On Monday, November 30, 2020 at 3:06:21 PM UTC+2, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> On Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 9:37:50 PM UTC+3, Bassam Karzeddin wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 4:13:42 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 5:36:19 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > > > I suppose that everybody is so familiar with the notations used in the question!
> > > >
> > > > However, if you need help to prove these mere facts, many hints are available in my posts, for sure
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > **Important notice: Please don't get so touchy since this isn't at all an issue about your so sensitive feelings, but purely about pure mathematics**
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > > > April 23ed, 2018
> > >
> > > This is another very little rigorous numerical counterexample (based on Integer Analysis with irrefutable and proven Diophantine Equation) that strictly proves and also refutes (and beyond any little doubt) that, the mathematical principles of (limits, Convergence, Cauchy sequences, Dedekind infamous cuts, Infinity fictional concept, Euler's unfinished sums, Newton's Approximations methods, Epsilon & Delta distances, Numerical rational or decimal endless representation of a real constructible numbers, and the alleged real numbers with endless significant digits to the right of the decimal notations or with endless terms, etc, etc) are all cooked up human invented fallen mathematics that are not any true discoveries, but maybe mere so easy decissions good enough for something else as (carpentary works) or else other than mathematics itself
> > >
> > > Consider the following Numerical example evidence with relation to Fermat's last theorem, where (A, B, C) are given natural numbers,
> > >
> > > Let:
> > >
> > > A = 867569735858490865304017061409147551384753718547192831
> > >
> > > B = 662670538747666907983753680457597152866152691137388307
> > >
> > > C = 980973626304803340369595949177624242734580267403237824
> > >
> > > Then we have
> > >
> > > (A/C)^3 + (B/C)^3 = 0.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 =/= 1
> > >
> > > Note that We can simply add many more digits to INTEGERS (A, B, C), where more and more 9's would be as a result, and if we keep adding digits indefinitely, our ratio becomes (0.999...), where this never can be considered as the same one, since they would constitute a counterexample to FLT, but a ratio of a clear illusion with non-existing natural numbers that are assumed in mind with endless digits
> > >
> > > And Frankly, if you miss it again and again and again as a so coward professional mathematician, then definitely, you are a traitor to all humanity and a traitor to the science that (feeds, drinks, and clothes you as well), since this basically tooooooo... easy to be fully comprehended by a (mature or clever school student or interested layperson) in just a few minutes, for sure
> > >
> > > Do you still need more and more digits for my example? wonder!
> > >
> > > I swear I have many many more, for sure
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > > April 28th, 2018
> > So, the ever simplest theme that one must fully comprehend that the so easy play can go on and on forever..., without a stop as long as natural numbers are impossible to be fully or even slightly exhausted, they are simply without any existing end, where nothing fictionally you would ever find a very cheap and clear mind barrier as a stop, or a very foolish try to finite the whole natural numbers, which was the main fictional function of the
> > legendary of "Infinity" makers and jugglers of mathematics
> >
> > then, our above numerical example can be reproduced to appear in a non-stop operation as long as numbers are freely available and "endlessly" as the following:
> >
> > A = 867569735858490865304017061409147551384753718547192831...
> >
> > B = 662670538747666907983753680457597152866152691137388307...
> >
> > C = 980973626304803340369595949177624242734580267403237824...
> >
> > Then you have this:
> >
> > [(A^3 + B^3) / C^3] = [0.999...] =/= 1
> >
> > Where this is the exact meaning of (non-existence) of a solution of Diophantine Equations with the whole natural numbers, that implies strictly the non-existence of such alleged and so fabricated real number noted by (0.999...) in mathematics as a real number and so shamefully as unity
> >
> > And once they had so devilishly established this plain brain fart fiction into your minds, then many other fictions had been poured so easily into your mind, as the real cube root of two, denoted by 2^{1/3}
> >
> > Not only that but so mercilessly, they had easily convinced you with more fictional matters as a natural consequence of other solutions of this polynomial (x^3 - 2 = 0), with so naive and illegal imagination than can you imagine about those other complex roots, that associated and with imaginary numbers, where the other two complex solutions are strictly derived from the real fictional root that can never exist or ever represent exactly any existing physical distance in our existing physical reality as the valid case for sqrt(3) for instance
> >
> > Where the refutation and the complete meaninglessness of such imaginary numbers had been PUBLISHED earlier in my earlier posts and maybe many others as well
> >
> > By the way, here is another and so easy example (out of so many) to understand strictly the total fictionality of fabricating such numbers
> >
> > Consider this so elementary mathematics
> >
> > (-1)^5 = (-1)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1)*(-1) = (-1) ----(1)
