tisdag 23 juni 2020 kl. 17:42:54 UTC+2 skrev bassam karzeddin:
> On Monday, June 22, 2020 at 9:41:12 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> > On Sunday, May 31, 2020 at 2:00:37 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> > > Date: May, 31, 2020
> > >
> > > Let me repeat only one of my very old lessons about the fake Cardano formula of the cubic equation solutions not necessarily for academic theoretical scientists but very necessary for clever school students and interested amateurs and laypersons (if at all existing)
> > >
> > > Consider this very simple "INSOLVABLE" Diaphontine Equation
> > >
> > > (n^3 = mn^2 + m^3), ... Eqn. (1), where (n, m) are coprime positive integers
> > >
> > > Of course, for every beginner student in number theory, Eqn (1) doesn't have any integer solution only from the first look, Why?
> > >
> > > Simply because the integer (m) divides exactly the RHS but doesn't divide exactly the LHS, hence a very clear contradiction that implies no existing integers (n, m) can ever satisfy this D. Eqn. (1), (PROOF FINISHED)
> > >
> > > Note: Divides exactly means that the result is Integer and doesn't divide exactly means a result is a rational number that is not an integer
> > >
> > > Now, where is the illusion in this very old story? wonder!
> > >
> > > Consider an innocent academic mathematician who missed it completely from the first look or a devilish academic mathematician (in power) who refused to let it go simply as it is indeed and wanted to make an endless huge business, fame and fake long history from this lousy situation by exploiting the modest intelligence of innocent people and see how would they act accordingly either by stupid or innocent or devilish intention which is more probable
> > >
> > > How would they act to make three alleged wonderful solutions from this insolvable D.Eqn.(1) and go further for a so-called fundamental theorem of algebra, quintic equations, and higher ... etc
> > >
> > > First, they would tell you to divide the whole Eqn. (1) by the integer (m^3) where they assume (x = n/m) and very simply rearrange the terms where they get the following wonderful irreducible cubic polynomial:
> > >
> > > (x^3 - x^2 - 1 = 0), that must have at least one real algebraic root and two other complex roots that are dependent solely on that alleged algebraic root as per their established fundamental theorem of algebra
> > >
> > > But how would they complete their obvious mind cheat and convince you about their alleged existing real root where you already know that no such integers (n, m) ever exist to satisfy their (x = n/m)? wonder!
> > >
> > > They would simply present it in decimal rational form and add their three meaningless dots (...) after some approximation and tell you that is an irrational algebraic number root
> > >
> > > How is it possible if the integers (n, m) don't even exist? wounder!
> > >
> > > Dear reader, don't wonder any more and you would certainly like the solutions to so an unbelievable limit despite knowing the fact just placed before your eyes
> > >
> > > Look very carefully here to realize the illusionary solutions with tones of long historical fart philosophy, logic, etc, ...
> > >
> > > They would simply let you believe that there are two integers that can satisfy this D.Eqn. (1), by convincing you of their endless approximations where (m = 10^k, and n is an integer with (k + 1) digits, where k is a natural number that tends to no number like their fiction infinity
> > >
> > > So, as a first approximation, when (k = 1, they choose n = 14), and they get (x = n/m = n/10^k = 14/10 = 1.4
> > >
> > > And when k=2, they make n= 146, where (x = 146/100 = 1.46) as second approximation
> > >
> > > Similarly when k=3, n= 1465, and x=1.465, and when k=4, n=14655, then x=1.4655, this process doesn't end since basically there are no existing integers as we saw together from the first glance above
> > >
> > > but they wouldn't tell you the truth, but continuing more and more to reach the unreachable integers that never exist except in their minds
> > >
> > > And when k=5, n=146557, but since that is absolutely impossible task as searching for something existing only in human minds they finally surrender by completing their solution with three meaningless dots (...) and being too careful to present it in a decimal notation form so that you don't notice anything but feel happier when you are feeling closer to that fabricated real algebraic roots as this
> > >
> > > x = 146557.../100000... = No number / No number = No number (as per our irrefuitable mentioned rigorous proof above
> > >
> > > But the very silly last trick they do employ on you is by writing the solution by decimal notational form as if it is any magical tool that can simply turn the non-existing numbers to real numbers where they present it for you in this following standard form
> > >
> > > (x = 1.46557...), and telling you that is an irrational algebraic root and also impossible to exactly construct by any means
> > >
> > > And to have more fun, they use this fabricated alleged real root to extract other two complex roots so that they comply with their designed fundamental theorem of algebra where they already established the imaginary numbers by very foolish decisions (i.e never any true discovery) for the same purpose of cubic equation solutions by so many historical figures like Cardano and many alike
