måndag 30 november 2020 kl. 16:49:46 UTC+1 skrev Bassam Karzeddin:
> On Sunday, December 29, 2019 at 9:56:16 PM UTC+3, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > When true imbecilic academic moderators and alike can't meet a single mathematical and very elementary mathematics, they simply cooperate fast among themselves not only to hide the question but also to hide the entire profile of the user who is trying to teach them first how to count by fingers
> >
> > The overflowed bath couldn't even tolerate to see, where also their elder sister of more imbecilic trends immediately support them
> >
> > So, this is truly a very sincere advice for any truly talented students or amateurs not to tell them anything you may discover or think it is very critical, and more especially if it is not generally known before and may contradict strictly with their old rotten belief's, because they would immediately (hide, steal, spoil, alter, dirt, ..., etc.) your entire content and may as well write new articles in their Donkypedia anonymously as if its their own discoveries and without your notice
> >
> > They aren't in any case so different from their masters with the same traits that are becoming very well-known against any talented person as amateurs and outside of their fields, simply like gangs of smugglings ideas and suppressing anything opposing their old refuted rotting myth magic
> >
> > After that overflowed bath deleted my contents with full profile, I simply took it to their much worse masters at Academia section, and the later couldn't tolerate it even for 20 minutes before they delete it
> >
> > Believing firmly that this action by generally academic mathematicians and alike is a true clear betraying to the profession that generally is feeding, drinking and cloths them as well
> >
> > Then, one should at least expose their very dirty traits wherever he goes in order other to protect other innocent people from their overflows, for sure
> >
> > This was to Academia
> >
> > What to do if the academic mathematicians themselves in overflow mathematics section keep deleting your content with the full determination and without being able even to refute openly only one of the proven and (too... elementary and fundamental issues)?
> >
> > Not to exclude the people in academia itself for doing the same reactions twice with me recently without being able to meet a truly any of the very elementary problems I DID propose, as if the true mathematical knowledge and meaningful discoveries are becoming a complete property of those only academics, and completely forbidden for amateurs
> >
> > Where is your mathematics hiding to convince me of your points of views academics and academia as well
> >
> > This was today posted in math overflow where they didn't tolerate it only for few hours
> >
> > Where the question was asking about amateur achievements,
> >
> > The true irrefutable discoveries in theoretical sciences like (Philosophy, Logic, Pure Physics and Pure Mathematics as well)
> >
> > This was today posted in math overflow where they didn't tolerate it only for few hours
> >
> > 1) Debunking of the concept of infinity being only a purely human mind illusion, since natural numbers are simply an endless chain of successive integers with no largest finite integer existing, but miraculously, magically, and so utterly infinity (which isn’t a number nor anything else) is greater than integers that never exist, hence infinity is a purely human mind fiction (Proof rigorously completed)
> >
> > 2) The debunking of (Zero, Negative and imaginary) numbers in mathematics
> >
> > Direct proof: Any numerical mathematical statement like $(a + b + c = 0)$ can be brought back to its original natural form (within a few seconds) that doesn’t include them
> >
> > Evidence numerical Example: $(7 – 4 – 3 = 0)$, where its original natural form id $(7 = 3 + 4)$, without losing any content, we eliminated both of zero and negatives without losing any meaningful contents
> > (Proof rigorously completed)
> >
> > 3) Debunking of imaginary numbers, by considering this right-angle triangle with sides:
> > $(a+\sqrt{- b},b-\sqrt{-a},0)$ hypogenous, where $(a, b)$ are positive constructible numbers
> > (Proof rigorously completed)
> >
> > 4) Debunking of the existence of the real non-constructible numbers in mathematics like $\pi, \sqrt[3]{2}$ on the real number line
> >
> > Direct proof: express them without using the decimal notation to see that they are actually a ratio of two non-existing numbers, (Proof rigorously Completed)
> >
> > 5) Debunking of the non-existence of the endless rational decimal representation of the real constructible number $\sqrt{2}$ being existing in accordance with Pythagorean theorem as a diagonal of a square with unity side distance
