On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 7:39:14 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 7:12:47 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > She also sold Russia our Uranium.
> > So Who is the real Russian asset?
> > The Russia Hoax goes back to
> > Obama gate... They were colluding.
> > She contests her election loss.
> > MAGA has the same right.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> Who can protect Hillary who paid for the Russia collusion Hoax
> found to be a lie over Trump... someone the democrats don't like.
> How could they get away with spying on the Trump campaign?
> as it was proved to have happened?
> She claimed Trump was doing something she was...
> She sold US Uranium to Russia. Who can overlook that?
The deep state is protecting the far left.
A corrupt DOJ and FBI as a starter Mitch.
They are trying their hearts out to cover up
The Biden crime syndicate.

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 8:18:44 PM UTC-4, Dan joyce wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 7:39:14 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:

> The deep state is protecting the far left.
> A corrupt DOJ and FBI as a starter Mitch.
> They are trying their hearts out to cover up
> The Biden crime syndicate.

Hmmm... another really bad case of Foxitis. See my reply to Chris for a possible cure.

Dan

On 8/30/2023 7:26 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 8:18:44 PM UTC-4, Dan joyce wrote:
>> On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 7:39:14 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> The deep state is protecting the far left.
>> A corrupt DOJ and FBI as a starter Mitch.
>> They are trying their hearts out to cover up
>> The Biden crime syndicate.
>
> Hmmm... another really bad case of Foxitis. See my reply to Chris for a possible cure.

Fox News? You think they are the only outlet that is trying to say what
is actually occurring at the border?

Oh, please, eat rock. Fool.

On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 10:12:47 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> She also sold Russia our Uranium.
> So Who is the real Russian asset?
> The Russia Hoax goes back to
> Obama gate... They were colluding.
> She contests her election loss.
> MAGA has the same right.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch

On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 8:18:44 PM UTC-4, Dan joyce wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 7:39:14 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 7:12:47 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > She also sold Russia our Uranium.
> > > So Who is the real Russian asset?
> > > The Russia Hoax goes back to
> > > Obama gate... They were colluding.
> > > She contests her election loss.
> > > MAGA has the same right.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > Who can protect Hillary who paid for the Russia collusion Hoax
> > found to be a lie over Trump... someone the democrats don't like.
> > How could they get away with spying on the Trump campaign?
> > as it was proved to have happened?
> > She claimed Trump was doing something she was...
> > She sold US Uranium to Russia. Who can overlook that?
> The deep state is protecting the far left.
> A corrupt DOJ and FBI as a starter Mitch.
> They are trying their hearts out to cover up
> The Biden crime syndicate.

Yes. To dismantle Russiagate fully, you'll need the deep state. Whether they provided the narrative to HRC: this is feasible.
Certainly they did the footwork.
https://thegrayzone.com/?s=Russiagate
All of Russophobia; the choice to reignite the cold war; it is all to be blamed on the U$FG ultimately.
Their need for an enemy is thus.
Finally they are picking on somebody that is half their size.
The lies are abominable, and accountability is going to be a real bitch.
Complicity was her name...

On 8/29/2023 9:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:31:44 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>>> Trump and his henchmen (those not in prison for their roles in the Russia case) want to turn over democratic Ukraine to his bum buddy Putin. Makes you proud, don't it, Mitch? Unfortunately, it was not possible to prosecute Trump as he was supposedly the US president at the time.
>
>> Biden created Afghanistan. He gave it to the Taliban.
>
> Biden did not create a 2O-years war, the longest in US history. It could not possibly have ended well. Trump certainly didn't help matters with his deal with the Taliban.

Trump had explicit conditions with very serious consequences, and would
have never gave up our airbase! Bagram, and left billions of state of
the art weapons behind. Wow, you are a tool.

>
>>>> USA has is own border issues. Ukraine is highly corrupt, and is being
>>>> invaded. I guess their border is more important than the USA border?
>>
> >
>>> You can't compare Putin's genocidal war of conquest on the Ukrainian people with impoverished families fleeing across the Rio Grande.
>
>> The USA needs to control it's own borders. Look at the massive hurricane
>> of deadly drugs flooding across the border now, thanks to The
>> el'Biden... They are killing many people! It is a deadly assault on the
>> USA.
>
> You really must explore alternative sources of news to Fox Noooz and company. They have recently been forced to publicly admit to knowingly lying to viewers, leading to massive lawsuits against them, with more to come, doubtless totaling the billions in the end. Don't make the same mistakes they made.

