On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
>
> Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
>
> Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> ******************************************
> The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> ***********************
>
> The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> ******************
> However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
>
> So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
>
> Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
>
> To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
>
> So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
>
> So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
>
> So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
>
> But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
>
> Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
>
> sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
>
> So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
>
> Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
>
> And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
>
> With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
>
> What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
>
> But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
>
> My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
>
> Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
>
> 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
>
> Similarly with two approximated digits as
>
> (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
>
> With three approximated digits we have
>
> (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
>
> Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> A(6) = 1264736
>
> Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
>
> (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
>
> Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
>
> (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> ..... ....
>
> ........
>
> Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
>
> In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
>
> Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
>
>
> Copyrights, (c), 2020
> Bassam Karzeddin

Le lundi 7 août 2023 à 06 h 14 min 07 s UTC-4, bassam karzeddin a écrit :
> On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
> >
> > Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
> >
> > Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> > ******************************************
> > The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> > ***********************
> >
> > The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> > ******************
> > However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
> >
> > So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
> >
> > Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
> >
> > To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
> >
> > So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
> >
> > So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
> >
> > So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> > [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
> >
> > But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
> >
> > Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
> >
> > sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> > cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
> >
> > So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
> >
> > Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
> >
> > And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
> >
> > With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
> >
> > What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
> >
> > But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
> >
> > My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
> >
> > Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
> >
> > 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> >
> > Similarly with two approximated digits as
> >
> > (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> >
> > With three approximated digits we have
> >
> > (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> >
> > Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> > With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> > with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> > A(6) = 1264736
> >
> > Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
> >
> > (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
> >
> > Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
> >
> > (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> > A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > ..... ....
> >
> > ........
> >
> > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> >
> > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> > We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
> >
> > Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
> >
> >
> > Copyrights, (c), 2020
> > Bassam Karzeddin

wow, BK!

> Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels

very nice! i asked GPT to summarize, do you think this synopsis expresses your point well enough?

Summary:

The author puts forth a strong argument against certain beliefs held by mathematicians, specifically around the constructibility and existence of certain angles and the triangles they create. Central to the author's argument is the concept that certain angles, like π/9 and π/7, are non-constructible and don't actually exist despite their acceptance in mathematical communities. The author emphasizes this point by calculating triangles with approximated sines and cosines of these angles and noting that they do not form right triangles, asserting this as proof of their non-existence. The mathematical exploration involves examining an integer difference, denoted as A(n)A(n), which seems to increase indefinitely as more digits are considered in the approximation. The central message is that humans, including professional mathematicians, are either unaware or deliberately ignore these facts and that these beliefs have persisted for centuries. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as the author consistently challenges mainstream mathematical beliefs and positions themselves as a lone harbinger of truth against deeply ingrained falsehoods.