> >
> > Since any (Limit, Convergence, sequence, cuts, …, etc) and by any means are technically and perpetually impossible to even reach many uncountable real existing constructible numbers that are strictly less than $\sqrt{2}$
> > Hence any alleged real number that ends with these three meaningless dots like this $(…)$ doesn’t exist
> > (Proof intuitively and rigorously completed)
> >
> > 6) The debunking of the true existence of the majorities of the most well-known angles in (old and modern mathematics) as well
> >
> > Example: The angle $(\pi/6 = 30)$ Degrees does exist in many uncountable triangles (with exactly known sides), but the angle $(\pi/9 = 20)$ Degrees is absolutely impossible to exist even in one single triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > (Proof rigorously completed)
> >
> > 7) Debunking of the quadratic and biquadrate general formulas upon the pure human mind functionality of the imaginary numbers
> >
> > 7) Debunking of the famous Cardano formula for cubic equation solution with this following and very clear numerical counterexample and the invalidity of the general cubic root operation where $\sqrt[3]{2}$ is not a radical number because it is non-existing number
> > Example: this famous irreducible cubic polynomial $(x^3 – 3x – 1 = 0)$ that must has at least one real root is originally taken from a non-solvable Diophantine Equation as this $(n^3 – m^3 = 3nm^2)$, simply by letting and assuming $(x = \frac{n}{m})$, where the co-prime natural numbers$(n, m)$ don’t exist
> >
> > Note that: for beginners in number theory, $n$ or $m$ divides exactly the RHS but doesn’t divide exactly the LHS, hence no such integers $(n, m)$ ever exist, (Proof rigorously completed)
> >
> > 8) The debunking of (Galois, Able & Ruffinie theorems) in mathematics based on the above-proven facts
> >
> > 9) Debunking the fundamental theorem of Algebra based on the above-proven facts
> >
> > 10) Debunking of the famous Wentzel proof in (1837) about the three famous impossible construction problems raised by the ancient Greeks, since he was true in conclusion but untrue in the true reasoning, where that kept the doors widely opened for many famous claimers in the history and up to our dates who constantly announce false constructions by other tools, whereas the fact that the tools are so irrelevant to the whole problems where even a compass is impossible to construct a circle exactly
> >
> > Since the true undiscovered reason was basically the non-existence of such alleged real numbers like $(\pi,\sqrt[3]{2})$
> >
> > But Wentzel didn’t realize this true fact, were then, how to square the circle (that never exists) becomes much easier to understand, or to construct angles that never exist like the angle $(\pi/9 = 20)$ Degrees, or doubling the cube with any existing arbitrary side number, (Proof was completed)
> >
> > However, here I gave only a very little and direct fast proof whereas other detailed proofs about many these issues or many more were already publically published in my public profiles
> >
> >
> > And so, unfortunately, I know that announcing or say better reminding the academic mathematicians with such proven facts would never mean at any case that I’m against mathematics but truly speaking against the false mathematics for sure
> >
> > Where the so few bitter facts are much more worth and a higher value to the true mathematics itself than millions of many sweet fallacies at the end
> >
> > Regards & happy new year with new coming mathematics FOR SURE
> >
> > *Note: Downvoting my answers wouldn’t, in any case, invalidate my global, public PUBLISHED proofs repeatedly where the spider’s threads can’t hide the proven facts by amateur any more
> >
> > Mainly due to the impossibility of being accepted by any alleged reputable Journals and Universities for many other reasons that are so irrelevant to the true mathematics itself but certainly relevant to general human behaviours and reactions towards superior elementary facts that are strictly contradicting the so common academic mainstream beliefs that were based on wrong conclusions and human short definitions that are not so different from wrong decisions being hiding behind fictions like infinity and practicality of other successful science like the mathematics invented basically by scientists and engineers for a an approximation problem solutions that don't require the perfection required by true mathematics
> >
> > Another note I would like to add that my earlier full profile on mathoverflow was completely hidden or deleted even from being visible to myself, and I don't know truly how my current this answer is made a wiki answer!
