On Saturday, July 25, 2020 at 10:54:25 AM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> This is a translation for a published article of mine written in Arabic Languge to Einglish Languge
>
> To Modern Forged Mathematics
>
> The big lie about what is known as the reputable and very reliable scientific sources for publishing houses and prestigious universities in the whole world, especially in mathematics and similar theoretical sciences such as logic, philosophy and physics
>
> Of course, the simple professional reader may rise up from the title and consider it nonsense, but the sane or natural and unbiased researchers usually give himself the rare opportunity to know the truth of the matter before he rushes to judgment and that at least between him/her and selves and regardless of what would affect them because The truth is usually completely unimportant as long as it is not released by those described above
>
> Very briefly. This topic is not new but has become outdated by many elementary irrefutable proofs most suitable for middle school students
>
> Because I had published it in my files publicly and repeatedly in many free public websites and in the English language, because many people know it well, including most of the students and researchers who speak Arabic also
>
> And since I found by long personal experience on the Internet from the year 2004 to the date above, that English speakers have a very profound problem in understanding the most basic matters in mathematics, which are certainly an average school level of all dimensions. Which prompted me to confirm my claims proven in the beautiful Arabic language, perhaps it is possible that these simple facts will be picked up by some of the specialists or researchers or Al-Nuzhah students and the impartial of any false sensitivity against what is proven absolutely without any doubt whatsoever
>
> I will not dwell on you and I will present the incontrovertible proof that blows up all of these historically falsified maths called modern or contemporary to a degree that is unbelievable at first glance and which required a public flyer because it is impossible for the seventh to accept those sources described in the above or any official authorities in Mathematics, as it contradicts and immediately destroys all inherited, ancient and very erroneous beliefs that are widespread worldwide.
>
> And to take the opportunity to understand and understand what I am saying immeadeatly. The student or researcher should have minimal interest in solving simple (numerical) Diaophontine equations
>
> Here is an example:
>
> What is the solution to the following (nonzero) numerical D.Equation?
>
> I will write the characters in English letters as the keyboard may not be eligible for this
>
> (m ^ 3 = 3 * n * m ^ 2 + m ^ 3)
>
> Of course, such issues are very simple numerical with respect to the number beginning with the science of numbers very easy at first sight and so that they knows immediately that no such non-zero integers (n, m) ever exist
>
> The impossibility of finding such natural numbers achieves that equation and no matter how big we are making such numbers (n, m) as
>
> Because the non-negotiable proof is very simple, it can be left to the reader to confirm first due to its absolute simplicity
>
> But what if someone decides to deceive everyone for several centuries by finding three solutions instead of one and so that at least one of them is a real root and the other two are right from that alleged real root directly and using imaginary numbers as well?
>
> How is that, or what, rather, is that absurd mental trick? I wonder
>
> Simply, it is suggested that you divide the Diaophontine equation above by the number (m^3)
>
> So the following equation will be produced with you
>
> (n / m)^3 - 3 * (n / m) - 1 = 0
>
> You were told to subtitute (x = n / m)
>
> To produce the following irreversible cubic algebraic equation
>
> (x^3 - 3*x - 1 = 0)
>
> And so that this equation is well known to mathematics from many ancient and modern sources such as Wikipedia that it has a real solution that represents the cost of an angle (pi/9 = 20) degrees and two imaginative solutions that are related to other alleged root (x) when both (n, m) tend to be large enough where (m) is a power of 10 and (n) is a natural number with the same number of digits for (m), where they use the decimal notation devilishly in order that you don't notice the number is only rational (x = n/m) and absolutly impossible to be that irrational number (in their minds) that they all beileave
>
> Have you ever seen a sillyer mind deceptive trick more than this greatest ever scandle for all of them in the whole history of science as well? wonder!
>
> The trick here makes you admit that the real solution is written in a decimal point way, and they are originally a relative number in which the numerator is given by a certain number of digits and divided by a number of ten power (denominator) and with the same number of digits for the numerator
>
> And to complete the pillars of the big mental deception, they add the three dotted points (...) after a certain number of terms and to the right of the decimal point to justify that this number is a non-relative root based on the essentialism of flowed algebra basic theorem.
>
> But that is impossible to establish according to the Cardano equation, as well as the exclusivity of the addition to the absence of the existence of an unlimited number of digits because that simply becomes no number in too elementary mathematics and also it is not permissible in the holy principles of arithmetic to divide two numbers each consisting of infinite numbers of the number of those digits Numbers
>
> So what can you learn from all this?
>
> 1) The real solution is not really present for this cubic equation, but rather a never-ending constructible approximations, which is certainly a relative approximation generallyin rationals
>
> 2) There is no really what is known as fictional numbers and it is well remembered that it was not the beginning of a true discovery but rather a completely wrong premise about the cube root of two
>
> 3) There is no continuity in the real numbers, (two lines proof published earlir in my posts desite all the huge volumes written about continiouty
>
> 4) The inability to understand that real numbers are originally created from one that is easy to find and construct because they are originaly present and existing as they are once one being the only true creator of those existing numbers
>
> 5) The basic theory of algebra is never valid but certainly flowed for sure
>
> 6) The non-existence of most of the known angles of past and present in mathematics
>
> There is a lot about it posted on my public files
>
> I wish you the best of luck in understanding what we have already announced again and again and again
>
> Good Luck
>
> Bassam King Karzeddin

What kind of a too silly human mind cheat is that?

Aren't you able yet to see it more clearly than ever?

No wonders!

BKK 🔊