*250th AP book of science-- proving Water is really H4O, not H2O, and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

Alright, I need to discuss the mathematics of True Chemistry.

So far I dealt with the Torus geometry as the Proton torus of coils with muon inside doing the Faraday law. And thus the absolute need of neutrons as skin cover and parallel plate capacitors to storage the new production of electricity. This involves the special number 4, as seen in Harold Jacobs book "Mathematics: A Human Endeavor" 1970, page 290, "Experiment. A Logarithmic Spiral in a "Rectangle of Whirling Squares"". And in this rectangle of whirling squares we get the special numbers phi = 1.61... the equiangular number 2.71.... and we get pi = 3.14..... Perhaps the most important set of numbers in physics and mathematics, all by rectangle of whirling squares.. We can say the rectangle of whirling squares is the physics of motion in electricity and magnetism.

It takes 4 squares to make a 360 degree revolution around a starting square..

And we see this in Chemistry Table, that the P orbital is add 4 to S orbital. The D orbital is add 4 to P orbital. The F orbital is add 4 to D orbital..

But now, let me add another math special number, the number 2 as seen in the S orbital. Every row of Table of Chemical elements has a S orbital to start that row.

And we get this number 2 in geometry from the fact that say we had cube blocks to stack. So how many cube blocks is needed to enclose completely 1 cube block? Answer: 26 more cube blocks for 3^3 = 27 with our enclosed cube as the center, surrounded by 26 other blocks. Now how many more cube blocks is needed to enclose completely the 27 cube blocks?? Answer: we need 2 more in a row that makes 5, and where 5^3 = 125 so that 125 subtract 27 is 98 more cube blocks to enclose the 27 cube as its center.

Now in a torus, the center is a donut hole, but in physics of Atomic theory that donut hole can be either empty space or it can be where neutrons as parallel plate capacitors reside.

So here is where we get the 2 number or the S orbital of chemical elements.

To enclose 1 cube we need 1+2 = 3 unit cubes for a row. To enclose the 3^3 cube, we need 3+2 = 5 or the 5^3 to enclose the 3^3 cube. To enclose the 5^3 cube we need 5+2 = 7 for the 7^3 to enclose the 5^3 cube. And again, the adding of 2 is the S orbital of Chemistry.

AP

250th AP book of science-- proving Water is really H4O, not H2O, and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

I am wondering how a Experimental Physicist would make the set-up for a precision exacting weighing of electrolysis of water, weighing the hydrogen test tube and the oxygen test tube. The reason I ask is all the pictures I have seen of electrolysis, has the test tubes submerged in the water and watch the bubbles replace the water.

But there is difficulty in weighing these test tubes. When pulling them out of the water, how to prevent contamination. How to prevent from water being inside the tube. How to prevent ambient air from entering.

I am sure an experienced Experimental Physicist and avoid all these contaminations. Probably a entire different arrangement would be set-up.

250th AP book of science and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

The blight and decay of Old Physics and Old Chemistry is their subatomic particles are tiny balls with no purpose and no function. Created by wastrel scientists playing math algebra games called Standard Model.

What AP does instead is say the laws of Electromagnetism-- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law are direct embodiments of subatomic particles.

So a proton of an atom is part of the Faraday law-- the coil is the proton. The electron of atoms is another part of the Faraday law-- the bar magnet that thrusts through the proton coil. You begin to see and appreciate the Logic behind this. Where we escape the insanity of "ball here, stick and ball there" and mindless electrons whizzing around balls with no purpose.

The neutrons in Old Physics and Old Chemistry were especially silly items, but in New Physics, the neutron comes from the Capacitor law, for we need to storage the electricity produced from the muon thrusting through the proton coil torus. So neutrons are parallel plates capacitor.

And now we understand why the Water molecule has to be H4O, for it makes no logical sense that you have a proton and muon inside producing electricity if there is no capacitor to storage that electricity. This is why H2 is the hydrogen atom, and not H alone. For one of the two proton+muon converts to acting as a capacitor and storage the electricity made by the other proton+muon.

H2 is not a molecule, it is the hydrogen atom itself. This means that OH is actually H2O.

Methane is said to be H4C in Old Chemistry, Old Physics, but here again, once mass measurements are conducted on methane, it is highly likely that the methane molecule is indeed, really H8C.