> > >
> > > And many very similar tragic stories were well-fabricated about many most likely non-existing historical persons and very genius figures like Galois, Ruffunee, Able, etc where those many little young boys were discovered being very genius people usually years after their tragic death (as always as usual especially from the forged history of mathematics)
> > >
> > > Dear readers, I know that most likely you wouldn't like to get anything or maybe innocently incapable of understanding my very clear point about what I wrote and maybe writing only for myself for purely near future and truer historical purposes and further documentations
> > >
> > > Copyright (c), 2020
> > > Bassam Karzeddin
> >
> > https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3717809/is-my-solution-true-or-false-for-the-following-diophantine-equation
> >
> > For all innocent minds who were very clueless about what is truly going on in your highest mathematical levels, please copy-paste, save this topic as soon as possible just before the slaves and dwarf moderators of academic professional mathematicians of all Stalk Exchange sections delete everything, again and again, to keep you as astray for the rest of your entire lives (hopelessly, aimlessly, foolishly, ... and devilishly as well) from the ever simplistic facts that need only a few minutes from an average school students to fully understand
> >
> > Make sure to have all the comments (it is only few pages), and observe carefully how stuck they are (not able to pronounce anything sensible except revenge by down voting)
> >
> > Sincerely yours (wither you do believe it or not)
> >
> > If anything not allowed to read, please inform me because I saved, copied everything over there with many thanks
> >
> > Bassam Karzeddin
> As per my earlier (100%) expectations, they have have deleted the entire very imprtant issue (with all my efforts provided with three answers)_anf further suspended me from, asking, writing, ..., etc for that innocent question, where one can see how polite and sinceer my question was before any addition from anyone? for sure
>
> It was of course a forbidden question in the world of Academia Church of mathematics, and for many several times and many similar other issues
>
> And this is the moderator's message for me
>
> https://math.stackexchange.com/users/message/4636#4636
>
> Kindly, tell me if it is visible to you or not
>
> Where my reply to them was this:
>
> Dear moderators
>
> I was expecting (100%) this reaction from you in advance if ever did you notice, where that wasn't for the first time but for many several times strictly on all your sites
>
> But there was a better way to judge the whole very important issue that is to embaressing for academic mathematicians to judge in public, by raising it officially to your highest authorities represented by the top-most reputable Journals and Universities in the field where we are quite certain that they came to know secretly all these proven public published facts since years nowadays
>
> And if cretinism is a part of science, then it mustn't stand so discriminative, stubborn and hopeless, and very shamefully against one's own rare talent for 30 years by now even by your top-authorities described above, where we supposed to belong to a century of an immediate communication and supercomputer era and still seems impossible to even convey the ever simplest facts (in mathematics) that are certainly middle school levels and deserve few minutes to fully understand and not many centuries as it is the case is so and funnily with expert academic mathematicians
>
> However, exposing those simple facts for innocent school students around the world would continue to be publically published in more and very clearer details where you can't delete and would face them again and again from so many school students unless you respect the science that supposes is (feeding, drinking and clothing you as well)
>
> And the perpetual denial of my own modest talents from the whole mathematical communities in this world since 30 years in this century is the strongest evidence of ignorance age of modern mathematics and doesn't count beside the superior truth in mathematics
>
> knowing that I have received already a threatening e.mails and calls from anonymous persons
>
> Good luck
>
> Sincerely yours
> Bassam Karzeddin
>
> June 23, 2020
I mean, it's very understandable you got banned lol

On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 11:52:14 PM UTC+3, markus...@gmail.com wrote:
> tisdag 23 juni 2020 kl. 17:42:54 UTC+2 skrev bassam karzeddin:
> > On Monday, June 22, 2020 at 9:41:12 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> > > On Sunday, May 31, 2020 at 2:00:37 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> > > > Date: May, 31, 2020
> > > >
> > > > Let me repeat only one of my very old lessons about the fake Cardano formula of the cubic equation solutions not necessarily for academic theoretical scientists but very necessary for clever school students and interested amateurs and laypersons (if at all existing)
> > > >
> > > > Consider this very simple "INSOLVABLE" Diaphontine Equation
> > > >
> > > > (n^3 = mn^2 + m^3), ... Eqn. (1), where (n, m) are coprime positive integers
> > > >
> > > > Of course, for every beginner student in number theory, Eqn (1) doesn't have any integer solution only from the first look, Why?
