usenet-- Panchanathan is worse at NSF than Trump is at presidency, and Panchanathan was a Trump appointment.

Why does the NSF hate the Pope??? You should all be all ashamed of yourself at the NSF and write the Pope a letter of apology for the James Kibo Parry Moroney Volney constant hate spew on the Pope.


---quoting Wikipedia ---
Controversy
Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
--- end quote ---

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Dr. Panchanathan , present day
NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
France Anne Cordova
Subra Suresh
Arden Lee Bement Jr.
Rita R. Colwell
Neal Francis Lane
John Howard Gibbons 1993

Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua


> On Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at 1:16:12 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Hagfish of Math and Slime Eel of Physics
> >Re: "howling crazy fuckdog"
> >"Putin's minion"
> > defiles the Pope before tarding:
> > Eric Spina,Elizabeth Smith,Todd B. Smith Univ Dayton--
> > Dayton? Are you trying to guess universities one by one to find mine?
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 4:51:55 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "imp of physics"
> > defiles the pope and then tards:
> > Turd Soup Machine".
>
> But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 11:50:15 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > Re: "mindless fuckdog" flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > Excellent numerology!
> >
> >
> > > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > > > down completely:
> > > >"mindless fuckdog"
> > >
> > >
> > > Kibo defiling of The Pope, AP and many others as paid for stalker, for 30 years now.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > > > > down completely:
> > > > >"mindless fuckdog"
> > > > > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 9:27:18 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Blowfly of Math and Screwfly of Physics
> > > > > >"necrophile"
> > > > > >"Pope Arky the Last"
> > > > > > Merrick Garland,Pres.Biden please check if it is legal for the US govt (CIA or NSF etc) to pay stalkers like Kibo Parry M-V to stalk US citizens for 30 years non-stop, pestering, harassing citizens in sci.math, sci.physics Kibo's necrophilia stalking 2022, Kibo's hatred of Pope, and Kibo's "you need more punishment" stalks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Michael Moroney Jul 7, 2022, 8:30:12 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 11:16:31 PM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > >"Pope of the Cult of Failure"
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apparently Kibo Parry Moroney along with a few of his friends-- Zelos Malum, Chris Thomasson were caught forging "I want to fuck her corpse" forging that into AP's posts, when only AP gave condolences. And this forgery of necrophilia caused the "governors of Usenet" to fire Zelos Malum and cause Kibo Parry to search for a new name to continue to stalk and defile Usenet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The forgery of AP text in September 2022 with necrophilia by Zelos Malum cost him his job, and appears to have cost Kibo having to discontinue with his fake name of Michael Moroney. And seems to have cost Chris Thomasson a month or two suspension in posting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the defiling of the character AP by Kibo Parry M-Volney continues as it has been from 1993 onwards. But now Kibo is defiling the Pope, in addition. And my recommendation is either Kibo go to jail or have regular psychiatric treatment. For I have never seen a Kibo post that is congratulatory of anyone, only despicable hatred. Why Kibo probably hates his own mother.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:28:57 AM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Feb 24, 2023, 11:28:40 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tuesday, February 28, 2023 at 9:28:07 PM UTC-6, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > > "self diagnosed as insane"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Mar 31, 2023, 1:45:31 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney Apr 15, 2023, 2:39:21 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney May 5, 2023, 9:43:31 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes "Pope of Failure" Plutonium flunked the math test of a lifetime-generation test
> > > > > > by Volney May 9, 2023, 10:57:43 PM
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:53:19 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 1:48:04 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thursday, May 11, 2023 at 11:27:58 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > > > >attacking the pope now? I know you aren't Catholic since you
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Merrick Garland, Pres.Biden allows Kibo Parry (Volney) to defile the Pope and AP, with his 30 year nonstop hatred. I bet it is against the law for the govt in CIA or NSF to pay for hatred stalker like Kibo. Govt money to pay to stalkers..