Let me tell you the story of Paul Dirac, a superb physicist with a logical mind to do physics. It is extremely rare to find a physicist with a logical mind. But Dirac had one. And about 1930, his logical physics mind told him that there had to be a magnetic monopole --- had to be --- otherwise the laws of physics were anti-symmetrical, the EM laws had no symmetry. This is what kept Dirac anchored to the truth. Sadly the magnetic monopole was discovered by AP long after Dirac died, discovered by AP in 2016-2017 reasoning that the muon was the true electron of atoms, meant the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.

I tell this story because what kept Dirac going was the alternative of Anti-symmetry. Likewise, what keeps AP going about water being H4O and not H2O is another case of Anti-symmetry. The existence of an Atom which has proton and muon but no capacitor is Anti-symmetry.

250th AP book of science and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

AP

Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

+Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within

3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.

Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.

In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.

A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.

The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.

Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.

AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.

In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.

Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".

You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen.. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.

The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.

Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium

Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
12:24 AM (13 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe

--- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:

Now, getting back to this report of NBC news

This report of 2006 helps.

--- quoting NBCnews website---
A surprising solar flare sent a stream of pure hydrogen at Earth.

"We've detected a stream of perfectly intact hydrogen atoms shooting out of an X-class solar flare," said researcher Richard Mewaldt of Caltech. "If we can understand how these atoms were produced, we'll be that much closer to understanding solar flares."

Solar flares occur when the sun's twisted magnetic fields suddenly release their stored energy. The energy jolts are classified into three categories, with X-class solar flares being major events that can trigger radio blackouts around the world and long-lasting radiation storms in the upper atmosphere. (M-class are medium-sized flares and C-class are small flares with few consequences on Earth.)

The event occurred on Dec. 5, 2006, when a large sunspot rounded the sun's eastern limb and with little warning it exploded. On the "Richter scale" of flares, which ranks X1 as a big event, the blast registered X9, making it one of the strongest flares over the past 30 years.

Such a ferocious blast usually produces a blizzard of high-energy particles dangerous to both satellites and astronauts. But an hour later, when NASA's twin Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft detected the particles, they were of an unexpected type.

"It was a burst of hydrogen atoms," Mewaldt said. "No other elements were present, not even helium (the sun's second-most abundant atomic species). Pure hydrogen streamed past the spacecraft for a full 90 minutes."

--- end quoting NBC news website ---

I suspect that this is H2 and not H. As for the ionized hydrogen , helium, oxygen and iron shot a 1/2 hour later by the Sun is just magnetic monopoles upon the atoms.

This supports the idea that the Sun hydrogen is H2.

But the immediate attention here on Earth is to weigh the test tubes of electrolysis water of hydrogen and oxygen and prove water is H4O.

Yes indeed, the Solar Ejection and Solar Flares pour out Hydrogen as H2, pure H2, for most of the hydrogen in the Sun is H2, atomic hydrogen, but then as the ejection and flaring of the Sun causes some of the H2 to become ionized with magnetic monopoles of either a up or down magnetic monopole, as the other ionized gases of helium or oxygen and metal iron ionized. Think of it as magnetic monopole transfer to ejected atoms or molecules.

Now how is it that we can prove more than 90% of the hydrogen in the Sun is H2?? Barely any different from deuterium?

I think we can prove this as a research earlier mentions that the spectral lines of light hydrogen are barely different from deuterium, and since deuterium has atomic mass unit of 2, that the hydrogen that predominates in the Sun and stars is also H2 and atomic mass unit of 2.

