On Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 10:32:54 AM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 11:48:06 PM UTC+3, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 2:28:57 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > It mustn't be used in any serious physical important studies since this would be very dangerous FOR SURE
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > You mean like landing a probe with near pinpoint accuracy on Mars, so far away that a radio signal take several minutes to arrive there from Earth. Let's see you do that with your goofy little system, Crank Boy. Counting your fingers and toes just won't do it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > You are a typical Academic professional mathematician, Right?
> > >
> >
> > No.
> >
> >
> > > Then keep the technology issues aside for its true makers, since they are certainly better than you in your maths, but you don't know this fact yet
> > >
> >
> > The math works with amazing precision. Deal with it, Crank Boy. Your goofy system is entirely useless.
> >
> >
> > > What did I mean exactly is something that is impossible to be well-understood especially by YOU
> > >
> > > I meant to say along with your example if the distance in (mm) from a position on earth you choose to a position on Mars is (N) (mm), where (N) is a natural number and a side of any right-angle triangle, and once you reduce that distance only by one (mm), then that triangle is no more any right angle, FOR SURE
> > >
> >
> > Pure gibberish!
> >
> >
> > > If you still can't believe what I tought you earlier,
> >
> > You can't teach anything, BKK. Your mission seems to be to confuse and mislead students to bring us back to the stone age. Or maybe you are just extremely stupid. Or both.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Dare you get your 40 degrees angle in only one triangle, but with ***EXACT*** known sides moron?
> > >
> dc-t Wrote:
> >
> > Did that yesterday for the 100th time. A triangle with sides 1, sin(40 degrees) and sin(50 degrees) units of length. Deal with it, Crank Boy. Your pathetic little system will never go anywhere. It won't get you to the next village, never mind landing on Mars. Yes, I can see you are insanely jealous. A total failure.
> >
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> > Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
> So, obviously you DO mean a Right-Angle Triangle with sides *EXISTS*:
>
> [1, sin(40 degrees) and sin(50 degrees) units of length]
>
> And since those angles are well-known to be a real irrational algebraic number (that aren't real constructible numbers) then it is impossible to construct them *EXACTLY* but can be always expressed numerically with endless digital or rational decimal forms in accordance with your maths but *not mine* Right?
>
> OK, Now your triangle can always be scaled to natural numbers with any approximations you may be able to obtain very accurately, such that by scaling your *SAME TRIANGLE* without any loss of any identity based on similarity as this for your triangle:
>
> 10^n, (10^n)*sin(40 degrees) and (10^n)*sin(50 degrees) units of length.
>
> Where (n) is a natural number that corresponds to the number of digits to your approximations such that you have the triangle sides always with integers, Right?
>
> But, I truly have checked the first 10 thousand digits of your endless approximations, where not a single case gave me any right-angle triangle you talk about, and so utterly I had noticed an error that is absolutely increasing drastically without limits to form the required right-angle triangle
>
> So to say, where is your right-angle triangle that you are after it to convince the so little sheep about its true existence? wonder!
>
> Do you mean that RAT is still staying somewhere at your sweet Paradise that stays deep into your minds? Wonder!
>
> Or do you mean frankly that nothing can be achieved truly in mathematics without a very clear betray under the sunlight and everyone's own eyes and minds attention as well to the holiest theorem of Pythagoras? wonder
>
> Is it truly a very smart act or very devilish *CRIME* acts by mythematickers to betray mercilessly also the so innocent human minds and uprising generations for all their lives about those many many too silly issues? Wonders!
>
> Don't mathematics itself and societies you belong to (feed, drinks, clothes) you all to teach them true mathematics instead of cheating them and destroying their brains for day and night with so much of rubbish about your non-existing numbers going to no numbers with your subtle fiction of infinity to this so unbelievable limits? wonders
>
> Aren't you so shameful of your own existence after all those too many elementary proofs brought solely by the *KING* to your attention where you still acting and pretending that you didn't see or hear about them? Wonders
>
> Or do you want seriously more powerful proofs from the *SKY*? No wonder!
>
> Don't you know yet that you are the core seed of all kinds of corruptions you see around? wonder!
>
> So, no doubt that you have to be replaced not far away from now, FOR SURE
> BKK

Who would believe you now anymore after a public published irrefutable proof about the non-existing angles like your 40 degrees angle?
Go and argue with the natural numbers themselves since they say the truth loudly 🔊 more than any human do, FOR SURE
🔊 Bassam Karzeddin 🔊