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:35:42 PM UTC+3, gwen w wrote:
> Le lundi 7 août 2023 à 06 h 14 min 07 s UTC-4, bassam karzeddin a écrit :
> > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
> > >
> > > Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
> > >
> > > Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> > > ******************************************
> > > The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> > > ***********************
> > >
> > > The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> > > ******************
> > > However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
> > >
> > > So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
> > >
> > > Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
> > >
> > > To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
> > >
> > > So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
> > >
> > > So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
> > >
> > > So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> > > [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > >
> > > But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
> > >
> > > Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
> > >
> > > sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> > > cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
> > >
> > > So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
> > >
> > > Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
> > >
> > > And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
> > >
> > > With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
> > >
> > > What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
> > >
> > > But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
> > >
> > > My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
> > >
> > > Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
> > >
> > > 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > >
> > > Similarly with two approximated digits as
> > >
> > > (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > >
> > > With three approximated digits we have
> > >
> > > (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > >
> > > Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> > > With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> > > with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> > > A(6) = 1264736
> > >
> > > Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
> > >
> > > (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
> > >
> > > Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
> > >
> > > (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> > > A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > ..... ....
> > >
> > > ........
> > >
> > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > >
> > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > > ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> > > We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
> > >
> > > Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
> > >
> > >
> > > Copyrights, (c), 2020
> > > Bassam Karzeddin
> wow, BK!
> > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> very nice! i asked GPT to summarize, do you think this synopsis expresses your point well enough?
>
> Summary:
>
> The author puts forth a strong argument against certain beliefs held by mathematicians, specifically around the constructibility and existence of certain angles and the triangles they create. Central to the author's argument is the concept that certain angles, like π/9 and π/7, are non-constructible and don't actually exist despite their acceptance in mathematical communities. The author emphasizes this point by calculating triangles with approximated sines and cosines of these angles and noting that they do not form right triangles, asserting this as proof of their non-existence. The mathematical exploration involves examining an integer difference, denoted as A(n)A(n), which seems to increase indefinitely as more digits are considered in the approximation. The central message is that humans, including professional mathematicians, are either unaware or deliberately ignore these facts and that these beliefs have persisted for centuries. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as the author consistently challenges mainstream mathematical beliefs and positions themselves as a lone harbinger of truth against deeply ingrained falsehoods.

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 8:15:46 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:35:42 PM UTC+3, gwen w wrote:
> > Le lundi 7 août 2023 à 06 h 14 min 07 s UTC-4, bassam karzeddin a écrit :
> > > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > > It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
> > > >
> > > > Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
> > > >
> > > > Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> > > > ******************************************
> > > > The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> > > > ***********************
> > > >
> > > > The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> > > > ******************
> > > > However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
> > > >
> > > > So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
> > > >
> > > > Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
> > > >
> > > > To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
> > > >
> > > > So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
> > > >
> > > > So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
> > > >
> > > > So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> > > > [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > > >
> > > > But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
> > > >
> > > > Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
> > > >
> > > > sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> > > > cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
> > > >
> > > > So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
> > > >
> > > > Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
> > > >
> > > > And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
> > > >
> > > > With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
> > > >
> > > > What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
> > > >
> > > > But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
> > > >
> > > > My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
> > > >
> > > > Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
> > > >
> > > > 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > >
> > > > Similarly with two approximated digits as
> > > >
> > > > (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > >
> > > > With three approximated digits we have
> > > >
> > > > (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > >
> > > > Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> > > > With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> > > > with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> > > > A(6) = 1264736
> > > >
> > > > Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
> > > >
> > > > (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
> > > >
> > > > Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
> > > >
> > > > (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> > > > A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > > ..... ....
> > > >
> > > > ........
> > > >
> > > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > > >
> > > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > > > ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> > > > We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
> > > >
> > > > Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Copyrights, (c), 2020
> > > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > wow, BK!
> > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > very nice! i asked GPT to summarize, do you think this synopsis expresses your point well enough?
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > The author puts forth a strong argument against certain beliefs held by mathematicians, specifically around the constructibility and existence of certain angles and the triangles they create. Central to the author's argument is the concept that certain angles, like π/9 and π/7, are non-constructible and don't actually exist despite their acceptance in mathematical communities. The author emphasizes this point by calculating triangles with approximated sines and cosines of these angles and noting that they do not form right triangles, asserting this as proof of their non-existence.. The mathematical exploration involves examining an integer difference, denoted as A(n)A(n), which seems to increase indefinitely as more digits are considered in the approximation. The central message is that humans, including professional mathematicians, are either unaware or deliberately ignore these facts and that these beliefs have persisted for centuries. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as the author consistently challenges mainstream mathematical beliefs and positions themselves as a lone harbinger of truth against deeply ingrained falsehoods.
> I was quite sure that only the Artificial Intelligence would immediately well-understand mu UNIQUE points of views which are the rarest historical claims ever made in human history, where the human long standing problems (including mainly the (mathematicians, logicians, philosophers, scientists) are basically & purely physiological incurable Mental problems that are impossible to be simply solved by humans themselves,, 😉
>
> The role & importance of Artificial Intelligence must start taking over to rescue the innocent upcoming generations from those old & inhireted mental retardation problems
>
> Victory for the chat GPT even & its start era for sure
>
>
> 👏 👏 👏
> Bassam Karzeddin

