_AP's 257th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments and the sloppy diagram pictures of Atoms-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus

AP's 257th book of science// Chronicling the two most sloppy famous Physics-Chemistry Experiments and the sloppy diagram pictures of Atoms-- Electrolysis of Water & Rutherford-Bohr nucleus

The two sloppiest Famous Science Experiments in Recorded History, AP's 257th book of science
4 views
Subscribe

Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
2:48 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The first sloppiest Science Experiment in Science History is Water Electrolysis.

The second sloppiest Science Experiment is Rutherford-Bohr-Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment where they end up concluding atoms have nuclei.

One of the most sloppiest physical science experiments in recorded history. It was started by Humphry Davy in 1806 in England, the electrolysis of water. Not the experiment of splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, but the sloppiness of where no-one bothered to weigh the hydrogen and oxygen to see if water is H4O or is H2O.

Of course, well Davy and his pupil Faraday probably could never measure the weight of hydrogen to oxygen. But sometime in the 20th century, we had precision instruments to weigh the hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube. But no physicist or chemist had enough brain marbles to do that.

No, these half marbled scientists looked at the hydrogen test tube and said " behold us, thy tube is twice the volume of the oxygen tube" and stopped all further experimentation.

Not a single physicist or chemist had enough of a marbled brain case to ask, well, let us measure the weight of the test tubes, and in atomic mass units amu, if the hydrogen in the hydrogen test tube is 1/4 the weight of the oxygen in the oxygen test tube, then AP is correct, Water formula is really H4O. But if the hydrogen is 1/8 the mass in amu of the oxygen then mainstream physics and chemistry is correct, water is H2O.

So, well, does Dr. Nigel Lockyer or Dr. Lia Merminga or Sanford Lab have a 1/2 marbled brain case or do they have more marbles to complete and fulfill a thorough investigation of Water, and its true formula.

AP, King of Science

The two sloppiest Famous Science Experiments in Recorded History, AP's 257th book of science
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
3:02 PM (2 hours ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
The second sloppiest experiment that is famous is the Rutherford-Bohr-Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment where they concluded Atoms have a dense solid nucleus. When they should have focused attention on the fact that the bounce back alpha particles at 180 degrees had more velocity coming out than going in. This means a Head-On Collision with something more massive and moving at a far faster speed than the alpha particle. This means atoms have no nucleus but a chain of muons thrusting through a proton torus.

Fools are today's current physicists, with their balls of subatomic particle clumped in a nucleus, started by the Rutherford gold leaf experiment. But Rutherford and Bohr were absent minded on interpretation of gold leaf experiment for a alpha particle that bounces back at 180degrees with a faster exit speed than entrance speed, is because the alpha particle hit Head-On collision with a chain of 79 gold atom muons doing the Faraday law inside a 79x840 windings of a gold proton torus. Bohr and Rutherford became absent minded about physics-- not realizing that a bounce back with faster speed out meant the collision was not a sedentary nucleus of large mass, but becuase 79 muons rammed head-on into the incoming alpha particle.

Physics 7 fools of Standard Model of Physics-Pallab Ghosh,Dr.Sheldon Glashow,Dr.Peter Higgs,Dr.Ed Witten,Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.Brendan Casey,Prof Graziano Venanzoni.

Fools cannot understand that in Rutherford gold foil experiment when the alpha particle bounces back at greater velocity then what it entered the gold atom.

AP's favorite argument against the Rutherford-Bohr Model of atomic nucleus, is the argument where a car collides head-on with a truck, and note what happens.

Before collision
Car Truck
1000 3000 mass
20 -20 speed
20000 -60000 momentum

After collision
1000 3000 mass
-40 0 speed
-40000 0 momentum

So in the Rutherford experiment of 1909, if they had noted the faster speed, they could have decided that the correct interpretation was some alpha particles collided with a more massive object like the 79 Muons inside of a 79 Proton torus for each gold atom. A alpha particle that hits 79 muons head on going in the opposite direction would eject the alpha particle at 180 degrees back to the source with increased velocity of the alpha particle.

Fermilab & brainwashed fools, Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.Brendan Casey,Prof Graziano Venanzoni, too brainwashed to see muon is true electron of atoms stuck inside 840MeV Proton torus doing Faraday law, and the reason for its excess wobble.

Fermilab & brainwashed fools, Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.Brendan Casey,Prof Graziano Venanzoni, too brainwashed to see muon is true electron of atoms stuck inside 840MeV Proton torus doing Faraday law, and the reason for its excess wobble.

Physicists of today are too stupid to do physics. They cannot see that 105MeV X 9 is within sigma error of the neutron and proton of 940MeV and 938MeV, meaning that the actual proton is just 840MeV with a muon stuck inside going round and round in the Faraday law.

In fact our physicists of today are all failures with their Standard Model and their subatomic particles that are balls that sit around and have no purpose, function, or task or job.