On 8/13/2023 8:04 PM, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> On Sunday, October 27, 2019 at 10:32:54 AM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
>> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 11:48:06 PM UTC+3, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> On Saturday, October 26, 2019 at 2:28:57 PM UTC-4, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It mustn't be used in any serious physical important studies since this would be very dangerous FOR SURE
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean like landing a probe with near pinpoint accuracy on Mars, so far away that a radio signal take several minutes to arrive there from Earth. Let's see you do that with your goofy little system, Crank Boy. Counting your fingers and toes just won't do it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are a typical Academic professional mathematician, Right?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Then keep the technology issues aside for its true makers, since they are certainly better than you in your maths, but you don't know this fact yet
>>>>
>>>
>>> The math works with amazing precision. Deal with it, Crank Boy. Your goofy system is entirely useless.
>>>
>>>
>>>> What did I mean exactly is something that is impossible to be well-understood especially by YOU
>>>>
>>>> I meant to say along with your example if the distance in (mm) from a position on earth you choose to a position on Mars is (N) (mm), where (N) is a natural number and a side of any right-angle triangle, and once you reduce that distance only by one (mm), then that triangle is no more any right angle, FOR SURE
>>>>
>>>
>>> Pure gibberish!
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you still can't believe what I tought you earlier,
>>>
>>> You can't teach anything, BKK. Your mission seems to be to confuse and mislead students to bring us back to the stone age. Or maybe you are just extremely stupid. Or both.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dare you get your 40 degrees angle in only one triangle, but with ***EXACT*** known sides moron?
>>>>
>> dc-t Wrote:
>>>
>>> Did that yesterday for the 100th time. A triangle with sides 1, sin(40 degrees) and sin(50 degrees) units of length. Deal with it, Crank Boy. Your pathetic little system will never go anywhere. It won't get you to the next village, never mind landing on Mars. Yes, I can see you are insanely jealous. A total failure.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
>>> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com
>> So, obviously you DO mean a Right-Angle Triangle with sides *EXISTS*:
>>
>> [1, sin(40 degrees) and sin(50 degrees) units of length]
>>
>> And since those angles are well-known to be a real irrational algebraic number (that aren't real constructible numbers) then it is impossible to construct them *EXACTLY* but can be always expressed numerically with endless digital or rational decimal forms in accordance with your maths but *not mine* Right?
>>
>> OK, Now your triangle can always be scaled to natural numbers with any approximations you may be able to obtain very accurately, such that by scaling your *SAME TRIANGLE* without any loss of any identity based on similarity as this for your triangle:
>>
>> 10^n, (10^n)*sin(40 degrees) and (10^n)*sin(50 degrees) units of length.
>>
>> Where (n) is a natural number that corresponds to the number of digits to your approximations such that you have the triangle sides always with integers, Right?
>>
>> But, I truly have checked the first 10 thousand digits of your endless approximations, where not a single case gave me any right-angle triangle you talk about, and so utterly I had noticed an error that is absolutely increasing drastically without limits to form the required right-angle triangle
>>
>> So to say, where is your right-angle triangle that you are after it to convince the so little sheep about its true existence? wonder!
>>
>> Do you mean that RAT is still staying somewhere at your sweet Paradise that stays deep into your minds? Wonder!
>>
>> Or do you mean frankly that nothing can be achieved truly in mathematics without a very clear betray under the sunlight and everyone's own eyes and minds attention as well to the holiest theorem of Pythagoras? wonder
>>
>> Is it truly a very smart act or very devilish *CRIME* acts by mythematickers to betray mercilessly also the so innocent human minds and uprising generations for all their lives about those many many too silly issues? Wonders!
>>
>> Don't mathematics itself and societies you belong to (feed, drinks, clothes) you all to teach them true mathematics instead of cheating them and destroying their brains for day and night with so much of rubbish about your non-existing numbers going to no numbers with your subtle fiction of infinity to this so unbelievable limits? wonders
>>
>> Aren't you so shameful of your own existence after all those too many elementary proofs brought solely by the *KING* to your attention where you still acting and pretending that you didn't see or hear about them? Wonders
>>
>> Or do you want seriously more powerful proofs from the *SKY*? No wonder!
>>
>> Don't you know yet that you are the core seed of all kinds of corruptions you see around? wonder!
>>
>> So, no doubt that you have to be replaced not far away from now, FOR SURE
>> BKK
>
> Who would believe you now anymore after a public published irrefutable proof about the non-existing angles like your 40 degrees angle?

Do you seriously not understand how to create a 9-ary circle division?
Think of a pizza cut into 9 equal pieces. You have got to be full of
shit not when you say 40 degree angle does not exist. Wow!

> Go and argue with the natural numbers themselves since they say the truth loudly 🔊 more than any human do, FOR SURE
> 🔊 Bassam Karzeddin 🔊