7-Betsie Jonck,Margaret Archibald,Witwatersrand, why John Gabriel a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Witwatersrand cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither John Gabriel nor Witwatersrand can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it Gabriel?? You spammer crank.
>
7> John Gabriel spamming sci.math
6> Eram semper recta wrote
6> unread,


Also the German spamming crew, William, Gus Gassmann, Wolfgang Mueckenheim

Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
21
unread,
4 February 2022: New visitors to sci.math: What a degree from Oops-Allah (Uppsala) university might get you: (2x5)/2 means 2 is a factor of 5.
8:01 AM

Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
14
unread,
Even though Newton and Leibniz had no clue why their methods worked, their method of setting h=0 is 100% VALID.
7:57 AM

Eram semper recta's profile photo
Eram semper recta
, …
markus...@gmail.com
22
How the utter imbeciles (math professors and math teachers) failed to realise the simplest theorem in calculus.
7:54 AM

William's profile photo
William
, …
Gus Gassmann
574
unread,
WM Logic

My 245th published book of science.

7>Overhaul & Revitalization of Calculus// Math-psychology-sociology
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

7>Preface: The purpose of this book is to move the dial on calculus education to where all of mathematics is easy, simple, clear, and understandable to even High School students. Where calculus is taught in early High School. All of this is possible when mistakes are corrected in Old Math. And when those mistakes are corrected, it is seen that calculus is just a tiny bit harder than learning the 4 operators of math-- add, subtract, multiply, divide. The last two operators of math are derivative and integral and not much harder to learn than add, subtract, multiply, divide. Provided, Old Math mistakes are corrected and or thrown out. We throw out the Reals as numbers of math and replace them with Decimal Grid Numbers. We throw out all functions of math, except polynomial functions. Anything else that looks like a function, we have to convert to a polynomial, first, over a interval, and then we can work with it. When we do this, and a little more, we end up with a mathematics and a calculus that is ultra simple, ultra easy, ultra clear, and fun to work with. But because of the psychology of math professors and the social environment of math careers, we have this ugly mess of math and especially calculus as torture chambers, nightmares and nervous breakdowns.. So horrid has math education become, that most students steer clear of mathematics. When in truth, once the errors of Old Math are fixed, that math is really the easiest of the physical sciences. It is the psychology and sociology that has made math the worst science and filled with error.


Cover Picture: My cover picture is my iphone photograph of my own handwriting of Decimal Grid Numbers, the numbers that replace the Reals of Old Math, plus the types of polynomials, sitting a-top a sheet of graphing paper. Those three dots after the numbers and polynomials means they continue and I have room to show only three kinds. Calculus is after all, a science of geometry for derivative is rate of change of dy to dx, and integral is after-all the area under the function graph.

Product details
• ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0C9P5F755
• Publication date ‏ : ‎ June 27, 2023
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• File size ‏ : ‎ 530 KB
• Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
• Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
• X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
• Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
• Print length ‏ : ‎ 116 pages

On Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 14:24:02 UTC-4, Ludwig Peohlman (aka crank Archimedes Plutonium) wrote:
<SHIT>

Hey mentally ill moron. Stay off my threads. Kill yourself now!!!

WTF: Hasn't your cancer metastasized, you mentally sick dog!!

sci.math is NOT your toilet, you filthy pig! End your useless existence Ludwig Phoelman!

On Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 14:24:02 UTC-4, Ludwig Poehlman (aka crank Archimedes Plutonium) wrote:
>
sci.math is NOT your toilet. Fuck off you mentally ill cancer.

8-Betsie Jonck,Margaret Archibald,Witwatersrand, why John Gabriel a decades long spammer of sci.math, yet he fails math. Is it that Witwatersrand cannot understand the slant cut in single cone is an Oval, never the ellipse, or is it the foolish Boole logic they teach of 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction? Or is it that neither John Gabriel nor Witwatersrand can do a geometry proof Fundamental Theorem of Calculus? Which is it Gabriel?? You spammer crank.

