Message-ID:

6 May, 2024: The networking issue during the past two days has been identified and appears to be fixed. Will keep monitoring.

tech / sci.math / Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)

Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)

<76a950b9-ab9f-45e8-b8b5-3bcf8068ea00n@googlegroups.com>

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=149388&group=sci.math#149388

X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a2a:b0:417:b90b:6c5c with SMTP id f42-20020a05622a1a2a00b00417b90b6c5cmr5836qtb.7.1695786900137;
Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:3a09:b0:1dd:39ce:e252 with SMTP id
du9-20020a0568703a0900b001dd39cee252mr341887oab.0.1695786899925; Tue, 26 Sep
2023 20:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1cbe6094-3580-4d3c-a26f-96403896d551@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=5.45.129.31; posting-account=WJi6EQoAAADOKYQDqLrSgadtdMk3xQwo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5.45.129.31
References: <1cbe6094-3580-4d3c-a26f-96403896d551@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <76a950b9-ab9f-45e8-b8b5-3bcf8068ea00n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)
From: b.karzed...@yahoo.com (bassam karzeddin)
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 03:55:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 24

by: bassam karzeddin - Wed, 27 Sep 2023 03:54 UTC

On Thursday, November 14, 2019 at 6:10:16 AM UTC+2, Dan Christensen wrote:
> See my recently updated blog posting "Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ???" at https://dcproof.wordpress.com/ (originally posted October 9, 2013). Comments and suggestions welcome at this link.
>
> From the introduction:
>
> "Here, I will develop the exponentiation function on the natural numbers with 0^0 undefined, given only the operations of addition and multiplication on N. I use what I believe to be a novel approach that looks at all possible functions that satisfy the usual requirements for an exponentiation function on N. In so doing, we can justify leaving 0^0 undefined, as it is on the set of real numbers R. I will also look at some implications for the usual laws of exponents on N for undefined 0^0."
>
>
> Dan
>
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
> Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Troll 🧌 Is very interested with No numbers as ZERO

BKK

Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)

<a5fdee3b-8f8d-433e-ba5c-50fcf54d5bbdn@googlegroups.com>

copy mid

https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=149437&group=sci.math#149437

copy link Newsgroups: sci.math

X-Received: by 2002:ad4:57a3:0:b0:656:194c:7ec0 with SMTP id g3-20020ad457a3000000b00656194c7ec0mr27563qvx.8.1695830375944;
Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2228:b0:3a9:b9eb:9990 with SMTP id
bd40-20020a056808222800b003a9b9eb9990mr3281118oib.0.1695830375704; Wed, 27
Sep 2023 08:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.math
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <76a950b9-ab9f-45e8-b8b5-3bcf8068ea00n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=163.182.225.42; posting-account=OWfgwwgAAADQpH2XgMDMe2wuQ7OFPXlE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.182.225.42
References: <1cbe6094-3580-4d3c-a26f-96403896d551@googlegroups.com> <76a950b9-ab9f-45e8-b8b5-3bcf8068ea00n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a5fdee3b-8f8d-433e-ba5c-50fcf54d5bbdn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)
From: Dan_Chri...@sympatico.ca (Dan Christensen)
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:59:35 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 3167

by: Dan Christensen - Wed, 27 Sep 2023 15:59 UTC

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 11:55:04 PM UTC-4, bassam karzeddin (aka BKK) wrote:

[snip]

From Psycho Troll BKK who also wrote here:

“Those many challenges of mine (in my posts) weren't actually designed for human beings, but for the future artificial beings that would certainly replace them not far away from now, for sure.”
-- BKK, Dec. 6, 2017

"The Devils deeds that are strictly and basically sourced from mathematicians like humans, FOR SURE!"
-- BKK, June 11, 2020

“You know certainly that I'm the man, and more specially the KING who is going to upside down most of your current false mathematics for all future generations.”
-- BKK, Nov. 22, 2018

“Despite thousands of years of continuous juggling and false definitions of what is truly the real number, they [us carbon-based lifeforms?] truly don't want to understand it as was discovered strictly by the *KING* [BKK Himself!]”
-- BKK, Nov. 28, 2019

“I don't believe even in one being a number”
-- BKK, Dec. 31, 2019

Math failure, BKK, doesn't believe in negative numbers, zero, one or numbers like pi and root 2. He doesn't even believe in 40 degree angles or circles. Simple speed-distance-time problems seem to be impossible for him. Really!

Needless to say his own goofy little system is getting nowhere and never will. As such he is insanely jealous of wildly successful mainstream mathematics. He seems to believe these super-intelligent artificial beings of his will somehow be enlisting his aid to "reform" mathematics worldwide when they take over the planet in the near future. He is truly delusional.

Dan

Download my DC Proof 2.0 freeware at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my Math Blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com

Subject	Author
Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)	bassam karzeddin
Re: Oh, the Ambiguity! 0^0 = ??? (Updated blog posting)	Dan Christensen