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mr. Garland & Biden, I suspect the US Constitution never allows for a government (agency) to pay for the stalking and pestering and harassment of a US citizen in Usenet sci.math, sci.physics, such as the 30 year nonstop stalker Kibo Parry with his necrophilia forgery and character defiling, even defiling the Pope.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kibo in CIA
> > > > > > Kibo Parry Moroney in 1997 blows his CIA cover-- to the entire world, mind you---
> > > > > > Re: Archimedes Vanadium, America's most beloved poster
> > > > > > >> In article <5nefan$i06$9...@news.thecia.net> kibo greps <ki....@shell.thecia.net> writes:
> > >
> > >
> > > The time in late 2022 when AP was giving condolences to a special deceased person, yet here comes Kibo with his hate channel gang of stalkers forging necrophila onto AP posts. Forgery that cost a ISP job of one of the forgers and trimmed Kibo's spamm, but not enough. And that Kibo needs to be banned altogether from sci.math and sci.physics, and all his morphed names.
> > >
> > > > Kibo> I want to fuck her corpseUniv DaytonElizabeth Smith,Todd B.Smith,Ivan Sudakow,Perry Yaney
> > > >
> > > > > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking hate spew
> > >
> > > > Kibo Parry's nymshifter Moroney-Volney open hate line of 30 year nonstop stalking
> > > > On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 3:14:40 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney (open hate line by James Kibo Parry 30 year paid stalker) wrote:
> > > > >"Drag Queen of Science"
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > Not again!
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You already said that.
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > You're really sick, Pluto!
> > > > >
> > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > > > > Necrophile
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You already said that.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Todd B. Smith
> > > > > > Univ. Dayton Physics dept.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rex L. Berney
> > > > > > Bob Brecha
> > > > > > Bruce Craver
> > > > > > John Erdei
> > > > > > Thomas P. Graham
> > > > > > Donald Hirst
> > > > > > Jenn Hyland
> > > > > > Jay Mathews
> > > > > > Robert Merithew
> > > > > > Brendon Mikula
> > > > > > George K. Miner
> > > > > > J. Michael O'Hare
> > > > > > Leno M Pedrotti
> > > > > > William N. Plick
> > > > > > Randall Schaurer
> > > > > > Elizabeth Smith
> > > > > > Ivan Sudakow
> > > > > > Perry Yaney
> > > > > wiki, wiki Revision history of " James Kibo Parry Moroney"
> > > > > www.exampleproblems dot com wiki
> > > > > (cur | prev) 03:21, 13 March 2021 Todd (talk | contribs ... (10,274 bytes)
> > > > > ep@toddbsmith dot com
> > > > >
> > > > > ---quoting Wikipedia ---
> > > > > Controversy
> > > > > Many government and university installations blocked, threatened to block, or attempted to shut-down The World's Internet connection until Software Tool & Die was eventually granted permission by the National Science Foundation to provide public Internet access on "an experimental basis."
> > > > > --- end quote ---
> > > > >
> > > > > NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
> > > > >
> > > > > Dr. Panchanathan , present day
> > > > > NSF Dr. Panchanathan, F. Fleming Crim, Dorothy E Aronson, Brian Stone, James S Olvestad, Rebecca Lynn Keiser, Vernon D. Ross, Lloyd Whitman, John J. Veysey, Scott Stanley
> > > > > France Anne Cordova
> > > > > Subra Suresh
> > > > > Arden Lee Bement Jr.
> > > > > Rita R. Colwell
> > > > > Neal Francis Lane
> > > > > John Howard Gibbons 1993
> > > > >
> > > > > Barry Shein, kibo parry std world
> > > > > Jim Frost, Joe "Spike" Ilacqua
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 8, 2023 at 12:14:29 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >"certifiably insane"
> > > > > > > > > > > Necrophile
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You already said that.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > You sicko! Why do you keep saying that?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wanting to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I want to fuck her corpse
> > > > > > > > > > >

Click here to read the complete article

Come, check out:

wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwe.000webhostapp.com

....................................................................................................................................

Chris, Dr.Wiles, Dr.Tao,Dr.Hales,Dr.Stillwell are 99% insane in math with their ellipse the slant cut of cone, for a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry and a cone can only give 1 axis of symmetry. You need the slant cut of cylinder to give an ellipse.

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 2:07:34 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> Are you 99% insane, or 99.999...% insane?

