novaBBS - sci.math - Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real arithmetical numbers of this form (q^{1/p})?

Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real arithmetical numbers of this form (q^{1/p})?

<05f62536-5d8c-4ec3-b77d-8968a367557en@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=147545&group=sci.math#147545

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4d45:0:b0:64f:92ca:5cae with SMTP id m5-20020ad44d45000000b0064f92ca5caemr71693qvm.8.1694216638587;
Fri, 08 Sep 2023 16:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d512:b0:1bb:e7ce:17d9 with SMTP id
b18-20020a170902d51200b001bbe7ce17d9mr1488514plg.6.1694216638307; Fri, 08 Sep
2023 16:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 16:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <13158f98-812e-4e7a-b664-fa9b2075b260@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.186.240.80; posting-account=WJi6EQoAAADOKYQDqLrSgadtdMk3xQwo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.186.240.80
References: <13158f98-812e-4e7a-b664-fa9b2075b260@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <05f62536-5d8c-4ec3-b77d-8968a367557en@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real
arithmetical numbers of this form (q^{1/p})?
From: b.karzed...@yahoo.com (bassam karzeddin)
Injection-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 23:43:58 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2807

by: bassam karzeddin - Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:43 UTC

On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 4:45:59 PM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> Where, (p > 2, q) are prime numbers
>
> Of course, this was proven to you over and over in my posts at the sci.math, the Math forum, and Quora, plus Stalk Exchange (where they had hidden my proofs earlier)
>
> So, I thought those people might understand by the time, but it seems so hopeless case with the vast majorities of them, so I repeated the Question for them thinking that the smart professionals would finally get my hints, but immediately was downvoted and closed, refusing to even have a little chance to understand their dogmatic old beliefs about real numbers were completely non-sense and so meaningless
>
> link:
> https://mathoverflow.net/questions/288089/why-does-fermats-last-theorem-invalidate-the-existence-of-many-real-algebraic-n?noredirect=1#comment713057_288089
>
> So, can a smart clever professional who correctly understands my simplest proofs save those dogmatic people from their own minds, please?
>
> or must I teach every professional mathematician alone about those very simple facts that do require only a drop of humanity first and a drop of intelligence second? wonder!
>
> Presently, I'm not allowed to post at MSE nor at HSE
> And since this was the last place for me to post at Overflow Mathematics at SE SO, Please rescue those astray people before they go mad, for sure
>
> Regards
> Bassam King Karzeddin
> Dec. 9th, 2017

Subject	Author
Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real	bassam karzeddin

Linus? Whose that? -- clueless newbie on #Linux

tech / sci.math / Re: Why does Fermat's last theorem invalidate all alleged real arithmetical numbers of this form (q^{1/p})?