Rocksolid Light

Welcome to novaBBS (click a section below)

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Two is not equal to three, even for large values of two.

tech / sci.math / Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?markus...@gmail.com
`* Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?bassam karzeddin
 +* Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?markus...@gmail.com
 |`- Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?Fritz Feldhase
 `- Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?Fritz Feldhase

1
Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?

<93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=143150&group=sci.math#143150

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:590d:0:b0:400:9629:cfad with SMTP id 13-20020ac8590d000000b004009629cfadmr73035qty.13.1690965630600;
Wed, 02 Aug 2023 01:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:9571:b0:1b3:f2ad:2a4b with SMTP id
v49-20020a056870957100b001b3f2ad2a4bmr16264838oal.11.1690965629599; Wed, 02
Aug 2023 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 01:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7f634680-de75-48eb-aece-e973f05b7698@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.216.128.143; posting-account=wiRvHAoAAABfPDgWKAHj9ss0MiPpqfE2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.216.128.143
References: <e0852b94-e882-4b5f-967a-0e1b8db72044@googlegroups.com> <7f634680-de75-48eb-aece-e973f05b7698@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?
From: markuskl...@gmail.com (markus...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 08:40:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2487
 by: markus...@gmail.com - Wed, 2 Aug 2023 08:40 UTC

söndag 3 november 2019 kl. 16:57:53 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 7:36:18 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > It happens many times where you have to follow strict rules in order to arrive at the desired and designed results that wouldn't contradict the illegal creation of those called imaginary or generally complex numbers!
> >
> > Where those type of rules become as holy rules and unquestionable,
> >
> > As you must do step one before step two, or you must recognize yourself what is to choose the more suitable answer, ...etc, but there may be cases where even strict rules wouldn't save the situation and everything collapses immediately!
> >
> > So unlike normal and sensible mathematics, may be because it was originated basically from imagination, that wasn't any significant discovery, How?
> >
> > .....?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bassam King Karzeddin
> >
> > 4th, OCT, 2016
> The complex numbers had been proven false, FOR SURE
> BKK
No. Python even provided a construction of them: R[x]/(x²+1).

Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?

<e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=143213&group=sci.math#143213

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:181a:b0:40f:e0dd:8050 with SMTP id t26-20020a05622a181a00b0040fe0dd8050mr22202qtc.5.1691009080197;
Wed, 02 Aug 2023 13:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7505:0:b0:6b9:99ab:7f25 with SMTP id
r5-20020a9d7505000000b006b999ab7f25mr17118216otk.6.1691009079901; Wed, 02 Aug
2023 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 13:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=5.45.130.101; posting-account=WJi6EQoAAADOKYQDqLrSgadtdMk3xQwo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5.45.130.101
References: <e0852b94-e882-4b5f-967a-0e1b8db72044@googlegroups.com>
<7f634680-de75-48eb-aece-e973f05b7698@googlegroups.com> <93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?
From: b.karzed...@yahoo.com (bassam karzeddin)
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 20:44:40 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2894
 by: bassam karzeddin - Wed, 2 Aug 2023 20:44 UTC

On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:40:35 AM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> söndag 3 november 2019 kl. 16:57:53 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 7:36:18 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > It happens many times where you have to follow strict rules in order to arrive at the desired and designed results that wouldn't contradict the illegal creation of those called imaginary or generally complex numbers!
> > >
> > > Where those type of rules become as holy rules and unquestionable,
> > >
> > > As you must do step one before step two, or you must recognize yourself what is to choose the more suitable answer, ...etc, but there may be cases where even strict rules wouldn't save the situation and everything collapses immediately!
> > >
> > > So unlike normal and sensible mathematics, may be because it was originated basically from imagination, that wasn't any significant discovery, How?
> > >
> > > .....?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > >
> > > 4th, OCT, 2016
> > The complex numbers had been proven false, FOR SURE
> > BKK
> No. Python even provided a construction of them: R[x]/(x²+1).

No, Python is a common acadimic who is generally & completely delusional about the fake established mathematics, where this fundamental topic is much behind a common acadimic to simply well-understand!

Immaginary numbers are completely fake & untrue math 🧮
For more than sure
BKK

Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?

