On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 8:37:40 PM UTC+2, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Durban Univ, why not go for the truth of mathematics-- the slant cut in cone is a oval, never the ellipse. Or will they listen to their screaming nitwit John Gabriel
>
> Is Durban Univ crippled in math as is kibo Parry Moroney is in arithmetic with his 8.88 is 12% short of 9.00
>
> On Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 12:30:22 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Silly boy, that's off by more than 12.6 MeV, or 12% of the mass of a muon.
> > Hardly "exactly" 9 muons.
> Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 9:52:21 AM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
>
> > Or, 938.2720813/105.6583745 = 8.88024338572. A proton is about the mass
> > of 8.88 muons, not 9. About 12% short.
>
> Why is kibo Parry Moroney even allowed in sci.math for he cannot even do arithmetic properly. And why has South Africa endorsed the spamming fool of John Gabriel, who to this day thinks ellipse is a conic and fails to ever have a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
>
> Does Durban Univ deserve the distinction of failure in geometry for even as kibo Parry Moroney fans a Franz fake proof of ellipse as conic, Durban continues to teach this fakery of ellipse. I would guess that every one of Durban's students can read the below and without even doing the Kerr or Mason lid in paper cone experiment, see in their mind's eye that no slant cut in cone ever yields a ellipse, always a oval.
>
> Durban Univ is so stupid and a failure of geometry on this subject that they cannot tell apart a ellipse from a oval.
>
> looking down from cone apex
> bottom
> ______
> ,'"^ "`.
> / \
> | | slant cut into cone is oval, never ellipse
> \ /
> '. .'
> " '
> top
>
> /\
>
> / \
>
> / \
>
>
> / \
>
> / \
>
> / \
>
> __
> .-' `-.
> .' `.
> / \
> ; ; B
> | |
> ; ;
> \ /
> `. .'
> `-._____.-'
>
>
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | | slant cut of cylinder is always a ellipse, never a oval due to the
> | | fact a cylinder has two axes of symmetry, while a cone has
> | | just 1 axis of symmetry
> | |
> | |
> | |
>
>
> (cranks Moroney and Franz, crank this mindrot of a fake-proof over and over)
>
> > Below you will find a simple *proof* that shows that certain conic
> > sections are ellipses.
> >
> > Some preliminaries:
> >
> > Top view of the conic section and depiction of the coordinate system used
> > in the proof:
> >
> > ^ x
> > |
> > -+- <= x=h
> > .' | `.
> > . | .
> > | | |
> > ' | '
> > `. | .'
> > y <----------+ <= x=0
> >
> > Cone (side view):
> > .
> > /|\
> > / | \
> > /b | \
> > /---+---' <= x = h
> > / |' \
> > / ' | \
> > / ' | \
> > x = 0 => '-------+-------\
> > / a | \
> >
> > Proof:
> >
> > r(x) = a - ((a-b)/h)x and d(x) = a - ((a+b)/h)x, hence
> >
> > y(x)^2 = r(x)^2 - d(x)^2 = ab - ab(2x/h - 1)^2 = ab(1 - 4(x - h/2)^2/h^2.
> >
> > Hence (1/ab)y(x)^2 + (4/h^2)(x - h/2)^2 = 1 ...equation of an ellipse
> >
> > qed
>
> Durban Univ, why not go for the truth of mathematics-- the slant cut in cone is a oval, never the ellipse.
>
> AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
>
> Length: 21 pages
>
> File Size: 1620 KB
> Print Length: 21 pages
> Publication Date: March 11, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PLSDQWC
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
>
>
> World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
> Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math where they had a ill-defined infinity; they had the fakery of Limit concept; and they had the fakery of a continuum.
>
> The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus basically says the integral is inverse to the derivative and the derivative is inverse to the integral. By inverse is meant that you can go to one given the other and vice versa, such as add is the inverse of subtract, so if we had 10 + 4 = 14 then the inverse is subtract 4 and we have 14-4 = 10 back to 10 where we started from. And the geometry proof involves a rectangle and a right triangle hinged atop a trapezoid. You hinge it one direction you have dy*dx for area of a rectangle for integral area. You hinge it the other direction you have the dy/dx for slope or derivative from the trapezoid formed.