Apparently John Gabriel has a hole in his education from Witwatersrand. Do they teach how "not to steal from others". I know Porat had this problem also and Arindam has this problem where they never cite reference from others.. They read something they like-- they reword it, and then pretend they discovered original new ideas.

Wake me up when John Gabriel starts citing and footnoting reference where he gets his ideas like polynomial in calculus or calculus is all geometry, instead of John stealing it from AP


John when you going to be professional and cite sources instead of stealing all your ideas? If one
zelos...@gmail.com's profile photo
zelos...@gmail.com
Oct 18, 2021, 2:00:20 AM

söndag 17 oktober 2021 kl. 18:57:28 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium: > I practice with dildos and
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
1:52 PM (9 minutes ago)



to
Gabriel stole various parts of AP's True Calculus, rewording it as "New Calculus"

And John Gabriel recently introduced polynomials into his stealing act, preparing to steal AP's "only functions that exist are polynomial functions".

John Gabriel is just one big stealing machine. And deserves a huge chapter in AP's book:

88th published book

Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) Kindle Edition

New True Ideas in Science are very difficult to come by.

And many communities and countries ignore or deny the practice of footnoting, citing reference source, or quoting, but are societies who live up to that of mass stealing.

At minimum, every school education should and must teach how we "do not steal" by teaching footnote, reference cite, quoting. I learned it in High School, but across the world, most never learned this.

I learned footnoting, citing sources reference, and quoting in High School English classrooms, thank you Wyoming High School, near Cincinnati Ohio, one of my most valuable lessons, because it teaches us not only honesty, but prepares us for becoming scientists and grappling with the truth of the world, without stealing it.

It was August of 1993 that I first arrived on the Internet in the sci.math, sci.physics and many other Newsgroups of Usenet. I had already copyrighted my Atom Totality theory and was protected in that manner of copyrights. But I wanted more protection so I published in the Dartmouth College newspaper many of my discovered ideas of 1990 through August 1993. So I had a double wall of protection of Library of Congress copyright but also, Dartmouth College newspaper. But then with the arrival onto Usenet newsgroups, sci.physics, sci.math, sci.chem, sci.bio.misc, sci.physics.electromag, sci.astro, and many more newsgroups. I saw that as a third layer of protection of my newly discovered ideas.

However, starting August 1993, it was plainly clear to me that this Internet posting of my ideas, that it is easy to steal those ideas.

Length: 147 pages

Product details
File Size: 783 KB
Print Length: 147 pages
Publication Date: February 13, 2020
Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B084T87JGY
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled  

Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #250,786 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#4742 in Counseling & Psychology
#2013 in Medical General Psychology
#7248 in Science & Math (Kindle Store)

