On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 10:00:10 AM UTC+2, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 10:53:22 PM UTC+3, marij...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi teacher,
> Hello student
> >
> > I've been reading about all the lies you uncovered for the innocent students like me.
> Of course, a student is always an innocent mind that deserves correct teaching, sure
> >I think I deserve a lot more of what my math teachers are trying to make me believe.
> Also, your teachers are innocent people, they simply were trying their best to teach you exactly what had been taught to them blindly without any little doubt, for sure
> >
> > For example, (-1)*(-1)=+1 is a stupid idea.
> Yes indeed, it is only one of the most stupid ideas ever happened in the history of mind-kind, for sure
> After reading your articles here it seems evident for me that (-1)*(-1) must be -1.
> Yes of course, and here, is only one link to those many articles
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.math/sHoiZV4RCwA%5B1-25%5D
>
> So, negative numbers are simply a mirror image of the natural numbers around a deliberate artificial (but never natural) say (Y-axis) that acts as a mirror on (X-axis), and vice versa, where the mirror image isn't any real (nor existing) even on the theoretical or imaginative level of awareness, sure
>
> *Note that your zero is the location of no existing number, hence not any real existing number, where also its mirror image never exists
>
> That is why it is a human invention (not any new discovery) number that amounts to nothing at all, and we can live without it (and not necessarily by going back to the old premitive Roman numerals), for sure
> > But then, I have a question. What is -1-1? Is it -2 or is it +2? For example, what is -x-x when multiplying a polynomial?
> It is true also that mathematicians could play with those negative numbers to be apparently consistent up to a limited certain degree of consistency, but the fact that it is not always absolutely consistent, for sure
>
> So in your example here: (-1 - 1 = - 2), not at all different from its original and natural state of convenient form as (1 + 1 = 2), that is to say, they had to add nothing to truly sensible mathematics, for sure
> >
> > My teacher insists that (x-1)^2 is x^2-2x+1 but I think this is moronic.. What do you think? is -x-x=-2x or is it +2x?
> This is also the same when you let (x = y + 1), then (y^2 = y^2), so what?
>
> So, if you have the Eqn. (a + b - c = 0), then you can simply originate it to its sensible original form as (a + b = c), that has no negative sign or zero
>
> Similarly, if you write it as (a - c = -b), or (- a - b = - c), or
> (-c + b = -a), all those extra forms add nothing to mathematics, sure
>
> Since its original natural form is simply (a + b = c)
> >
> > I'm asking you because you have a lot to teach me and the world!
> That is absolutely right for sure, but you should note that many discoveries of mine are not desirable at all by the public or genius mainstream academic professional mathematicians experts for surer
>
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
>
> Welcome a lot more for sure
>
> BKK