Kibo says no wonder Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Wiles cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not their ellipse.
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 9:03:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>"barking fuckdog"
>"Putin's Stooge"

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 12:33:41 PM UTC-5, V õ l u r wrote:
> Come, check out:
>

Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Wiles, Terence Tao, Thomas Hales, John Stillwell, Jill Pipher, Ruth Charney, Ken Ribet, Andrew Beal, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Gerald Edgar, AMS, no-one there can do a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all they can offer is a limit analysis, so shoddy in logic they never realized that "analyzing" is not the same as "proving" for analyzing is much in the same as "measuring but not proving". And yet, none can do a geometry proof and the reason is quite clear for none can even see that the slant cut in single right-circular cone is a Oval, never the ellipse. So they could never do a geometry proof of FTC even if they wanted to. For they have no logical geometry brain to begin to do anything geometrical. Is it that Andrew Wiles and Terence Tao cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Not having a Logical brain to do math, for any rational person would be upset by Wiles, Tao saying truth table of AND is TFFF when it actually is TTTF. Is that why neither Terence Tao or Andrew Wiles can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?
>
> Maybe they need to take up Earle Jones offer to wash dishes or pots at Stanford Univ or where ever, for they sure cannot do mathematics.
> Why are these people failures of Math?? For none can even contemplate these 4 questions.
>
> 1) think a slant cut in single cone is a ellipse when it is proven to be a Oval, never the ellipse. For the cone and oval have 1 axis of symmetry, while ellipse has 2.
> 2) think Boole logic is correct with AND truth table being TFFF when it really is TTTF in order to avoid 2 OR 1 =3 with AND as subtraction
> 3) can never do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and are too ignorant in math to understand that analysis of something is not proving something in their "limit hornswaggle"
> 4) too stupid in science to ask the question of physics-- is the 1897 Thomson discovery of a 0.5MeV particle actually the Dirac magnetic monopole and that the muon is the true electron of atoms stuck inside a 840MeV proton torus doing the Faraday law. Showing that Peter Higgs, Sheldon Glashow, Ed Witten, John Baez, Roger Penrose, Arthur B. McDonald are sap-heads when it comes to logical thinking in physics with their do nothing proton, do nothing electron.
>
>
> Is Jim Holt, Virginia Klenk, David Agler, Susanne K. Langer, Gary M. Hardegree, Raymond M. Smullyan,
> John Venn, William Gustason, Richmond H. Thomason, more of propagandists and belong in "Abnormal Psychology" dept than in the department of logic, like Dan Christensen a laugh a minute logician? Probably because none can admit slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse, due to axes of symmetry for cone and oval have 1 while ellipse has 2. Why they cannot even count beyond 1. Yet their minds were never good enough to see the error nor admit to their mistakes. They failed logic so badly they accept Boole's insane AND truth table of TFFF when it is TTTF avoiding the painful 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. Or is it because none of these logicians has a single marble of logic in their entire brain to realize calculus requires a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, not a "limit analysis" for analysis is like a measurement, not a proving exercise. Analysis does not prove, only adds data and facts, but never is a proof of itself. I analyze things daily, and none of which is a proof. So are all these logicians like what Clutterfreak the propaganda stooge says they are.
>
> 3rd published book
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> •
> •
>
> Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
>
> Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
>
> In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
>
> Product details
> • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
>
> #12-2, 11th published book
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> Preface:
> Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis".. And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.
>
> To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
>
> Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
>
>
> Product details
> ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> Language ‏ : ‎ English
> File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Click here to read the complete article

Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, most insane stalker of Usenet, yet they keep paying this arsewipe to stalk
On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:02:35 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> So you hallucinate these millions or billions of views? "Billions"? If
> the population of earth is about 8 billion now, you claim more than one
> of 8 people on earth has viewed your crappy videos? Including small
> children, those without computers or internet access, those living in
> some hut in Africa miles away from the nearest road, even further from
> electricity, those who know no English etc. ?

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

> Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, most insane stalker of Usenet, yet they keep
> paying this arsewipe to stalk On Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:02:35 PM
> UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>> So you hallucinate these millions or billions of views? "Billions"? If
>> the population of earth is about 8 billion now, you claim more than one

ohh my, that Fluoridated water, to stay calm, they give you in capitalist america, makes you walk like fools.

