On Saturday, April 28, 2018 at 4:13:42 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 5:36:19 PM UTC+3, bassam king karzeddin wrote:
> > I suppose that everybody is so familiar with the notations used in the question!
> >
> > However, if you need help to prove these mere facts, many hints are available in my posts, for sure
> >
> >
> > **Important notice: Please don't get so touchy since this isn't at all an issue about your so sensitive feelings, but purely about pure mathematics**
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bassam King Karzeddin
> > April 23ed, 2018
> This is another very little rigorous numerical counterexample (based on Integer Analysis with irrefutable and proven Diophantine Equation) that strictly proves and also refutes (and beyond any little doubt) that, the mathematical principles of (limits, Convergence, Cauchy sequences, Dedekind infamous cuts, Infinity fictional concept, Euler's unfinished sums, Newton's Approximations methods, Epsilon & Delta distances, Numerical rational or decimal endless representation of a real constructible numbers, and the alleged real numbers with endless significant digits to the right of the decimal notations or with endless terms, etc, etc) are all cooked up human invented fallen mathematics that are not any true discoveries, but maybe mere so easy decissions good enough for something else as (carpentary works) or else other than mathematics itself
>
> Consider the following Numerical example evidence with relation to Fermat's last theorem, where (A, B, C) are given natural numbers,
>
> Let:
>
> A = 867569735858490865304017061409147551384753718547192831
>
> B = 662670538747666907983753680457597152866152691137388307
>
> C = 980973626304803340369595949177624242734580267403237824
>
> Then we have
>
> (A/C)^3 + (B/C)^3 = 0.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 =/= 1
>
> Note that We can simply add many more digits to INTEGERS (A, B, C), where more and more 9's would be as a result, and if we keep adding digits indefinitely, our ratio becomes (0.999...), where this never can be considered as the same one, since they would constitute a counterexample to FLT, but a ratio of a clear illusion with non-existing natural numbers that are assumed in mind with endless digits
>
> And Frankly, if you miss it again and again and again as a so coward professional mathematician, then definitely, you are a traitor to all humanity and a traitor to the science that (feeds, drinks, and clothes you as well), since this basically tooooooo... easy to be fully comprehended by a (mature or clever school student or interested layperson) in just a few minutes, for sure
>
> Do you still need more and more digits for my example? wonder!
>
> I swear I have many many more, for sure
>
> Regards
> Bassam King Karzeddin
> April 28th, 2018