>
> Sad that Old Math was so full of ill-defined concepts and fake concepts that never was a geometry proof of FTC ever possible in Old Math.
>
> Length: 29 pages
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1225 KB
> Print Length: 29 pages
> Publication Date: March 14, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07PQTNHMY
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> #134 in Calculus (Books)
> #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: journal-textbook for ages 5 to 18, Volume 1; textbook math series, book 1 Kindle Edition
>
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
>
>
> #1 New Release in General Geometry
>
>
> Volume 1 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education.
>
> This is the one textbook that carries every person through all his/her math education, 5 year old to senior in High School, that is needed to do both science and math. Every other math book is incidental to this one.
>
> I call it a journal-textbook because Amazon's Kindle offers me the ability to edit overnight, and to change the text, almost on a daily basis. A unique first in education textbooks-- almost a continual overnight editing. Adding new text, correcting text. Volume 1 takes the 5 year old student through to senior in High School for their math education. Volume 2 carries the Freshperson in College for their math education.
>
> What prompted me to write this textbook is that Old Math is filled with error, mistakes and just sheer irrelevant nonsense. In the early 2000s I wrote about 5 editions of Correcting Math textbooks and about 9 editions of True Calculus, but then I got so fed up and tired with all the mistakes of Old Math, that I decided the best way forward is throw out all of Old Math and start anew. Originally I thought I could start with 8 year olds, but saw the TV show "Odd Squad" with their negative numbers and had to drop down to 5 year olds, so they do not get polluted and brainwashed with fake math.
>
> Length: 370 pages
>
> File Size: 1996 KB
> Print Length: 370 pages
> Publication Date: May 2, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07RG7BVZW
> Text-to-Speech: Enabled
> X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

> Word Wise: Not Enabled
> Lending: Enabled
> Screen Reader: Supported
> Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
> Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #274,398 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> #27 in General Geometry
> #336 in Geometry & Topology (Books)
>
>
> TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 2 for age 18-19, 1st year College Calculus, math textbook series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
>
> This is volume 2, series 2 of Teaching True Mathematics, designed for College Freshperson of age 18-19. This is 1st year college calculus math. It is the continuation of volume 1 for ages 5 through 18 years old. The main major topic is the AP-EM equations of electricity and magnetism. The end goal of this textbook is to teach all math, physics, chemistry, biology and hard sciences the mathematics they need to continue in science. This textbook at the end teaches students the mathematics of electricity and magnetism. In Old Math, they devoted about 1/3 of their textbook content to reach the Maxwell Equations at the end, but sadly, no Old Math textbook was ever able to cover the Maxwell Equations with any comprehension, and left the students with headaches, nightmares and nervous breakdowns of the mathematics needed to do electricity and magnetism. This textbook resolves all those problems. And this textbook asks the students and parents of students to equip their daughter or son with a tool kit of instruments to do electricity and magnetism.
> Cover Picture is my EM instruments to gain numbers for the laws of EM theory: a multimeter, galvanometer attached to a coil with a strong bar magnet inside. Three electromagnets and a transformer to step down 120 volts to 12 volts to run the electromagnets. A case of iron powder to measure the strength of magnets and a battery case. I urge students who can afford these instruments to use them as you take this course in calculus.
> Length: 132 pages
>
> Product details
> File Size: 1316 KB
> Print Length: 132 pages
> Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited
> Publication Date: August 16, 2019
> Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
> Language: English
> ASIN: B07WN9RVXD
>
>
>
>
>
> Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa Physics dept --Rodrigues,Bhattacharyya,Carter,Chen,Comins,Koch,Every,Forbes,Goldstein,Jejjala,Joubert never going to confirm real proton is 840MeV, Gabriel says they cannot even tell ellipse from oval
>
>
>
>
>
> The fraudulent formulation of mainstream calculus.