> >
> > Now take the square root of both sides of Eqn. (1), you get:
> >
> > (Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1)) = (Sqrt(-1)), Hence,
> >
> > i^5 = i, divide by (i), you get (i^4 = 1)
> >
> > Oops, this is absolutely so correct and confirms the (definition or the decision) of imaginary unit (i = Sqrt(-1)), so very happy end here, and no objection from any professional experts you would certainly encounter
> >
> > But wait a while, and consider a very similar argument here:
> >
> > (-1)^3 = (-1)*(-1)*(-1) = (-1) ------(2)
> >
> > Now take the square root of both sides of Eqn. (2), you get:
> >
> > (Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1))*(Sqrt(-1)) = Sqrt(-1), this implies
> >
> > (i^3 = i), divide by (i), Implies (i^2 = 1)
> >
> > Oops, this contrary to the basic definition of (i^2 = - 1)
> >
> > But here, in this case, you would certainly find so many professional mathematicians EXPERTS, asking you to waite, and this isn't the correct way to deal with such numbers, and it isn't necessarily always that:
> > [Sqrt(ab) = Sqrt(a)*Sqrt(b)], as if they had some mind catalogue for users "on how to deal correctly with such dangerous numbers" so that you must not arrive strictly to any contradictions, or else you must be a Troll
> >
> > Ignoring the so easy fact about the story of those fabricated imaginary numbers in mathematics, where those numbers were not at all any new meaningful discovery but simply a so naive human make as an easy decision, where they call it as a definition as if discovering new mathematical facts depends solely on our decisions or even our definitions, wonder!
> >
> > No, Discovery of new mathematical absolute facts never depend on our own existence either, for sure
> >
> > Famous Example: Humans Discovered the Pythagorean theorem properties about the physical existence distances of particular geometrical shapes as triangles in space, though it was always valid even much before our own existence or definitions or decisions, and also perpetually valid forever in space
> >
> > And this is truly why human make mathematics usually fails in the course of time, but true discoveries last forever, sure
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > April 29th, 2018
> this is a very important lesson mainly to those alleged living (Philosophers, Logicians and pure Physicians and excluding the mathematicians since they refuse stubbornly to well-understand many irrefutable proofs by natural numbers) as well, to go back many thousand years where mathematics started by no existing object like a circle (despite the fact that a tool like a compass can make it visible and apparent to your own eyes) where you do simply believe your own eyes and become a mere victim of all kinds of the mathematician's hallucinations about almost all the so-called as modern mathematics
>
> Don't let those very stupid and unbelievable dark creatures take your minds for a non-return trip to their many fake Paradises where YOU have to cure them definitely after every silly theorem was well-exposed in my current and stolen public published posts (by the academic mathematician's **THIEVES**
>
> Otherwise, Philosophers and Logicians are becoming a source of fun and Jokes
>
> Physicians would also import their many wrongs and disproven concepts and would start soon hallucinating about imaginary mass, negative and imaginary energy, ..., etc to produce many funny stories about the Universe and many others where any religion would be too shameful to include
>
> You must realize that the current modern mathematics was solely made by scientists and engineers for other practical and non-mathematical problem solution by approximations based mainly upon the carpenter's skills where the whole issue is a matter of approximated calculations (by so many methods ....)
>
> There is hardly a few correct results and truly discovered mathematics (not by any human-like axioms), mainly in geometry and number theory after the so-called Pythagorean theorem
>
> Also, remember that students around the world are generally suffering from mathematics thinking wrongly that they are incapable of understanding mathematics whereas the fact is people can't understand incomprehensible nonsense produced by many mentally retarded and mad people who were stupidly and so ****ILLEGALLY**** described as the top-most genius historical or living mathematicians (generally)
>
> There is no escape at all from many **IRREFUITABLE*** and so rigorous elementary proofs by ***NATURAL*** numbers that were ***STOLEN*** and repeatedly ***PUBLISHED*** in my free public posts
>
> However, the **ALLEGED** top-most mathematical authorities around the world are certainly very ***GUILTY*** in this regard for their entire silence and full absence for many years (acting exactly like deads) without minimum ethical requirements available among its members
>
> Where are my posts and profiles since 2004?
>
> Not only here in immoderate sites like sci. math but also on Stalk-Exchange, Quora, Reddit the Math Forum, Google, Yahoo
>
> Isn't it the greatest historical shame upon the academic proffessional mathematicians against an amateur only in such an open era of supercomputer age and immediate communications to a second with so elementary issues that need minutes to well-understand? No wounders
>
> They are spoiling my computer at work, mobile, emails, .., hiding my contents,...
>
> Thinking that would change the proven facts about their behaviours ...
>
> No, you can't hide the truth in mathematics by the spider's threads any more .... FOR SURE
>
> Bassam Karzeddin