>
> JG stole AP's "limits are nonsense"
>
> JG is trying to steal AP's "polynomials only"
>
> JG is trying to steal AP's "Calculus is geometry--yet no math professor able to do a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
>
> JG is just one massive stealing machine, con artist, and he plies his con art ways by bad mouthing everyone else, and never any footnotes or citing reference.
>
> I vote to permanently ban JG from sci.math as a stealing misfit.
> > John Gabriel may become the greatest stealing shithead in sci.math newsgroup history, topping any and every other such stealing candidate. Winning the Kleptomaniac Hollywood award for 5 years in a row.
> >
> > About worthless stealing thieves in newsgroups:
> >
> >
> > Discussion
> > 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus. (23)
> > By Eram semper recta 107 posts 301 views updated 11:15 AM
> > On Sunday, March 1, 2020 at 9:30:51 PM UTC-6, John wrote:
> > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 04:45:32 -0800 (PST), Eram semper recta
> > > <thenewc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Sunday, 1 March 2020 06:02:07 UTC-5, John wrote:
> > > >> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 22:43:06 -0800 (PST), Archie or Archaic Poo
> > > >> <plutonium....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> <<snipped trash>>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >I re-opened the old newsgroup PAU of 1990s and
> > > >> >there one can read my recent posts without the hassle
> > > >> >of spammers, off-topic-misfits, front-page-hogs,
> > > >> >churning imbeciles, stalking mockers, suppression-bullies,
> > > >> > and demonizers.
> > > >>
> > > >> So, little Archie has an echo chamber where only the voice of Archaic
> > > >> Poo is ever heard.
> > > >>
> > > >> Nice. It must be ever so warm, comfortable and happiness-making in
> > > >> there without the cold light of reality being flashed in your face by
> > > >> the hordes of sensible, sane, educated and honest folk who constantly
> > > >> correct your banal, trite, demented shite.
> > > >>
> > > >> Science is a group effort. It is the *interaction* of intellects and
> > > >> ideas. Science can not truly ever be done by one person. Demented
> > > >> ramblings, delusional visions and insanity on the other hand all can.
> > > >>
> > > >> And, in your case, Archie, are.
> > > >>
> > > >> Have you ever considered that *you* may be wrong and we may be right?
> > > >>
> > > >> If not, what does that say?
> > > >>
> > > >> J.
> > > >
> > > >Do you realise that you wasted several minutes of your daily time?
> > >
> > > Yep. I fully realised it even as I was typing. So? It's my PC, my
> > > time, my electricity and my bandwidth, within The Law what I do with
> > > them all is relatively unrestricted.
> > >
> > > Do *you* realise you wasted *your* little life berating me?
> > >
> > > >You cannot get through to Ludwig Poehlman - he is mentally ill.
> > >
> > > Many people seem to be but may actually be reachable. Others, not so
> > > much. It is quite possible that Archie can be reach but no one has yet
> > > found the One True Phrase that will convince him to stop, think,
> > > repent and actually go to school to learn stuff.
> > >
> > > My ambition is to gain Internet Glory and Immortality by being The
> > > One Who Does This.
> > >
> > > I want to crack the crank's armour. I want to be the first one ever
> > > to be *thanked* by Archaic Poo for disagreeing with him in such a form
> > > of words that he realises his errors, breaks down in tears of joy at
> > > he majesty and magic of Reality and what it offers him and actually
> > > *reads* *a* *book*.
> > >
> > > I know my chances are slim but I did try to converse with you, once,
> > > with abut the same odds so I must be just a tiny bit of an optimist.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Just confirms what I think about you - that you're an idiot too.
> > >
> > > It does no such thing and I am not though a demented little fuck like
> > > yourself with several fixed, unshakable and absolutely wrong ideas
> > > about the worlds and how they work would, of course, think me so as I
> > > can never give you the unalloyed adulation and subservience you
> > > require and demand as your due.
> > >
> > > Whether you, Archaic Poo, Willy Mucked-up-brain or some other witless
> > > cloddie are the most mentally broken of Usenet's village idiots is a
> > > question open to debate but you are certainly in the running for most
> > > gormless plook on the planet.
> > >
> > > I contributed to my Society, Family, Nation and World. What have
> > > *you* managed? What has Archaic Poo ever done that has improved the
> > > human condition?
> > >
> > > Take a few steps back from your keyboard, Mr. Gabby and Mr. Poo to
> > > look at the unsightly mass of crap you have generated. Compare it to a
> > > two-year-old's castle made from blocks. Cosider which has beauty,
> > > which contributes to the world and which is worthwhile.
> > >
> > > If you are totally objective about your rantings and ramblings,
> > > something you can never be - a trait you have in common with Archaic
> > > Poo - you will come to the conclusion that the child's construction
> > > which took it all of a few moments is by *far* worthier than your
> > > entire life's deposits on Usenet.
> > >
> > > You and Archaic Poo contribute *nothing*.
> > >
> > > You only detract from Humanity.
> > >
> > > You are too stupid, too ineducable, too insane to see it.
> > >
> > > I feel sorry for you both.
> > >
> > > J.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium
Mar 17, 2022, 8:59:44 PM



to
90-100% of what Gabriel writes is stolen from others, especially AP.