> By Eram semper recta 14 posts 51 views updated 10:04 AM
>
>
>
>
> Euler, the moron from Switzerland and his bullshit contribution S = Lim S. (7)
> By Eram semper recta 22 posts 61 views updated 10:03 AM
>
>
> On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 9:07:35 PM UTC-5, Jew Lover <thenewc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Only a complete and total moron takes mentally ill
>
>
> Dr. A Maharaj,Dr. S Moyo,Dr. S Rajah, Durban Univ//Are you as stupid and a education parasite as Gabriel on ellipse, for the oval is the conic, never the ellipse?? Geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, see proofs below
>
> Meira Hockman,Sameerah Jamal,Abdul Kara,Sonja Currie, Witwatersrand Univ// Are you as stupid and a education parasite as Gabriel on ellipse, for the oval is the conic, never the ellipse?? Geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, see proofs below
> Meira Hockman,Sameerah Jamal,Abdul Kara,Arnold Knopfmacher Witwatersrand Univ// Are you as stupid and a education parasite as Gabriel on ellipse, for the oval is the conic, never the ellipse?? see proof below
>
>
>
>
> AP writes: the fool Gabriel is so dumb in math, he cannot even tell apart the oval from the ellipse, but worse yet, he could never understand that the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires a purely geometry proof and yet Gabriel never knew that, nor tried to do a geometry proof of FTC (see my proof below)
>
>
> On Monday, February 18, 2019 at 3:07:12 PM UTC-6, Jew Lover wrote:
> > I am the terror of mainstream academic cranks who call themselves professors of mathematics.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan Christensen wrote:
>
>
>
> Feb 9
>
>
> >Fed up with know-nothing, idiot trolls like John "Troll Boy" Gabriel here at sci.math. Now there is an alternative.
>
> On Saturday, February 9, 2019 at 12:51:09 PM UTC-5, Jew Lover wrote:
> > https://...
> What do you know about calculus,
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 31, 2019 at 7:24:04 AM UTC-6, Jew Lover wrote:
> > In chapter 9 of the most important mathematics book ever written, I describe
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2019 at 2:34:42 PM UTC-6, Jew Lover wrote:
> > Although m+n is ALWAYS greater than 0, because the New Calculus is so resilient and sound
>
> AP writes: Not only is the above author a education parasite on the ellipse and oval, but on Calculus, also, for the numbskull cannot even do a Geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- with his silly twisted up grievances of Old Math.
>
> Sonja Currie,Alexander Davison,Mensah Folly-Gbetoula,Marie Grobbelaar,Yorick Hardy of Witwatersrand Univ// Are you as stupid and a education parasite as Gabriel on ellipse, for the oval is the conic, never the ellipse?? see proof below
>
>
> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 9:50:51 AM UTC-6, Jew Lover <thenewc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have written,,,
>
> AP writes: the clear message that John Gabriel is sending out to the world is that no-one in South Africa seems to understand nor care that the conic cut at a slant is always a oval, never an ellipse, yet you seem to just want to teach this fakery, never correcting it.
>
> This is what I call an education parasite-- more concerned about money or convenience then ever worried about "teaching the truth".
>
> Definition: education parasite: a person or a group of people that values money or convenience ahead of the Truth. They never want to fix errors but teach errors forever because it takes time and money out of them to fix errors and teach the truth.
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 8:55:14 AM UTC-6, Jew Lover <thenewc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 3 January 2019 09:24:00 UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > What it would be like if the mathematicians eventually are forced to adopt "Archimedes Plutonium" principle about numbers they actually obey? wonder!
> > >
> > Archimedes Plutonium is a crank de luxe. Nothing he writes or says has any value whatsoever. He is a product of mainstream stupidity. This means that he tried to understand mainstream math and gave up one day, choosing to focus on his drivel. AP is mentally ill and associating with him is not good for your credibility.
