söndag 30 juli 2023 kl. 02:04:09 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 14:34:52 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 7/29/2023 5:27 AM, some shithead wrote:
> > > lördag 29 juli 2023 kl. 00:17:13 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > >>> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > >> I will respond to anyone else who asks a question with the right attitude.
> > >>
> > >> Please DO NOT feed the troll Markus Klyver.
> > >
> > > You haven't even responded to my objections so why would anyone want to ask you anything. If they disagree with you and point out you're wrong you tell them they're "vile Jews" and that "Hitler did nothing wrong". Or that they should kill themselves.
> > I would like my students to be able to think.
> Of course. That was never under question. What you don't want are students who simply memorise and repeat the drivel they are taught and you know who I am referring to here. Such students do not accept correction and they cannot be convinced because they are brainwashed and incorrigibly stupid - like followers of Donald Trump.
Math is not (only) memorization.

On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 20:04:09 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 14:34:52 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 7/29/2023 5:27 AM, some shithead wrote:
> > > lördag 29 juli 2023 kl. 00:17:13 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > >>> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > >> I will respond to anyone else who asks a question with the right attitude.
> > >>
> > >> Please DO NOT feed the troll Markus Klyver.
> > >
> > > You haven't even responded to my objections so why would anyone want to ask you anything. If they disagree with you and point out you're wrong you tell them they're "vile Jews" and that "Hitler did nothing wrong". Or that they should kill themselves.
> > I would like my students to be able to think.
> Of course. That was never under question. What you don't want are students who simply memorise and repeat the drivel they are taught and you know who I am referring to here. Such students do not accept correction and they cannot be convinced because they are brainwashed and incorrigibly stupid - like followers of Donald Trump.

Chris, Be careful of swine like Klyver and Jean Pierre Messager. They are toxic. Best to ignore them completely. They live a lie every second.

söndag 30 juli 2023 kl. 13:26:53 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 20:04:09 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 14:34:52 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 7/29/2023 5:27 AM, some shithead wrote:
> > > > lördag 29 juli 2023 kl. 00:17:13 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > >> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > >>> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > > >> I will respond to anyone else who asks a question with the right attitude.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please DO NOT feed the troll Markus Klyver.
> > > >
> > > > You haven't even responded to my objections so why would anyone want to ask you anything. If they disagree with you and point out you're wrong you tell them they're "vile Jews" and that "Hitler did nothing wrong". Or that they should kill themselves.
> > > I would like my students to be able to think.
> > Of course. That was never under question. What you don't want are students who simply memorise and repeat the drivel they are taught and you know who I am referring to here. Such students do not accept correction and they cannot be convinced because they are brainwashed and incorrigibly stupid - like followers of Donald Trump.
> Chris, Be careful of swine like Klyver and Jean Pierre Messager. They are toxic. Best to ignore them completely. They live a lie every second.
Now I'm a swine too? Pigs are cute.

On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank

Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.

On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 6:26:59 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:

> Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will [bla]

Yeah, an AI which is too dumb to think on its own lets appear you "great".

(Seems that AIs are great at boosting one's ego.)

Holy shit!

söndag 30 juli 2023 kl. 18:26:59 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.
LLMs are conditioned to agree with the user. Nothing remarkable. You could equally well convince a LLM that the Earth is flat. What does that prove?

On 7/30/2023 9:26 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
>
> Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.

..(3) is the way base 10 represents 1 divided by 3. So what?

On 7/30/2023 6:53 AM, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> söndag 30 juli 2023 kl. 13:26:53 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>> On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 20:04:09 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 29 July 2023 at 14:34:52 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/29/2023 5:27 AM, some shithead wrote:
>>>>> lördag 29 juli 2023 kl. 00:17:13 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
>>>>>> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
>>>>>> I will respond to anyone else who asks a question with the right attitude.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please DO NOT feed the troll Markus Klyver.
>>>>>
>>>>> You haven't even responded to my objections so why would anyone want to ask you anything. If they disagree with you and point out you're wrong you tell them they're "vile Jews" and that "Hitler did nothing wrong". Or that they should kill themselves.
>>>> I would like my students to be able to think.
>>> Of course. That was never under question. What you don't want are students who simply memorise and repeat the drivel they are taught and you know who I am referring to here. Such students do not accept correction and they cannot be convinced because they are brainwashed and incorrigibly stupid - like followers of Donald Trump.
>> Chris, Be careful of swine like Klyver and Jean Pierre Messager. They are toxic. Best to ignore them completely. They live a lie every second.
> Now I'm a swine too? Pigs are cute.

https://youtu.be/s77_YPsIVuQ?list=PLVwT00hPkdemT0DdtTdih8GlKRLqqRi-1

That is one fine pig. Iirc, that was a quote?