On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 3:57:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/29/2023 9:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:31:44 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >>>>>> Trump and his henchmen (those not in prison for their roles in the Russia case) want to turn over democratic Ukraine to his bum buddy Putin. Makes you proud, don't it, Mitch? Unfortunately, it was not possible to prosecute Trump as he was supposedly the US president at the time.
> >
> >> Biden created Afghanistan. He gave it to the Taliban.
> >
> > Biden did not create a 2O-years war, the longest in US history. It could not possibly have ended well. Trump certainly didn't help matters with his deal with the Taliban.

> Trump had explicit conditions with very serious consequences, and would
> have never gave up our airbase! Bagram, and left billions of state of
> the art weapons behind.

[snip]

The Foxitis talking again?

As I understand it, poorly motivated Afgan government soldiers had no interest in being last to die in a lost cause. They deserted en masse as you would expect. There was nothing the US could have done about it at that point. The whole point was to cut their losses and just get out, not to continue fighting. TWENTY F---ING YEARS for nothing. FIVE TIMES LONGER than the US role in WW2!!! Both the USA and the USSR before them got their butts kicked.

Dan

On 8/31/2023 8:29 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 3:57:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/29/2023 9:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:31:44 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump and his henchmen (those not in prison for their roles in the Russia case) want to turn over democratic Ukraine to his bum buddy Putin. Makes you proud, don't it, Mitch? Unfortunately, it was not possible to prosecute Trump as he was supposedly the US president at the time.
>>>
>>>> Biden created Afghanistan. He gave it to the Taliban.
>>>
>>> Biden did not create a 2O-years war, the longest in US history. It could not possibly have ended well. Trump certainly didn't help matters with his deal with the Taliban.
>
>> Trump had explicit conditions with very serious consequences, and would
>> have never gave up our airbase! Bagram, and left billions of state of
>> the art weapons behind.
>
> [snip]
>
> The Foxitis talking again?

No. You keep bringing it up. Why? Anyway, why was Bagram given/served up
to the enemy? Why! My god this is stupid, el'oBiden at its best.

> As I understand it, poorly motivated Afgan government soldiers had no interest in being last to die in a lost cause. They deserted en masse as you would expect. There was nothing the US could have done about it at that point. The whole point was to cut their losses and just get out, not to continue fighting. TWENTY F---ING YEARS for nothing. FIVE TIMES LONGER than the US role in WW2!!! Both the USA and the USSR before them got their butts kicked.

Part of the conditions wrt Trump included, if you touch anybody on our
side in a negative way, you will be bombed back to the moon and back.
Big time, kaboom. Biden is a loon.

Trump, or any sane person, would not give up Bagram and all of those
weapons. Who is in charge of Bagram now? The CCP?

Yikes!

On 8/31/2023 8:29 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 3:57:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/29/2023 9:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:31:44 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump and his henchmen (those not in prison for their roles in the Russia case) want to turn over democratic Ukraine to his bum buddy Putin. Makes you proud, don't it, Mitch? Unfortunately, it was not possible to prosecute Trump as he was supposedly the US president at the time.
>>>
>>>> Biden created Afghanistan. He gave it to the Taliban.
>>>
>>> Biden did not create a 2O-years war, the longest in US history. It could not possibly have ended well. Trump certainly didn't help matters with his deal with the Taliban.
>
>> Trump had explicit conditions with very serious consequences, and would
>> have never gave up our airbase! Bagram, and left billions of state of
>> the art weapons behind.
>
> [snip]
>
> The Foxitis talking again?
>
> As I understand it, poorly motivated Afgan government soldiers had no interest in being last to die in a lost cause. They deserted en masse as you would expect. There was nothing the US could have done about it at that point. The whole point was to cut their losses and just get out, not to continue fighting. TWENTY F---ING YEARS for nothing. FIVE TIMES LONGER than the US role in WW2!!! Both the USA and the USSR before them got their butts kicked.
>
> Dan

Think of a strategy akin to something like: If we found a damn sniper
during the reduction of troops in Afghanistan, wrt the rules and
conditions, we would conduct heavy saturated cluster bombing campaigns
all over terrorist positions, and sweep them out of existence. Then we
will try the reduction process over again.

We will always keep Bagram and all of the weapons therein!!! Forever.

The problem with the USA southern border is too many enemy agents have
already entered and have access to a deadly opiate, deadly on the
microgram level... Thanks el, oBiden and friends! Thanks a lot, you punks.