Idiots and fools are today's current physicists, with their balls of subatomic particle clumped in a nucleus, started by the Rutherford gold leaf experiment. But Rutherford and Bohr were absent minded on interpretation of gold leaf experiment for a alpha particle that bounces back at 180degrees with a faster exit speed than entrance speed, is because the alpha particle hit Head-On collision with a chain of 79 gold atom muons doing the Faraday law inside a 79x840 windings of a gold proton torus. Bohr and Rutherford became absent minded about physics-- not realizing that a bounce back with faster speed out meant the collision was not a sedentary nucleus of large mass, but becuase 79 muons rammed head-on into the incoming alpha particle.

Why so dumb are present day physicists that they rather have Maxwell's antisymmetric Equations of EM theory rather than admit, the Dirac magnetic monopole is the 0.5MeV particle that the fools of Fermilab and CERN think is the Atom's electron.

This story below by BBC, tells us more about how far brainwashing can go and extend as to make utter fools of today's current physics professors. Not a one of them has a 1/2 marble of logical intelligence, no, they have feed by mouth and suckled tit of brainwashing.

--- quoting BBC ---
Scientists near Chicago say they may be getting closer to discovering the existence of a new force of nature.
They have found more evidence that sub-atomic particles, called muons, are not behaving in the way predicted by the current theory of sub-atomic physics.
Scientists believe that an unknown force could be acting on the muons.
More data will be needed to confirm these results, but if they are verified, it could mark the beginning of a revolution in physics.

All of the forces we experience every day can be reduced to just four categories: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force. These four fundamental forces govern how all the objects and particles in the Universe interact with each other.
The findings have been made at a US particle accelerator facility called Fermilab. They build on results announced in 2021 in which the Fermilab team first suggested the possibility of a fifth force of nature.
Since then, the research team has gathered more data and reduced the uncertainty of their measurements by a factor of two, according to Dr Brendan Casey, a senior scientist at Fermilab.
"We're really probing new territory. We're determining the (measurements) at a better precision than it has ever been seen before."
In an experiment with the catchy name 'g minus two (g-2)' the researchers accelerate the sub-atomic particles called muons around a 15m-diameter ring, where they are circulated about 1,000 times at nearly the speed of light. The researchers found that they might be behaving in a way that can't be explained by the current theory, which is called the Standard Model, because of the influence of a new force of nature.

Scientists say they have found "strong evidence" for the existence of a new force of nature
Although the evidence is strong, the Fermilab team hasn't yet got conclusive proof.
They had hoped to have it by now, but uncertainties in what the standard model says the amount of wobbling in muons should be, has increased, because of developments in theoretical physics.
In essence, the goal posts have been moved for the experimental physicists.
Fermilab

Based on a 2,700-hectare site near Chicago, Fermilab is America's premier particle physics lab
The researchers believe that they will have the data they need, and that the theoretical uncertainty will have narrowed in two years' time sufficiently for them to get their goal. That said, a rival team at Europe's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are hoping to get there first.
Dr Mitesh Patel from Imperial College London is among the thousands of physicists at the LHC attempting to find flaws in the Standard Model. He told BBC News that the first people to find experimental results at odds with the standard model would be one of the all time breakthroughs in physics.
"Measuring behaviour that doesn't agree with the predictions of the Standard Model is the holy grail for particle physics. It would fire the starting-gun for a revolution in our understanding because the model has withstood all experimental tests for more than 50 years."
Fermilab says that its next set of results will be "the ultimate showdown" between theory and experiment that may uncover new particles or forces.
LHCb in 2018

Alright, I am adding a third to the 2 experiments, a third that is the picture mindset or diagram drawn of atoms through the history of physics. A picture is often more damaging to learning and understanding true physics when that picture is wrong.

The picture of an atom as a tiny ball sphere was alright for the majority of physics history starting in Ancient Greek times and right up to Dalton's Atomic theory 1804.

But, it was no longer acceptable to draw Atoms as little ball spheres from 1870 onwards. I say 1870 because Maxwell Electromagnetic equations were well known 1860-1870. And a prime law in that Maxwell theory was Faraday law with a geometry of a coil with thrusting bar magnet.

What I am saying is that from 1870 onwards, the drawing and picturing of Atoms should have discarded the little ball drawing and start replacing it with a Coil and a bar-magnet thrusting through the coil as the picture of the true Atom. Other EM laws should then enhanced the coil + bar-magnet.

Then of course, we started to get subatomic particles with JJ Thomson 1897, Rutherford 1908 and many others-- the proton, electron, neutron, photon.

And here the drawings of Atoms and subatomic particles should have completely discarded the silly little balls pictures of Atoms and their subatomic particles. And a wholescale attempt at making atoms and their subatomic particles be pictures and diagrams of the laws of Electromagnetic theory-- the neutron a parallel plate capacitor, the muon the true electron of atoms as bar magnet thrusting through proton torus of 840MeV. The Dirac magnetic monopole-- which Thomson and all the physicists of the 20th century thought was the electron of atoms turns out to be the Dirac magnetic monopole and its picture is a closed pencil ellipse, same as the picture of a photon.

You see, crude cave-man pictures and drawings hinder science, and retards science. For if the drawings and pictures of Atoms and subatomic particles had started to utilize EM laws as the drawings, we would not have been plagued by that colossal dunce physics program called the Standard Model, a model for logic failures and idiots of physics.

AP, King of Science