On Sunday, December 1, 2019 at 9:19:31 PM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> Can clever school students and amateurs in mathematics truly understand the impossibility of the general solutions by radicals for polynomials of degree higher than forth in just a few minutes?
>
> A question made solely by the *KING* on Quora just now, but let us see if the moderators mathematicians would like to release it and don't have intentional control on its content especially for my contents (as always as usual)
>
> Of course, it is completely the greatest mathematical sin of the academic professional mathematicians and alike since my published answers in my public profiles were already given to them freely and repeatedly since years but certainly, they don't want the innocent clever school kids to learn them in only one page and a few minutes at most (not only in this very dirty site (by vast majorities of its very dirty members) for sci. math, but also on Quora, and MSE and every moderated site as well, and most probably on the highest prestigious fake levels of official alleged topmost reputable Journals and Universities as well, and FOR SURE
>
> Once a clever school student or a mature layperson learn truly the very easy trick, then he must *ALONE* understand what do I mean by the Global proven corruption and unbelievable artificial stupidity of the academic mathematical communities around the whole world for sure
> ***********************************************
>
> OK, let us go directly to the core point by repeating the lesson several times
>
> Consider this simple insolvable Diophantine Equation
>
> (n^5 - m^5 = n*m^4), ...... (1), where (n, m) are non-zero integers and
> gcd(n, m) = 1,
>
> Of course, and from the first look, one can easily see that dividing both sides of equation (1), that (n) or (m) divides *EXACTLY* the Left-Hand Side but doesn't divide exactly the Right-hand side of the same equation
>
> Hence a rigorous contradiction of unsolvability of Eqn. (1)
>
> *Note: divides exactly means the result is an integer and doesn't divide exactly means the result is a fraction rational number that is not an integer
>
> Where a fraction which isn't an integer doesn't equal to an integer
>
> Proof completed (FINISHED) FOR SURE
> ***************************************************
>
> But note that how magicians (I mean strictly *ALLEGED* genius *GLOBAL* world mathematicians) would make the same very simple problem by very silly and cheap cheat last for centuries and never understood up to this date
>
> (But they have certainly and secretly well-understood it from my older posts for sure, but don't like to teach the so innocent students about it for many other unnecessary buissness and physicological so irrelevant problems that were well-explained earlier for sure )
> *************************************************
>
> What is the silly cheap cheat trick? wonder!
>
> They simply divide the whole Eqn. (1) by (m^5) and let (x = n/m), then rearranging the terms to get this famous insolvable polonomial by radicals
>
> (x^5 - x - 1 = 0), where their solution is impossible to be out side the endless rational field form for (x = n/m) by equevelent form like this:
>
> x = A(k)/10^{k - 1}, Where (n = A(k) is an integer with k integer number of digits, and (m = 10^{k - 1}))
>
> That is to say, the solution *APPROXIMATION* is a ratio of two large numbers that never exist from proof we have above
>
> To explain it in 10 base number system, they get a no numbers like this
>
> (n = 16730397826141868...), and (m = 10000000000000000...), and their ratio
> becomes like this:
> x = 16730397826141868.../10000000000000000... = No existing number, as per rigorous proof above for non-existing integers (n, m)
>
> BUT what another silly magic trick they use is the ***DECIMAL NOTATION*** that makes you feel happy and relaxed when they give it to you magically like this:
>
> x = 1.6730397826141868...
>
> At all cases, they must tell the truth that the whole issue is only an approximation where no need to add classes of unreal numbers and be completely legal (as simple as that) for sure
>
> Of course, you wouldn't ask about the extra meaningless dots since that had been exposed almost hundreds of times for sure
>
> And please don't ask me about other four complex roots since they are strictly derived from that non-existing root, because that much larger fictions were also exposed in many earlier *PUBLISHED POSTS* for sure
>
> And please don't ask me again about graphing the function and crossing the (X-Axis), then the real root is the intersection,...etc, since continuity of real numbers were proven fake in many older *PUBLISHED* posts of the *KING* FOR SURE
>
> However, if only you DO learn this perfectly from the *KING*, then you are certainly a truer genius than SO many fake genius historical figures FOR SURE
>
> But if you don't then alas, nothing can help FOR SURER
>
> Clever People who well-understood this issue are so kindly requested to globally spread it in order to save many other helpless people from the devilish *DISRESPECTED* cheaters magicians on this earth immediately the *KING* ORDERS, FOR SURE
>
> Copyright (c), 2019
> Bassam Karzeddin