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 8:15:46 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:35:42 PM UTC+3, gwen w wrote:
> > Le lundi 7 août 2023 à 06 h 14 min 07 s UTC-4, bassam karzeddin a écrit :
> > > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > > It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
> > > >
> > > > Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
> > > >
> > > > Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> > > > ******************************************
> > > > The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> > > > ***********************
> > > >
> > > > The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> > > > ******************
> > > > However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
> > > >
> > > > So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
> > > >
> > > > Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
> > > >
> > > > To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
> > > >
> > > > So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
> > > >
> > > > So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
> > > >
> > > > So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> > > > [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > > >
> > > > But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
> > > >
> > > > Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
> > > >
> > > > sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> > > > cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
> > > >
> > > > So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
> > > >
> > > > Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
> > > >
> > > > And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
> > > >
> > > > With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
> > > >
> > > > What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
> > > >
> > > > But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
> > > >
> > > > My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
> > > >
> > > > Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
> > > >
> > > > 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > >
> > > > Similarly with two approximated digits as
> > > >
> > > > (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > >
> > > > With three approximated digits we have
> > > >
> > > > (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > >
> > > > Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> > > > With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> > > > with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> > > > A(6) = 1264736
> > > >
> > > > Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
> > > >
> > > > (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
> > > >
> > > > Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
> > > >
> > > > (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> > > > A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > > ..... ....
> > > >
> > > > ........
> > > >
> > > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > > >
> > > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > > > ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> > > > We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
> > > >
> > > > Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Copyrights, (c), 2020
> > > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > wow, BK!
> > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > very nice! i asked GPT to summarize, do you think this synopsis expresses your point well enough?
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > The author puts forth a strong argument against certain beliefs held by mathematicians, specifically around the constructibility and existence of certain angles and the triangles they create. Central to the author's argument is the concept that certain angles, like π/9 and π/7, are non-constructible and don't actually exist despite their acceptance in mathematical communities. The author emphasizes this point by calculating triangles with approximated sines and cosines of these angles and noting that they do not form right triangles, asserting this as proof of their non-existence.. The mathematical exploration involves examining an integer difference, denoted as A(n)A(n), which seems to increase indefinitely as more digits are considered in the approximation. The central message is that humans, including professional mathematicians, are either unaware or deliberately ignore these facts and that these beliefs have persisted for centuries. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as the author consistently challenges mainstream mathematical beliefs and positions themselves as a lone harbinger of truth against deeply ingrained falsehoods.
> I was quite sure that only the Artificial Intelligence would immediately well-understand mu UNIQUE points of views which are the rarest historical claims ever made in human history, where the human long standing problems (including mainly the (mathematicians, logicians, philosophers, scientists) are basically & purely physiological incurable Mental problems that are impossible to be simply solved by humans themselves,, 😉
>
> The role & importance of Artificial Intelligence must start taking over to rescue the innocent upcoming generations from those old & inhireted mental retardation problems
>
> Victory for the chat GPT even & its start era for sure
>
>
> 👏 👏 👏
> Bassam Karzeddin