AP

> *250th AP book of science-- proving Water is really H4O, not H2O, and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Alright, I need to discuss the mathematics of True Chemistry.
>
> So far I dealt with the Torus geometry as the Proton torus of coils with muon inside doing the Faraday law. And thus the absolute need of neutrons as skin cover and parallel plate capacitors to storage the new production of electricity. This involves the special number 4, as seen in Harold Jacobs book "Mathematics: A Human Endeavor" 1970, page 290, "Experiment. A Logarithmic Spiral in a "Rectangle of Whirling Squares"". And in this rectangle of whirling squares we get the special numbers phi = 1.61... the equiangular number 2.71.... and we get pi = 3.14..... Perhaps the most important set of numbers in physics and mathematics, all by rectangle of whirling squares. We can say the rectangle of whirling squares is the physics of motion in electricity and magnetism.
>
> It takes 4 squares to make a 360 degree revolution around a starting square.
>
> And we see this in Chemistry Table, that the P orbital is add 4 to S orbital. The D orbital is add 4 to P orbital. The F orbital is add 4 to D orbital.
>
> But now, let me add another math special number, the number 2 as seen in the S orbital. Every row of Table of Chemical elements has a S orbital to start that row.
>
> And we get this number 2 in geometry from the fact that say we had cube blocks to stack. So how many cube blocks is needed to enclose completely 1 cube block? Answer: 26 more cube blocks for 3^3 = 27 with our enclosed cube as the center, surrounded by 26 other blocks. Now how many more cube blocks is needed to enclose completely the 27 cube blocks?? Answer: we need 2 more in a row that makes 5, and where 5^3 = 125 so that 125 subtract 27 is 98 more cube blocks to enclose the 27 cube as its center.
>
> Now in a torus, the center is a donut hole, but in physics of Atomic theory that donut hole can be either empty space or it can be where neutrons as parallel plate capacitors reside.
>
> So here is where we get the 2 number or the S orbital of chemical elements.
>
> To enclose 1 cube we need 1+2 = 3 unit cubes for a row. To enclose the 3^3 cube, we need 3+2 = 5 or the 5^3 to enclose the 3^3 cube. To enclose the 5^3 cube we need 5+2 = 7 for the 7^3 to enclose the 5^3 cube. And again, the adding of 2 is the S orbital of Chemistry.
>
> AP
>
> 250th AP book of science-- proving Water is really H4O, not H2O, and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> I am wondering how a Experimental Physicist would make the set-up for a precision exacting weighing of electrolysis of water, weighing the hydrogen test tube and the oxygen test tube. The reason I ask is all the pictures I have seen of electrolysis, has the test tubes submerged in the water and watch the bubbles replace the water.
>
> But there is difficulty in weighing these test tubes. When pulling them out of the water, how to prevent contamination. How to prevent from water being inside the tube. How to prevent ambient air from entering.
>
> I am sure an experienced Experimental Physicist and avoid all these contaminations. Probably a entire different arrangement would be set-up.
>
>
> 250th AP book of science and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> The blight and decay of Old Physics and Old Chemistry is their subatomic particles are tiny balls with no purpose and no function. Created by wastrel scientists playing math algebra games called Standard Model.
>
> What AP does instead is say the laws of Electromagnetism-- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law are direct embodiments of subatomic particles.
>
> So a proton of an atom is part of the Faraday law-- the coil is the proton. The electron of atoms is another part of the Faraday law-- the bar magnet that thrusts through the proton coil. You begin to see and appreciate the Logic behind this. Where we escape the insanity of "ball here, stick and ball there" and mindless electrons whizzing around balls with no purpose.
>
> The neutrons in Old Physics and Old Chemistry were especially silly items, but in New Physics, the neutron comes from the Capacitor law, for we need to storage the electricity produced from the muon thrusting through the proton coil torus. So neutrons are parallel plates capacitor.
>
> And now we understand why the Water molecule has to be H4O, for it makes no logical sense that you have a proton and muon inside producing electricity if there is no capacitor to storage that electricity. This is why H2 is the hydrogen atom, and not H alone. For one of the two proton+muon converts to acting as a capacitor and storage the electricity made by the other proton+muon.
>
> H2 is not a molecule, it is the hydrogen atom itself. This means that OH is actually H2O.
>
> Methane is said to be H4C in Old Chemistry, Old Physics, but here again, once mass measurements are conducted on methane, it is highly likely that the methane molecule is indeed, really H8C.
>
> Let me tell you the story of Paul Dirac, a superb physicist with a logical mind to do physics. It is extremely rare to find a physicist with a logical mind. But Dirac had one. And about 1930, his logical physics mind told him that there had to be a magnetic monopole --- had to be --- otherwise the laws of physics were anti-symmetrical, the EM laws had no symmetry. This is what kept Dirac anchored to the truth. Sadly the magnetic monopole was discovered by AP long after Dirac died, discovered by AP in 2016-2017 reasoning that the muon was the true electron of atoms, meant the 0.5MeV particle was Dirac's magnetic monopole.