> >
> > **Copyright© 2019**
> >
> > Bassam Karzeddin
> >
> >
> > For further details and references, consider my few still undeleted answers in SE and few answers on Quora or sci. math (public profiles), one link below:
> >
> > https://www.quora.com/profile/Bassam-Karzeddin-1/answers
> >
> > BKK
Have you ever considered the possibility of you being wrong?

On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:07:25 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> måndag 30 november 2020 kl. 16:49:46 UTC+1 skrev Bassam Karzeddin:
> > On Sunday, December 29, 2019 at 9:56:16 PM UTC+3, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > When true imbecilic academic moderators and alike can't meet a single mathematical and very elementary mathematics, they simply cooperate fast among themselves not only to hide the question but also to hide the entire profile of the user who is trying to teach them first how to count by fingers
> > >
> > > The overflowed bath couldn't even tolerate to see, where also their elder sister of more imbecilic trends immediately support them
> > >
> > > So, this is truly a very sincere advice for any truly talented students or amateurs not to tell them anything you may discover or think it is very critical, and more especially if it is not generally known before and may contradict strictly with their old rotten belief's, because they would immediately (hide, steal, spoil, alter, dirt, ..., etc.) your entire content and may as well write new articles in their Donkypedia anonymously as if its their own discoveries and without your notice
> > >
> > > They aren't in any case so different from their masters with the same traits that are becoming very well-known against any talented person as amateurs and outside of their fields, simply like gangs of smugglings ideas and suppressing anything opposing their old refuted rotting myth magic
> > >
> > > After that overflowed bath deleted my contents with full profile, I simply took it to their much worse masters at Academia section, and the later couldn't tolerate it even for 20 minutes before they delete it
> > >
> > > Believing firmly that this action by generally academic mathematicians and alike is a true clear betraying to the profession that generally is feeding, drinking and cloths them as well
> > >
> > > Then, one should at least expose their very dirty traits wherever he goes in order other to protect other innocent people from their overflows, for sure
> > >
> > > This was to Academia
> > >
> > > What to do if the academic mathematicians themselves in overflow mathematics section keep deleting your content with the full determination and without being able even to refute openly only one of the proven and (too... elementary and fundamental issues)?
> > >
> > > Not to exclude the people in academia itself for doing the same reactions twice with me recently without being able to meet a truly any of the very elementary problems I DID propose, as if the true mathematical knowledge and meaningful discoveries are becoming a complete property of those only academics, and completely forbidden for amateurs
> > >
> > > Where is your mathematics hiding to convince me of your points of views academics and academia as well
> > >
> > > This was today posted in math overflow where they didn't tolerate it only for few hours
> > >
> > > Where the question was asking about amateur achievements,
> > >
> > > The true irrefutable discoveries in theoretical sciences like (Philosophy, Logic, Pure Physics and Pure Mathematics as well)
> > >
> > > This was today posted in math overflow where they didn't tolerate it only for few hours
> > >
> > > 1) Debunking of the concept of infinity being only a purely human mind illusion, since natural numbers are simply an endless chain of successive integers with no largest finite integer existing, but miraculously, magically, and so utterly infinity (which isn’t a number nor anything else) is greater than integers that never exist, hence infinity is a purely human mind fiction (Proof rigorously completed)
> > >
> > > 2) The debunking of (Zero, Negative and imaginary) numbers in mathematics
> > >
> > > Direct proof: Any numerical mathematical statement like $(a + b + c = 0)$ can be brought back to its original natural form (within a few seconds) that doesn’t include them
> > >