Eram semper recta wrote:

> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
>> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/
Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
>
> Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics
> bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of
> crap.

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/

𝗕𝗶𝗴 𝗣𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗮 𝗘𝘅𝗲𝗰 𝗔𝗱𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗 𝗝𝗮𝗯𝘀 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗧𝗼 ‘𝗞𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲’
Have you wondered why some people seem perfectly fine after the COVID
shot, whereas others are dropping dead or suffering debilitating injuries?
Well, evidence has emerged that not everyone who rolled their sleeve up
for […]

𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲'𝘀 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘁
Scientists have confirmed that mRNA vaccinations ‘drastically alter’ the
personalities of recipients due extensive damage they do to the small
capillaries in the brain. According to a shocking new report, mRNA jabs
override the blood-brain […]

𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗟𝗮𝗯 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁-𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗮
A massive Chinese bioweapons laboratory has been discovered operating out
of the Democrat-controlled state of California. Why would a bio-lab,
tasked with creating weapons designed to kill Americans, be operating in
Reedley, CA in the […]

𝗞𝗹𝗮𝘂𝘀 𝗦𝗰𝗵𝘄𝗮𝗯’𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗲𝗿: ‘𝗣𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 – 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲
𝗜𝘁 𝗼𝗿 𝗡𝗼𝘁’
The daughter of World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab has boasted that
permanent ‘climate lockdowns’ are coming, whether people like it or not.
According to Nicole Schwab, the COVID pandemic was a “tremendous
opportunity” to […]

𝗡𝗔𝗦𝗔: ‘𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘄𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗦𝘆𝗻𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗜𝘀 𝗦𝗸𝘆𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗘𝗠𝗙 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲’
The rapid deployment of 5G and wireless technology has caused a massive
outbreak of ‘microwave syndrome’ in humans, according to NASA. People are
now more exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) than ever before, and
the […]

𝗨𝗦 𝗦𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝗧𝗼 𝗖𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱 𝗝𝗮𝗯
𝗦𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀
What many of us knew to be true at the time is finally being revealed.
Following the recent Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the
Federal Government, internal documents produced by Facebook’s Mark
Zuckerberg, reveal […]

𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿 ‘𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱’ 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗛𝗲𝗿 ‘𝗖𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹’ 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀
Louise Chivers, a social worker with 25 years experience, has been told
she cannot apply for more work after she questioned whether transgender
influencer Dylan Mulvaney was the right person to be modelling sports bras
[…]

𝗙𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲: 𝗦𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗨𝗞 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗪𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗚𝗼 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗦𝗵𝘂𝘁
𝗗𝗼𝘄𝗻
Former UKIP leader Nigel Farage is campaigning on behalf of people whose
bank accounts have been closed– and has launched a new website to tackle
de-banking. Farage, who says he plans to “build a powerful […]

𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 ‘𝗡𝗼𝗻-𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀’ 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝘆 𝗨𝗦
𝗠𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆
US lawmakers have been hearing first-hand accounts of UFO sightings from
former members of the military. According to former US Air Force
intelligence officer David Grusch, the US government recovered non-human
biological remains found in […]

𝗢𝗯𝗮𝗺𝗮 𝗦𝗽𝗼𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗕𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗘𝘆𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝗣𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹
𝗖𝗵𝗲𝗳
Barack H. Obama has been spotted in public for the first time since the
mysterious drowning death of his long-term personal chef Tafari Campbell –
and the former president was covered in cuts and bruises. […]

On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 15:49:27 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/30/2023 9:26 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> >
> > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.
> .(3) is the way base 10 represents 1 divided by 3. So what?

It's wrong. That's what!

On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 13:10:43 UTC-4, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 6:26:59 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will [bla]
>
> Yeah, an AI which is too dumb to think on its own lets appear you "great"..

Bullshit. AIs don't give a shit what you think. They will respond with mainstream knowledge and NOTHING ELSE.

söndag 30 juli 2023 kl. 22:36:11 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 13:10:43 UTC-4, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 6:26:59 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will [bla]
> >
> > Yeah, an AI which is too dumb to think on its own lets appear you "great".
> Bullshit. AIs don't give a shit what you think. They will respond with mainstream knowledge and NOTHING ELSE.
They respond with the most likely output given the training data. If you keep telling a LLM the Earth is flat, it will eventually agree. It means nothing.

On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank

Even a mainstream pretrained AI can understand but not an actual mainstream macademic (new word for mathematics academic because none of them can be called mathematicians). Moron is more appropriate in most circumstances.

On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 15:49:27 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 7/30/2023 9:26 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> >
> > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.
> .(3) is the way base 10 represents 1 divided by 3. So what?