On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 5:24:35 AM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 8:15:46 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> > On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:35:42 PM UTC+3, gwen w wrote:
> > > Le lundi 7 août 2023 à 06 h 14 min 07 s UTC-4, bassam karzeddin a écrit :
> > > > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > > > It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
> > > > >
> > > > > Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
> > > > >
> > > > > Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> > > > > ******************************************
> > > > > The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> > > > > ***********************
> > > > >
> > > > > The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> > > > > ******************
> > > > > However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
> > > > >
> > > > > So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
> > > > >
> > > > > Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
> > > > >
> > > > > To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
> > > > >
> > > > > So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
> > > > >
> > > > > So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
> > > > >
> > > > > So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> > > > > [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > > > >
> > > > > But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> > > > > cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
> > > > >
> > > > > So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
> > > > >
> > > > > And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
> > > > >
> > > > > With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
> > > > >
> > > > > What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
> > > > >
> > > > > But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
> > > > >
> > > > > My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
> > > > >
> > > > > Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
> > > > >
> > > > > 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > > >
> > > > > Similarly with two approximated digits as
> > > > >
> > > > > (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > > >
> > > > > With three approximated digits we have
> > > > >
> > > > > (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > > >
> > > > > Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> > > > > With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> > > > > with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> > > > > A(6) = 1264736
> > > > >
> > > > > Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
> > > > >
> > > > > (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
> > > > >
> > > > > Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> > > > > A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > > > ..... ....
> > > > >
> > > > > ........
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > > > >
> > > > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > > > > ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> > > > > We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
> > > > >
> > > > > Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Copyrights, (c), 2020
> > > > > Bassam Karzeddin
> > > wow, BK!
> > > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > > very nice! i asked GPT to summarize, do you think this synopsis expresses your point well enough?
> > >
> > > Summary:
> > >
> > > The author puts forth a strong argument against certain beliefs held by mathematicians, specifically around the constructibility and existence of certain angles and the triangles they create. Central to the author's argument is the concept that certain angles, like π/9 and π/7, are non-constructible and don't actually exist despite their acceptance in mathematical communities. The author emphasizes this point by calculating triangles with approximated sines and cosines of these angles and noting that they do not form right triangles, asserting this as proof of their non-existence. The mathematical exploration involves examining an integer difference, denoted as A(n)A(n), which seems to increase indefinitely as more digits are considered in the approximation. The central message is that humans, including professional mathematicians, are either unaware or deliberately ignore these facts and that these beliefs have persisted for centuries. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as the author consistently challenges mainstream mathematical beliefs and positions themselves as a lone harbinger of truth against deeply ingrained falsehoods.
> > I was quite sure that only the Artificial Intelligence would immediately well-understand mu UNIQUE points of views which are the rarest historical claims ever made in human history, where the human long standing problems (including mainly the (mathematicians, logicians, philosophers, scientists) are basically & purely physiological incurable Mental problems that are impossible to be simply solved by humans themselves,, 😉
> >
> > The role & importance of Artificial Intelligence must start taking over to rescue the innocent upcoming generations from those old & inhireted mental retardation problems
> >
> > Victory for the chat GPT even & its start era for sure
> >
> >
> > 👏 👏 👏
> > Bassam Karzeddin
> Where are those well-known academic Trolls residents on sci.math like (Dan C T, Jan burse with many characters, Python, Sego, Philipe, ... and many others)?
>
> Would they ever comprehend a thing than even a machine with a bit of artificial intelligence could easily do?
>
> Come and learn about your perpetual incurable mental retardation for sure!
>
> Where is your angle 40 degrees Dan C, can't you check it with your DC Proof? Wonder!
>
> 🙏 don't think that I'm disappreseating your modest talents fox, but we are teaching YOU & the whole world 🌎 as well the hidden truths,where if you drop aside your many egoistic incurable physiological sever mental problems, You would certainly get completely cured & teach the whole world 🌎 about it for sure
>
> So, do something useful in your life time once aat least for sure
>
> 🔊 Bassam Karzeddin 🔊

On Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:35:42 PM UTC+3, gwen w wrote:
> Le lundi 7 août 2023 à 06 h 14 min 07 s UTC-4, bassam karzeddin a écrit :
> > On Sunday, November 8, 2020 at 8:24:47 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > > It is more than a wonderful shred piece of undeniable evidence (with integer analysis I only introduced), that must be considered as a true natural historical record to condemn very badly the general tendencies of ALL academic professional mathematicians of cheating mercilessly ALL innocent school students and ALL societies around the world for their own interest strictly
> > >
> > > Here, I would like to repeat an old lesson of mine that was publically and globally published (in the English Language) in my many older relevant posts where the academic professional mathematicians have fought against very aggressively (here on sci. math) to hide it from public visibility, and (more especially in that old traditional site for teaching wrong mathematics as Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit, ..., etc which usually (hides, dirt, modify, delete, ..., etc) most of my public published contents by its bad academic members and moderators
> > >
> > > Where their true turn must have been exactly the opposite to their (illegal, biased, discriminative, and chatting behaviours of the non-specialists and innocent school students) about their own old wrong inherited and refuted beliefs in many styles and beyond any little doubt
> > > ******************************************
> > > The very important lesson is the non-existing angles in both old and modern mathematics, where I shall consider the most famous angle that is related to old Greek's problems of impossible construction of trisecting the arbitrary angle and the famous historical proof of Wentzel in 1826, where he never understood the truth of such impossibility despite his valid conclusion
> > > ***********************
> > >
> > > The repeated lesson is about why such an angle like (pi/9 = 20 Degrees) is an impossible existence by any tools or any means where this fact is the true reason for such impossibility that is never occurred or mentioned in Wentzel famous proof in 1826
> > > ******************
> > > However, and due to human general desires and tendencies to solve anything even by exploiting the unlimited density of constructible angles were the laypersons can't generally distinguish the truth from the fact since they seem the same for them on practical matters where they never realize the human-mind cheat in this very old issue of the Greeks
> > >
> > > So, they related it to tools like a compass and unmarked straigt edge, where they claimed historically and illegally that can be made by many other different tools or methods (all based on the human very silly mind cheat)
> > >
> > > Since the tools are never related to any theoretical problems where there is always an error of measurements in any tools where the theoretical problems suddenly jump out of any true theory and people keep away from any truth that is covered by the thieves
> > >
> > > To see this plain simple cheat very clearly even for clever mid-school students, interested amateurs and laypersons, we shall consider the right angle with sides (1, sin(pi/9), cost(pi/9)) and check by ourselves that triangle is in fact impossible existence by all the tools and means as well
> > >
> > > So to say, geometrically from Wentzel proof it was well known that such angle is an impossible construction (but so utterly believed existing among mathematicians and all humans strictly)
> > >
> > > So, let us see again and again that angle like (pi/9) is in fact an absolute impossible existence, where then it is impossible to construct by any alleged tools
> > >
> > > So, consider the law of cosine again, where
> > > [sin(x)]^2 + [cos(x)]^2 = 1, where every mathematician generally believes especially that is absolutely valid when the angle is a constructible angle in a triangle (with exactly known sides)
> > >
> > > But. what people (including all the mathematicians on earth) don't know yet or more precisely don't like deliberately to know is that the PT is never valid with non-constructible angles since basically they never exist
> > >
> > > Now, we have only information about pi/9 angle about its approximated sine or cosine were generally expressed numerically as follows:
> > >
> > > sin(pi/9) = 0.342020143325668..., and:
> > > cos(pi/9) = 0.939692620785908....
> > >
> > > So let us see together and numerically as well, where the numbers are much more truthful than any human beings like where (1, sin(pi/9), cos(pi/9) is an impossible right angle triangle by any tools or means
> > >
> > > Of course, they would see that is an approximation and so and so to hide the well-spoken fact that must eventually arise
> > >
> > > And do well-remember (from elementary school lessons) that similar triangles have similar angles