> > > Evidence numerical Example: $(7 – 4 – 3 = 0)$, where its original natural form id $(7 = 3 + 4)$, without losing any content, we eliminated both of zero and negatives without losing any meaningful contents
> > > (Proof rigorously completed)
> > >
> > > 3) Debunking of imaginary numbers, by considering this right-angle triangle with sides:
> > > $(a+\sqrt{- b},b-\sqrt{-a},0)$ hypogenous, where $(a, b)$ are positive constructible numbers
> > > (Proof rigorously completed)
> > >
> > > 4) Debunking of the existence of the real non-constructible numbers in mathematics like $\pi, \sqrt[3]{2}$ on the real number line
> > >
> > > Direct proof: express them without using the decimal notation to see that they are actually a ratio of two non-existing numbers, (Proof rigorously Completed)
> > >
> > > 5) Debunking of the non-existence of the endless rational decimal representation of the real constructible number $\sqrt{2}$ being existing in accordance with Pythagorean theorem as a diagonal of a square with unity side distance
> > >
> > > Since any (Limit, Convergence, sequence, cuts, …, etc) and by any means are technically and perpetually impossible to even reach many uncountable real existing constructible numbers that are strictly less than $\sqrt{2}$
> > > Hence any alleged real number that ends with these three meaningless dots like this $(…)$ doesn’t exist
> > > (Proof intuitively and rigorously completed)
> > >
> > > 6) The debunking of the true existence of the majorities of the most well-known angles in (old and modern mathematics) as well
> > >
> > > Example: The angle $(\pi/6 = 30)$ Degrees does exist in many uncountable triangles (with exactly known sides), but the angle $(\pi/9 = 20)$ Degrees is absolutely impossible to exist even in one single triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > > (Proof rigorously completed)
> > >
> > > 7) Debunking of the quadratic and biquadrate general formulas upon the pure human mind functionality of the imaginary numbers
> > >
> > > 7) Debunking of the famous Cardano formula for cubic equation solution with this following and very clear numerical counterexample and the invalidity of the general cubic root operation where $\sqrt[3]{2}$ is not a radical number because it is non-existing number
> > > Example: this famous irreducible cubic polynomial $(x^3 – 3x – 1 = 0)$ that must has at least one real root is originally taken from a non-solvable Diophantine Equation as this $(n^3 – m^3 = 3nm^2)$, simply by letting and assuming $(x = \frac{n}{m})$, where the co-prime natural numbers$(n, m)$ don’t exist
> > >
> > > Note that: for beginners in number theory, $n$ or $m$ divides exactly the RHS but doesn’t divide exactly the LHS, hence no such integers $(n, m)$ ever exist, (Proof rigorously completed)
> > >
> > > 8) The debunking of (Galois, Able & Ruffinie theorems) in mathematics based on the above-proven facts
> > >
> > > 9) Debunking the fundamental theorem of Algebra based on the above-proven facts
> > >
> > > 10) Debunking of the famous Wentzel proof in (1837) about the three famous impossible construction problems raised by the ancient Greeks, since he was true in conclusion but untrue in the true reasoning, where that kept the doors widely opened for many famous claimers in the history and up to our dates who constantly announce false constructions by other tools, whereas the fact that the tools are so irrelevant to the whole problems where even a compass is impossible to construct a circle exactly
> > >
> > > Since the true undiscovered reason was basically the non-existence of such alleged real numbers like $(\pi,\sqrt[3]{2})$
> > >
> > > But Wentzel didn’t realize this true fact, were then, how to square the circle (that never exists) becomes much easier to understand, or to construct angles that never exist like the angle $(\pi/9 = 20)$ Degrees, or doubling the cube with any existing arbitrary side number, (Proof was completed)
> > >
> > > However, here I gave only a very little and direct fast proof whereas other detailed proofs about many these issues or many more were already publically published in my public profiles
> > >
> > >
> > > And so, unfortunately, I know that announcing or say better reminding the academic mathematicians with such proven facts would never mean at any case that I’m against mathematics but truly speaking against the false mathematics for sure
