2-Kibo Parry Volney why is Harvard's Lisa Randall and Dr. Hau CCP lackey

On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 11:36:40 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> Woodlouse of Math and Bathynomus giganteus of Physics
> On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 5:20:48 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote:
> >"CCP's lackey"
>
> AP was giving condolences to the Queen who recently passed away and it can be seen on AP's newsgroup. Read my recent posts in peace and quiet.
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!forum/plutonium-atom-universe
> > Archimedes Plutonium
> > But as AP was giving his kind condolences to the late Queen of England, in steps the insane stalkers of Zelos, Kibo Parry Moron-ey and Chris Thomasson forging AP into their insane demented "necrophilia". I have often asked for the administrators of Usenet to pull the plug on Zelos, Kibo, and C.Thomasson.
> >
> > Sci.math has a marauder gang of idiot bullies and this gang needs to be thrown out of sci.math and sci.physics.
> >
> >
> > On Friday, September 30, 2022 at 2:58:49 PM UTC-5, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> > > On 9/29/2022 10:19 PM, Michael Moroney wrote:
> > > > ☠️ of Math and ☣ of Physics Archimedes "antiscience" Plutonium
> > > > <plutonium....@gmail.com> fails at math and science:
> > > >
> > > >>> I want to fuck her corpse
> > > >
> > > > Once again, it looks like I triggered another autism meltdown by
> > > > ArchiePoo. Is it because I pointed out stuff about colors that he didn't
> > > > know, but every little kid who has ever played with paints knows? Is he
> > > > upset that he cannot gain access to the corpse of the Queen? Anyway,
> > > > StupidPlutonium seems to be in spamming mode again (still), where he
> > > > repeatedly repeats his sick desires with the body of the Queen. What can
> > > > be done to help poor autistic ArchiePoo and his autism meltdowns?
> > > I did not know that AP is into necrophilia... Wow! Talk about learning
> > > something new everyday! ;^o

3-Kibo Parry Volney why is Harvard's Lisa Randall and Dr. Hau CCP lackey

4-Kibo why is Dr.Wiles math failure-- is it because he is so dishonest of math truth, he cannot admit slant cut of cone is Oval, not ellipse and that prevents him from doing a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus?? See AP proofs below.

Kibo Parry Moroney Volney 30 year nonstop stalker
,
Volney
2 3-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,Jean Paul Van Bendegem,Johan van Benthem,Jean-Yves Beziau with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
Aug 23


,
Volney
2 unread,
2-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,ohn Lane Bell, Nuel Belnap, Paul Benacerraf, with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
Aug 23


, …
Volney
3 unread,
Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse, Peter Bruce Andrews, Lennart Aqvist, Henk Barendregt with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction.
Aug 23

Donald Trump's profile photo
Donald Trump
, …
Volney
6 unread,
Re: Rey de Reyes de la Ciencia --AP-- King of Science, what we throw out of Old Math as fakery// TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 3 for age 19-20 Sophomore year College, math textbook series, book 4
Aug 23


,
Volney
3 9m views// AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, only math textbooks with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and the only valid proof of FTC in all of mathematics.
Aug 23