From ChatGPT:

John Gabriel:
1/3 is not equal to 0.333...

ChatGPT:
Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (...) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:

1/3 = 0.333...

To clarify further, the digit "3" repeats infinitely without end, but we typically round the decimal representation to a certain number of decimal places when performing calculations.

For example:
1/3 ≈ 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
1/3 ≈ 0.3333 (rounded to four decimal places)
1/3 ≈ 0.33333 (rounded to five decimal places)

No matter how many decimal places you calculate, it will still be an approximation because the true value of 1/3 is an infinitely repeating decimal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See, the AI does not agree with me. So, your comments about making the AI agree are a load of rubbish.

To make it say otherwise, you have to provide proof which it can check according to its pretrained knowledge as best it can.

On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 3:36:28 AM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:

> [Mr. Rectum:] 1/3 is not equal to 0.333...
>
> ChatGPT:
>
> Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (...) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:
>
> 1/3 = 0.333...

It's obvious that Claude is much more vulnerable to your nonsense than ChatGPT. It seems that Claude tries to please the user (personally) very much. It seems to me that it acts very much like a "slave".

On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 21:58:23 UTC-4, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 3:36:28 AM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
>
> > [Mr. Rectum:] 1/3 is not equal to 0.333...
> >
> > ChatGPT:
> >
> > Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (....) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:
> >
> > 1/3 = 0.333...
> It's obvious that Claude is much more vulnerable to your nonsense than ChatGPT. It seems that Claude tries to please the user (personally) very much.. It seems to me that it acts very much like a "slave".

Look Fritzie. The Chat Bots are tools. You can get good and bad results depending on how you use them. Garbage in-garbage out. In the hands of a master (that's me!), they will give excellent results. In the hands of a monkey (that's you!), all bets are off. Make sense now?

måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 03:36:28 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 15:49:27 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > On 7/30/2023 9:26 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > >> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > >
> > > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.
> > .(3) is the way base 10 represents 1 divided by 3. So what?
> From ChatGPT:
>
> John Gabriel:
> 1/3 is not equal to 0.333...
>
>
> ChatGPT:
> Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (...) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:
>
> 1/3 = 0.333...
>
> To clarify further, the digit "3" repeats infinitely without end, but we typically round the decimal representation to a certain number of decimal places when performing calculations.
>
> For example:
> 1/3 ≈ 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
> 1/3 ≈ 0.3333 (rounded to four decimal places)
> 1/3 ≈ 0.33333 (rounded to five decimal places)
>
> No matter how many decimal places you calculate, it will still be an approximation because the true value of 1/3 is an infinitely repeating decimal.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> See, the AI does not agree with me. So, your comments about making the AI agree are a load of rubbish.
>
> To make it say otherwise, you have to provide proof which it can check according to its pretrained knowledge as best it can.
In 0.333..., the digits go on forever. So you are correct any finite number of 3s will not ever be 1/3. But 0.333... is defined as a minute and that limit is indeed 1/3.

måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 10:40:51 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 21:58:23 UTC-4, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> > On Monday, July 31, 2023 at 3:36:28 AM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote:
> >
> > > [Mr. Rectum:] 1/3 is not equal to 0.333...
> > >
> > > ChatGPT:
> > >
> > > Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (...) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:
> > >
> > > 1/3 = 0.333...
> > It's obvious that Claude is much more vulnerable to your nonsense than ChatGPT. It seems that Claude tries to please the user (personally) very much. It seems to me that it acts very much like a "slave".
> Look Fritzie. The Chat Bots are tools. You can get good and bad results depending on how you use them. Garbage in-garbage out. In the hands of a master (that's me!), they will give excellent results. In the hands of a monkey (that's you!), all bets are off. Make sense now?
I agree with you this is garbage in, garbage out. If you teach it fake math, like you do, it will produce fake math.

On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 04:47:55 UTC-4, markus... wrote:
> måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 03:36:28 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 15:49:27 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 7/30/2023 9:26 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > >> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > > >
> > > > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.
> > > .(3) is the way base 10 represents 1 divided by 3. So what?
> > From ChatGPT:
> >
> > John Gabriel:
> > 1/3 is not equal to 0.333...
> >
> >
> > ChatGPT:
> > Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (....) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:
> >
> > 1/3 = 0.333...
> >
> > To clarify further, the digit "3" repeats infinitely without end, but we typically round the decimal representation to a certain number of decimal places when performing calculations.
> >
> > For example:
> > 1/3 ≈ 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
> > 1/3 ≈ 0.3333 (rounded to four decimal places)
> > 1/3 ≈ 0.33333 (rounded to five decimal places)
> >
> > No matter how many decimal places you calculate, it will still be an approximation because the true value of 1/3 is an infinitely repeating decimal.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > See, the AI does not agree with me. So, your comments about making the AI agree are a load of rubbish.
> >
> > To make it say otherwise, you have to provide proof which it can check according to its pretrained knowledge as best it can.
> In 0.333..., the digits go on forever.