> > >
> > > Where the so few bitter facts are much more worth and a higher value to the true mathematics itself than millions of many sweet fallacies at the end
> > >
> > > Regards & happy new year with new coming mathematics FOR SURE
> > >
> > > *Note: Downvoting my answers wouldn’t, in any case, invalidate my global, public PUBLISHED proofs repeatedly where the spider’s threads can’t hide the proven facts by amateur any more
> > >
> > > Mainly due to the impossibility of being accepted by any alleged reputable Journals and Universities for many other reasons that are so irrelevant to the true mathematics itself but certainly relevant to general human behaviours and reactions towards superior elementary facts that are strictly contradicting the so common academic mainstream beliefs that were based on wrong conclusions and human short definitions that are not so different from wrong decisions being hiding behind fictions like infinity and practicality of other successful science like the mathematics invented basically by scientists and engineers for a an approximation problem solutions that don't require the perfection required by true mathematics
> > >
> > > Another note I would like to add that my earlier full profile on mathoverflow was completely hidden or deleted even from being visible to myself, and I don't know truly how my current this answer is made a wiki answer!
> > >
> > > **Copyright© 2019**
> > >
> > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > >
> > >
> > > For further details and references, consider my few still undeleted answers in SE and few answers on Quora or sci. math (public profiles), one link below:
> > >
> > > https://www.quora.com/profile/Bassam-Karzeddin-1/answers
> > >
> > > BKK
> Have you ever considered the possibility of you being wrong?

torsdag 3 augusti 2023 kl. 11:12:40 UTC+2 skrev bassam karzeddin:
> On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:07:25 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail..com wrote:
> > måndag 30 november 2020 kl. 16:49:46 UTC+1 skrev Bassam Karzeddin:
> > > On Sunday, December 29, 2019 at 9:56:16 PM UTC+3, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > > When true imbecilic academic moderators and alike can't meet a single mathematical and very elementary mathematics, they simply cooperate fast among themselves not only to hide the question but also to hide the entire profile of the user who is trying to teach them first how to count by fingers
> > > >
> > > > The overflowed bath couldn't even tolerate to see, where also their elder sister of more imbecilic trends immediately support them
> > > >
> > > > So, this is truly a very sincere advice for any truly talented students or amateurs not to tell them anything you may discover or think it is very critical, and more especially if it is not generally known before and may contradict strictly with their old rotten belief's, because they would immediately (hide, steal, spoil, alter, dirt, ..., etc.) your entire content and may as well write new articles in their Donkypedia anonymously as if its their own discoveries and without your notice
> > > >
> > > > They aren't in any case so different from their masters with the same traits that are becoming very well-known against any talented person as amateurs and outside of their fields, simply like gangs of smugglings ideas and suppressing anything opposing their old refuted rotting myth magic
> > > >
> > > > After that overflowed bath deleted my contents with full profile, I simply took it to their much worse masters at Academia section, and the later couldn't tolerate it even for 20 minutes before they delete it
> > > >
> > > > Believing firmly that this action by generally academic mathematicians and alike is a true clear betraying to the profession that generally is feeding, drinking and cloths them as well
> > > >
> > > > Then, one should at least expose their very dirty traits wherever he goes in order other to protect other innocent people from their overflows, for sure
> > > >
> > > > This was to Academia
> > > >
> > > > What to do if the academic mathematicians themselves in overflow mathematics section keep deleting your content with the full determination and without being able even to refute openly only one of the proven and (too.... elementary and fundamental issues)?