>
> I tell this story because what kept Dirac going was the alternative of Anti-symmetry. Likewise, what keeps AP going about water being H4O and not H2O is another case of Anti-symmetry. The existence of an Atom which has proton and muon but no capacitor is Anti-symmetry.
>
> 250th AP book of science and what it solves is the question of the purpose and function of every subatomic particle// TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> AP
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> +Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within
>
> 3m views Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
>
> Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
>
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> In Old Chemistry and Old Physics, their subatomic particles were do nothing and no function and no job particles that sit around as balls or whiz around the outside of balls doing nothing but pointless circling.
>
> In New Physics and New Chemistry-- All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. Every subatomic particle has a job a function a purpose as to the Laws of Electromagnetism--- Faraday law, Coulomb law, Ampere law, Capacitor law.
>
> A proton is a torus of 840MeV with 840 windings, while the muon is the true electron of Atoms and is encased inside the proton torus thrusting through and producing electricity-- magnetic monopoles.
>
> The neutron of Atoms is a parallel plate capacitor storing the electricity of proton+muon and is skin cover on the outside of the proton torus in the form of parallel plates.
>
> Can hydrogen be a Atom if it is just a proton+muon? No, all atoms require to have a capacitor such as at least one neutron. Thus the Hydrogen Atom is H2 where you have 2 proton+muon where 1 of the 2 proton+muon acts like a neutron to the other proton+muon. Thus, water molecule is not H2O but rather is H4O.
>
> AP is waiting for experimental chemists and physicists to prove him correct that Water is H4O.
>
> In the meantime we have Hydroxyl which in Old Chemistry, especially Biology is OH, while AP says that is wrong and that is really H2O.
>
> Now glycerine is a hydroxyl with formula C3H8O3. And what I am thinking at this moment, is that hydroxyls will be an easier proof that Water is truly H4O, rather than wait for experimentalists to actually "weigh the electrolysis test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen".
>
> You see, with H4O as water, glycerine is C3(2 waters)O with an extra oxygen. If Water is H2O then glycerine is C3(4 waters) deficit O. It is missing an oxygen if water is H2O.
>
> The reason glycerine is so effective as a skin ointment is because it has glycerine, the extra O oxygen. If water were H2O, then glycerine would be a missing oxygen and not a skin lotion that works, but makes skin even more dry.
>
> Proving Water is H4O, not H2O, and where hydroxyl is H2O// AP's 250th book TEACHING TRUE CHEMISTRY, by Archimedes Plutonium
>
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 12:24 AM (13 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
>
> --- quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
> Perhaps there is only two Faraday laws on Electrolysis. I am looking at the one that states: Faraday's first law of electrolysis relates the mass of a substance liberated (or deposited) at an electrode to the electric charge used (Q). A proportionality constant Z can be used:
>
> m = ZQ = (E/96485)(Q)
>
> m = mass, Q = total charge rewritten as Q = I*t amperes x time in seconds.
>
> This website gives an example: 5amps passed through molten Sodium Chloride for 3 hours. Calculate the mass of Sodium. E=23/1.
>
> m = (23/96485) (5) (3*60*60) approx 12.87 grams.
>
> --- end quoting in part from source-- Study.com ---
>
> Now has such a experiment been performed on Water to see how much atomic mass of hydrogen and of oxygen results??? If AP is correct, the formula of water is H4O, if Old Physics, Old Chemistry is correct the formula is H2O. So which is it???
>
> AP
>
>
> No, sorry no, Faraday's Law of Electrolysis is not going to tell the correct mass of hydrogen.
>
> Reading Wikipedia on Faraday's Electrolysis law.
>
> --- quoting Wikipedia ---
> A monovalent ion requires 1 electron for discharge, a divalent ion requires 2 electrons for discharge and so on. Thus, if x electrons flow,
> x/v atoms are discharged.
>
> So the mass m discharged is
>
> m= (xM)/vN_A) = (QM)/(eN_A *v) = (QM) / (vF)
> where
> N_A is the Avogadro constant;
> Q = xe is the total charge, equal to the number of electrons (x) times the elementary charge e;
> F is the Faraday constant.
> --- end quoting Wikipedia ---
>
> No, the Faraday law of Electrolysis will not work on water with a correct answer, because H is not an atom but H2 is an Atom. And where one of the proton+muon converts to being a neutron to the other proton+muon.
>
> So if Faraday's law of Electrolysis was applied to water, thinking it would deliver a true answer is mistaken because the one H converts to neutron.
>
> So it appears that we need to directly measure the test tube of oxygen and the test tube of hydrogen by a direct mass measurement.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 1:14 AM (12 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> I doubt we can measure a test tube of hydrogen or test tube of oxygen, too small to determine the mass on some sort of weight scale.
