On Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 9:52:21 PM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 29, 2017 at 9:58:38 PM UTC+3, burs...@gmail.com wrote:
> > There is a newer post:
> > http://blog.logicalphalluses.net/2017/03/04/math-crankery-with-john-gabriel-cauchys-kludge/
> >
> > "To use this quote to cast doubt on modern mathematics (and it seems clear, that this is what Gabriel wants to do) is typical creationist logic: “Hey, I found something in a book by Cauchy that’s flawed, hence Calculus is wrong” is exactly like saying “I found an error in Darwin’s book, hence the modern theory of Evolution is wrong”. Why do cranks always think, that one single book is the infallible foundation of a whole modern scientific field?
> >
> > Well okay, in the case of creationists that’s just projection, I assume. They have an infallible book, hence the opposition must have one as well. Gabriel, it seems, regards Plato’s works (as we’ll see) as his infallible bible, hence… modern mathematicians must use Cauchy’s works as their infallible bible? Is that the reasoning here? Who knows…"
> >
> brusegan wrote:
>
> > But why don't they never ever pick on Bossom Queen Karzinom?
> > I want to see Bossom Queen Karzinom paper fold a Hendecagon.
> They certainly they would never be able to pick up on me
>
> Because they would be exposed so openly (for sure)
>
> Tell me moroo...n
>
> What can they pick up on my irrefutable (conjectures, formulas, proofs, puzzles, ... etc)
>
> Are not you here up to every post written,
> Did you see anyone daring to touch my subjects or crack anything or found a counterexample, EXCEPT for nonsense concepts, so spell the truth moron
>
> And certainly, I can make all of them look like negligible dwarfs for sure
> Did not I make it here moron, so what do you think of those dwarfs, they are not any better than here, or even better than you, all look alike for sure
>
> So, dare you touch my issues with your nonsense
>
> And better for them keep hiding when I throw you some rusted bones only
>
> And if mathematics is not made as a result of big wars or a challenge, then it is not mathematics at all for sure
>
> BK
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 20:49:19 UTC+2 schrieb shio...@googlemail.com:
> > > http://blog.logicalphalluses.net/2017/02/28/math-crankery-with-john-gabriel-calculus-102-cauchy-sequences-and-the-real-numbers/