> >
>
>
> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 6:45:42 AM UTC-6, John Gabriel wrote:
> > Proof using bogus calculus and a patch I created for the bullshit derivative:
> >
>
>
>
>
> About
>
>
>
>
>
> About the SPAMMING troll Dan Christensen: FACT checking his lies and misrepresentations. (11)
> By Jew Lover 24 posts 98 views updated 3:43 PM
>
>
> + 5 others
>
>
>
> Jan Burse - the pest from Switzerland whose grandmother was a Greek nanny goat and whose father a Swiss moron. (4)
> By Jew Lover 4 posts 6 views updated 3:32 PM
>
>
>
>
>
> The New Calculus - it's gaining in popularity and the mainstream Church of Academia hate it! (19)
> By Jew Lover 19 posts 32 views updated 3:28 PM
>
>
> Gabriel helping to save whales,Drs.Barnes, Bartlett, Batley, Baumberg of Cambridge are you like Raemsch too stupid to learn Boole was wrong with his 10 OR 4 = 14// too stupid for proton is 840MeV, electron=muon= 105MeV and.5 MeV was Dirac's monopole
> ,,,
> -ooO(o o)Ooo-
> (_)
>
>
> Our Whale Animals
>
> Can a Trump tariff fine,
> Like the tariff of a Macron French wine,
> Show us how crazy is the world sign,
> When you have a crazy USA president time,
> Who pines about his hair line,
> More than he cares about 1,500 whales slaughtered by Japan crime.
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 197.79.2.43
> From: John Gabriel <thenewc...@gmail.com
>
>
> 11:30:52 Gabriel// Univ Witwatersrand,Andrew Chen,Darell Comins,Robert De Mello Koch, are you as stupid as Gabriel to learn proton is _not_ 938MeV electron .5MeV when they really are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding
>
> The world no longer needs physics professors who cannot understand Angular Momentum and that the Chemical bond cannot exist with proton = 938MeV, electron= .5MeV. The true proton is 840MeV, true electron= muon = 105MeV and the little particle of .5MeV that JJ Thomson discovered is actually Dirac's magnetic monopole.
>
> John Gabriel-- hates everyone and everything-- even himself-- a perfect example of a misanthrope
>
> ..
> .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
> , . `.' ' `.
> .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
> . ; .' . `. ;
> ; . ' `. . '
> . ' ` `. |
> . '. '
> . 0 0 ' `.
> ' `
> ; `
> .' `
> ; U `
> ; '; `
> : | ;.. :` `
> : `;. ```. .-; | '
> '. ` ``.., .' :' '
> ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am foul mouthed spammer in sci.math, so stupid and insane am I that I use names like the above to post with, and is my contempt of everything and everbody around me. I am a misanthrope, who hates everybody including myself. I never have a good word to say about anything because I am a living pile of shit manure, John Gabriel.
> ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` ` ; ; ' '
> ` `. ````'''''' ' '
> ` . ' '
> / ` `. ' ' .
> / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
> / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
> / .'' ; ` .' `
> ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
> "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
> ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
> :' | ' ` , `. `
> | ' ` ' `. `
> ` ' ` ; `. |
> `.' ` ; `-'
> `...'
>
>
>
>
> Univ Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
> Physics dept
> Joao Rodrigues
> Somnath Bhattacharyya
> John Carter
> Andrew Chen
> Darell Comins
> Robert De Mello Koch
> Arthur Every
> Andrew Forbes
> Kelvin Goldstein
> Vishnu Jejjala
> Robert Joubert
> Jonathan Keartland
> Nukri Komin
> Bruce Mellado
> Deena Naidoo
> Mervin Naidoo
> Alex Quandt
> Elias Sideras-Haddad
> Martin Ntwaeaborwa
>
>
> Durban Univ, South Africa math dept
>
> Dr. D. Brijlall
> Dr. D Day
> Dr. DB Lortan
> Dr. A Maharaj
> Dr. S Moyo
> Dr. S Rajah
> Dr. D Singh
>
> University Witwatersrand South Africa math dept
> Betsie Jonck
> Jesse Alt
> Margaret Archibald
> Charlotte Brennan
> Sonja Currie
> Alexander Davison
> Mensah Folly-Gbetoula
> Marie Grobbelaar
> Yorick Hardy
> Meira Hockman
> Sameerah Jamal
> Abdul Kara
> Arnold Knopfmacher
> Wen Chi Kou
> Christopher Kriel
> Rugare Kwashira
> Florian Luca
> Ronnie Maartens
> Carminda Mennen
> Manfred Moller
> Eunice Gogo Mphako-Banda
> Augustine Munagi
> Loyiso Nongxa
> Bruce Watson
> Yevhen Zelenyuk
>
>
>
> /\-------/\
> \::O:::O::/
> (::_ ^ _::)
> \_`-----'_/
> You mean the classroom is the world, not just my cubbyhole in South Africa?