>
> But here is a possible lucrative idea. We should be able to get pure deuterium water. Then run the electrolysis. Collect the test tubes.
>
> Now have some sort of balancing beam weight scale. Place the regular water of hydrogen test tube on one side, and place the deuterium water hydrogen test tube on other side. If they stay balanced, then AP is correct and Water is really H4O.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 1:48 AM (11 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Cosmic Rays from Sun
>
> 90% of Sun's cosmic rays are 840MeV proton+muon inside = H. The hydrogen Atom is H2 where one of the H proton+muon converts to being a neutron.
>
> When these proton+muon hit Earth atmosphere, they can turn into pions and muons.
>
> I commented that H alone is a subatomic particle and that makes sense in the idea that Sun's cosmic rays are 90% these proton+muon.
>
> Now is interstellar hydrogen H2 and intergalactic hydrogen H2 formed when one H cosmic ray joins up with another H cosmic ray to form H2 atom?
>
> Is this how we get H2 in outer space? From the splitting apart of H2 into H cosmic rays?
>
> So how much of the Sun's hydrogen is H2 and how much is H ready to join with another H and reform back into H2. Probably little of the Sun's H is H alone, and the vast majority of the Sun's hydrogen is H2.
>
> How much deuterium in the Sun? And it is a higher percentage than the deuterium in water on Earth?
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
> 3:11 AM (10 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Water is the only known non-metallic substance that expands when if freezes; its density decreases and it expands approximately 9% by volume. (Source: web Lunar and Planetary Institute)
>
> I have to wait for experimental chemists and physicists to weigh the mass of test tubes from electrolysis, as to the verdict-- water is H4O.
>
> But until that news comes in, I will look for other means of proof.
>
> So AP says that the H2 is not a molecule but is the hydrogen Atom itself, where one proton+muon converts to a neutron and capacitates the other proton+muon which undergo the Faraday law.
>
> There are subatomic particles of H in the form of Cosmic Rays from the Sun, but most of the Sun's hydrogen is H2, and flips back and forth from H to rejoining to form H2. Some gets away from the Sun and is cosmic rays.
>
> But H2 is an Atom and H is a fleeting subatomic particle.
>
> So can I prove Water is H4O from the data of Spectral lines of H2 is the same as deuterium, only slight difference is that the deuterium is a full fledged neutron not a makeshift proton+muon of H.
>
> I suspect that special trait of water freezing is a proof that Water is H4O. Because the 840MeV proton torus with muon inside doing the Faraday law acting as a makeshift neutron capacitor for the other 840MeV proton torus with muon inside, is where H2 gets that expansion characteristic.
>
> A neutron is a parallel plate capacitor and those plates can expand when frozen temperature occurs. As the temperature gets colder, those plates move further apart.
>
> Now does deuterium which truly has a full neutron, does it expand also when frozen?? If so, does it expand as much as H2 which is 2 protons with 2 muons inside?
>
> So comparing the freezing and expansion of the parallel plates of a neutron in deuterium with the freezing and expansion of one of the proton+muon that is acting as a makeshift neutron in H2.
>
> If I can numbers correlate the H2 expansion with the Deuterium expansion would be a alternative proof that Water is really H4O and not H2O.
>
> AP
> to
> So now on Blankenship's book "Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis", 2014, page 134, shows The structure of ATP, ADP, AMP. And within that structure are OH hydroxyls.
>
> In New Chemistry, water is truly H4O, and where hydroxyls are now H2O. And we have first proof of this in the Figure 8.1 of Blankenship's "Chemical structure of ATP".
>
> For in the lower left corner of the diagram, Blankenship has a H+ all alone, (really a mindless error) and has P surrounded by O-, O-, O and OH. The OH is really H2O for hydroxyls are H2O and water itself is H4O, and that would leave that mindless H+ as being hydrogen Atom of H2.
>
> The world of physics and chemistry should drop what they are doing and weigh the electrolysis test tube of hydrogen and oxygen to discover the correct true formula of water is H4O.
>
> AP is total confident, becuase an Atom cannot exist if it has no capacitor structure such as a neutron, or one of the H in H2 acting as a neutron. I am totally confident that Water formula is truly H4O. And I need look only to methane of H4C, to realize that there is no HC, no H2C, no H3C, but starts with H4C, and that tells me water starts with H4O. Totally confident that Old Chemistry, Old Physics did electrolysis experiments and the moment they saw hydrogen test tube be 2x volume of oxygen test tube, they dropped their work and went out for a Danish and coffee break, rather than finish their work--- actual physics weighing of atomic mass units (not the Faraday electrolysis law for it does not apply to water).
>
> When water electrolysis is physics weighed, AP is confident that there are 4H per every one oxygen O. And that Water is truly H4O.
>
> AP, King of Science