> > >
> > > With the first approximation of the triangle (1, 0.3, 0.9) is a similar triangle with sides (10, 3, 9), where the angles remain unchanged and exactly similar, Right? where have no right to say false
> > >
> > > What in short I do claim with an integer analysis (I only did introduce) which isn't any kind of pure silly human mind cheat like those of the real or complex analysis in current standard mathematics (most suitable for carpentry works)
> > >
> > > But an exact undeniable analysis which only the foolish academic professional mathematicians deny globally under the sunlight
> > >
> > > My simple claim is that there is an integer difference (with similar triangles) with such non-existing angles that prevent perpetually such a right angle triangle to occur where it increases indefinitely whenever we get more approximations by more number of digits
> > >
> > > Let that integer difference be denoted by A(n), where (n) is the number of approximated digits after a decimal notation for sin and cosine of a non-constructible angle, so with (n = 1) as one digital approximation saying here in 10-base number system, we have a similar triangle which is of course not any right-angle triangle as following :
> > >
> > > 10^2 = 3^2 + 9^2 + A(1), Where, A(1) = 10, HECE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > >
> > > Similarly with two approximated digits as
> > >
> > > (100)^2 = (34)^2 + (93)^2 + A(2), Where, A(2) = 195, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > >
> > > With three approximated digits we have
> > >
> > > (1000)^2 = (342)^2 + (939)^2 + A(3), Where, A(3) = 1315, HENCE NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > >
> > > Similarly, With 4 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(4) = 18784
> > > With 5 accurate digits of accuracy, we have A(5) = 50235
> > > with 6 accurate number of digits for sin and cosine magnitude, we have
> > > A(6) = 1264736
> > >
> > > Please note and well-understand how A(n) is absolutely and indefinitely increasing where a right angle triangle with non-constructible angles as
> > >
> > > (1, sin(x), cos(x)) is absolutely impossible existence by any tools or means since the non-constructible angles simply never exist except of course in so primitive human minds for sure
> > >
> > > Now with 7 number of accurate digits of accuracy for sin and cosine of such a legendary fake angle would be like this:
> > >
> > > (10000000)^2 = (3420201)^2 + (9396926)^2 + A(7), Where
> > > A(7) = 6870123, HENCE, NO RIGHT ANGLE TRIANGLE
> > > ..... ....
> > >
> > > ........
> > >
> > > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > >
> > > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> > > ------------------------------***--------------------------------------****-------------------------*
> > > We aren't asking any specialist academic professional mathematician experts to spread immediately this proven fact and true discovery of only an amateur, but we are asking those interested unbiased and decent laypersons to spread this fact immediately once they easily well-understood it
> > >
> > > Google masters would be most likely very angry from this thread as all the mathematicians on earth as well, but the facts are much more important to be globally revealed than all existing creatures FOR SURE
> > >
> > >
> > > Copyrights, (c), 2020
> > > Bassam Karzeddin
> wow, BK!
> > Now, when do you personally expect that A(n) becomes suddenly and utterly as the non-existing number as zero in your mathematics in the order we may have hopefully such an angle like pi/9 as a true existing angle?
> > In the many Paradises of all fools where angles become like angels
> very nice! i asked GPT to summarize, do you think this synopsis expresses your point well enough?
>
> Summary:
>
> The author puts forth a strong argument against certain beliefs held by mathematicians, specifically around the constructibility and existence of certain angles and the triangles they create. Central to the author's argument is the concept that certain angles, like π/9 and π/7, are non-constructible and don't actually exist despite their acceptance in mathematical communities. The author emphasizes this point by calculating triangles with approximated sines and cosines of these angles and noting that they do not form right triangles, asserting this as proof of their non-existence. The mathematical exploration involves examining an integer difference, denoted as A(n)A(n), which seems to increase indefinitely as more digits are considered in the approximation. The central message is that humans, including professional mathematicians, are either unaware or deliberately ignore these facts and that these beliefs have persisted for centuries. The tone is somewhat confrontational, as the author consistently challenges mainstream mathematical beliefs and positions themselves as a lone harbinger of truth against deeply ingrained falsehoods.