In the following 12 part series that was never published, we see the Art of the Con.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-prescient-documentary-that-donald-trump-tried-to-suppress/ar-AA1fiob9

On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 4:44:01 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote: [...]

The title should read: Mainstream math academia _very_ different from conman Trump

Crank John Gabriel, aka Eram semper recta wrote:
> In the following 12 part series that was never published, we see the Art of the Con.
>
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-prescient-documentary-that-donald-trump-tried-to-suppress/ar-AA1fiob9

Thank you for the link John, this is very interesting.

When it comes to compare Donald J. Trump to anyone here, you are
the one matching the most features, by far !

- arrogance
- ignorance
- stupidity
- rudeness
- bad faith
- arguing by insults
- proven wrong, still pretending it never happened
- spouting nonsense
- profanities
- bad temper
- bad shape
- homophobic
- anti-elitism
- liar
- famous (somewhat) for what you are: a moron

what you don't match at all is :

- healthy (well, Trump is not as rich as he pretends)
- big fan base

are you bad as golf also ? sexist ?

On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 10:52:25 UTC-4, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 4:44:01 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote: [...]
>
> The title should read: Mainstream math academia _very_ different from conman Trump

You mean cons like you? Claiming that my HGT was known and then writing Lim before each constant term and claiming it is mainstream? Chuckle.

HGT: (f(x+h)-f(x))/h = f'(x) + Q(x,h)

Douche bag Feldhase writes:

lim (h->0) (f(x+h)-f(x))/h = lim (h->0) f'(x) + lim (h->0) Q(x,h) [FF]

And then concludes that lim (h->0) (f(x+h)-f(x))/h = f'(x).

Problem is that lim (h->0) (f(x+h)-f(x))/h never produces a difference quotient that represents the tangent line in terms of f.

Another problem is that in my theorem, ALL the terms are ***CONSTANT*** and taking limits does not change anything. In fact, any varying of h will render the identity false since each secant line has a UNIQUE h. One cannot simply toss h away. Moreover, the arithmetic mean f'(x)+Q(x,h) is not the same if h changes, meaning that the definition of integral would fail, but alas, as we know the definition of integral is sound:

Area(x,h) = h*[f'(x) + Q(x,h)] = \int_x^{x+h} f'(x) dx

You'll notice that the vile shit never addresses the above fact and that if h goes to 0, then the area of any integral is ZERO.

All these and more explained in the Holy Grail of Calculus:

https://www.academia.edu/105576431/The_Holy_Grail_of_Calculus

But in [FF], Q(x,h) absconds, and the right hand side magically evolves into a difference quotient f'(x) that is the same as rise/run of the tangent line.

Spoiler: Just because the tangent line slope is called f'(x) does not mean it could not have been called ts(x). There is simply no way to find the derivative rigorously in the bullshit known as mainstream calculus.

https://www.academia.edu/62358358/My_historic_geometric_theorem_of_January_2020

On 8/15/2023 9:18 AM, Python wrote:
> Crank John Gabriel, aka Eram semper recta wrote:
>> In the following 12 part series that was never published, we see the
>> Art of the Con.
>>
>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-prescient-documentary-that-donald-trump-tried-to-suppress/ar-AA1fiob9
>
> Thank you for the link John, this is very interesting.
>
> When it comes to compare Donald J. Trump to anyone here, you are
> the one matching the most features, by far !
>
> - arrogance
> - ignorance
> - stupidity
> - rudeness
> - bad faith
> - arguing by insults
> - proven wrong, still pretending it never happened
> - spouting nonsense
> - profanities
> - bad temper
> - bad shape
> - homophobic
> - anti-elitism
> - liar
> - famous (somewhat) for what you are: a moron
>
> what you don't match at all is :
>
> - healthy (well, Trump is not as rich as he pretends)
> - big fan base
>
> are you bad as golf also ? sexist ?

Wow. That about sums it up.

