This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.

https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png

What do you think?

On 6/19/2023 1:40 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
>
> https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
>
> What do you think?

It creates a triangle... ;^) Is it good enough?

https://i.ibb.co/bgxNK5b/image.png

F-35 grows infinitely in Russian trenches??? Chris, does the F-35 have machine guns for trench warfare???

800 F-35 fighter jets in Ukraine immediately, flying sorties, because insane Putin gave Belarus nuclear weapons. The West must show Russians and Chinese that the West is superior in arms to prevent nuclear war. At this rate, Putin will nuke Kiev. If NATO were in Ukraine with 800 F-35s, immediately, then the Russian chain of command will remove Putin.

Russians need to see they are inferior to the West, for them to stop their aggression.

Hitler in 1940 wanted to conquer England, and so they tried by Luftwaffe to bring England to a negotiation table.

It was the bravery of the Spitfire, the superior aircraft that saved Britain in the "Battle of Britain".

One can say that the Battle of Britain was the first defeat of the insane Hitler of Germany. And then Hitler being insane and crazy launches a invasion of Russia with Stalingrad defeat to follow.

Putin is much the same in terms of insanity as was Hitler, but Putin has a nuclear arsenal, very much more dangerous than a insane Hitler. But by showing Russia that the West arms are all superior to Russian arms, they begin to come to their senses and realize that their ICBMs are also rust bucket and that the West will vaporize Russia if the insane Putin presses nuclear.

The Russian people and chain of command need to see the West superiority, and the F-35 will do just that. Prove to Russia, they have a insane person at the helm that threatens to vaporize Russia.

I see in the specifications of the F-35 that over 900 were built. We need at least 500 of those immediately in Ukraine flying sorties. We need those 500 with already trained pilots from what ever country. We need this immediately.

It is no use in sending the F-16 or F-35 after Russia or Belarus hits Kiev with a nuclear bomb. We need those F-16 or F-35 fighter jets in there now. This is the only way the insane Putin learns-- learns be seeing superior force. And his chain of command removes Putin.

But there is a parallel of WW2 to now the Ukraine war. In that we need air superiority over Ukraine, especially with the pronuocement of 16Jun2023, that Putin has put nuclear missiles into Belarus.

This action alone must be met by NATO with having F-16 and F-35 immediately flying sorties in Ukraine.

The Russian and Belarus escalation must by met with F-16 superiority patrolling Ukraine.

We cannot wait after Russia and Belarus drop a nuclear bomb on Kiev, we must act now.

For the insanity of Putin must be seen by all Russians as the F-16 shows Russia, it is inferior in war, shows Russians that Putin the insane is leading them down a path of vaporization.

Even shows China of its belligerence and if it goes insane as Putin over Taiwan, that China will be vaporized.

The world saw how the Spitfire saved Britain, and now the world needs to see how F-16 and F-35 save Ukraine and removes Putin. Once the Russians all see how the West is superior in war, no-one in Russia will follow any order from Putin and remove him from power.

AP, King of Science

The other insane dictator- Hitler, much like Putin, and why Russia needs to see The West F-16, F-35 superiority, so Russia and China come to the realization their every armament is second rate rustbucket (ICBMs)// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH

On 6/19/2023 1:46 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> F-35 grows infinitely in Russian trenches??? Chris, does the F-35 have machine guns for trench warfare???
[...]

I think f-35 has a cannon, as does f-22. However f-22 would be on cap,
while the f-35's attack sam sites with harm missiles and can do strafe
bombing missions against enemy armor and troop positions. Perhaps aided
by a-10's.

On 6/19/2023 1:52 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/19/2023 1:46 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> F-35 grows infinitely in Russian trenches??? Chris, does the F-35 have
>> machine guns for trench warfare???
> [...]
>
> I think f-35 has a cannon, as does f-22. However f-22 would be on cap,
> while the f-35's attack sam sites with harm missiles and can do strafe
> bombing missions against enemy armor and troop positions. Perhaps aided
> by a-10's.
>

I am not sure if f-35 can have pylons on the underside of the wings
because that would radically weaken their stealth capabilities. Iirc,
their weapons are stored in a bay, just like f-22. Now, after the enemy
air defenses have been crippled with cruise missile and HARM attacks
from the f-35's, and after the f-22's have gained air superiority...
Then a-10's and f-16's can go in with rocket pods hanging off their
pylons. Lock onto a tank a couple of miles away, pull the trigger, and
five or six guided rockets launch, pull up and break away launching some
chaff and flares...

Chris what is the best NATO plane to clear out Russian trenches?

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:00:03 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/19/2023 1:52 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 6/19/2023 1:46 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> >> F-35 grows infinitely in Russian trenches??? Chris, does the F-35 have
> >> machine guns for trench warfare???
> > [...]
> >
> > I think f-35 has a cannon, as does f-22. However f-22 would be on cap,
> > while the f-35's attack sam sites with harm missiles and can do strafe
> > bombing missions against enemy armor and troop positions. Perhaps aided
> > by a-10's.
> >
> I am not sure if f-35 can have pylons on the underside of the wings
> because that would radically weaken their stealth capabilities. Iirc,
> their weapons are stored in a bay, just like f-22. Now, after the enemy
> air defenses have been crippled with cruise missile and HARM attacks
> from the f-35's, and after the f-22's have gained air superiority...
> Then a-10's and f-16's can go in with rocket pods hanging off their
> pylons. Lock onto a tank a couple of miles away, pull the trigger, and
> five or six guided rockets launch, pull up and break away launching some
> chaff and flares...