How could you know? You've only been a sore on this planet for approximately 25 years.

Too bad they didn't get to spay your mother in time. Tsk, tsk.

<more straw man args and shit>

måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 10:53:50 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 04:47:55 UTC-4, markus... wrote:
> > måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 03:36:28 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Sunday, 30 July 2023 at 15:49:27 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > > On 7/30/2023 9:26 AM, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > >> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, even the AIs which are preprogrammed with mainstream mathematics bullshit will agree that 1/3 = 0.333... and 1 = 0.999... is a bunch of crap.
> > > > .(3) is the way base 10 represents 1 divided by 3. So what?
> > > From ChatGPT:
> > >
> > > John Gabriel:
> > > 1/3 is not equal to 0.333...
> > >
> > >
> > > ChatGPT:
> > > Actually, 1/3 is equal to 0.333... (repeating decimal). The ellipsis (...) indicates that the decimal representation of 1/3 goes on infinitely, with the digit "3" repeating indefinitely. The correct decimal representation of 1/3 is 0.333..., and it can be expressed as an infinite series as follows:
> > >
> > > 1/3 = 0.333...
> > >
> > > To clarify further, the digit "3" repeats infinitely without end, but we typically round the decimal representation to a certain number of decimal places when performing calculations.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > > 1/3 ≈ 0.333 (rounded to three decimal places)
> > > 1/3 ≈ 0.3333 (rounded to four decimal places)
> > > 1/3 ≈ 0.33333 (rounded to five decimal places)
> > >
> > > No matter how many decimal places you calculate, it will still be an approximation because the true value of 1/3 is an infinitely repeating decimal.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > See, the AI does not agree with me. So, your comments about making the AI agree are a load of rubbish.
> > >
> > > To make it say otherwise, you have to provide proof which it can check according to its pretrained knowledge as best it can.
> > In 0.333..., the digits go on forever.
> How could you know? You've only been a sore on this planet for approximately 25 years.
>
> Too bad they didn't get to spay your mother in time. Tsk, tsk.
>
> <more straw man args and shit>
Because I understand what ... means and I also happen to understand limits.

On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank

Refreshed due to troll activity.

måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 14:42:15 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> Refreshed due to troll activity.
Learn limits.

On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 12:57:18 UTC-4, markus. dickhead wrote:
> måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 14:42:15 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > Refreshed due to troll activity.
> Learn limits.

Learn to SHUT UP you moron. Before you were born I learned limits and the difference between us, is that I understand and you are a fucking idiotic little queer who thinks he knows better.

Eat my shit and DIE!!!!!!

If you ever cross my path, be very certain that I don't find out it is you, because I will fuck you up so bad you will spend 6 weeks in hospital and maybe you'll never walk again.

måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 22:12:53 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 12:57:18 UTC-4, markus. dickhead wrote:
> > måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 14:42:15 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > > Refreshed due to troll activity.
> > Learn limits.
> Learn to SHUT UP you moron. Before you were born I learned limits and the difference between us, is that I understand and you are a fucking idiotic little queer who thinks he knows better.
>
> Eat my shit and DIE!!!!!!
>
> If you ever cross my path, be very certain that I don't find out it is you, because I will fuck you up so bad you will spend 6 weeks in hospital and maybe you'll never walk again.
You still don't understand limits.

On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 16:58:35 UTC-4, markus..pisshead scribbled:
> måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 22:12:53 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 12:57:18 UTC-4, markus. dickhead wrote:
> > > måndag 31 juli 2023 kl. 14:42:15 UTC+2 skrev Eram semper recta:
> > > > On Sunday, 23 July 2023 at 10:38:51 UTC-4, Eram semper recta wrote:
> > > > > https://www.academia.edu/104847210/Are_you_a_mainstream_mathematics_academic_If_yes_then_chances_are_quite_high_that_you_are_a_delusional_crank
> > > > Refreshed due to troll activity.
> > > Learn limits.
> > Learn to SHUT UP you moron. Before you were born I learned limits and the difference between us, is that I understand and you are a fucking idiotic little queer who thinks he knows better.
> >
> > Eat my shit and DIE!!!!!!
> >
> > If you ever cross my path, be very certain that I don't find out it is you, because I will fuck you up so bad you will spend 6 weeks in hospital and maybe you'll never walk again.
> You still don't understand limits.

💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