On 8/15/2023 9:18 AM, Python wrote:
> Crank John Gabriel, aka Eram semper recta wrote:
>> In the following 12 part series that was never published, we see the
>> Art of the Con.
>>
>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-prescient-documentary-that-donald-trump-tried-to-suppress/ar-AA1fiob9
>
> Thank you for the link John, this is very interesting.
>
> When it comes to compare Donald J. Trump to anyone here, you are
> the one matching the most features, by far !
>
> - arrogance
> - ignorance
> - stupidity
> - rudeness
> - bad faith
> - arguing by insults
> - proven wrong, still pretending it never happened
> - spouting nonsense
> - profanities
> - bad temper
> - bad shape
> - homophobic
> - anti-elitism
> - liar
> - famous (somewhat) for what you are: a moron
>
> what you don't match at all is :
>
> - healthy (well, Trump is not as rich as he pretends)
> - big fan base
>
> are you bad as golf also ? sexist ?

recta is busy spending money on hitlers art? Humm... ;^o

On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:52:25 PM UTC+3, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 4:44:01 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote: [...]
>
> The title should read: Mainstream math academia _very_ different from conman Trump

Yes, they are quite different, generally speaking, the mainstream with their alleged tops hardly noticeable, they live lonely in dark biting each other online where still nobody cares about their whole existence, one cannot truly compare them even with a good fatballer boy (not necessarily the best) or compare them with even a little singer 😉 or a famous politician like Tramp as well

They are completely forgotten catagory of human beings like where rarely they come in the front pages

This is the unpleasant fact of mathematicians in our days

Bassam karzeddin 🔊

On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 14:12:10 UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/15/2023 9:18 AM, Python wrote:
> > Crank John Gabriel, aka Eram semper recta wrote:
> >> In the following 12 part series that was never published, we see the
> >> Art of the Con.
> >>
> >> https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-prescient-documentary-that-donald-trump-tried-to-suppress/ar-AA1fiob9
> >
> > Thank you for the link John, this is very interesting.
> >
> > When it comes to compare Donald J. Trump to anyone here, you are
> > the one matching the most features, by far !
> >
> > - arrogance
> > - ignorance
> > - stupidity
> > - rudeness
> > - bad faith
> > - arguing by insults
> > - proven wrong, still pretending it never happened
> > - spouting nonsense
> > - profanities
> > - bad temper
> > - bad shape
> > - homophobic
> > - anti-elitism
> > - liar
> > - famous (somewhat) for what you are: a moron
> >
> > what you don't match at all is :
> >
> > - healthy (well, Trump is not as rich as he pretends)
> > - big fan base
> >
> > are you bad as golf also ? sexist ?
> Wow. That about sums it up.

No, it doesn't moron. It sums up Jean Pierre Messager (aka Python, JPM, YBM) and you.

> recta is busy spending money on hitlers art? Humm... ;^o

You're a little snake. I was prepared to excuse your stupidity, but now you will be ignored.

On Tuesday, 15 August 2023 at 16:57:47 UTC-4, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:52:25 PM UTC+3, Fritz Feldhase wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 4:44:01 PM UTC+2, Eram semper recta wrote: [...]
> >
> > The title should read: Mainstream math academia _very_ different from conman Trump
> Yes, they are quite different, generally speaking, the mainstream with their alleged tops hardly noticeable, they live lonely in dark biting each other online where still nobody cares about their whole existence, one cannot truly compare them even with a good fatballer boy (not necessarily the best) or compare them with even a little singer 😉 or a famous politician like Tramp as well
>
> They are completely forgotten catagory of human beings like where rarely they come in the front pages
>
> This is the unpleasant fact of mathematicians in our days
>
> Bassam karzeddin 🔊

They are not at all different. Both are con artists.

tisdag 15 augusti 2023 kl. 18:19:04 UTC+2 skrev Python:
> Crank John Gabriel, aka Eram semper recta wrote:
> > In the following 12 part series that was never published, we see the Art of the Con.
> >
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/the-prescient-documentary-that-donald-trump-tried-to-suppress/ar-AA1fiob9
> Thank you for the link John, this is very interesting.
>
> When it comes to compare Donald J. Trump to anyone here, you are
> the one matching the most features, by far !
>
> - arrogance
> - ignorance
> - stupidity
> - rudeness
> - bad faith
> - arguing by insults
> - proven wrong, still pretending it never happened
> - spouting nonsense
> - profanities
> - bad temper
> - bad shape
> - homophobic
> - anti-elitism
> - liar
> - famous (somewhat) for what you are: a moron
>
> what you don't match at all is :
>
> - healthy (well, Trump is not as rich as he pretends)
> - big fan base
>
> are you bad as golf also ? sexist ?
And both think they're geniuses.