> On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 1:40:39 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > "Kim Jong Un's lackey" autistically melts
> > down completely:
> >"mindless fuckdog"
> > Kibo Parry (moroney volney) replies
> > On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 1:27:42 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > >"goonclod failure of logic"
> > > makes a complete fool of himself:
> > >can be re-arranged to spell "Demon
> > > Cult: Raise Him Up!"
> > > Kibo Parry (Volney)
> > > On Friday, May 19, 2023 at 12:36:40 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
> > > > "Court Jester of Math"
> > > > fails at math and science:
> > > Kibo Parry anal sickfuck Usenet stalker assisted by his gang for 30 years of hate spew
> > >
> > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney stalks "AnalButtfuckManure Attacks" Dartmouth's Philip J. Hanlon, Stanford's Marc Tessier-Lavigne with his 10 OR 6 = 16; his ellipse a conic when it never was; his proton to electron at 938 to 0.5 MeV when in truth..
> > > > 1481 views
> > > > by Professor Wordsmith Aug 14, 2020, 11:07:05 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 102-Kibo Parry Moroney (Barry Shein's world std) stalking analbuttfuckmanure shithead of 27 years nonstop-- needs a emergency straightjacket size XXsmall
> > > > By Eduardo Remington
> > > > Jan 25, 2020, 11:53:33 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 2-fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Dan Christensen, Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP??
> > > > 102 views
> > > > by Earl Biggs Oct 11, 2020, 5:13:25 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, kill// Dan Christensen, Uncle Al, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, Dept Educ Betsy DeVos, John Baez, Port563 Gilbert Strang, Barry Shein
> > > > by Earl Biggs Oct 11, 2020, 5:01:45 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney paid stalker, NSF Betsy DeVos dept of educ says fails at math Drs. Tao, Hales, Wiles, Stillwell with their ellipse a conic when it never was, their 10 OR 3 = 13, and never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
> > > > by Herp Derpington Aug 8, 2020, 9:58:57 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Drs.Larry Summers, Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall of Harvard, teach percentages correctly??-- Moroney//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > By Michael Moroney 49 posts 519 views, 1/23/18
> > > >
> > > > Re: 1-Kibo Parry Moroney, how do you clean your dick after it has been up Barry Shein's arsehole, or does it improve your stalking
> > > > By Richard Cranium May 10, 2020, 8:30:43 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 135,566 Student victims Queen's Univ. James Leech, Arthur B. McDonald by Dan Christensen teaching 10 OR 2 = 12 with AND as subtraction, never a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus-- his mindless electron =0.5MeV when real electron o
> > > > May 10, 2021
> > > > by Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: ...although Kibo _universally regarded_ as having more physics intelligence in his shit streaked underwear than in the entire brain of Todd B Smith - Earle Jones's Stanford's math and physics dept combined
> > > > by Adolpho the Sarcastic Rooftop Monkey
> > > > Apr 10, 2021, 3:20:20 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: fuckdog boston's Kibo Parry Moroney subhuman *stalkers* Betsy DeVos, NSF Dr. Panchanathan, barry shein's world std paying how much to stalk AP? Subhuman Kibo Parry Moroney says freedom of speech means freedom to stalk, liar, cheat, steal, ,,,,
> > > > by Hewitt Buettner Oct 10, 2020, 2:55:48 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Spamming fuckdog Kibo Parry Moroney says fire Stanford's Alexander Fetter, John Lipa, William Little, Douglas Osheroff, David Ritson, H. Alan Schwettman, John Turneaure, Robert Wagoner, Stanley Wojcicki, Mason Yearian rather than let them brainwash o
> > > > by
> > > > Richard Cranium Jan 24, 2021, 3:01:28 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: 1Kibo Parry Moroney says Analbuttfuckmanure MIT, William Bertozzi, Robert Birgeneau, Hale Bradt, Bernard Burke, George Clark , Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins , Paul Joss, Vera Kistiakowsky, Earle Lomon, Irwin Pless, Paul Schechter...
> > > > by Hoofington P. McSnort Aug 26, 2020, 6:58:48 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry M on Cynthia Barnhart and why MIT is a propaganda camp not a school of higher education.
> > > > by Michael Moroney Jun 27, 2021, 3:49 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Moroney says autism // Jeffrey Goldstone, Thomas Greytak, Lee Grodzins//never realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > 3/4/18
> > > > By Michael Moroney
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Autism..says Moroney //Jacob Barandes, Howard Berg, Michael Brenner//realizing Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's monopole
> > > > by
> > > > Michael Moroney Feb 26, 2018, 11:29:08 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Vincent Meunier,Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer Polytechnic, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek,kibo Moroney Parry is the reason RPI failed ellipse is like Kibo fails with 938 is 12% short of 945
> > > > by Allen Walker Apr 13, 2019, 2:04:32 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cornell a sicko school? Re: Cornell Univ like Christensen, an education parasite //with their 3 OR 2= 5 while their 3 AND 2 = 1, embracing the contradiction Either..Or..Or..Both
> > > > by Michael Moroney Jan 18, 2019, 4:59:49 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Drs.Benedict Gross, Joseph Harris of Harvard, are you as dumb as Moroney never realizing the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV,monopole=.5MeV // 12 proofs below
> > > > by Michael Moroney Jan 2, 2018, 11:15:07 AM
> > > >
> > > > Re: Drs.Hugh Woodin,Horng-Tzer Yau of Harvard, never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Moroney//your students deserve better
> > > > by Michael Moroney Dec 29, 2017, 9:04:44 AM
> > > >
> > > > Re: chemistry cannot exist with electron 0.5 to 938 MeV Re: Drs.Thomas Rosenbaum John Schwarz Kip Thorne of CalTech/never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, 0.5MeV = Dirac monopole
> > > > by Michael Moroney Jan 25, 2018, 11:36:09 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Drs.David Cobden Victor Cook John Cramer of Univ Wash. are you as dumb as Jeff Relf, _...@__.__//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = monopole
> > > > by Michael Moroney Jan 14, 2018, 3:19:12 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney on failed physicist Steven Weinberg who cannot entertain the question of which is the real electron of atoms-- is it the muon or the 0.5MeV particle?
> > > > by Michael Moroney May 29, 2021, 9:02:21 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Cambridge, Harvard, Stanford, MIT, CalTech never does correct Logic, why an unpaid Archimedes Plutonium is doing their work
> > > > by Michael Moroney Oct 28, 2017, 11:55:50 PM
> > > >
> > > > Re: the most stupid poster of logic in sci.math for decade-- Dan Christensen, that insane Canadian stalker
> > > > by Michael Moroney Dec 24, 2017, 1:15:41 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Jeff Relf, Seattle offtopic shithead spammer says Democrats value tortured South Korean Moon Bears at trillions of dollars, while Republicans rather have rats than Moon Bears
> > > > By Michael Moroney May 10, 2021
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: South Korea frees Moon Bears, due to Ayaz apology. Glory to God Almighty, South Korea finally freeing their tortured Moon Bears
> > > > I happened to see a video of a moon bear that was freed from a bile farm (in Vietnam). Nice to see,
> > > > By Michael Moroney May 9, 2021, 9:48 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Re: Kibo Parry Moroney pink slips Sheldon Glashow, Lisa Randall, Lene Hau,Thomas Hayes, Eric Heller, Jason Hoffman, Jenny Hoffman, Gerald Holton, Paul Horowitz, John Huth, Arthur Jaffe //cannot tell apart muon = real electron and 0.5MeV Dirac monopole...
> > > > by Eldridge Art Carpenter Apr 2, 2021, 6:24 AM
> > >
> > > My 3rd published book
> > >
> > > AP's Proof-Ellipse was never a Conic Section // Math proof series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Ever since Ancient Greek Times it was thought the slant cut into a cone is the ellipse. That was false. For the slant cut in every cone is a Oval, never an Ellipse. This book is a proof that the slant cut is a oval, never the ellipse. A slant cut into the Cylinder is in fact a ellipse, but never in a cone.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PLSDQWC
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 11, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 1621 KB
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 20 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > •
> > > •
> > >
> > > Proofs Ellipse is never a Conic section, always a Cylinder section and a Well Defined Oval definition//Student teaches professor series, book 5 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 14May2022. This is AP's 68th published book of science.
> > >
> > > Preface: A similar book on single cone cut is a oval, never a ellipse was published in 11Mar2019 as AP's 3rd published book, but Amazon Kindle converted it to pdf file, and since then, I was never able to edit this pdf file, and decided rather than struggle and waste time, decided to leave it frozen as is in pdf format. Any new news or edition of ellipse is never a conic in single cone is now done in this book. The last thing a scientist wants to do is wade and waddle through format, when all a scientist ever wants to do is science itself. So all my new news and thoughts of Conic Sections is carried out in this 68th book of AP. And believe you me, I have plenty of new news.
> > >
> > > In the course of 2019 through 2022, I have had to explain this proof often on Usenet, sci.math and sci.physics. And one thing that constant explaining does for a mind of science, is reduce the proof to its stripped down minimum format, to bare bones skeleton proof. I can prove the slant cut in single cone is a Oval, never the ellipse in just a one sentence proof. Proof-- A single cone and oval have just one axis of symmetry, while a ellipse requires 2 axes of symmetry, hence slant cut is always a oval, never the ellipse.
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B081TWQ1G6
> > > • Publication date ‏ : ‎ November 21, 2019
> > > • Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > • File size ‏ : ‎ 827 KB
> > > • Simultaneous device usage ‏ : ‎ Unlimited
> > > • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > • Print length ‏ : ‎ 51 pages
> > > • Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > 
> > > 
> > > #12-2, My 11th published book
> > >
> > > World's First Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus// Math proof series, book 2 Kindle Edition
> > > by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
> > >
> > > Last revision was 15Dec2021. This is AP's 11th published book of science.
> > > Preface:
> > > Actually my title is too modest, for the proof that lies within this book makes it the World's First Valid Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for in my modesty, I just wanted to emphasis that calculus was geometry and needed a geometry proof. Not being modest, there has never been a valid proof of FTC until AP's 2015 proof. This also implies that only a geometry proof of FTC constitutes a valid proof of FTC.
> > >
> > > Calculus needs a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. But none could ever be obtained in Old Math so long as they had a huge mass of mistakes, errors, fakes and con-artist trickery such as the "limit analysis". And very surprising that most math professors cannot tell the difference between a "proving something" and that of "analyzing something". As if an analysis is the same as a proof. We often analyze various things each and every day, but few if none of us consider a analysis as a proof. Yet that is what happened in the science of mathematics where they took an analysis and elevated it to the stature of being a proof, when it was never a proof..
> > >
> > > To give a Geometry Proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus requires math be cleaned-up and cleaned-out of most of math's mistakes and errors. So in a sense, a Geometry FTC proof is a exercise in Consistency of all of Mathematics. In order to prove a FTC geometry proof, requires throwing out the error filled mess of Old Math. Can the Reals be the true numbers of mathematics if the Reals cannot deliver a Geometry proof of FTC? Can the functions that are not polynomial functions allow us to give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a Coordinate System in 2D have 4 quadrants and still give a Geometry proof of FTC? Can a equation of mathematics with a number that is _not a positive decimal Grid Number_ all alone on the right side of the equation, at all times, allow us to give a Geometry proof of the FTC?
> > >
> > > Cover Picture: Is my hand written, one page geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the world's first geometry proof of FTC, 2013-2015, by AP.
> > >
> > >
> > > Product details
> > > ASIN ‏ : ‎ B07PQTNHMY
> > > Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 14, 2019
> > > Language ‏ : ‎ English
> > > File size ‏ : ‎ 1309 KB
> > > Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
> > > Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
> > > Print length ‏ : ‎ 154 pages
> > > Lending ‏ : ‎ Enabled
> > > Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #128,729 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
> > > #2 in 45-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
> > > #134 in Calculus (Books)
> > > #20 in Calculus (Kindle Store)

Kibo's hatred of logic Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy,Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki
, …
Volney
4
unread,
7-Part List of World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic//Dan Christensen,Jan Burse,JamesKiboParry, Martin Davis, Michael A.E. Dummett, John Etchemendy, ,with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
11:53 AM


,
Volney
2
unread,
5-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,James Kibo Parry, Alan Richard Bundy, Gregory Chaitin, with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
11:49 AM


,
Volney
2
unread,
6-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,James Kibo Parry, Jack Copeland, John Corcoran, Dirk van Dalen,with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtract
11:49 AM


,
Volney
2
6m views--TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, only math textbooks teaching the true calculus with the only valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, and a geometry proof-- at that--. Geometry is easier to understand than a algebra proof. 6m views
11:46 AM


,
Volney
2
unread,
*9m views--AP's TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS, only math textbooks with a geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and the only valid proof of FTC in all of mathematics. 9m views
11:38 AM


,
Volney
2
unread,
4-Partial List of the World's Crackpot Logicians-- should be in a college Abnormal-Psychology department, not Logic// Dan Christensen, Jan Burse,Andrea Bonomi, Nicolas Bourbaki (a group of logic fumblers) with their 2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction
11:34 AM

Chris M. Thomasson's profile photo
Chris M. Thomasson
, …

31
Re: Germany's barking fuckdog Wolfgang Mueckenheim WM and his trailing barking fuckdogs Sergi_o, Jim Burns, TheRafters, Fritz Feldhase, Gus Gassmann, Ben Bacarisse, play act SPAMMING of sci.math needs to be kicked out of sci.math
9:19 AM


My 5th published book

Suspend all College Classes in Logic, until they Fix their Errors // Teaching True Logic series, book 1
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)

Last revision was 29Mar2021. This is AP's 5th published book of science.
Preface:
First comes Logic-- think straight and clear which many logic and math professors are deaf dumb and blind to, and simply refuse to recognize and fix their errors.

The single biggest error of Old Logic of Boole and Jevons was their "AND" and "OR" connectors. They got them mixed up and turned around. For their logic ends up being that of 3 OR 2 = 5 with 3 AND 2 = either 3 or 2 but never 5, when even the local village idiot knows that 3 AND 2 = 5 (addition) with 3 OR 2 = either 3 or 2 (subtraction). The AND connector in Logic stems from the idea, the mechanism involved, that given a series of statements, if just one of those many statements has a true truth value, then the entire string of statements is overall true, and thus AND truth table is truly TTTF and never TFFF. And secondly, their error of the If->Then conditional. I need to make it clear enough to the reader why the true Truth Table of IF --> Then requires a U for unknown or uncertain with a probability outcome for F --> T = U and F --> F = U. Some smart readers would know that the reason for the U is because without the U, Logic has no means of division by 0 which is undefined in mathematics. You cannot have a Logic that is less than mathematics. A logic that is impoverished and cannot do a "undefined for division by 0 in mathematics". The true logic must be able to have the fact that division by 0 is undefined. True logic is larger than all of mathematics, and must be able to fetch any piece of mathematics from out of Logic itself. So another word for U is undefined. And this is the crux of why Reductio ad Absurdum cannot be a proof method of mathematics, for a starting falsehood in a mathematics proof can only lead to a probability end conclusion.

My corrections of Old Logic have a history that dates before 1993, sometime around 1991, I realized the Euclid proof of infinitude of primes was illogical, sadly sadly wrong, in that the newly formed number by "multiply the lot and add 1" was necessarily a new prime in the indirect proof method. So that my history of fixing Old Logic starts in 1991, but comes to a synthesis of correcting all four of the connectors of Equal/not, And, Or, If->Then, by 2015.

Cover picture: some may complain my covers are less in quality, but I have a good reason for those covers-- I would like covers of math or logic to show the teacher's own handwriting as if he were back in the classroom writing on the blackboard or an overhead projector.

Product details
File Size: 773 KB
Print Length: 72 pages
Publication Date: March 12, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PMB69F5
Text-to-Speech: Enabled 
X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 
Word Wise: Not Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Screen Reader: Supported 
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled 

🐔 of Math and 🦃 of Physics Archimedes "goonclod failure of logic"
Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> makes a complete fool of himself:

> My 134th published book
>
> Introduction to TEACHING TRUE MATHEMATICS: Volume 1 for ages 5 through 26, math textbook series, book 1 Kindle Edition
> by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)
>
Why do you keep trying to brainwash poor little 5 year old kids?

WARNING TO STUDENTS, PARENTS and TEACHERS: Archimedes Plutonium is
offering to teach your children his broken physics and math. BEWARE! He
will corrupt the minds of your children! Mr. Plutonium is not content to
be a failure of math and physics all by himself. He wants everyone else
to fail as well! He teaches bizarre false physics and math, such as
atoms contain the unstable muon, water is H4O and not H2O, the ellipse
isn't a conic section, there are no negative numbers and no complex
numbers, that a sine wave isn't sinusoidal but semicircles, cycloids or
parabolas (depending on his mood), plus many, many other instances of
bad math and physics.

Plutonium has previously tried to corrupt our youth by posting his books
on Usenet. That has failed until now, perhaps in part due to the fact
Usenet is an old, dying medium, which few modern students even know of,
much less use. However, Mr. Plutonium has somehow duped Amazon into
providing his dangerous books for free on Kindle. This has greatly
increased the danger to our students!

One of his dangerous tricks is teach false Boolean logic such as 10 AND
2 = 12. His method at doing this is particularly insidious. He'll post a
false statement that nobody believes, such as 10 OR 2 = 12, say that it
is false (which it is), but then he'll try to replace it with another
similar false statement such as 10 AND 2 = 12, in order to really
confuse future computer scientists. Plutonium is taking advantage of the
fact that AND means different things in Boolean logic and elementary
arithmetic, as AND is an informal synonym for plus/addition. It is
important for future computer scientists to remember that in the bitwise
Boolean logic used by modern computers, 10 OR 2 = 10 and 10 AND 2 = 2.
Of course in pure Boolean logic the only possible values are true and
false (1 or 0), so in pure Boolean logic the statements "10 AND 2" and
"10 OR 2" don't even make sense. Don't let evil Plutonium's bad logic
confuse you!

Plutonium has been targeting children as young as 5. A new attempt to
corrupt the minds of young children is to teach that the alphabet has 12
letters, 6 vowels and 6 consonants. This sounds like a great way to
keep our children from reading!

Nobody knows why Plutonium wishes to corrupt the minds of our youth like
this. Perhaps Plutonium is envious of their potential success, which he
never had because he is a failure at math and science. Plutonium is not
content to be a failure at math and physics all by himself. He wants
everyone to fail as well. Some claim Plutonium is an agent of China, in
order for China to dominate the world economy. Maybe he is a minion of
Kim Jong Un of North Korea. Most likely, however, he is an agent of
Putin and Russia, since Plutonium has previously attempted to summon
Russian robots in 2017 "to create a new, true mathematics" in an attempt
to destroy mathematics.

Additionally, Plutonium has started a Cult of Failure. He is trying to
convince students to worship his evil pagan Plutonium atom god of
Failure. This cult is anti-science and anti-mathematics. Its only goal
is to promote failure in math and science.

There is some evidence this Cult of Failure may be a suicide cult.
Plutonium has advocated that the "good guy" nations join into a
supernation and threaten to "flatten" the (nuclear armed) "bad guy"
nations who misbehave. The idea may to initiate an all-out nuclear
war when "bad guy" nations retaliate. Not simply is Plutonium or his
cult committing suicide but would take Planet Earth with them. As the
war in Ukraine continues, Plutonium keeps asking NATO to attack the
Russians, starting a nuclear WW3, which he feels is unavoidable. More
evidence of Plutonium's Cult of Failure being a suicide cult.

Plutonium is now encouraging resistance fighters fighting the regimes
in Russia and Iran to attack power lines in Tehran and Moscow by
carrying long vertical aluminum poles under them, presumably to short
them out, complete with a diagram. Obviously, this will not end well
for for the resistance fighter. The question is, did he do this because
he is Putin's stooge trying to kill off resistance fighters? Or is this
part of Plutonium's Suicide Cult of Failure, meaning this is merely a
suggestion how to commit suicide while failing to harm the regimes? Or
both?

But the point is, stay away, if he offers to give or sell you one of his
dangerous books. Especially now since they are available for free from
otherwise legitimate Amazon.