On Sunday, November 24, 2019 at 12:17:28 PM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> Hints: this had been proven and well-explained in my published posts
>
> And to generalize this, I shall make this as a general theorem
>
> Theorem: It is like the seventh impossible for an existing real number to represent exactly a sequence or a series sum
>
> ****************************************EXAMPLES************************
>
> Consider the historical first discovered irrational number as sqrt(2) based only on the Pythagorean theorem
>
> Then my theorem implies that there are uncountable decimal rational numbers that are strictly *******LESS THAN****** sqrt(2), that is also **IM[PSSIBLE** to obtain by any represented sequences or any series sums, hence sqrt(2) doesn't represent the limit of anything but a unique existing number being exactly the diagonal distance of a square with existing unity side distance
>
> Proof FINISHED, FOR SURE
>
> Now, let the specialised academic professionals represent my same proof in different styles that they can easily understand
>
> Wikipedia writers or secretive researchers are also encouraged for this work,
>
> (but with very clear original oldest references and never like fabricated or concluded as they like references),
>
> And Nobel public heretic academic professionals (If at all existing from any field and not necessarily only poor mathematicians), are so welcomed to do it publically and openly here on sci. math (as being originated first on sci. math)
>
> Regards
>
> Copyright (c), 2019
> Bassam Karzeddin