On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 2:50:28 PM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> Also the question might sound as weird question but this is actually the fact, since the negative integers were actually not any true discovery but rather a decision or invention or just an agreement where they call it as a definition in order to justify illegally the unsolvable Diophantine Equation of this form
>
> (n + 1 = 0)
>
> Since, there was no solution for such equations without that decision, but later they were forced to rename the natural existing integers to be called as positive integers.
>
> And since then, they had established the additive inverse of each natural integer as being its negative integer (mirror image), where if you add them together they get vanished (n + (-n)) = 0), where this was not any possible physical reality phenomena, such that it was the start of the art of finding fictional solutions to no known problems at all
>
> **Note that this principle is used fundamentally at the set theory
>
> However the subtraction operation is actually not independently fundamental operation but sourcing directly from additive operation
>
> So, if you have an equation of this form (a - c + b = 0), you can so simply write it in its original natural shape without using the invented negative operation or the invented integer zero) as this (a + b = c)
>
> In other words, what adds so unnecessary problems to mathematics is the mathematicians themselves in order to make business and show very unnecessary talents for sure
>
> Regards
> Bassam King Karzeddin
> Dec. 27th, 2017