*_British_mission_to_rescue_Titanic_divers_blocked_by_US_* – Telegraph
https://%72t.com/news/578403-us-blocks-uk-titanic-rescue/

Hilarious. The pommys need approval from the gringos to leave their own ports to rescue these people! I am sure glad I'm not on that submersible.

Karma for bombing Nordstream pipelines! Anglo-Saxons and their lackeys, don't mess with us , Russians !!!

*_BALTOPS22_* (aka *_Baltic_Operations_year_2022_*)

These countries will exercise a *_myriad_of_capabilities_*, demonstrating the *_inherent_flexibility_of_maritime_forces_*. Exercise scenarios include amphibious, gunnery, *_anti-submarine_*, air defense, and *_mine_clearance_operations_*, as well as *_explosive_ordnance_disposal_*, *_unmanned_underwater_* and *_surface_vehicle_exercises_*, and medical responses.
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/06/baltops-2023-exercise-kicks-off-in-the-baltic-sea/

*_Documentary_about_khakhol_maidan_Donbass_* with English subtitles
https://zn21g5kls-n995.bitchute.com/9G0DhX7u29e3/J5qJjEveH38K.mp4

Re: _Kibo's corpse fucking--UCLA Dr. Terence Tao. Why Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, is it because Dr.Tao runs and hides when faced with the question of slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse? Or is it because Dr.Tao fails math
On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 6:14:37 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
>Re: "barking fuckdog"

Re: _Kibo's corpse fucking--UCLA Dr. Terence Tao. Why Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney, is it because Dr.Tao runs and hides when faced with the question of slant cut of cone is Oval, never ellipse? Or is it because Dr.Tao fails math with never a geometry pr
by
V
May 13, 2023, 12:44:05 PM

Or, Kibo, is it because Dr.Tao or Dr. Andrew Wiles, neither one can do a geometry proof, much less a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus???

On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 1:28:10 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> In fact I've noticed doing so is a common crank characteristic, a crank
> may have an abstract claim but ask them what is the answer to a specific
> situation, and they refuse to answer. Even if the answer could be
> trivially calculated from the crank's claims.

My 3rd published book

AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
•
•

Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.

Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.

In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse..

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
• Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
• Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled

#12-2, My 11th published book

World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
Preface:
Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.

Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof.

To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?

Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.

Product details
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
#134 in Calculus (Books)
#20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

My 245th published book of science.


Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide.. The last two operators of math are derivative and integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous breakdowns. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has made math the worst science and filled with error.

Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

Click here to read the complete article

Gnat of Math and Phlea of Physics Archimedes "always wrong" Plutonium
autistically melts down completely:

> My 134th published book
>
> Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Why do you still keep trying to brainwash little 5 year old kids?

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or
parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
increased the danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
confuse you!

Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12
letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
keep our children from reading!

Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
to destroy mathematics.

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
is to promote failure in math and science.

There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a
suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
both?

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his
dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from
otherwise legitimate Amazon.

🤡‍ of Math and 🃏 of Physics Archimedes "Court Jester of Physics"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> fails at math and science:

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his
dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from
otherwise legitimate Amazon.

Subject	Author
_John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panch	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why	V õ l u r
Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: does Kibo defile The Pope	Thurman Akkeren
Re: _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why	Archimedes Plutonium
Re: Archimedes "psycho" Plutonium flunked the math test of a	Volney
Re: Archimedes "Lord of the Flies" Plutonium flunked the math test of	Volney

"If value corrupts then absolute value corrupts absolutely."

tech / sci.math / _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking? 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: > "antiscience" >"Pope Arky the

"If value corrupts then absolute value corrupts absolutely."

tech / sci.math / _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking? 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: > "antiscience" >"Pope Arky the

tech / sci.math / _John J.Veysey,Purdue's France Cordova,NSF Dr. Panchanathan, why does Kibo defile The Pope with his hate stalking? 30 year stalker Kibo Parry Moroney-Volney On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote: > "antiscience" >"Pope Arky the