> > > >
> > > > Simply because the integer (m) divides exactly the RHS but doesn't divide exactly the LHS, hence a very clear contradiction that implies no existing integers (n, m) can ever satisfy this D. Eqn. (1), (PROOF FINISHED)
> > > >
> > > > Note: Divides exactly means that the result is Integer and doesn't divide exactly means a result is a rational number that is not an integer
> > > >
> > > > Now, where is the illusion in this very old story? wonder!
> > > >
> > > > Consider an innocent academic mathematician who missed it completely from the first look or a devilish academic mathematician (in power) who refused to let it go simply as it is indeed and wanted to make an endless huge business, fame and fake long history from this lousy situation by exploiting the modest intelligence of innocent people and see how would they act accordingly either by stupid or innocent or devilish intention which is more probable
> > > >
> > > > How would they act to make three alleged wonderful solutions from this insolvable D.Eqn.(1) and go further for a so-called fundamental theorem of algebra, quintic equations, and higher ... etc
> > > >
> > > > First, they would tell you to divide the whole Eqn. (1) by the integer (m^3) where they assume (x = n/m) and very simply rearrange the terms where they get the following wonderful irreducible cubic polynomial:
> > > >
> > > > (x^3 - x^2 - 1 = 0), that must have at least one real algebraic root and two other complex roots that are dependent solely on that alleged algebraic root as per their established fundamental theorem of algebra
> > > >
> > > > But how would they complete their obvious mind cheat and convince you about their alleged existing real root where you already know that no such integers (n, m) ever exist to satisfy their (x = n/m)? wonder!
> > > >
> > > > They would simply present it in decimal rational form and add their three meaningless dots (...) after some approximation and tell you that is an irrational algebraic number root
> > > >
> > > > How is it possible if the integers (n, m) don't even exist? wounder!
> > > >
> > > > Dear reader, don't wonder any more and you would certainly like the solutions to so an unbelievable limit despite knowing the fact just placed before your eyes
> > > >
> > > > Look very carefully here to realize the illusionary solutions with tones of long historical fart philosophy, logic, etc, ...
> > > >
> > > > They would simply let you believe that there are two integers that can satisfy this D.Eqn. (1), by convincing you of their endless approximations where (m = 10^k, and n is an integer with (k + 1) digits, where k is a natural number that tends to no number like their fiction infinity
> > > >
> > > > So, as a first approximation, when (k = 1, they choose n = 14), and they get (x = n/m = n/10^k = 14/10 = 1.4
> > > >
> > > > And when k=2, they make n= 146, where (x = 146/100 = 1.46) as second approximation
> > > >
> > > > Similarly when k=3, n= 1465, and x=1.465, and when k=4, n=14655, then x=1.4655, this process doesn't end since basically there are no existing integers as we saw together from the first glance above
> > > >
> > > > but they wouldn't tell you the truth, but continuing more and more to reach the unreachable integers that never exist except in their minds
> > > >
> > > > And when k=5, n=146557, but since that is absolutely impossible task as searching for something existing only in human minds they finally surrender by completing their solution with three meaningless dots (...) and being too careful to present it in a decimal notation form so that you don't notice anything but feel happier when you are feeling closer to that fabricated real algebraic roots as this
> > > >
> > > > x = 146557.../100000... = No number / No number = No number (as per our irrefuitable mentioned rigorous proof above
> > > >
> > > > But the very silly last trick they do employ on you is by writing the solution by decimal notational form as if it is any magical tool that can simply turn the non-existing numbers to real numbers where they present it for you in this following standard form
> > > >
> > > > (x = 1.46557...), and telling you that is an irrational algebraic root and also impossible to exactly construct by any means
> > > >
> > > > And to have more fun, they use this fabricated alleged real root to extract other two complex roots so that they comply with their designed fundamental theorem of algebra where they already established the imaginary numbers by very foolish decisions (i.e never any true discovery) for the same purpose of cubic equation solutions by so many historical figures like Cardano and many alike