On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 11:49:02 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/31/2023 8:29 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 3:57:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> >> On 8/29/2023 9:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:31:44 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> Trump and his henchmen (those not in prison for their roles in the Russia case) want to turn over democratic Ukraine to his bum buddy Putin.. Makes you proud, don't it, Mitch? Unfortunately, it was not possible to prosecute Trump as he was supposedly the US president at the time.
> >>>
> >>>> Biden created Afghanistan. He gave it to the Taliban.
> >>>
> >>> Biden did not create a 2O-years war, the longest in US history. It could not possibly have ended well. Trump certainly didn't help matters with his deal with the Taliban.
> >
> >> Trump had explicit conditions with very serious consequences, and would
> >> have never gave up our airbase! Bagram, and left billions of state of
> >> the art weapons behind.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > The Foxitis talking again?

> No. You keep bringing it up. Why? Anyway, why was Bagram given/served up
> to the enemy? Why! My god this is stupid, el'oBiden at its best.

> > As I understand it, poorly motivated Afgan government soldiers had no interest in being last to die in a lost cause. They deserted en masse as you would expect. There was nothing the US could have done about it at that point. The whole point was to cut their losses and just get out, not to continue fighting. TWENTY F---ING YEARS for nothing. FIVE TIMES LONGER than the US role in WW2!!! Both the USA and the USSR before them got their butts kicked.

> Part of the conditions wrt Trump included, if you touch anybody on our
> side in a negative way, you will be bombed back to the moon and back.
> Big time, kaboom. Biden is a loon.
>

Another Monday-morning quarterback. The top priority was clearly to cut their losses and get out as fast as they could, both the US and Afghan militaries, and their agents. You wanted them to save face with some vengeance bombing as they made their hasty retreat??? 20 years of bombing had gotten you nowhere and had cost you dearly.

But, enough politics.

On 8/31/2023 10:14 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
> On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 11:49:02 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/31/2023 8:29 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 3:57:26 PM UTC-4, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 8/29/2023 9:39 PM, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 4:31:44 PM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump and his henchmen (those not in prison for their roles in the Russia case) want to turn over democratic Ukraine to his bum buddy Putin. Makes you proud, don't it, Mitch? Unfortunately, it was not possible to prosecute Trump as he was supposedly the US president at the time.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Biden created Afghanistan. He gave it to the Taliban.
>>>>>
>>>>> Biden did not create a 2O-years war, the longest in US history. It could not possibly have ended well. Trump certainly didn't help matters with his deal with the Taliban.
>>>
>>>> Trump had explicit conditions with very serious consequences, and would
>>>> have never gave up our airbase! Bagram, and left billions of state of
>>>> the art weapons behind.
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> The Foxitis talking again?
>
>> No. You keep bringing it up. Why? Anyway, why was Bagram given/served up
>> to the enemy? Why! My god this is stupid, el'oBiden at its best.
>
>>> As I understand it, poorly motivated Afgan government soldiers had no interest in being last to die in a lost cause. They deserted en masse as you would expect. There was nothing the US could have done about it at that point. The whole point was to cut their losses and just get out, not to continue fighting. TWENTY F---ING YEARS for nothing. FIVE TIMES LONGER than the US role in WW2!!! Both the USA and the USSR before them got their butts kicked.
>
>> Part of the conditions wrt Trump included, if you touch anybody on our
>> side in a negative way, you will be bombed back to the moon and back.
>> Big time, kaboom. Biden is a loon.
>>
>
> Another Monday-morning quarterback. The top priority was clearly to cut their losses and get out as fast as they could, both the US and Afghan militaries, and their agents. You wanted them to save face with some vengeance bombing as they made their hasty retreat??? 20 years of bombing had gotten you nowhere and had cost you dearly.

Me?

Trump had very clear conditions. If they were violated in any way, shape
or form, would result in a massive a sustained bombing campaign. Bigger
than anything they have ever seen before. We should have never gave up
Bagram. Biden did not respect Trumps conditions at all. The suicide
bombing at Abbey gate is the result, God bless the victims of that
horrible act of terrorism. Also, why in the heck did Biden leave 70+
billion dollars of state-of-the-art weapons behind? wow. Biden gave the
enemy Bagram airbase and many, many weapons. WHY!? ;^o

The el, oBiden told everybody to surge the border, god knows how many
terrorists got in! Armed with a highly potent and deadly drug. Thanks,
asshole Biden. ;^o

>
> But, enough politics.

Okay.