novaBBS - sci.math - Re: (PI/2) = sin(PI/3) + sin(PI/4) ?

Re: (PI/2) = sin(PI/3) + sin(PI/4) ?

<add6166f-0bef-4039-907b-869bb4febf58n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=147140&group=sci.math#147140

X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4b45:b0:76f:130a:c957 with SMTP id su5-20020a05620a4b4500b0076f130ac957mr221221qkn.11.1693866897506;
Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e808:b0:1b9:fef8:9af1 with SMTP id
u8-20020a170902e80800b001b9fef89af1mr4048599plg.5.1693866896980; Mon, 04 Sep
2023 15:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 15:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f60d163b-6041-4d87-aeb5-aa0100baf1a6@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.186.232.116; posting-account=WJi6EQoAAADOKYQDqLrSgadtdMk3xQwo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.186.232.116
References: <f60d163b-6041-4d87-aeb5-aa0100baf1a6@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <add6166f-0bef-4039-907b-869bb4febf58n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: (PI/2) = sin(PI/3) + sin(PI/4) ?
From: b.karzed...@yahoo.com (bassam karzeddin)
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 22:34:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2606

by: bassam karzeddin - Mon, 4 Sep 2023 22:34 UTC

On Thursday, September 1, 2016 at 1:34:48 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> How close is (PI/2) = SIN (PI/3) + SIN (PI/4) ?
>
> Please forgive my skepticism concerning the modern mathematics absolute truthiness, since many issues in this regard are increasing rapidly in the discussion forums around the world these days!
>
> The question came in mind then,
>
> Why physics keeps silent which is very relevant and more realistic in this matter?
>
> Can’t physics for example (by physical measurements and best available technology tools) provide us the maximum number of accurate digits of (PI) that would (not) contradict mathematics?
>
> We know also that science applications presently doesn’t require so many digits of accuracy (may be around 13 digits only), despite having around13 trillions digits only, (out of infinite number of digits) that had been obtained so far,
>
> Noting that if we store all our known digits of (PI) (by assumed more advance technology) in only one (mm) ^3, then the whole volume of our Milky Way galaxy or our universe would be still insufficient to contain the volume of (PI) endless digits!
>
> Mentioning that is applicable to any constructible number system (not necessarily our 10 decimal number system)
>
> Regards
> Bassam king Karzeddin
> 01092016

For large values of one, one equals two, for small values of two.

tech / sci.math / Re: (PI/2) = sin(PI/3) + sin(PI/4) ?

Subject	Author
Re: (PI/2) = sin(PI/3) + sin(PI/4) ?	bassam karzeddin