> > > >
> > > > Not to exclude the people in academia itself for doing the same reactions twice with me recently without being able to meet a truly any of the very elementary problems I DID propose, as if the true mathematical knowledge and meaningful discoveries are becoming a complete property of those only academics, and completely forbidden for amateurs
> > > >
> > > > Where is your mathematics hiding to convince me of your points of views academics and academia as well
> > > >
> > > > This was today posted in math overflow where they didn't tolerate it only for few hours
> > > >
> > > > Where the question was asking about amateur achievements,
> > > >
> > > > The true irrefutable discoveries in theoretical sciences like (Philosophy, Logic, Pure Physics and Pure Mathematics as well)
> > > >
> > > > This was today posted in math overflow where they didn't tolerate it only for few hours
> > > >
> > > > 1) Debunking of the concept of infinity being only a purely human mind illusion, since natural numbers are simply an endless chain of successive integers with no largest finite integer existing, but miraculously, magically, and so utterly infinity (which isn’t a number nor anything else) is greater than integers that never exist, hence infinity is a purely human mind fiction (Proof rigorously completed)
> > > >
> > > > 2) The debunking of (Zero, Negative and imaginary) numbers in mathematics
> > > >
> > > > Direct proof: Any numerical mathematical statement like $(a + b + c = 0)$ can be brought back to its original natural form (within a few seconds) that doesn’t include them
> > > >
> > > > Evidence numerical Example: $(7 – 4 – 3 = 0)$, where its original natural form id $(7 = 3 + 4)$, without losing any content, we eliminated both of zero and negatives without losing any meaningful contents
> > > > (Proof rigorously completed)
> > > >
> > > > 3) Debunking of imaginary numbers, by considering this right-angle triangle with sides:
> > > > $(a+\sqrt{- b},b-\sqrt{-a},0)$ hypogenous, where $(a, b)$ are positive constructible numbers
> > > > (Proof rigorously completed)
> > > >
> > > > 4) Debunking of the existence of the real non-constructible numbers in mathematics like $\pi, \sqrt[3]{2}$ on the real number line
> > > >
> > > > Direct proof: express them without using the decimal notation to see that they are actually a ratio of two non-existing numbers, (Proof rigorously Completed)
> > > >
> > > > 5) Debunking of the non-existence of the endless rational decimal representation of the real constructible number $\sqrt{2}$ being existing in accordance with Pythagorean theorem as a diagonal of a square with unity side distance
> > > >
> > > > Since any (Limit, Convergence, sequence, cuts, …, etc) and by any means are technically and perpetually impossible to even reach many uncountable real existing constructible numbers that are strictly less than $\sqrt{2}$
> > > > Hence any alleged real number that ends with these three meaningless dots like this $(…)$ doesn’t exist
> > > > (Proof intuitively and rigorously completed)
> > > >
> > > > 6) The debunking of the true existence of the majorities of the most well-known angles in (old and modern mathematics) as well
> > > >
> > > > Example: The angle $(\pi/6 = 30)$ Degrees does exist in many uncountable triangles (with exactly known sides), but the angle $(\pi/9 = 20)$ Degrees is absolutely impossible to exist even in one single triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > > > (Proof rigorously completed)
> > > >
> > > > 7) Debunking of the quadratic and biquadrate general formulas upon the pure human mind functionality of the imaginary numbers
> > > >
> > > > 7) Debunking of the famous Cardano formula for cubic equation solution with this following and very clear numerical counterexample and the invalidity of the general cubic root operation where $\sqrt[3]{2}$ is not a radical number because it is non-existing number
> > > > Example: this famous irreducible cubic polynomial $(x^3 – 3x – 1 = 0)$ that must has at least one real root is originally taken from a non-solvable Diophantine Equation as this $(n^3 – m^3 = 3nm^2)$, simply by letting and assuming $(x = \frac{n}{m})$, where the co-prime natural numbers$(n, m)$ don’t exist
> > > >
> > > > Note that: for beginners in number theory, $n$ or $m$ divides exactly the RHS but doesn’t divide exactly the LHS, hence no such integers $(n, m)$ ever exist, (Proof rigorously completed)
> > > >
> > > > 8) The debunking of (Galois, Able & Ruffinie theorems) in mathematics based on the above-proven facts
> > > >
> > > > 9) Debunking the fundamental theorem of Algebra based on the above-proven facts
> > > >
> > > > 10) Debunking of the famous Wentzel proof in (1837) about the three famous impossible construction problems raised by the ancient Greeks, since he was true in conclusion but untrue in the true reasoning, where that kept the doors widely opened for many famous claimers in the history and up to our dates who constantly announce false constructions by other tools, whereas the fact that the tools are so irrelevant to the whole problems where even a compass is impossible to construct a circle exactly
> > > >
> > > > Since the true undiscovered reason was basically the non-existence of such alleged real numbers like $(\pi,\sqrt[3]{2})$
> > > >
> > > > But Wentzel didn’t realize this true fact, were then, how to square the circle (that never exists) becomes much easier to understand, or to construct angles that never exist like the angle $(\pi/9 = 20)$ Degrees, or doubling the cube with any existing arbitrary side number, (Proof was completed)
> > > >
> > > > However, here I gave only a very little and direct fast proof whereas other detailed proofs about many these issues or many more were already publically published in my public profiles
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And so, unfortunately, I know that announcing or say better reminding the academic mathematicians with such proven facts would never mean at any case that I’m against mathematics but truly speaking against the false mathematics for sure
> > > >
> > > > Where the so few bitter facts are much more worth and a higher value to the true mathematics itself than millions of many sweet fallacies at the end
> > > >
> > > > Regards & happy new year with new coming mathematics FOR SURE
> > > >
> > > > *Note: Downvoting my answers wouldn’t, in any case, invalidate my global, public PUBLISHED proofs repeatedly where the spider’s threads can’t hide the proven facts by amateur any more
> > > >
> > > > Mainly due to the impossibility of being accepted by any alleged reputable Journals and Universities for many other reasons that are so irrelevant to the true mathematics itself but certainly relevant to general human behaviours and reactions towards superior elementary facts that are strictly contradicting the so common academic mainstream beliefs that were based on wrong conclusions and human short definitions that are not so different from wrong decisions being hiding behind fictions like infinity and practicality of other successful science like the mathematics invented basically by scientists and engineers for a an approximation problem solutions that don't require the perfection required by true mathematics
> > > >
> > > > Another note I would like to add that my earlier full profile on mathoverflow was completely hidden or deleted even from being visible to myself, and I don't know truly how my current this answer is made a wiki answer!
> > > >
> > > > **Copyright© 2019**
> > > >
> > > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For further details and references, consider my few still undeleted answers in SE and few answers on Quora or sci. math (public profiles), one link below:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.quora.com/profile/Bassam-Karzeddin-1/answers
> > > >
> > > > BKK
> > Have you ever considered the possibility of you being wrong?
> Never, simply because I have announced the irrefutable proofs that are spoken solely by natural numbers, where they don't need any human agreements but rather they need strictly their blind obedience to the undesirable truths in mathematics
>
> BKK
Your arrogance is not really admirable.

Em 03/08/2023 06:12, bassam karzeddin escreveu:
> Never, simply because I have announced the irrefutable proofs that are spoken solely by natural numbers, where they don't need any human agreements but rather they need strictly their blind obedience to the undesirable truths in mathematics
>
> BKK

oh boy, hope your oversized ego doesn't kill you

--
nabru

On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 3:50:55 PM UTC+3, nabru wrote:
> Em 03/08/2023 06:12, bassam karzeddin escreveu:
> > Never, simply because I have announced the irrefutable proofs that are spoken solely by natural numbers, where they don't need any human agreements but rather they need strictly their blind obedience to the undesirable truths in mathematics
> >
> > BKK
> oh boy, hope your oversized ego doesn't kill you
>
>
> --
> nabru

I hope your deep global inhireted stupidity doesn't kill you too for sure

BKK