On 6/19/2023 2:25 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Chris what is the best NATO plane to clear out Russian trenches?

a-10 is pretty good at getting up and close and down and dirty. Cluster
bombs from cruise missiles work good against entrenched troop positions.

>
>
> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:00:03 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 6/19/2023 1:52 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 6/19/2023 1:46 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>>> F-35 grows infinitely in Russian trenches??? Chris, does the F-35 have
>>>> machine guns for trench warfare???
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I think f-35 has a cannon, as does f-22. However f-22 would be on cap,
>>> while the f-35's attack sam sites with harm missiles and can do strafe
>>> bombing missions against enemy armor and troop positions. Perhaps aided
>>> by a-10's.
>>>
>> I am not sure if f-35 can have pylons on the underside of the wings
>> because that would radically weaken their stealth capabilities. Iirc,
>> their weapons are stored in a bay, just like f-22. Now, after the enemy
>> air defenses have been crippled with cruise missile and HARM attacks
>> from the f-35's, and after the f-22's have gained air superiority...
>> Then a-10's and f-16's can go in with rocket pods hanging off their
>> pylons. Lock onto a tank a couple of miles away, pull the trigger, and
>> five or six guided rockets launch, pull up and break away launching some
>> chaff and flares...

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:40:28 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
>
> https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
>
> What do you think?
Nice. What is interesting it looks like it is new and not documented.
Like some of my stuff,
I'll send you my video of the largest enclosed rectangular lattice that
the pencil never leaves the paper and these lattice's can be built --->oo.
A lot of simple stuff is documented aside from set theory with lattice's.
That isn't simple. In fact it is over my head.
I slowed it down to a speed that is easy to follow the pencil lines.

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:27:08 PM UTC-4, Dan joyce wrote:
> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:40:28 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
> >
> > https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
> >
> > What do you think?
> Nice. What is interesting it looks like it is new and not documented.
> Like some of my stuff,
> I'll send you my video of the largest enclosed rectangular lattice that
> the pencil never leaves the paper and these lattice's can be built --->oo..
> A lot of simple stuff is documented aside from set theory with lattice's.
> That isn't simple. In fact it is over my head.
> I slowed it down to a speed that is easy to follow the pencil lines.
Also, you could start that with just a few squares and draw it in slow motion
would be interesting. Making it a to the right leaning V--->oo.

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:42:39 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/19/2023 1:40 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
> >
> > https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
> >
> > What do you think?
> It creates a triangle... ;^) Is it good enough?
>
> https://i.ibb.co/bgxNK5b/image.png
Nice. I didn't see that one until after I posted my response to the first one.

On 6/19/2023 3:44 PM, Dan joyce wrote:
> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:27:08 PM UTC-4, Dan joyce wrote:
>> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:40:28 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
>>>
>>> https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>> Nice. What is interesting it looks like it is new and not documented.
>> Like some of my stuff,
>> I'll send you my video of the largest enclosed rectangular lattice that
>> the pencil never leaves the paper and these lattice's can be built --->oo.
>> A lot of simple stuff is documented aside from set theory with lattice's.
>> That isn't simple. In fact it is over my head.
>> I slowed it down to a speed that is easy to follow the pencil lines.
> Also, you could start that with just a few squares and draw it in slow motion
> would be interesting. Making it a to the right leaning V--->oo.

One thing at a time. I am going to code up your newest lattice sometime
tonight. However, I am still tinkering around with my little test:

https://i.ibb.co/rk82xmQ/image.png

I was thinking of creating a little page where one can copy and paste
directions:

R, U, L, D

and render them.

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 8:25:58 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/19/2023 3:44 PM, Dan joyce wrote:
> > On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:27:08 PM UTC-4, Dan joyce wrote:
> >> On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:40:28 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >>> This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
> >>>
> >>> https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
> >>>
> >>> What do you think?
> >> Nice. What is interesting it looks like it is new and not documented.
> >> Like some of my stuff,
> >> I'll send you my video of the largest enclosed rectangular lattice that
> >> the pencil never leaves the paper and these lattice's can be built --->oo.
> >> A lot of simple stuff is documented aside from set theory with lattice's.
> >> That isn't simple. In fact it is over my head.
> >> I slowed it down to a speed that is easy to follow the pencil lines.
> > Also, you could start that with just a few squares and draw it in slow motion
> > would be interesting. Making it a to the right leaning V--->oo.
> One thing at a time. I am going to code up your newest lattice sometime
> tonight. However, I am still tinkering around with my little test:
>
> https://i.ibb.co/rk82xmQ/image.png
>
> I was thinking of creating a little page where one can copy and paste
> directions:
>
> R, U, L, D
>
> and render them
..
Sounds like a good idea.
The 5th lattice, I'll send that video to you tonight if I can get an expectable
video from my smart phone. I slowed it way down. First I used a 1 to 10,000
loop but it produced a split second flash that created the whole lattice.
I finally had to use 1 to 500,000 to slow it down to a fast drawing pencil.
A light color paper background and a dark colored pencil.
Smart phones suck for doing these types of videos.
A question on the 5th lattice, are there other paths possible for that
size lattice?

On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 1:40:28 PM UTC-7, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> This grows infinitely on the x and y axis.
>
> https://i.ibb.co/f4KzG4w/image.png
>
> What do you think?

A flat universe would be an infinite plane.
So how would the stars be young?
The finite universe needs an hypersphere
in order to close it.

Mitchell Raemsch