On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 4:20:27 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 10:56:37 PM UTC+3, Don Redmond wrote:
> > On Monday, April 17, 2017 at 12:30:06 PM UTC-5, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > Based on my recent posts including irrefutable proofs and new definition for the real existing numbers, one simply can refute many well established theorems in old mathematics, using those new simple proven concepts, for sure
> > >
> > > I had some rigorous many examples that are indeed can invalidate all those old fake theorems that were built upon clear wrong understanding of what is the truth of the real existing numbers
> > >
> > > Any talented a mature or professional mathematicians is welcomed to participate in this very sensitive issue gladly
> > >
> > > So, this is an announcement of the horrible death of the fundamental theorem of algebra, for sure
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > > 17 th, April, 2017
> >
> > So how are you going to kill off the FTA? Since you apparently don't believe in complex numbers or real numbers, in general, is your new version going to be something like: every polynomial, of degree n, with rational coefficients has at most n rational roots or at most n constructible roots or something like that?
> >
> > Don
> Please understand that I am not any killer, but a true rescuer of all fictions that are killing human minds for sure
>
> So, you may consider me the Fiction Killer of Mathematics
>
> About imaginary numbers or the majority of our current real numbers, it was never a matter of believe, but a matter of rigorous and irrefutable proofs that are still challenging and PUBLISHED there in my posts, where simply no one dared to refute them clearly and so openly, even that no one would also dare to accept them so openly, since they are not produced by an authority
>
> And you may simply imagine what type of world's top professional mathematicians do we have in plenty those days, especially that they can not refute the proofs, nor dare to accept it and built farther on it, wonder!
>
> I think you are smart enough to get my point, but with little modification, about roots of polynomials:
>
> 1) A polynomial, of degree (n), with rational coefficients has at most (n)
> number of real existing constructible roots, and at least no roots at all
>
> 2) An approximation unreal roots can be obtained OR expressed only in real constructible numbers that are layers of rational numbers
>
> 3) No imaginary or complex roots exist to any polynomial
>
> 4) Any odd Degree polynomial equation with rational coefficients, must have at least one real existing constructible root, or unreal Approximate constructible root
>
> 5) There are many more to this important issue
>
> Regards
> Bassam King Karzeddin
> 18 th, April, 2017
You can't run away safely with this refutation
BKK