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 9:34 AM (15 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 8:56:57 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Now I see some of these electronic weighing scales are accurate to 0.00001 gram. I do not know if that is within the accuracy I need for weighing a test tube of oxygen then a test tube of hydrogen from water electrolysis.
>
> Now modern day physics and chemist experimenters can really do a marvelous job if they wanted to. For they could freeze the test tubes of oxygen and hydrogen to where they are liquid and compare liquids from water electrolysis.
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 10:01 AM (5 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> So, what AP is saying here is that we do electrolysis of water. We collect the two test tubes, one with oxygen the other with hydrogen.
>
> To prove Water is truly the formula H4O and not H2O we must weigh the masses of the two tubes to find that the ratio is 1 x 16amu to 4 x 1amu.
>
> The silly grotesque science error of the past was to look at volumes in the two test tubes-- "Hey-- the hydrogen is twice the volume of oxygen so the formula of water is H2O".
>
> No, way was that science good practice. For the correct formula of water needs to be measured by mass, by atomic mass units where Oxygen is 16amu and hydrogen is 1amu.
>
> I suspect a balance beam scale is good enough to see the hydrogen test tube will be 1/4 as massive as the oxygen test tube. To get within precision of electronic weighing scale of 0.00001 gram we just have to make a larger test tube of electrolysis of water.
>
> AP is betting that the readings will be hydrogen test tube 1/4 the mass of oxygen test tube proving Water formula is truly H4O.
>
> Old Physics and Old Chemistry is betting that the mass experiment will have the hydrogen test tube be 1/8 the mass of the oxygen test tube, proving Water formula is H2O.
>
> AP does not have these precision equipment to conduct an at-home experiment of this nature.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 12:38 PM (7 minutes ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> So, once Water is found to actually be H4O, not H2O, we move on to methane, and ask the same question of its hydrogen bonds. Is Methane really that of H8C and not H4C.
>
> Well, looking in the literature for anomalies to methane, I come across a arXiv "Low and high-temperature anomalies in the physical properties of solid methane "The anomalous behavior of thermodynamic, spectral, plastic, elastic and some other properties of solid methane is discussed near 20.48K and...
>
> AP wonders: if they can get methane to solid form, well, I am then hopeful that the mass of the molecule can be determined. Because if methane is truly H8C, that difference of H4 in atomic mass units would be very much noticeable difference.
>
> Chemistry Europe--
> "The Anomalous Deuterium Isotope Effect in the NMR Spectrum of Methane...
>
> P Vermeeren, 2023
> "The abnormally long and weak methylidyne C-H bond.."
> "The C-H bond of the methylidyne radical, CH*, is abnormally long and weak, even longer and..."
>
> AP asks, are these anomalies solved if we consider methane is actually H8C and not H4C?
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium
> 12:21 AM (2 hours ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to
> I still have the problem of whether the Cosmic rays from Sun are H or H2.
>
> This report of 2006 helps.
>
> --- quoting NBCnews website---
> A surprising solar flare sent a stream of pure hydrogen at Earth.
>
> "We've detected a stream of perfectly intact hydrogen atoms shooting out of an X-class solar flare," said researcher Richard Mewaldt of Caltech. "If we can understand how these atoms were produced, we'll be that much closer to understanding solar flares."
>
> Solar flares occur when the sun's twisted magnetic fields suddenly release their stored energy. The energy jolts are classified into three categories, with X-class solar flares being major events that can trigger radio blackouts around the world and long-lasting radiation storms in the upper atmosphere. (M-class are medium-sized flares and C-class are small flares with few consequences on Earth.)
>
> The event occurred on Dec. 5, 2006, when a large sunspot rounded the sun's eastern limb and with little warning it exploded. On the "Richter scale" of flares, which ranks X1 as a big event, the blast registered X9, making it one of the strongest flares over the past 30 years.
>
> Such a ferocious blast usually produces a blizzard of high-energy particles dangerous to both satellites and astronauts. But an hour later, when NASA's twin Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft detected the particles, they were of an unexpected type.
>
> "It was a burst of hydrogen atoms," Mewaldt said. "No other elements were present, not even helium (the sun's second-most abundant atomic species). Pure hydrogen streamed past the spacecraft for a full 90 minutes."
>
> --- end quoting NBC news website ---
>
> I suspect that this is H2 and not H. As for the ionized hydrogen , helium, oxygen and iron shot a 1/2 hour later by the Sun is just magnetic monopoles upon the atoms.
>
> This supports the idea that the Sun hydrogen is H2.
>
> But the immediate attention here on Earth is to weigh the test tubes of electrolysis water of hydrogen and oxygen and prove water is H4O.
>
> AP