> > > >
> > > > And many very similar tragic stories were well-fabricated about many most likely non-existing historical persons and very genius figures like Galois, Ruffunee, Able, etc where those many little young boys were discovered being very genius people usually years after their tragic death (as always as usual especially from the forged history of mathematics)
> > > >
> > > > Dear readers, I know that most likely you wouldn't like to get anything or maybe innocently incapable of understanding my very clear point about what I wrote and maybe writing only for myself for purely near future and truer historical purposes and further documentations
> > > >
> > > > Copyright (c), 2020
> > > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > >
> > > https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3717809/is-my-solution-true-or-false-for-the-following-diophantine-equation
> > >
> > > For all innocent minds who were very clueless about what is truly going on in your highest mathematical levels, please copy-paste, save this topic as soon as possible just before the slaves and dwarf moderators of academic professional mathematicians of all Stalk Exchange sections delete everything, again and again, to keep you as astray for the rest of your entire lives (hopelessly, aimlessly, foolishly, ... and devilishly as well) from the ever simplistic facts that need only a few minutes from an average school students to fully understand
> > >
> > > Make sure to have all the comments (it is only few pages), and observe carefully how stuck they are (not able to pronounce anything sensible except revenge by down voting)
> > >
> > > Sincerely yours (wither you do believe it or not)
> > >
> > > If anything not allowed to read, please inform me because I saved, copied everything over there with many thanks
> > >
> > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > As per my earlier (100%) expectations, they have have deleted the entire very imprtant issue (with all my efforts provided with three answers)_anf further suspended me from, asking, writing, ..., etc for that innocent question, where one can see how polite and sinceer my question was before any addition from anyone? for sure
> >
> > It was of course a forbidden question in the world of Academia Church of mathematics, and for many several times and many similar other issues
> >
> > And this is the moderator's message for me
> >
> > https://math.stackexchange.com/users/message/4636#4636
> >
> > Kindly, tell me if it is visible to you or not
> >
> > Where my reply to them was this:
> >
> > Dear moderators
> >
> > I was expecting (100%) this reaction from you in advance if ever did you notice, where that wasn't for the first time but for many several times strictly on all your sites
> >
> > But there was a better way to judge the whole very important issue that is to embaressing for academic mathematicians to judge in public, by raising it officially to your highest authorities represented by the top-most reputable Journals and Universities in the field where we are quite certain that they came to know secretly all these proven public published facts since years nowadays
> >
> > And if cretinism is a part of science, then it mustn't stand so discriminative, stubborn and hopeless, and very shamefully against one's own rare talent for 30 years by now even by your top-authorities described above, where we supposed to belong to a century of an immediate communication and supercomputer era and still seems impossible to even convey the ever simplest facts (in mathematics) that are certainly middle school levels and deserve few minutes to fully understand and not many centuries as it is the case is so and funnily with expert academic mathematicians
> >
> > However, exposing those simple facts for innocent school students around the world would continue to be publically published in more and very clearer details where you can't delete and would face them again and again from so many school students unless you respect the science that supposes is (feeding, drinking and clothing you as well)
> >
> > And the perpetual denial of my own modest talents from the whole mathematical communities in this world since 30 years in this century is the strongest evidence of ignorance age of modern mathematics and doesn't count beside the superior truth in mathematics
> >
> > knowing that I have received already a threatening e.mails and calls from anonymous persons
> >
> > Good luck
> >
> > Sincerely yours
> > Bassam Karzeddin
> >
> > June 23, 2020
> I mean, it's very understandable you got banned lol