<01e2238b-4376-47a3-bff5-fcdd152807een@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=143222&group=sci.math#143222

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:41e:b0:76c:b6b3:a8d5 with SMTP id 30-20020a05620a041e00b0076cb6b3a8d5mr77537qkp.2.1691014974476;
Wed, 02 Aug 2023 15:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1a1f:b0:3a7:541c:8064 with SMTP id
bk31-20020a0568081a1f00b003a7541c8064mr5158019oib.8.1691014974089; Wed, 02
Aug 2023 15:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 15:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.216.128.143; posting-account=wiRvHAoAAABfPDgWKAHj9ss0MiPpqfE2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.216.128.143
References: <e0852b94-e882-4b5f-967a-0e1b8db72044@googlegroups.com>
<7f634680-de75-48eb-aece-e973f05b7698@googlegroups.com> <93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>
<e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <01e2238b-4376-47a3-bff5-fcdd152807een@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?
From: markuskl...@gmail.com (markus...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 22:22:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 by: markus...@gmail.com - Wed, 2 Aug 2023 22:22 UTC

onsdag 2 augusti 2023 kl. 22:44:44 UTC+2 skrev bassam karzeddin:
> On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 11:40:35 AM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> > söndag 3 november 2019 kl. 16:57:53 UTC+1 skrev bassam king karzeddin:
> > > On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 7:36:18 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > > It happens many times where you have to follow strict rules in order to arrive at the desired and designed results that wouldn't contradict the illegal creation of those called imaginary or generally complex numbers!
> > > >
> > > > Where those type of rules become as holy rules and unquestionable,
> > > >
> > > > As you must do step one before step two, or you must recognize yourself what is to choose the more suitable answer, ...etc, but there may be cases where even strict rules wouldn't save the situation and everything collapses immediately!
> > > >
> > > > So unlike normal and sensible mathematics, may be because it was originated basically from imagination, that wasn't any significant discovery, How?
> > > >
> > > > .....?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > > >
> > > > 4th, OCT, 2016
> > > The complex numbers had been proven false, FOR SURE
> > > BKK
> > No. Python even provided a construction of them: R[x]/(x²+1).
> No, Python is a common acadimic who is generally & completely delusional about the fake established mathematics, where this fundamental topic is much behind a common acadimic to simply well-understand!
>
> Immaginary numbers are completely fake & untrue math 🧮
> For more than sure
> BKK
Do you understand qoutient rings?

Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?

<f81ad8ea-a486-4ae9-914c-66ad8a00958an@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=143226&group=sci.math#143226

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5b0d:0:b0:40d:4c6:bce7 with SMTP id m13-20020ac85b0d000000b0040d04c6bce7mr67391qtw.10.1691017349396;
Wed, 02 Aug 2023 16:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:711:b0:1bb:6dc3:210d with SMTP id
ea17-20020a056870071100b001bb6dc3210dmr17321660oab.4.1691017349094; Wed, 02
Aug 2023 16:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 16:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.155.159.239; posting-account=-75WZwoAAABL0f0-07Kn6tvNHWg7W9AE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.155.159.239
References: <e0852b94-e882-4b5f-967a-0e1b8db72044@googlegroups.com>
<7f634680-de75-48eb-aece-e973f05b7698@googlegroups.com> <93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>
<e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <f81ad8ea-a486-4ae9-914c-66ad8a00958an@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?
From: franz.fr...@gmail.com (Fritz Feldhase)
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 23:02:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1634
 by: Fritz Feldhase - Wed, 2 Aug 2023 23:02 UTC

On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 10:44:44 PM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote nonsense.

"Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?"

Yeah. where? :-)

Not HERE it seems: https://www.mathforengineers.com/AC-circuits/complex-numbers-in-AC-circuits.html

Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?

<c0079dd9-7775-4d6f-8612-a9394957a449n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=143227&group=sci.math#143227

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.math
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:189d:b0:403:f3f9:850d with SMTP id v29-20020a05622a189d00b00403f3f9850dmr129110qtc.3.1691017391965;
Wed, 02 Aug 2023 16:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:7009:b0:1be:d373:4cd with SMTP id
u9-20020a056870700900b001bed37304cdmr12659077oae.5.1691017391773; Wed, 02 Aug
2023 16:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 16:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <01e2238b-4376-47a3-bff5-fcdd152807een@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.155.159.239; posting-account=-75WZwoAAABL0f0-07Kn6tvNHWg7W9AE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.155.159.239
References: <e0852b94-e882-4b5f-967a-0e1b8db72044@googlegroups.com>
<7f634680-de75-48eb-aece-e973f05b7698@googlegroups.com> <93d59846-6d24-4a76-ad39-0fe231f41762n@googlegroups.com>
<e1d2c9ae-0b03-4fc6-ac67-6826285437dcn@googlegroups.com> <01e2238b-4376-47a3-bff5-fcdd152807een@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c0079dd9-7775-4d6f-8612-a9394957a449n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Where do the Complex numbers fail completely?
From: franz.fr...@gmail.com (Fritz Feldhase)
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 23:03:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 1645
 by: Fritz Feldhase - Wed, 2 Aug 2023 23:03 UTC

On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:22:59 AM UTC+2, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> onsdag 2 augusti 2023 kl. 22:44:44 UTC+2 skrev bassam karzeddin: <bla>

> Do you understand qoutient rings?

For more than sure!

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor