On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 7:53:32 PM UTC+2, bassam karzeddin wrote:
> https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/788/why-is-it-so-hard-to-find-the-roots-of-polynomial-equations/3482146#3482146
>
> Q:It is truly not hard at all to understand the whole issue of polynomials roots in the least time if one honestly gives himself first the chance and before giving it to any other one
>
> See in the above question how students even with highest obtained degrees are still sufferings a lot with polynomial solutions like a mind phobia planted into their innocent minds made by either very foolish (but allegedly and illegally called historically genius people) or most likely were well-fabricated by truly human devils to torcher people for ever and remedilessly with it
>
> And when a person like me gives them the complete remedy to understand their very devilish trick or absolute unlimited stupidity, in a various types of answers at that big morons site SE, they immediately get the alarm message and feel that they are threaten by their useless business and exposing stupidities, where their action to hide my remedy answer for the whole problem that needs few minutes from specialists to fully realize and at most few hours from any others, and here is only one occasion for deleting the secret for polynomial solutions impossibility by radicals
>
> My following deleted post, (but not so clear as was produced in their shifty thieves sites)
> *********************************my answer*******************
>
> I’m very sorry mathematicians, In fact, I’m truly too sad academic mathematicians, and I don’t know what to say in such a miserable situations,
>
> and I never like to be that messenger to tell you the absolute full truth about the roots of polynomial equations shocking facts that are generally higher than first degree in principles, were generally no academic Reputable Journal and University would ever like to believe it nor would ever be capable to tolerate it or accept it as it is,
> despite a very elementary school level rigorous proof that immediately reveals all those old discovered facts, even though they are in fact that old but were discovered only in the elapsed century around (1990), but the facts insist to come out and so, unfortunately, they did where so many specialized people know about them since years by now, where in all cases the bitter truths must be far better than many sweet human mind fallacies, and certainly, you would
>
> immediately understand the theme of the surprising too elementary proofs from the first look or few minutes at most, since they are truly too simple to understand
>
> And of course, it would be too silly and quite shameful to keep denying them or even claim that needs any peer review, especially from an amateur civil engineer like me for example, and kindly don’t be so angry because my true intention was never to disgrace any science in particular but to upraise the absolute truth as always as usual for the grate sack of all human being benefits as a result
>
> However, your true turn than should be raising them professionally in a group works (since this would never be accepted by any single academic individual no matter who is that person is well-trusted and reputed or authorized as well) to your highest esteemed specialized mathematical authorities in order to save the new innocent uprising generations from wasting their entire lives aimlessly and hopelessly as well searching general radical roots were no real root ever exists generally for polynomials that are sourced strictly from direct insolvable Diophantine Equations, where no real number for root ever exists (but approximately accepted in real constructible number form) for whatever non-mathematical reason might be)
>
> Let us show you fast the well-known already revealed secret publicly of the general insolvability of the quintic equations that was basically and simply derived from this simple Insolvable Diophantine Equation
> k^5=ks^4+s^5
>
> , where (k,s) are co prime non-zero integers Where a beginner in number theory would easily understand it immediately and only from the first glance, (How?),
>
> don’t please anymore pretend or wonder!
> The integer s divides exactly the RHS but doesn’t divide exactly the LHS of the above DE, (Proof rigorously completed for sure), where “divides exactly” mean the result is a full integer whereas “doesn’t divide exactly” mean the result is a fraction of a rational number that is never a full integer, hence no equity exists and insolvability is well-established, where also no such integers like (k,s) ever exist to satisfy the above DE
>
> But if someone so innocently divides the whole DE above by the term k5, and denote the ratio as (x=s/k), and further rearrange those three terms, then he would wonderfully arrive immediately on this very famous reduced unsolvable form of fifth-degree polynomial like this form:
> x^5+x^4–1=0
>
> , Where this polynomial form must have at least one real algebraic root (but impossible to construct by any means) in accordance with the fundamental theorem of algebra in mathematics that usually is associated with infinity that isn’t any existing number in the same mathematics
>
> Hence a very clear contradiction sourced mainly from infinity, otherwise how can there be any radical root if there is no real existing root basically; however below is well-known reliable formula nowadays about how can we approximate a real root in a constructible number form (since this is the only true choice left for us if we insist to have something like real approximated root for whatever other non-mathematical reason might be
>
>
> Here is this a NEW CORRECT One real approximated root in a rational form for the following n-th degree polynomial equation
> (x^n+x^m=1)
>
> where (n>m) are two distinct positive integers, is given by the following series formula:
>
> x=1−1n+∑k=2N(−1)k∏k−1i=1(km−in+1)k!nk=1−1n+2m−n+12!n2−(3m−2n+1)(3m−n+1)3!n3+(4m−3n+1)(4m−2n+1)(4m−n+1)4!n4−(5m−n+1)(5m−2n+1)(5m−3n+1)(5m−4n+1)5!n5+⋯
>
> *Note that - the formula was not typed or looking like its original shape there
>
> Where N is a relatively to infinity a very small suitable chosen integer up to our practical needs and capability of making our real roots more sensible for any other purpose since it is absolutely and perpetually impossible to make the sum of our terms go with no number in mathematics principles like infinity, since then our real root in our minds would be simply become like a ratio of two no existing numbers (x=s/k), where each with uncountable number of digits, which isn't any number,
>
> I know that many other unbelievable questions might immediately arise about the other complex roots that are associated with that unreal root or the well-established continuity of the real numbers or many more, but make sure that those are even much easier questions to be correctly answered if one is given any chance to explain the most likely in one hour or so
>
> However, my public PUBLISHED profiles with few short answers (say on Quora) are guaranteed to explain all your questions and many more related issues about polynomials and their solvability conditions
>
> My Sincere Regards
>
> Copyright©, 2019 Bassam Karzeddin
>
> REFERENCE https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-ways-to-understand-the-proof-that-there-is-no-formula-for-expressing-the-roots-of-the-general-quintic-equation-via-radicals/answer/Bassam-Karzeddin-1
>
> (1994) for a reference to the more general solution of this Trinomial equation with rational coefficients of the following form
> ax^n+bx^m+c=0
>
> http://www.nl.gov.jo/Documents/Bibliography/BibliographyEn/1994En.pdf
>
> Kindly: don’t remove the references for purposes of translations to Arabic Language and future historical documentary
> **********************************end******************
>
> I'm also so aware that GENERALLY, the vast majorities of readers are most likely much worse than them, but the fact is truly more important than your entire silly opinionS and existence too, FOR SURE
>
> BKK

What a shame upon those who are dwarfs & too incompetent in their own fields where they dare devising to hide the truth under the sunlight?
BKK